The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles

American Psychologist

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 408-423

  Eagly, Alice H ^a   Wood, Wendy ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001203631     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51, 909-917.
2. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.
3. Beall, A. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (1993). The psychology of gender. New York: Guilford Press.
4. Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Borkenau, P. (1992). Age preferences: The crucial studies have yet to be done. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 93-94.
6. Broude, G. J. (1992). The May-September algorithm meets the 20th century actuarial table. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 94-95.
7. Buss, D. M. (1989a). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-14.
8. Buss, D. M. (1989b). Toward an evolutionary psychology of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 39-49.
9. Buss, D. M. (1995a). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1-30.
10. Buss, D. M. (1995b). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50, 164-168.
11. Buss, D. M. (1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 3-38). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Buss, D. M. (1998). The psychology of human mate selection: Exploring the complexity of the strategic repertoire. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 405-429). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Buss, D. M. et al. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5-47.
14. Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53, 533-548.
15. Buss, D. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (1998). Evolutionary social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 982-1026). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
16. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
17. Canary, D. J., & Dindia, K. (Eds.). (1998). Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413-423.
19. Collear, M. L., & Hines, M. (1995). Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones during early development? Psychological Bulletin, 118, 55-107.
20. Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex differences in dating aspiration and satisfaction with computer-selected partners. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 28, 62-66.
21. Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Barkow, J. H. (1992). Introduction: Evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 3-15). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Crawford, C. (1998). The theory of evolution in the study of human behavior: An introduction and overview. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 3-41). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Cronk, L. (1991). Human behavioral ecology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 20, 25-53.
24. Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 925-935.
25. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution, and behavior (2nd ed.). Boston: Grant Press.
26. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1998). The evolutionary social psychology of family violence. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 431-456). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.
28. Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 788-827). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
29. DeKay, W. T., & Buss, D. M. (1992). Human nature, individual differences, and the importance of context: Perspectives from evolutionary psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 184-189.
30. Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: Norton.
31. Draper, P., & Harpending, H. (1982). Father absence and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 255-273.
32. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145-158.
34. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but . . . : A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
35. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
36. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
37. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. (in press). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Ehrenberg, M. (1989). Women in prehistory. London: British Museum Publications.
39. England, P., & Browne, I. (1992). Internalization and constraint in women's subordination. In B. Agger (Ed.), Current perspectives in social theory (Vol. 12, pp. 97-123). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40. Fedigan, L. M. (1986). The changing role of women in models of human evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 25-66.
41. Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981-993.
42. Feingold, A. (1991). Sex differences in the effects of similarity and physical attractiveness on opposite-sex attraction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 357-367.
43. Feingold, A. (1992a). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125-139.
44. Feingold, A. (1992b). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304-341.
45. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
46. Ferree, M. M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages: Dimensions of variability and change. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 158-180.
47. Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.
48. Foley, R. (1996). The adaptive legacy of human evolution: A search for the environment of evolutionary adaptedness. Evolutionary Anthropology, 4, 194-203.
49. Geary, D. C. (1995). Sexual selection and sex differences in spatial cognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 289-301.
50. Geary, D. C. (1996). Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 229-284.
51. Glenn, N. D. (1989). Intersocietal variation in the mate preferences of males and females. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 21-23.
52. Glick, P. (1991). Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles, 25, 351-378.
53. Gould, S. J. (1991). Exaptation: A crucial tool for an evolutionary psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 43-65.
54. Gutek, B. A., & Morasch, B. (1983). Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues, 38(4), 55-74.
55. Haas, L. L. (1995). Household division of labor in industrial societies. In B. B. Ingoldsby & S. Smith (Eds.), Families in multicultural perspective: Perspectives on marriage and the family (pp. 268-296). New York: Guilford Press.
56. Halpern, D. F. (1997). Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for education. American Psychologist, 52, 1091-1102.
57. Harris, M. (1993). The evolution of human gender hierarchies: A trial formulation. In B. D. Miller (Ed.), Sex and gender hierarchies (pp. 57-79). New York: Cambridge University Press.
58. Hembroff, L. A. (1982). Resolving status inconsistency: An expectation states theory and test. Social Forces, 61, 183-205.
59. Herzog, A. R., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1983). Paid work, child care, and housework: A national survey of high school seniors' preferences for sharing responsibilities between husband and wife. Sex Roles, 9, 109-135.
60. House, J. S. (1995). Social structure, relationships, and the individual. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 387-395). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
61. Hrdy, S. B. (1997). Raising Darwin's consciousness: Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy. Human Nature, 8, 1-49.
62. Hyde, J. S. (1996). Where are the gender differences? Where are the gender similarities? In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
63. Jackson, L. A. (1992). Physical appearance and gender: Sociobiological and sociocultural perspectives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
64. Jacobs, J. A. (1989). Revolving doors: Sex segregation and women's careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65. Janicki, M. G., & Krebs, D. L. (1998). Evolutionary approaches to culture. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 163-207). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Jones, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropology, 36, 723-748.
