Who wins in settlement negotiations?

American Law and Economics Review

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 162-208

  Korobkin, Russell ^a   Doherty, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69749083050     PISSN: 14657252     EISSN: 14657260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aler/ahp004     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andreoni, James, and Lise Vesterland. 2001. "Which Is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism," 116 Quarterly Journal of Economics 293-312.
2. Ayres, Ian. 1991. "Fair Driving: Gender and Race Discrimination in Retail Car Negotiations," 104 Harvard Law Review 817-72.
3. Ayres, Ian, and Peter Siegleman. 1995. "Race and Gender Discrimination in Bargaining for a New Car," 85 American Economic Review 304-21.
4. Babcock, Linda. 2007. "Dinner Parties and Poker Games: Setting the Table, Shaping the Game, and Other Negotiation Metaphors," 23 Negotiation Journal 75-83.
5. Babcock, Linda, and Sara Laschever. 2003. Women Don't Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Babcock, Linda, and Sara Laschever. 2004. "First You Have to Ask," 7 Negotiation 1-3.
7. Baird, Douglas G., Robert H. Gertner and Randal C. Picker. 1994. Game Theory and the Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Bazerman, Max H., and Margaret Ann Neale. 1992. Negotiating Rationally. New York: Free Press.
9. Bowles, Hannah Riley, Linda Babcock, and Lei Lai. 2007. "Social Incentives for Gender Differences in the Propensity to Initiate Negotiations: Sometimes It Does Hurt to Ask," 103 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 84-103.
10. Bowles, Hannah Riley, Linda Babcock and Kathleen L. McGinn. 2005. "Constraints and Triggers: Situational Mechanics of Gender in Negotiation," 89 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 951-65.
11. Buelens, Marc, and Dirk Van Poucke. 2004. "Determinants of a Negotiator's Initial Opening Offer," 19 Journal of Business and Psychology 23-35.
12. Camerer, Colin F., and Robin M. Hogarth. 1999. "The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework," 19 Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 7-48.
13. Craver, Charles B., and David W. Barnes. 1999. "Gender, Risk Taking, and Negotiation Performance," 5 Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 299-352.
14. Croson, Rachel, and Ury Gneezy. 2004. "Gender Differences in Preferences," available at http://www.hks.harvard.edu/wappp/ research/rachelcrosonandurigneez.pdf.
15. Eckel, Catherine C., and Philip J. Grossman. 1998. "Are Women Less Selfish Than Men? Evidence from Dictator Experiments," 108 Economic Journal 726-35.
16. Fisher, Roger, William Ury, and Bruce Patton. 1991. Getting to Yes. New York: Penguin Books.
17. Galinsky, Adam D., Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Gerardo A. Okhuysen and Thomas Mussweiler. 2005. "Regulatory Focus at the Bargaining Table: Promoting Distributive and Integrative Success," 31 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1087-98.
18. Galinsky, Adam, and Thomas Mussweiler. 2001. "First Offers as Anchors: The Role of Perspective Taking and Negotiator Focus," 81 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 657-69.
19. Galinsky, Adam D., Thomas Mussweiler and Victoria Husted Medvec. 2002. "Disconnecting Outcomes and Evaluations: The Role of Negotiator Focus," 83 Journal of Personality Social Psychology 1131-40.
20. Guinier, Lani, Michelle Fine, and Jane Balin, with Ann Bartow and Deborah Lee Stachel. 1994. "Becoming Gentlemen:WOmen's Experiences at One Ivy League Law School," 143 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1-110.
21. Guth, Werner, Carsten Schmidt and Matthias Sutter. 2007. "Bargaining Outside the Lab - A Newspaper Experiment of a Three-Person Ultimatum Game," 117 Economic Journal 449-69.
22. Hertwig,Ralph, andAndreas Ortmann. 2001. "Experimental Practices in Economics: AMethodological Challenge for Psychologists?" 24 Behavioral & Brain Sciences 383-403.
23. Holt, Charles A., and Susan K. Laury. 2002. "Rick Aversion and Incentive Effects," 92 American Economic Review 1644-55.
