Correction to: A Multimedia Adaptive Tutoring System for Mathematics that Addresses Cognition, Metacognition and Affect (International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, (2014), 24, 4, (387-426), 10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y);A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 387-426

  Arroyo, Ivon ^a   Woolf, Beverly Park ^b   Burelson, Winslow ^c   Muldner, Kasia ^d   Rai, Dovan ^e   Tai, Minghui ^f  

^a WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Biologically Inspired Neural and Dynamical Systems Laboratory   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect; Cognition; Intelligent tutoring; Mathematics education; Metacognition

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; SCHEDULING; TEACHING;

AFFECT; COGNITION; INTELLIGENT TUTORING; MATHEMATICS EDUCATION; METACOGNITION;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84908702387     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: 15604306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40593-018-0169-0     Document Type: Erratum

References (96)

1. Aleven, V.; Stahl, E.; Schworm, S.; Fischer, F.; Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 277-320.
2. Aleven, V.; Roll, I.; McLaren, B.; Ryu, E. J.; Koedinger, K. (2005). An architecture to combine meta-cognitive and cognitive tutoring: Pilot testing the Help Tutor. In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17-24.
3. Aleven, V.; McLaren, B.; Roll, I.; Koedinger, K. (2006). Toward Meta-Cognitive Tutoring: A Model of Help-Seeking with a Cognitive Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 16(2), 101-128.
4. Aleven, V.; Roll, I.; McLaren, B. M.; Koedinger, K. R. (2010) Automated, unobtrusive, action-by-action assessment of self-regulation during learning with an intelligent tutoring system. Educational Psychologist
5. Arroyo, I.; Woolf, B. (2005) Inferring learning and attitudes from a Bayesian Network of log file data. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED'05), 33-40.
6. Arroyo, I.; Beal, C.; Murray, T.; Walles, R.; Woolf, B. P. (2004) Web-Based Intelligent Multimedia Tutoring for High Stakes Achievement Tests Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In Proceedings of the 7th Internatinal Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'04), 142-169.
7. Arroyo, I.; Ferguson, K.; Johns, J.; Dragon, T.; Meheranian, H.; Fisher, D.; Woolf, B. (2007) Repairing disengagement with non-invasive intervention. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 195-202.
8. Arroyo, I.; Cooper, D. G.; Burleson, W.; Woolf, B. P.; Muldner, K.; Christopherson, R. (2009a) Emotion Sensors Go To School. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED'09), 17-24.
9. Arroyo, I.; Woolf, B. P.; Royer, J. M.; Tai, M. (2009b) Affective gendered learning companions. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED'09), 41-48.
10. Arroyo, I.; Cooper, D.; Burleson, W.; Woolf, B. P. (2010a). Bayesian networks and linear regression models of students' goals, moods, and emotions. In C. Romero, S. Ventura, M. Pechenizkiy, R. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Data Mining (pp. 323-338). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
11. Arroyo, I.; Mehranian, H.; Woolf, B. (2010b) Effort-based tutoring: An empirical approach to intelligent tutoring. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 1-10.
12. Arroyo, I.; Royer, J. M.; Woolf, B. P. (2011a). Using an Intelligent Tutor and Math Fluency Training to Improve Math Performance. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21(2), 135-152.
13. Arroyo, I.; Woolf, B. P.; Cooper, D. G.; Burleson, W.; Muldner, K. (2011b, 6-8 July 2011) The Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents on Girls' and Boys' Emotions, Attitudes, Behaviors and Learning. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 506-510.
14. Arroyo, I.; Muldner, K.; Burleson, W.; Woolf, B. (2014) Adaptive Interventions to Address Students' Negative Activating and Deactivating Emotions during Learning Activities. Design Recommendations for Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Adaptive Instructional Strategies (Volume 2). U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
15. Azevedo, R.; Cromley, J.; Winters, F.; Moos, D.; Greene, J. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33, 381-412.
16. Azevedo, R.; Bouchet, F.; Harley, J. M.; Feyzi-Behnagh, R.; Trevors, G.; Duffy, M.; Taub, M.; Pacampara, N.; Agnew, L.; Griscom, S.; Mudrick, N.; Stead, V.; Yang, W. (2011). MetaTutor: An Intelligent Multi-Agent Tutoring System Designed to Detect, Track, Model, and Foster Self-Regulated Learning In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Self-Regulated Learning in Educational Technologies. In conjunction with the 15th International Conference onArtificial Intelligence on Education (AIED 2011)
17. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon.
