A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 141, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 85-104

  Mazei, Jens ^a   Hüffmeier, Joachim ^b   Freund, Philipp Alexander ^c   Stuhlmacher, Alice F ^d   Bilke, Lena ^a   Hertel, Guido ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (Germany)

^c LEUPHANA UNIVERSITY OF LÜNEBURG   (Germany)

^d DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic outcomes; Gender; Meta analysis; Negotiation; Sex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; META ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEGOTIATING; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925610539     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0038184     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Amanatullah, E. T. (2007). Negotiating gender role stereotypes: The influence of gender role stereotypes on perceivers' evaluations and targets' behaviors in value claiming negotiations and situational moderation by representation role (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3285036)
2. Amanatullah, E. T., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women's fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 256-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017094
3. Amanatullah, E. T., Morris, M. W., & Curhan, J. R. (2008). Negotiators who give too much: Unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 723-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012612
4. Amanatullah, E. T., & Tinsley, C. H. (2013a). Ask and ye shall receive? How gender and status moderate negotiation success. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 6, 253-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12014
5. Amanatullah, E. T., & Tinsley, C. H. (2013b). Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much . . . or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 110-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.006
6. Andersen, S., Ertac, S., Gneezy, U., List, J. A., & Maximiano, S. (2012). Gender, bargaining and culture: Evidence from two field experiments. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7. Anderson, C., & Thompson, L. L. (2004). Affect from the top down: How powerful individuals' positive affect shapes negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 125-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.05.002
8. Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When White men can't do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1371
9. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Oxford, UK: Rand McNally.
10. Balliet, D., Li, N. P., Macfarlan, S. J., & Van Vugt, M. (2011). Sex differences in cooperation: A meta-analytic review of social dilemmas. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 881-909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025354
11. Barron, L. A. (2003). Ask and you shall receive? Gender differences in negotiators' beliefs about requests for a higher salary. Human Relations, 56, 635-662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00187267030566001
12. Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2001). Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements. Marketing Letters, 12, 157-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011117103381
13. Bijmolt, T. H. A., Van Heerde, H. J., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2005). New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 141-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.42.2.141.62296
14. Borenstein, M. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 221-235). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
15. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
16. Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 84-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.001
17. Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & McGinn, K. L. (2005). Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 951-965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.951
18. Bowles, H. R., & Flynn, F. J. (2010). Gender and persistence in negotiation: A dyadic perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 769-787. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814595
19. Bowles, H. R., & McGinn, K. L. (2008). Gender in job negotiations: A two-level game. Negotiation Journal, 24, 393-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00194.x
20. Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences. Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50, 164 -168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.3.164
21. Calhoun, P. S., & Smith, W. P. (1999). Integrative bargaining: Does gender make a difference? International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 203-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb022824
22. Carnevale, P. J., & Lawler, E. J. (1986). Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 636 - 659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002786030004003
23. Chan, C. W. (1993). Effects of negotiator accountability, performance evaluation system, and perception of divisional power on transfer pricing negotiation outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Pro- Quest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 9404951)
24. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Cohen, T. R. (2010). Moral emotions and unethical bargaining: The differential effects of empathy and perspective taking in deterring deceitful negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 569-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0338-z
26. Cooper, H. (2009). Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 19-35). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
27. Cotter, M., & Henley, J., Jr. (2004). Pressurized zero-sum game negotiation outcomes: Gender contrasts. Marketing Management Journal, 14, 148-157.
28. Craver, C. B. (1990). The impact of gender on clinical negotiating achievement. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 6, 1-13.
