Integrative bargaining: Does gender make a difference?

International Journal of Conflict Management

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 203-224

  Calhoun, Patrick S ^b   Smith, William P ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033273225     PISSN: 10444068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb022824     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ben-Yoav, O., & Pruitt, D. G. (1984a). Resistance to yielding and the expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 325-335.
2. Ben-Yoav, O., & Pruitt, D. G. (1984b). Accountability to constituents: A two edged sword. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 282-295.
3. Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
4. Carnevale, P. J. D., & Lawler, E. J. (1987). Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 636-659.
5. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-151.
6. Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Eagly, A. (1993). Sex differences in human social behavior: Meta-analytic studies of social psychological research. In M. Haug, R. E. Whalen, C. Aron, & K. L. Olsen (Eds.), The development of sex differences and similarities in behaviour (pp. 421-436). London: Kluwer Academic.
8. Eagly, A. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145-158.
9. Eagly, A., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 100, 309-330.
10. Folger, J. P., Hewes, D., & Poole, M. S. (1984). Coding social interaction. In B. Dervin & M. Voight (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 115-161). New York: Ablex.
11. Gayle, B. M., Preiss, R. W., & Allen, M. (1994). Gender differences and the use of conflict strategies. In L. H. Turner & H. M. Sterk (Eds.), Differences that make a difference (pp. 72-84). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
12. Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. (1991). Determinants and consequences of salary negotiations by male and female MBA graduates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 256-262.
13. Gray, B. (1994). The gender based foundations of negotiation theory. Research on Negotiations in Organizations, 4, 3-36.
14. Kimmel, M. J., Pruitt, D. G., Magenau, J. M., Konar-Goldband, E., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1980). Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 9-22.
15. Kirk, R. E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
16. Kolb, D. M. (1992, August). Is it her voice or her place that makes a difference? A consideration of gender issues in negotiation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NV.
17. Kolb, D. M., & Coolidge, G. G. (1991). Her place at the table: A consideration of gender issues in negotiation. In J. W. Breslin & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Negotiation theory and practice (pp. 261-277). Cambridge, MA: Program on Negotiation.
18. Krauss, R. M. (1966). Structural and attitudinal factors in interpersonal bargaining. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 42-55.
19. Krone, K. J., Allen, M., & Ludlum, J. (1994). A meta-analysis of gender research in managerial influence. In L. H. Turner, & H. M. Sterk (Eds.), Differences that make a difference (pp. 72-84). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
20. Main, A. (1991). Visual access and gender in interpersonal negotiation. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University.
21. Marston, M. (1991). Effects of gender and task on integrative bargaining. Honors thesis in psychology, Vanderbilt University.
22. Neale, M. A., Huber, V. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1987). The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 39, 228-241.
23. Pihakis, (1989). Couples in conflict: Effect of relationship and gender on integrative bargaining. Honors thesis in psychology, Vanderbilt University.
24. Pruitt, D. G. (1983). Strategic choice in negotiation. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 162-194.
25. Pruitt, D. G., Camevale, P. J. D., Ben-Yoav, O., Nochajski, T. H., & Van Slyck, M. R. (1983). Incentives for cooperation in integrative bargaining. In R. Tietz (Ed.), Aspiration levels in bargaining and economic decision making (pp. 26-52). Berlin: Springer.
26. Pruitt, D. G., Carnevale, P. J. D., Forcey, B., & Van Slyck, M. (1986). Gender effects in negotiation: Constituent surveillance and contentious behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 264-275.
27. Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621-633.
28. Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
29. Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
30. Schulz, J. W., & Pruitt, D. G. (1978) The effects of mutual concern on joint welfare. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 480-492.
31. Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Meyer, L. L. (1998). Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 1-29.
32. Watson, C. (1994). Gender differences in negotiating behavior and outcomes: Fact or artifact. In A. Taylor & J. B. Miller (Eds.), Conflict and gender (pp. 191-210). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.