18. Baker, R. S. J. d.; Corbett, A. T.; Koedinger, K. R.; Evenson, S. E.; Roll, I.; Wagner, A. Z.; Naim, M.; Raspat, J.; Baker, D.J.; Beck, J. (2006) Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System. In Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 392-401.
19. Baker, R.S.J.d.; S.M. Gowda, M. Wixon, J. Kalka, A.Z. Wagner, A. Salvi, V. Aleven, G. Kusbit, J. Ocumpaugh, and L. Rossi (2012) Sensor-free automated detection of affect in a Cognitive Tutor for Algebra. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 126-133.
20. Baker, R.; Corbett, A.; Koedinger, K.; Wagner, A. (2004) Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students "game the system". In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'04), 383-390.
21. Baker, R. S.; Corbett, A. T.; Roll, I.; Koedinger, K. R. (2008). Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system. User-Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 18, 287-314.
22. Bickmore, T.; Picard, R. W. (2004). Establishing and Maintaining Long-Term Human-Computer Relationships. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(2), 293-327.
23. Brusilovsky, P.; Vassileva, J. (2003) Course sequencing techniques for large-scale web-based education. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life long Learning, 13(1-2), 75-94.
24. Bull, S. (2012) Preferred features of open learner models for university students. In Proc. of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 411-421.
25. Bull, R.; Scerif, G. (2001). Executive Functioning as a Predictor of Children's Mathematics Ability: Inhibition, Switching, and Working Memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19(3), 273-293.
26. Bull, S.; Wasson, B.; Johnson, M. D.; Petters, D.; Hansen, C. (2012). Helping teachers effectively support group learning. In Proceedings of Workshop on Intelligent Support for Learning in Groups, Intelligent Tutoring Systems
27. Burleson, W.; Picard, R. W. (2007). Affective Learning Companions. Educational Technology, Special Issue on Pedagogical Agents, 47(1), 28-32.
28. Butler, D. L.; Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
29. Calvo, R. A.; D'Mello, S. K. (2010). Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and their Applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1(1), 18-37.
30. Carraher, D. W.; Schliemann, A. D. (2002). The transfer dilemma. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 1-24.
31. Carraher, T. N.; Carraher, D. W.; Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 21-29.
32. Ceci, S. J.; Williams, W. M.; Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218-261.
33. Collins, A.; Brown, J. S.; Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: essays in honor of robert glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Conati, C.; Maclaren, H. (2009) Empirically Building and Evaluating a Probabilistic Model of User Affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
35. Cooper, D.; Arroyo, I.; Woolf, B.; Muldner, K.; Burleson, W.; Christopherson, R. (2009) Sensors Model Student Self Concept in the Classroom. In Proceedings of UMAP 2009, First and Seventeenth International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, 30-41.
36. Cooper, D. G.; Muldner, K.; Arroyo, I.; Woolf, B. P.; Burleson, W.; Dolan, R. (2010) Ranking Feature Sets for Emotion Models used in Classroom Based Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on User Modeling and Adaptive Presentation (UMAP'10), 135-146.
37. Cooper, D.; Arroyo, I.; Woolf, B. (2011) Actionable affective processing for automatic tutor interventions. In R. Calvo S. D'Mello (Eds.), New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies (pp. 127-140)
38. Corbett, A. T.; Anderson, J. R. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 4, 253-278.
39. Dignath, C.; Buettner, G.; Langfeldt, H. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101-112.
40. D'Mello, S.; Lehman, B.; Sullins, J.; Daigle, R.; Combs, R.; Vogt, K.; et al. (2010). A time for emoting: When affect-sensitivity is and isn't effective at promoting deep learning. In J. Kay V. Aleven (Eds.), Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 245-254). Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg.
41. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-Theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
42. Dweck, C. S. (2002a). Beliefs that make smart people dumb. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Why smart people do stupid things. New Haven: Yale University Press.
43. Dweck, C. S. (2002b) Messages that motivate: How praise molds students' beliefs, motivation, and performance (in surprising ways) In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 61-87): Academic Press.