29. Craver, C. B. (2002). Gender and negotiation performance. Sociological Practice, 4, 183-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016577528642
30. Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Eisenkraft, N. (2010). The objective value of subjective value: A multi-round negotiation study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 690-709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00593.x
31. Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Xu, H. (2006). What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 493-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.493
32. Curhan, J. R., Neale, M. A., Ross, L., & Rosencranz-Engelmann, J. (2008). Relational accommodation in negotiation: Effects of egalitarianism and gender on economic efficiency and relational capital. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 192-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.009
33. Curhan, J. R., & Overbeck, J. R. (2008). Making a positive impression in a negotiation: Gender differences in response to impression motivation. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1, 179-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4716.2008.00010.x
34. Curhan, J. R., & Pentland, A. (2007). Thin slices of negotiation: Predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 802-811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.802
35. Dalton, D. R., Todor, W. D., & Owen, C. L. (1987). Workplace justice outcomes as a function of adversaries' gender composition: A field assessment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1, 203-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01020809
36. Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 788-827). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
37. De Dreu, C. K. W., Beersma, B., Stroebe, K., & Euwema, M. C. (2006). Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 927-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.927
38. De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889- 905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.889
39. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40. Eagly, A. H. (1996). Differences between women and men: Their magnitude, practical importance, and political meaning. American Psychologist, 51, 158-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.158
41. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
42. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
43. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (pp. 458-476). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
44. Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
45. Elfenbein, H. A., Curhan, J. R., Eisenkraft, N., Shirako, A., & Baccaro, L. (2008). Are some negotiators better than others? Individual differences in bargaining outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1463-1475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.010
46. Flynn, F. J., & Ames, D. R. (2006). What's good for the goose may not be as good for the gander: The benefits of self-monitoring for men and women in task groups and dyadic conflicts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 272-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.272
47. Foo, M. D., Elfenbein, H. A., Tan, H. H., & Aik, V. C. (2004). Emotional intelligence and negotiation: The tension between creating and claiming value. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 411-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb022920
48. Freund, P. A., & Kasten, N. (2012). How smart do you think you are? A meta-analysis on the validity of self-estimates of cognitive ability. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 296-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026556
49. Galinsky, A. D., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 657-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514 .81.4.657
50. Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. (1991). Determinants and consequences of salary negotiations by male and female MBA graduates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 256 -262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.256
51. Herbst, U., & Schwarz, S. (2011). How valid is negotiation research based on student sample groups? New insights into a long-standing controversy. Negotiation Journal, 27, 147-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00300.x
52. Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539-1558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
53. Hiller, J. A. B. (1982). Situational determinants of conflict behavior: Seating arrangement as an influence on the outcomes of bargaining (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 8228988)
54. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55. Honts, A. K. (1997). The dual-dependence model: Developing and testing a new approach to studying negotiations (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 9724961)
56. Hüffmeier, J., Freund, P. A., Zerres, A., Backhaus, K., & Hertel, G. (2014). Being tough or being nice? A meta-analysis on hard- and softline strategies in distributive negotiations. Journal of Management, 40, 866- 892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206311423788
57. Hüffmeier, J., & Richter, C. (2012). [Gender differences in repeated negotiations]. Unpublished raw data.
58. Hüffmeier, J., Zerres, A., Freund, P. A., Trötschel, R., Backhaus, K., & Hertel, G. (2012). Strong versus weak synergy in integrative team negotiations: A competitive test of two theoretical approaches. Manuscript submitted for publication.