24. Hu, Li-Tze, and Peter Bentler. 1995. "Evaluating Model Fit," in Rick H. Hoyle, ed., Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk," 47 Econometrica 263-92.
26. Kolb, Deborah M., and Gloria G. Coolidge. 1991. "Her Place at the Table: A Consideration of Gender Issues in Negotiation," in J. William Breslin and Jeffery Z. Rubin, eds., Negotiation Theory and Practice Cambridge, MA: The Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.
27. Korobkin, Russell. 2000. "A Positive Theory of Legal Negotiation," 88 Georgetown Law Journal 1789-1832.
28. Korobkin, Russell. 2002a. Negotiation Theory and Strategy. New York: Aspen Law & Business.
29. Korobkin, Russell. 2002b. "Aspirations and Settlement," 88 Cornell Law Review 1-61.
30. Korobkin, Russell. 2006. "On Bargaining Power," in Andrea Kupfer Schneider and Chris Honeyman eds., The Negotiator's Fieldbook. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
31. Korobkin, Russell. 2009. "Against Integrative Bargaining," Case Western Law Review (forthcoming).
32. Kristensen, Henrik, and Tommy Garling. 2000. "Anchor Points, Reference Points, and Counteroffers in Negotiations," 9 Group Decision & Negotiation 493-505.
33. Lax, David A., and James K. Sebenius. 2006. 3-D Negotiation: Powerful Tools to Change the Game in Your Most Important Deals. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
34. Mnookin, Robert H., and Lewis Kornhauser. 1979. "Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce," 88 Yale Law Journal 950.
35. Mnookin, Robert H., Scott R. Peppet and Andrew S. Tulumello. 2000. Beyond Winning: Negotiating to Create Value in Deals and Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
36. Murnighan, Keith, Linda Babcock, Leigh Thompson andMadan Pillutla. 1999. "The Information Dilemma in Negotiations: Effects of Experience, Incentives, and Integrative Potential," 10 International Journal of Conflict Management 313-39.
37. Mussweiler, Thomas, and Fritz Stack. 1999. "Comparing is Believing: A Selective Accessibility Model of Judgmental Anchoring," 10 European Review of Social Psychology 135-68.
38. Oesch, John, and Adam Galinsky. 2003. "First Offers in Negotiation: Determinants and Effects," available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=399722.
39. Orr, Dan, and Chris Guthrie. 2006. "Anchoring, Information, Expertise, and Negotiation: New Insights from Meta-Analysis," 21 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 597-628.
40. Pillutla, Madan M., and J. Keith Murnighan. 2003. "Fairness in Bargaining," 16 Social Justice Research 241-62.
41. Shell, G. Richard. 1999. Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People. New York: Viking.
42. Smith, Vernon L., and James M. Walker. 1993. "Monetary Rewards and Decision Cost in Experimental Economics," 31 Economic Inquiry 245-61.
43. Straub, Paul G., and J. Keith Murnighan. 1995. "An Experimental Investigation of Ultimatums: Complete Information, Fairness, Expectations, and Lowest Acceptable Offers," 27 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 345-64.
44. Stolte, John F. 1983. "Self-Efficacy: Sources and Consequences in Negotiation Networks," 119 Journal of Social Psychology 69-76.
45. Stuhlmacher, Alice F., and Amy E. Walters. 1999. "Gender Differences in Negotiation Outcome: A Meta-Analysis," 52 Personnel Psychology 653-78.
46. Sullivan, Brandon A., Kathleen M. O'Connor, and Ethan R. Burris. 2005. "Negotiator Confidence: The Impact of Self-Efficacy on Tactics and Outcomes," 42 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 567-81.
47. White, Sally Blount and Margaret A. Neale. 1994. "The Role of Negotiator Aspirations and Settlement Expectancies in Bargaining Outcomes," 57 Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 303-17.
48. Young, H. Peyton. 1991. "Negotiation Analysis," in H. Peyton Young, ed., Negotiation Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
49. Zetik, Deborah C., and Alice F. Stulmacher. 2002. "Goal Setting and Negotiation Performance: A Meta-Analysis," 5 Group Proc. & Intergroup Relations 35-52.