67. Kalick, S. M., Zebrowitz, L. A., Langlois, J. H., & Johnson, R. M. (1998). Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal data on an evolutionary question. Psychological Science, 9, 8-13.
68. Kalmijn, M. (1991). Status homogamy in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 496-523.
69. Kalmijn, M. (1994). Assortative mating by culture and economic occupational status. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 422-452.
70. Kelly, R. L. (1995). The foraging spectrum: Diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
71. Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75-91.
72. Kenrick, D. T., Trost, M. R., & Sheets, V. L. (1996). Power, harassment, and trophy mates: The feminist advantages of an evolutionary perspective. In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, and conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 29-53). New York: Oxford University Press.
73. Kerckhoff, A. C. (1995). Social stratification and mobility processes: Interaction between individuals and social structures. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 476-496). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
74. Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.
75. Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the "people-things" dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996-1009.
76. Lips, H. M. (1991). Women, men, and power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
77. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1998). Group status and perceptions of homogeneity. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 31-75). Chichester, England: Wiley.
78. Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15-32.
79. Moscowitz, D. W., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753-761.
80. Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211-238). New York: Guilford.
81. Pfeffer, J. (1998). Understanding organizations: Concepts and controversies. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 733-777). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
82. Potts, R. (1984). Home bases and early hominids. American Scientist, 72, 338-347.
83. Powers, E. A. (1971). Thirty years of research on ideal mate characteristics: What do we know? International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 1, 207-215.
84. Presser, H. B. (1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender. American Sociological Review, 59, 348-364.
85. Reskin, B. F., & Padavic, I. (1994). Women and men at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
86. Ridgeway, C. L. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70, 367-386.
87. Ridgeway, C. L. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62, 218-235.
88. Ridgeway, C. L., & Diekema, D. (1992). Are gender differences status differences? In C. L. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction, and inequality (pp. 157-180). New York: Springer-Verlag.
89. Rose, L., & Marshall, F. (1996). Meat eating, hominid sociality, and home bases revisited. Current Anthropology, 37, 307-338.
90. Sanday, P. R. (1981). Female power and male dominance: On the origins of sexual inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
91. Schaller, M. (1997). Beyond "competing," beyond "compatible." American Psychologist, 52, 1379-1380.
92. Shelton, B. A. (1992). Women, men and time: Gender differences in paid work, housework, and leisure. New York: Greenwood Press.
93. Silverman, I., & Phillips, K. (1998). The evolutionary psychology of spatial sex differences. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 595-612). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
94. Simon, R. J., & Landis, J. M. (1989). The polls - A report: Women's and men's attitudes about a woman's place and role. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 265-276.
95. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307.
96. Skrypnek, B. J., & Snyder, M. (1982). On the self-perpetuating nature of stereotypes about women and men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 277-291.
97. Smith, E. A. (in press). Three styles in the evolutionary study of human behavior. In L. Cronk, W. Irons, & N. Chagnon (Eds.), Adaptation and human behavior: An anthropological perspective. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
98. Sork, V. L. (1997). Quantitative genetics, feminism, and evolutionary theories of gender differences. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: Boundaries, intersections, and frontiers (pp. 86-115). New York: Chapman & Hall.
99. Spence, J. T., & Hahn, E. D. (1997). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 17-34.
100. Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074-1080.
101. Steil, J. M. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well-being of husbands and wives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
102. Strier, K. B. (1994). Myth of the typical primate. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 37, 233-271.
103. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
104. Symons, D. (1992). On the use and misuse of Darwinism in the study of human behavior. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 137-159). New York: Oxford University Press.
105. Tassinary, L. G., & Hansen, K. A. (1998). A critical test of the waist-to-hip-ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychological Science, 9, 150-155.
106. Tattersall, I. (1998). Becoming human: Evolution and human uniqueness. New York: Harcourt Brace.
107. Tittle, C. K. (1981). Careers and family: Sex roles and adolescent life plans. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
108. Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1995). Sex composition and gendered earnings inequality: A comparison of job and occupational models. In J. A. Jacobs (Ed.), Gender inequality at work (pp. 23-56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
109. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1989). The innate versus the manifest: How universal does universal have to be? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 36-37.
110. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990a). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58, 17-67.
111. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990b). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375-424.
112. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19-136). New York: Oxford University Press.
113. Townsend, J. M. (1989). Mate selection criteria: A pilot study. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 241-253.
114. Toynbee, A. J. (1934-1961). A study of history (Vols. 1-12). New York: Oxford University Press.
115. Travis, C. B., & Yeager, C. P. (1991). Sexual selection, parental investment, and sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 47(3), 117-129.
116. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine.
117. Twenge, J. M. (1997). Attitudes toward women, 1970-1995: A metaanalysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 35-51.
118. United Nations Development Programme. (1995). Human development report 1995. New York: Oxford University Press.
119. United Nations Development Programme. (1996). Human development report 1996. New York: Oxford University Press.
120. United Nations Development Programme. (1997). Human development report 1997. New York: Oxford University Press.
121. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125-151.
122. Whyte, M. K. (1978). The status of women in preindustrial societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
123. Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 115-124.
124. Wiley, M. G. (1995). Sex category and gender in social psychology. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 362-386). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
125. Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
126. Wood, W., Cnristensen, P. N., Hebl, M. R., & Rothgerber, H. (1997). Conformity to sex-typed norms, affect, and the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 523-535.
127. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Social structure and the origins of sex differences in social behavior. Manuscript in preparation.
128. Wood, W., & Karten, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 341-347.