59. Imai, L., & Gelfand, M. J. (2010). The culturally intelligent negotiator: The impact of cultural intelligence (CQ) on negotiation sequences and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 83-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.02.001
60. Insko, C. A., Kirchner, J. L., Pinter, B., Efaw, J., & Wildschut, T. (2005). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a function of trust and categorization: The paradox of expected cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 365-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.365
61. Institute for Women's Policy Research. (2012, March). The gender wage gap: 2011. Retrieved October. 01, 2012, from http://www.iwpr.org/publications/pubs/the-gender-wage-gap-2011
62. Jones, B. H., & Jelassi, M. T. (1990). The effect of computer intervention and task structure on bargaining outcome. Theory and Decision, 28, 355-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00162705
63. Judge, T. A., & Livingston, B. A. (2008). Is the gap more than gender? A longitudinal analysis of gender, gender role orientation, and earnings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 994 -1012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.994
64. Kalaian, H. A., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1996). A multivariate linear model for meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 227-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.3.227
65. Keller, J., & Dauenheimer, D. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women's math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 371-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250218
66. Kemp, K. E., & Smith, W. P. (1994). Information exchange, toughness, and integrative bargaining: The roles of explicit cues and perspectivetaking. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 5-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb022734
67. King, W. C., Jr., & Hinson, T. D. (1994). The influence of sex and equity sensitivity on relationship preferences, assessment of opponent, and outcomes in a negotiation experiment. Journal of Management, 20, 605-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639402000305
68. Korobkin, R., & Doherty, J. (2009). Who wins in settlement negotiations? American Law and Economics Review, 11, 162-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahp004
69. Kray, L. J. (2012). Gender discrimination in negotiator deception: An archival analysis of behavior in the MBA classroom. Manuscript submitted for publication.
70. Kray, L. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Thompson, L. L. (2002). Reversing the gender gap in negotiations: An exploration of stereotype regeneration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 386-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2979
71. Kray, L. J., Locke, C. C., & Van Zant, A. B. (2012). Feminine charm: An experimental analysis of its costs and benefits in negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1343-1357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167212453074
72. Kray, L. J., Reb, J., Galinsky, A. D., & Thompson, L. (2004). Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: The effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 399 - 411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261884
73. Kray, L. J., & Thompson, L. L. (2005). Gender stereotypes and negotiation performance: An examination of theory and research. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 26, pp. 103-182). New York, NY: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
74. Kray, L. J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942-958. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.942
75. Kulik, C. T., & Olekalns, M. (2012). Negotiating the gender divide: Lessons from the negotiation and organizational behavior literatures. Journal of Management, 38, 1387-1415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206311431307
76. Lauzen, M. M., & Dozier, D. M. (2008). Civilizing prime time: Gender and conflict resolution in the 2004-05 season. Mass Communication & Society, 11, 300-318.
77. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78. Ma, Z. (2007). Conflict management styles as indicators of behavioral pattern in business negotiation: The impact of contextualism in two countries. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18, 260-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10444060710825990
79. Margolis, J. A. (1991). The ability to perceive the other party's perspective across different negotiation structures (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 9211719)
80. Miles, E. W. (2010). Gender differences in distributive negotiation: When in the negotiation process do the differences occur? European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1200-1211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.714
81. Miles, E. W., & LaSalle, M. M. (2008). Asymmetrical contextual ambiguity, negotiation self-efficacy, and negotiation performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19, 36-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10444060810849173
82. Miles, E. W., & LaSalle, M. M. (2009). Gender and creation of value in mixed-motive negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20, 269-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10444060910974885
83. Miles, E. W., & Maurer, T. J. (2012). Advancing validity of self-efficacy in negotiation through focusing at the domain level. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 23-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317910X531744
84. Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
85. Nadler, M. K., & Nadler, L. B. (1987). The influence of gender on negotiation success in asymmetric power situations. In L. B. Nadler, M. K. Nadler, & W. R. Mancillas (Eds.), Advances in gender communication research. New York, NY: University Press of America.
86. Nauta, A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & van der Vaart, T. (2002). Organizational goal concerns and interdepartmental problem-solving behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 199-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.136
87. Neu, J., Graham, J. L., & Gilly, M. C. (1988). The influence of gender on behaviors and outcomes in a retail buyer-seller negotiation simulation. Journal of Retailing, 64, 427-451.
88. O'Connor, K. M., Arnold, J. A., & Burris, E. R. (2005). Negotiators' bargaining histories and their effects on future negotiation performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 350-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.350
89. Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 175-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175
90. Pollmann, M. M. H. (2012). [The effects of self-control and motivation on negotiation outcomes]. Unpublished raw data.