44. Ekman, P. (1999). Facial Expressions. New York: John Wiley Sons Ltd.
45. Eynde, P.; de Corte, E.; Verschaffel, L. (2007). Student Emotions: A key component of self-regulated learning? Emotion in education. San Diego: Academic.
46. Geary, D. C.; Hoard, M. K. (2003). Learning disabilities in basic mathematics: Deficits in memory and cognition. In J. M. Royer (Ed.), Mathematical Cognition (p. 2003). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
47. Gobert, J.; Sao Pedro, M.; Raziuddin, J.; Baker, R. S. (2013). From log files to assessment metrics for science inquiry using educational data mining. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(4), 521-563.
48. Graesser, A.; Chipman, P.; King, B.; McDaniel, B.; D'Mello, S. (2007). Emotions and Learning with AutoTutor. In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 569-571.
49. Graham, S.; Weiner, B. (1986). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. Berliner R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 63-84). NY: Macmillan.
50. Greene, J. A.; Azevedo, R. (2007). A Theoretical Review of Winne and Hadwin's Model of Self-Regulated Learning: New Perspectives and Directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334-372.
51. Hartfield, E. (1994). Emotional contagion. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
52. Heffernan, N.; Militello, M.; Heffernan, C.; Decoteau, M. (2012) Effective and meaningful use of educational technology: three cases from the classroom. In C. Dede J. Richards (Eds.), Digital Teaching Platforms (pp. 88-102).
53. Johns, J.; Woolf, B. (2006). A Dynamic Mixture Model to Detect Student Motivation and Proficiency. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2-8.
54. Karampiperis, P.; Sampson, D. (2005). Adaptive Learning Resources Sequencing in Educational Hypermedia Systems. Educational Technology and Society, 8(4), 128-147.
55. Kay, J. (2012). AI and Education: Grand Challenges. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 27(5), 66-69.
56. Koedinger, K. R.; Anderson, J. R.; Hadley, W. H.; Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent Tutoring Goes To School in the Big City. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 8, 30-43.
57. Lajoie, S. P.; Lesgold, A. (1989). Apprenticeship training in the workplace: Computer coached practice environment as a new form of apprenticeship. Machine- Mediated Learning, 3, 7-28.
58. Lemaire, P.; Lecacheur, M. (2011). Age-related changes in children's executive functions and strategy selection: a study in computational estimation. Cognitive Development, 26, 282-294.
59. Lester, J. C.; Towns, S. G.; FitzGerald, P. J. (1999). Achieving Affective Impact: Visual Emotive Communication in Lifelike Pedagogical Agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(3-4), 278-291.
60. Locke, E. A.; Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
61. Long, Y.; Aleven, V. (2013). Supporting students' self-regulated learning with an open learner model in a linear equation tutor. In In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education AIED 2013 (pp. 249-258).
62. Mathews, M.; Mitrovic, A.; Lin, B.; Holland, J.; Churcher, N. (2012) Do your eyes give it away? Using eye tracking data to understand students' attitudes towards open student model representations. In Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 422-427
63. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Mazzocco, M. M. M.; Feigenson, L.; Halberda, J. (2011) Preschoolers' Precision of the Approximate Number System Predicts Later School Mathematics Performance.
65. McQuiggan, S.; Rowe, J.; Lester, J. (2008) The effects of empathetic virtual characters on presence in narrative-centered learning environments. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08), 1511-1520.
66. Mueller, C. M.; Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children's performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33-52.
67. Muldner, K.; Burleson, W.; VanLehn, K. (2010) "Yes!": Using Tutor and Sensor Data to Predict Moments of Delight during Instructional Activities. In Proceedings of User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, 159-170
68. Murray, T.; Arroyo, I. (2002) Towards measuring and maintaining the zone of proximal development in adaptive instructional systems. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 749-758.
69. Nass, C.; Fogg, B. J.; Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal Human Computer Studies, 45, 669-678.
70. Ogan, A.; Aleven, V.; Jones, C.; Kim, J. (2011). Pervasive social effects of agent-based instructional dialog. In In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2011) (pp. 238-246).
71. Pekrun, R. (2006). The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341.
72. Pekrun, R.; Frenzel, A.; Goetz, T.; Perry, R. (2007). The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: An Integrative Approach to Emotions in Education Emotion in education. San Diego: Academic.
