Constraints on analogical inference

Cognitive Science

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 373-418

  Markman, Arthur B ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031256817     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2104_1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bowdle, B., & Gentner, D. (in press). The coherence-imbalance theory of asymmetry in similarity. Cognitive Psychology.
2. Clement, C. A., & Gentner, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15, 89-132.
3. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R.J. Sternberg, & J.E. Davidson (Eds.) The nature of insight (pp. 365-396). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41(1), 1-63.
5. Forbus, K. D., Ferguson, R. W., & Gentner, D. (1994). Incremental structure-mapping. In A. Ram & K. Eiselt (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Atlanta, GA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). Structural evaluation of analogies: What counts? In The Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Ann Arbor, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Forbus, K. D., & Oblinger, D. (1990). Making SME greedy and pragmatic. In The Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston, MA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Gardial, S., & Biehal, G. (1991). Evaluative and factual ad claims, knowledge level and making inferences. Marketing Letters, 2(4), 349-358.
9. Gentner, D. (1982). Are scientific analogies metaphors? In D.S. Miall (Ed.) Metaphor: Problems and Perception. London: Harvester Press, Ltd.
10. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
11. Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 199-241). London: Cambridge University Press.
12. Gentner, D., & Jerzioski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in western science. In A. Ortony (Ed.) Metaphor and thought (pp. 447-480). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structural alignment in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45-56.
14. Gentner, D., Markman, A. B., & Medin, D. L. (in preparation). The structure of similarity.
15. Gentner, D., & Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277-300.
16. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
17. Goldstone, R. L. (1994). Similarity, interactive-activation and mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20(1), 3-28.
18. Goldstone, R. L., & Medin, D. L. (1994). The time course of comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20(1), 29-50.
19. Heit, E. (1994). Models of the effects of prior knowledge on category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1264-1282.
20. Hesse, M. B. (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
21. Holyoak, K. J., Novick, L. R., & Melz, E. R. (1994). Component processes in analogical transfer: Mapping, pattern completion and adaptation. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory, Vol 2: Analogical connections (pp. 113-180). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13(3), 295-355.
23. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental Leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
24. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104(3), 427-466.
25. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (in press). From analogy to schema induction in a structure-sensitive connectionist model. In T. Dartnall & D. Peterson (Eds.), Creativity and Computation Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
26. Keane, M. T. (1996). On adaptation in analogy: Tests of pragmatic-importance and adaptability in analogical problem solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 1062-1085.
27. Keane, M. T., Ledgeway, T., & Duff, S. (1994). Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models. Cognitive Science, 18, 387-438.
28. Keane, M. T., & Brayshaw, M. (1988). The incremental analogy machine: A computational model of analogy. In D. Sleeman (Eds.), Third European Working Session on Machine Learning (pp. 53-62). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
29. Lassaline, M.E. (1996). Structural alignment in induction and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 754-770.
30. Lassaline, M. E., & Murphy, G. L. (1996). Induction and category coherence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3(1), 95-99.
31. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 431-467.
32. Markman, A. B., Yamauchi, T., & Makin, V. S. (1997). The creation of new concepts: A multifaceted approach to category learning. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100(2), 254-278.
34. Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14(3), 510-520.
35. Novick, L. R. (1990). Representational transfer in problem solving. Psychological Science, 1(2), 128-132.
36. Novick, L. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 398-415.
37. Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning from performance errors. Psychological Review, 103(2), 241-262.
38. Reed, S. K., Ernst, G. W., & Banerji, R. (1974). The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 436-450.
39. Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13(4), 629-639.
40. Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15(3), 456-468.
41. Ross, W. T., & Creyer, E. H. (1992). Making inferences about missing information: The effects of existing information. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 14-25.
42. Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Pragmatics in analogical mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 307-346.