91. Porter, C. O. L. H., Conlon, D. E., & Barber, A. E. (2004). The dynamics of salary negotiations: Effects on applicants' justice perceptions and recruitment decisions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 273-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb022915
92. Pruitt, D. G. (1998). Social conflict. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 470-503). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
93. Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York, NY: Random House.
94. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
95. Renard, M. K. (1992). Salary negotiations and the male-female wage gap. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 9304384)
96. Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
97. Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
98. Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Chacón-Moscoso, S. (2003). Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 8, 448-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.448
99. Small, D. A., Gelfand, M., Babcock, L., & Gettman, H. (2007). Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 600-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.600
100. Solomon-Ravich, R. (1985). The effects of alternatives and motivational orientation on negotiation behavior (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 8523243)
101. Song, F., Cadsby, C. B., & Morris, T. (2004). Other-regarding behavior and behavioral forecasts: Females versus males as individuals and as group representatives. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 340-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb022917
102. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
103. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
104. Stevens, C. K., Bavetta, A. G., & Gist, M. E. (1993). Gender differences in the acquisition of salary negotiation skills: The role of goals, selfefficacy, and perceived control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 723-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.723
105. Stuhlmacher, A. F., Citera, M., & Willis, T. (2007). Gender differences in virtual negotiation: Theory and Research. Sex Roles, 57, 329-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9252-y
106. Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Linnabery, E. (2013). Gender and negotiation: A social role analysis. In M. Olekalns & W. Adair (Eds.), Handbook of research on negotiation research (pp. 221-248). London, UK: Edward Elgar. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781005903.00018
107. Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Walters, A. E. (1999). Gender differences in negotiation outcome: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 52, 653- 677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00175.x
108. Swaab, R. I., & Swaab, D. F. (2009). Sex differences in the effects of visual contact and eye contact in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 129-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.06.009
109. Thompson, L. L. (1990). An examination of naive and experienced negotiators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 82-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.82
110. Thompson, L. L. (1991). Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 161-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(91)90020-7
111. Thompson, L. L. (2009). The mind and heart of the negotiator (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
112. Thompson, L. L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 98-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90048-E
113. Thompson, L. L., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2004). Why negotiation is the most popular business school course. Ivey Business Journal. Retrieved October, 13, 2013, from http://iveybusinessjournal.com
114. Tinsley, C. H., & Amanatullah, E. T. (2008, November). Backlash: Who does it, when, and why? Paper presented at the 21st conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Chicago, IL. Paper retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1298528. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1298528
115. Tinsley, C. H., Cheldelin, S. I., Schneider, A., & Amanatullah, E. T. (2009). Women at bargaining table: Pitfalls and prospects. Negotiation Journal, 25, 233-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00222.x
116. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
117. Van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2003). Multilevel meta-analysis: A comparison with traditional metaanalytical procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 765-790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164403251027
118. Wade, M. E. (2001). Women and salary negotiation: The costs of selfadvocacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 65-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00008
119. Walter, T. B. (1996). Transfer pricing within an organizational context: An expansion of the theory and an experiment in bilateral negotiation (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 9609376)
120. Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Meyer, L. L. (1998). Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2797
121. Watson, C., & Hoffman, L. R. (1996). Managers as negotiators: A test of power versus gender as predictors of feelings, behavior, and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 63-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1048- 9843(96)90035-1
122. Wiltermuth, S. S., & Neale, M. A. (2011). Too much information: The perils of nondiagnostic information in negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 192-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021871
123. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 629-667). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
124. Zerres, A., Hüffmeier, J., Freund, P. A., Backhaus, K., & Hertel, G. (2013). Does it take two to tango? Longitudinal effects of unilateral and bilateral integrative negotiation training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 478 - 491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032255
125. Zhang, Z.-X., & Han, Y.-L. (2007). The effects of reciprocation wariness on negotiation behavior and outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 16, 507-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006- 9070-6