73. Pekrun, R.; Goetz, T.; Daniels, L.; Stupinsky, R.; Perry, R. (2010). Boredom in Achievement Settings: Exploring Control-Value Antecedents and Performance Outcomes of a Neglected Emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531-549.
74. Picard, R. W.; Papert, S.; Bender, W.; Blumberg, B.; Breazeal, C.; Cavallo, D.; Machover, T.; Resnick, M.; Roy, R.; Strohecker, C. (2004). Affective Learning-A Manifesto. BT Technical Journal, 22(4), 253-269.
75. Rai, D.; Arroyo, I.; Stephens, L.; Lozano, C.; Burleson, W.; Woolf, B. P.; Beck, J. (2013) Repairing deactivating negative emotions with student progress pages. In Proceedings of the 16th of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED).
76. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
77. Robison, J.; McQuiggan, S.; Lester, J. (2009) Evaluating the Consequences of Affective Feedback in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In Proceedings of International Conference on Affective Computing Intelligent Interaction, 37-42.
78. Roll, I.; Aleven, V.; McLaren, B.; Koedinger, K. (2007). Designing for metacognition - applying Cognitive Tutor principles to metacognitive tutoring. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2-3), 125-140.
79. Roll, I.; Aleven, V.; and Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Metacognitive practice makes perfect: Improving students' self-assessment skills with an intelligent tutoring system. In Proceedings of the International conference on artificial intelligence in education, 288-295.
80. Royer, J. M. (Ed.). (2003). Mathematical Cognition. Greenwich: Infoage Publishing.
81. Royer, J. M.; Walles, R. (2007). Influences of gender, motivation and socioeconomic status on mathematics performance. In D. B. Berch M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children (pp. 349-368). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
82. Shanabrook, D. H.; Arroyo, I.; Woolf, B. P.; Burleson, W. (2012) Visualization of Student Activity Patterns within Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'2012), 46-51.
83. Stottler, D.; Domeshek, E. (2005) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs): Advanced Learning Technology for Enhancing Warfighter Performance. In Proceedings of Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC).
84. Tai, M.; I.; A.; Woolf, B. P. (2013) Teammate Relationships Improve Help-seeking Behavior in an Intelligent Tutoring System. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education
85. Thomson, D.; Mitrovic, A. (2010). Preliminary evaluation of a negotiable student model in a constraint-based ITS. Research, Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 5(1), 19-33.
86. Tronsky, L. N. (2005). Complex multiplication: Strategy use, the development of automaticity with practice, and working memory involvement. Memory Cognition, 33, 927-940.
87. Tronsky, L. N.; Royer, J. M. (2003). Relationships among basic computational automaticity, working memory, and complex mathematical problem solving: What we know and what we need to know. In J. M. Royer (Ed.), Mathematical cognition. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
88. Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes: Harvard University Press.
89. Wang, Y.; Heffernan, N. (2013). Extending Knowledge Tracing to allow Partial Credit: Using Continuous versus Binary Nodes. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Education Conference, 181-188.
90. Wigfield, A.; Karpathian, M. (1991). Who Am I and What Can I Do? Children's Self-Concepts and Motivation in Achievement Situations. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 233-261.
91. Wixon, M.; Arroyo, I.; Muldner, K.; Burleson, W.; Lozano, C.; Woolf, B. (2014) The Opportunities and Limitations of Scaling Up Sensor-Free Affect Detection. In Proceedings of Educational Data Mining.
92. Woolf, B. (2009). Building Intelligent Tutors: Bridging Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Elsevier Inc./Morgan Kauffman.
93. Woolf, B.; Burleson, W.; Arroyo, I.; Dragon, T.; Cooper, D.; Picard, R. (2009). Affect-aware tutors: recognising and responding to student affect. International Journal of Learning Technology, 4(3-4), 129-164.
94. Woolf, B.; Arroyo, I.; Muldner, K.; Burleson, W.; Cooper, D.; Dolan, R.; Christopherson, R. (2010) The Effect of Motivational Learning Companions on Low Achieving Students and Students with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'10), 327-337.
95. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
96. Zimmerman, B. J.; Moylan, A. R. (2009) Self-regulation: Where motivation and metacognition intersect Handbook of Metacognition in Education.