The impact of animated pedagogical agents on girls' and boys' emotions, attitudes, behaviors and learning

Proceedings of the 2011 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 506-510

  Arroyo, Ivon ^a   Woolf, Beverly P ^a   Cooper, David G ^a   Burleson, Winslow ^b   Muldner, Kasia ^b  

^a Biologically Inspired Neural and Dynamical Systems Laboratory   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Empirical evaluation; Gender differences; Intelligent Tutoring Systems; Mathematics education; Motivation and affect; Pedagogical agents

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; GENDER DIFFERENCES; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; MATHEMATICS EDUCATION; PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; STUDENTS;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 80052728668     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2011.157     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Arroyo, I., D. Cooper, W. Burleson, B. Woolf, K. Muldner, and R. Christopherson. Emotion Sensors go to School. Proc. of Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (ITS'09). 2009. 17-24.
2. Conati, C. and H. Maclaren. Evaluating A Probabilistic Model of Student Affect. In Proc. of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. 2004. 55-66.
3. D'Mello, S., R. Picard, and A. Graesser, Towards an Affect Sensitive Auto Tutor. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2007. 22(4): p. 53-61.
4. Cooper, D., I. Arroyo, B. Woolf, K. Muldner, W. Burleson, and R. Christopherson. Sensors Model Student Self Concept in the Classroom. In Proc. of International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP'09). 2009. 30-41
5. Woolf, B.P., I. Arroyo, K. Muldner, W. Burleson, D. Cooper, R. Dolan, and R. Christopherson. The Effect of Motivational Learning Companions on Low Achieving Students and Students with Disabilities. In Proc. of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. 2010. 327-337.
6. Graesser, A., P. Chipman, B. King, B. McDaniel, and S. D'Mello. Emotions and Learning with AutoTutor. In Proc. of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2007. 569-571.
7. Eccles, J.S., A. Wigfield, R.D. Harold, and P. Blumenfeld, Age and gender differences in children's self and task perceptions during elementary school. Child development, 1993. 64: p. 830-847.
8. Catsambis, S., The gender gap in mathematics: Merely a step function?, in Gender differences in mathematics 2005. p. 220-245).
9. Arroyo, I., C.R. Beal, T. Murray, R. Walles, and B.P. Woolf. Web-Based Intelligent Multimedia Tutoring for High Stakes Achievement Tests. In Proc. of International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. 2004. 468-477.
10. Dweck, C.S., Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 1986. 41: p. 1040-1048.
11. Shute, V.J., SMART: Student Modeling Approach for Responsive Tutoring. User modeling -user-adapted instruction, 1995. 5: p. 1-44.
12. Beal, C.R., Boys and girls: The development of gender roles. 1994, New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Sax, L., Why Gender Matters: What Parents and Teachers Need to Know about the Emerging Science of Sex Differences. 2005.
14. Fennema, E., T. Carpenter, V. Jacobs, M. Franke, and L. Levi, A Longitudinal Study of Gender Differences in Young Children's Mathematical Thinking. Educational Researcher, 1998. 27(5): p. 6- 11. (Pubitemid 128100317)
15. Arroyo, I. and B. Woolf. Inferring learning and attitudes from a Bayesian network of log file data. In Proc. of Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2005. 33-40.
16. Weiner, B. (1972) Attribution Theory, Achievement Motivation, and the Educational Process. Review of Educational Research, 42, 2, 203-215