The objective value of subjective value: A multi-round negotiation study

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 690-709

  Curhan, Jared R ^a   Elfenbein, Hillary Anger ^b   Eisenkraft, Noah ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952734381     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00593.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Barley S R. Contextualizing conflict: Notes on the anthropology of disputes and negotiations. Research on negotiation in organizations 1990, 165-199. Bazerman M HLewicki R JSheppard B H. In, Eds., Vol. 3, pp., Greenwich, CT, JAI Press
2. Barry B, Oliver R L. Affect in dyadic negotiation: A model and propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996, 67:127-143.
3. Bazerman M H, Curhan J R, Moore D A. The death and rebirth of the social psychology of negotiation. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes 2001, 196-228. Fletcher G J O, Clark M S, In, Eds., pp., Oxford, UK, Blackwell
4. Curhan J R, Elfenbein H A, Kilduff G. Getting off on the right foot: Subjective value versus economic value in predicting longitudinal job outcomes from job offer negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:524-534.
5. Curhan J R, Elfenbein H A, Xu H. What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 91:493-512.
6. Curhan J R, Neale M A, Ross L, Rosencranz-Engelmann J. Relational accommodation in negotiation: Effects of egalitarianism and gender on economic efficiency and relational capital. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2008, 107:192-205.
7. Dabholkar P A, Johnston W J, Cathey A S. The dynamics of long-term business-to-business exchange relationships. Academy of Marketing Science 1994, 22:130-145.
8. De Dreu C K W, Weingart L R, Kwon S. Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 78:889-905.
9. Druckman D, Broome B J. Value differences and conflict resolution: Familiarity or liking? Journal of Conflict Resolution 1991, 35:571-593.
10. Dwyer F R, Schurr P H, Oh S. Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 1987, 51:11-27.
11. Eagly A H, Chaiken S. Attitude structure and function. The handbook of social psychology 1998, 788-827. Gilbert D T, Fiske S T. In, Eds., pp., Boston, McGraw-Hill
12. Elfenbein H A, Curhan J R, Eisenkraft N, Shirako A, Baccaro L. Are some negotiators better than others? Individual differences in bargaining outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality 2008, 42:1463-1475.
13. Elfenbein H A, Curhan J R, Eisenkraft N, Shirako A, Brown A. Why are some negotiators better than others? Opening the black box of bargaining behaviors. 2010, Unpublished manuscript
14. Fortgang R S, Lax D A, Sebenius J K. Negotiating the spirit of the deal. Harvard Business Review 2003, 81(2):66-75.
15. Froman L A, Cohen M D. Compromise and logroll: Comparing efficiency of two bargaining processes. Behavioral Science 1970, 30:180-183.
16. Fry W R, Firestone I J, Williams D L. Negotiation process and outcome of stranger dyads and dating couples: Do lovers lose? Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1983, 4:1-16.
17. Ganesan S. Negotiation strategies and the nature of channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research 1993, 30:183-203.
18. Gelfand M J, Major V S, Raver J L, Nishii L H, O'Brien K. Negotiating relationally: The dynamics of the relational self in negotiations. Academy of Management Review 2006, 31:427-451.
19. Gelman A, Hill J. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models 2007, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
20. Greenhalgh L. Relationships in negotiations. Negotiation Journal 1987, 3:235-243.
21. Gruen T W, Summers J O, Acito F. The dark side of long-term relationship in marketing services. Journal of Marketing Research 2000, 36:132-141.
22. Hibbard J D, Brunel F F, Dant R P, Iacobucci D. Does relationship marketing age well? Business Strategy Review 2001, 12:29-35.
23. Kashy D A, Kenny D A. The analysis of data from dyads and groups. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology 2000, 451-477. Reis H T, Judd C M. In, Eds., pp., New York, Cambridge University Press
24. Kenny D A. The effect of nonindependence on significance testing in dyadic research. Personal Relationships 1995, 2:67-75.
25. Kumar R. The role of affect in negotiations: An integrative overview. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 1997, 33:84-100.
26. Lawler E J, Yoon J. Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange. American Sociological Review 1993, 58:465-481.
27. Lawler E J, Yoon J. Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review 1996, 61:89-108.
28. Lax D A, Sebenius J K. Interests: The measure of negotiation. Negotiation Journal 1986, 2:73-92.
29. Lind E A, Tyler T R. The social psychology of procedural justice 1988, New York, Plenum
30. Mannix E A, Tinsley C H, Bazerman M. Negotiating over time: Impediments to integrative solutions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1995, 62:241-251.
31. Mestdagh S, Buelens M. Thinking back on where we're going: A methodological assessment of five decades of research in negotiation behavior. 2003, June, Paper presented at the 16 annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Melbourne, Australia
32. Miller D T. The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist 1999, 54:1053-1060.
33. Mills C W. Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review 1940, 5:904-913.
34. Naquin C E, Paulson G D. Online bargaining and interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88:113-120.
35. O'Connor K M, Arnold J A, Burris E R. Negotiators' bargaining histories and their effects on future negotiation performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:350-362.
36. Oliver R L, Balakrishnan P V, Barry B. Outcome satisfaction in negotiation: A test of expectancy disconfirmation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1994, 60:252-275.
37. Pinkley R L, Neale M A, Bennett R J. The impact of alternatives to settlement in dyadic negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1994, 57:97-116.
38. Pruitt D G. Achieving integrative agreements. Negotiating in organizations 1983, 35-49. Bazerman M HLewicki R J. In, Eds., pp., Beverly Hills, CA, Sage
39. Pruitt D G, Rubin J Z. Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement 1986, New York, McGraw-Hill
40. Raiffa H. The art and science of negotiation 1982, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
41. Shah P, Jehn K. Do friends perform better than acquaintances? The interaction of friendship, conflict, and task. Group Decision and Negotiation 1993, 2:149-165.
42. Sullivan B A, O'Connor K M, Burris E R. Negotiator confidence: The impact of self-efficacy on tactics and outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2006, 42:567-581.
43. Tenbrunsel A E, Wade-Benzoni K A, Moag J, Bazerman M H. The negotiation matching process: Relationships and partner selection. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1999, 80:252-283.
44. Thompson L. Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 108:515-532.
45. Thompson L, Hrebec D. Lose-lose agreements in interdependent decision making. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 120:396-409.
46. Tinsley C H, O'Connor K M, Sullivan B A. Tough guys finish last: The perils of a distributive reputation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2002, 88:621-645.
47. Valley K L, Neale M A, Mannix E A. Friends, lovers, colleagues, strangers: The effects of relationships on the process and outcome of dyadic negotiations. Research on Negotiation in Organizations 1995, 5:65-93.
48. Vonesh E F, Chinchilli V P, Pu K W. Goodness-of-fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models. Biometrics 1996, 52:572-587.
49. Walton R E, Cutcher-Gershenfeld J E, McKersie R B. Strategic negotiations: Theory of change in labor-management relations 1994, Cambridge, MA, Harvard Business School Press
50. Walton R E, McKersie R B. A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system 1965, New York, McGraw-Hill
51. Weitz B A, Bradford K D. Personal selling and sales management: A relationship marketing perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1999, 27:241-254.
52. White J B, Tynan R, Galinsky A D, Thompson L L. Face threat sensitivity in negotiation: Roadblock to agreement and joint gain. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2004, 94:102-124.
53. Xu R H. Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Statistics in Medicine 2003, 22:3527-3541.