Designing for metacognition-applying cognitive tutor principles to the tutoring of help seeking

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 2, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 125-140

  Roll, Ido ^a   Aleven, Vincent ^a   McLaren, Bruce M ^a   Koedinger, Kenneth R ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive tutors; Help seeking; Instructional design principles; Intelligent tutoring systems; Meta cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 36849062576     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-007-9010-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Limitations of student control: Do students know when they need help? In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 292-303). Berlin: Springer.
2. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147-179.
3. Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a Cognitive Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16, 101-128.
4. Aleven, V., Roll, I., McLaren, B. M., Ryu, E. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005). An architecture to combine meta-cognitive and cognitive tutoring: Pilot testing the Help Tutor. In Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 17-24). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS.
5. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. M. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 277-320.
6. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
7. Azevedo, R. (2005a). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199-209.
8. Azevedo, R. (2005b). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 193-197.
9. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370.
10. Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Wagner, A. Z. (2004). Off-task behavior in the Cognitive Tutor classroom: When students "game the system." In ACM CHI 2004: Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 383-90).
11. Baker, R. S. J. d., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., Evenson, E., Roll, I., Wagner, A. Z., et al. (2006a). Adapting to when students game an intelligent tutoring system. In 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 392-401). Berlin: Springer.
12. Baker, R. S. J. d., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Roll, I. (2006b). Generalizing detection of Gaming the System across a tutoring curriculum. In 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 402-11). Berlin: Springer.
13. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13(2), 221-252.
14. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Kadira, B., Viswanath, K., Vye, N., Schwartz, D. L., et al. (2004). Incorporating self regulated learning techniques into learning by teaching environments. In The Twenty Sixth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 120-125).
15. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Reiner, & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Bunt, A., & Conati, C. (2003). Probabilistic student modelling to improve exploratory behavior. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13(3), 269-309.
18. Carver, S. M. (2001). Cognition and instruction: Enriching the laboratory school experience of children, teachers, parents, and undergraduates. In S. M. Carver, & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 385-426). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Carver, S. M., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). Learning and transfer of debugging skills: Applying task analysis to curriculum design and assessment. In Teaching and Learning Computer Programming: Multiple Research Perspectives (pp. 259-97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Conati, C., & VanLehn, K. (1999). Teaching meta-cognitive skills: Implementation and evaluation of a tutoring system to guide self-explanation while learning from examples. In Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 297-304). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS.
21. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253-278.
22. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: Impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In J. Jacko, A. Sears, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, & R. Jacob (Eds.), CHI'2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 245-52). New York: ACM.
23. de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179-201.
24. Del Solato, T., & du Boulay, B. (1995). Formalization and implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(4), 337-378.
25. Gama, C. (2004). Metacognition in interactive learning environments: The reflection assistant model. In 7th Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 668-677). Berlin: Springer.
26. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
27. Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. T. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning science to the classroom. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 61-78). Cambridge University Press.
28. Luckin, R., & Hammerton, L. (2002). 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Getting to know me: Helping learners understand their own learning needs through metacognitive scaffolding. Berlin: Springer.
29. Mathan, S. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005). Fostering the intelligent novice: Learning from errors with metacognitive tutoring. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 257-265.
30. Morgan, P., & Ritter, S. (2002). An experimental study of the effects of cognitive tutor algebra I on student knowledge and attitude. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Learning, Inc.
31. Quintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. (2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 235-244.
32. Razzaq, L., Feng, M., Nuzzo-Jones, G., Heffernan, N. T., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005). The Assistment project: Blending assessment and assisting. In The 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence In Education (pp. 555-62). Amsterdam: IOS.
33. Reif, F., & Scott, L. A. (1999). Teaching scientific thinking skills: Students and computers coaching each other. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 819-831.
34. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington: National Academy Press.
35. Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2007). Can help seeking be tutored? Searching for the secret sauce of metacognitive tutoring. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 203-210). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS.
36. Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Ryu, E., Baker, R. S., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006). The Help Tutor: Does metacognitive feedback improve students' help-seeking actions, skills and learning? In 8th International Conference in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 360-369). Berlin: Springer.
37. Roll, I., Baker, R. S., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005). Modeling students' metacognitive errors in two intelligent tutoring systems. In user modeling 2005 (pp. 379-388). Berlin: Springer.
38. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.
39. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
40. Wood, H. A., & Wood, D. J. (1999). Help seeking, learning, and contingent tutoring. Computers and Education, 33(2), 153-169.