Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a function of trust and categorization: The paradox of expected cooperation

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 365-385

  Insko, Chester A ^a   Kirchner, Jeffrey L ^a   Efaw, Jamie ^b   Pinter, Brad ^c   Wildschut, Tim ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GUILT; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTITUDE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GUILT; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 13444274750     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.365     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
2. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
3. Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limit of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Barth, K. (1960). The humanity of God (J. N. T. T. Wieser, Trans.). Richmond, VA: John Knox.
6. Brewer, M. B. (1981). Ethnocentricism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M. Brewer & B. E. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 345-360). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Brewer, M., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
8. Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 151-192). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
9. Colman, A. M. (1995). Game theory and its application in the social and biological sciences. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
10. Coombs, C. A. (1973). A reparameterization of the prisoner's dilemma game. Behavioral Science, 18, 424-428.
11. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 169-193). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
12. De Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2000). What people look for in others: Influences of the perceiver and the perceived on information selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 206-219.
13. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 267-279.
14. Digman, J. M. (1996). The curious history of the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality (pp. 1-20). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Enzle, M. E., Harvey, M. D., & Wright, E. F. (1992). Implicit role obligations versus social responsibility in constituency representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 238-245.
16. Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77-94.
17. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. R. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
18. Gaertner, S. L., & Rust, M. (2000). The common ingroup identity model and the discontinuity effect. Unpublished manuscript, University of Delaware.
19. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
20. Graziano, W. G., Hair, E. C., & Finch, J. F. (1997). Competitiveness mediates the link between personality and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1394-1408.
21. Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.
22. Hardin, R. (2001). Conceptions and explanations of trust. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 3-39). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23. Hoyle, R. H., Pinkley, R. L., & Insko, C. A. (1989). Perceptions of behavior: Evidence of differing expectations for interpersonal and intergroup interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 365-376.
24. Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (1998). Differential distrust of groups and individuals. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 75-108). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Drigotas, S. M., Graetz, K., Kennedy, J., Cox, C., et al. (1993). The role of communication in interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 108-138.
26. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Gaertner, L., Wildschut, T., Kozar, R., Pinter, B., et al. (2001). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through anticipation of future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 95-111.
27. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Graetz, K. A., Drigotas, S. M., Currey, D. P., Smith, S. L., et al. (1994). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity in the prisoner's dilemma game. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 87-116.
28. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Hoyle, R. H., Dardis, G. J., & Graetz, K. A. (1990). Individual-group discontinuity as a function of fear and greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 68-79.
29. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Pemberton, M. B., Wieselquist, J., McIlraith, S., Currey, D. P., et al. (1998). Long-term outcome maximization and the reduction of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 695-710.
30. Insko, C. A., Wildschut, T., & Pinter, B. (2003). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a function of ingroup and outgroup procedural interdependence. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
31. Johnson, R. C., Kim, R. J., & Danko, G. P. (1989). Guilt, shame and adjustment: A family study. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 71-74.
32. Johnson, R. C., Kim, R. J., Danko, G. P., Huang, Y. H., Park, J. Y., Johnson, S. B., et al. (1987). Guilt, shame and adjustment in three cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 357-364.
33. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
34. Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivational losses in small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828.
35. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
36. LeBon, G. (1896). The crowd. London: Unwin (Original work published 1895)
37. Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley.
38. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C., Hoffman, J., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
39. McCallum, D. M., Harring, K., Gilmore, R., Drenan, S., Chase, J., Insko, C. A., et al. (1985). Competition between groups and between individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 301-320.
40. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
41. McDougall, W. (1920). The group mind. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
42. Niebuhr, R. (1932). Moral man and immoral society. New York: Scribner.
43. Niebuhr, R. (1941). The nature and destiny of man (Vol. 1). London: Nisbet.
44. Orbell, J., Dawes, R., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (1994). Trust, social categories, and individuals: The case of gender. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 109-128.
45. Parks, C. D., & Hulbert, L. G. (1995). High and low trusters' responses to fear in a payoff matrix. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4, 718-730.
46. Pemberton, M. J., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (1996). Memory for and experience of differential competitive behavior of individuals and groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 953-966.
47. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 363-392). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
48. Rabbie, J. M., Schot, J. C., & Visser, L. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioural interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171-202.
49. Rapoport, A. (1987). Research paradigms and expected utility models for the provision of step-level public goods. Psychological Review, 94, 74-83.
50. Ridley, M. (1996). The origins of virtue: Human instincts and the evolution of cooperation. London: Penguin Press.
51. Schopler, J., Insko, C. A., Drigotas, S. M., Wieselquist, J., Pemberton, M., & Cox, C. (1993). The role of identifiability in the reduction of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 553-574.
52. Schopler, J., Insko, C. A., Graetz, K. A., Drigotas, S., Smith, V. A., & Dahl, K. (1993). Individual-group discontinuity: Further evidence for mediation by fear and greed. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 419-431.
53. Schopler, J., Insko, C. A., Wieselquist, J., Pemberton, M., Witcher, B., Kozar, R., et al. (2001). When groups are more competitive than individuals: The domain of the discontinuity effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 632-644.
54. Shure, G. H., Meeker, R. J., & Hansford, E. A. (1965). The effectiveness of pacifist strategies in bargaining games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 9, 106-117.
55. Smith, R. H., Webster, J. M., Parrott, W. G., & Eyre, H. L. (2002). The role of public exposure in moral and nonmoral shame and guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 138-159.
56. Stockard, J., Van de Kragt, A. J. C., & Dodge, P. J. (1988). Gender roles and behavior in social dilemmas: Are there sex differences in cooperation and in its justification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 154-163.
57. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
58. Tangney, J. P. (2003). Self-relevant emotions. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 384-400). New York: Guilford Press.
59. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411-429.
60. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley
61. Van Lange, P. A. M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126-141.
62. Van Lange, P. A. M., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1991). The influence of other's morality and own social value orientation on cooperation in The Netherlands and the U.S.A. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 429-449.
63. Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Meyer, L. L. (1998). Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 1-29.
64. Wildschut, T. & Insko, C. A. (in press) A paradox of individual and group morality. In P. A. M. Van Lange (Ed.), Bridging social psychology, Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
65. Wildschut, T., Insko, C. A., & Gaertner, L. (2002). Intragroup social influence and intergroup competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 975-992.
66. Wildschut, T., Insko, C. A., & Pinter, B. (2004). The perception of outgroup threat: Content and activation of the outgroup schema. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception (pp. 335-359). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 698-722.
68. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110-116.
69. Yamagishi, T. (1988). The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 265-271.
70. Yamagishi, T., & Sato, K. (1986). Motivational bases of the public goods problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 67-73.
71. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 129-166.