Persistent effects of social instructional dialog in a virtual learning environment

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6738 LNAI, Issue , 2011, Pages 238-246

  Ogan, Amy ^a   Aleven, Vincent ^a   Jones, Christopher ^a   Kim, Julia ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

entitativity; instructional dialog; social outcomes; trust; virtual agents

Indexed keywords

ENTITATIVITY; INSTRUCTIONAL DIALOG; SOCIAL OUTCOMES; TRUST; VIRTUAL AGENT;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; EDUCATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 79959293474     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_32     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Litman, D., Silliman, S.: ITSPOKE: An Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System. In: Companion Proc. of the HLT/NAACL, Boston, MA (2004).
2. Jordan, P., Makatchev, M., Pappuswamy, U., VanLehn, K., Albacete, P.: A natural language tutorial dialogue system for physics. In: Sutcliffe, G., Goebel, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th Intl FLAIRS Conf. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006).
3. D'Mello, S.K., Picard, R., Graesser, A.C.: Toward an affect-sensitive AutoTutor. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22, 53-61 (2007). (Pubitemid 47274706)
4. Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L.: A Social-Cognitive Framework for Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions. J. Edu. Tech. Research and Dev. 54(6), 569-596 (2006).
5. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media like Real People and Place. Cambridge University, Cambridge (1996).
6. Wang, N., Gratch, J.: Can a Virtual Human Build Rapport and Promote Learning? In: Proc 14th International Conference on AIED, Brighton (2009).
7. Okita, S.Y., Bailenson, J., Schwartz, D.L.: Mere Belief of Social Action Improves Complex Learning. In: Barab, S., Hay, K., Hickey, D. (eds.) ICLS 2008. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (2008).
8. Kumar, R., Ai, H., Beuth, J., Rosé, C.: Socially Capable Conversational Tutors Can Be Effective in Collaborative Learning Situations. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS. 2010. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 156-164. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
9. Bickmore, T., Cassell, J.: Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust. In: Proc. of CHI, pp. 396-403. ACM, New York (2001). (Pubitemid 32393381)
10. Wang, N., Johnson, W.L.: The Politeness Effect in an Intelligent Foreign Language Tutoring System. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 270-280. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).
11. Ogan, A., Aleven, V., Kim, J., Jones, C.: Developing interpersonal relationships with virtual agents through social instructional dialog. In: Proc. of IVA. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
12. Hill, R.W., Belanich, J., Lane, H.C., Core, M.G., Dixon, M., Forbell, E., Kim, J., Hart, J.: Pedagogically Structured Game-based Training: Development of the ELECT BiLAT Simulation. In: Proc. 25th Army Science Conf. (2006).
13. Gelfand, M., Brett, J. (eds.): The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture, Stanford (1983).
14. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: Cooperative learning and achievement. In: Sharan, S. (ed.) Cooperative learning: Theory and Research, pp. 23-37. Praeger, NY (1990).
15. Lou, Y., Abrami, P.C., d'Apollonia, S.: Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 71(3), 449-521 (2001). (Pubitemid 33402450)
16. Neale, M.A., Bazerman, M.H.: The role of perspective-taking ability in negotiating under different forms of arbitration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36, 378-388 (1983).
17. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20, 709-734 (1995).
18. Lester, J.C., Converse, S.A., Kahler, S.E., Barlow, S.T., Stone, B.A., Bhogal, R.S.: The Persona Effect: Affective Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents. In: Proc. CHI 1997, pp. 359-366 (1997).
19. Bochner, A.P., Ellis, C., Tillmann-Healy, L.M.: Relationships as stories: Accounts, storied lives, evocative narratives. In: Dindia, K., Duck, S. (eds.) Communication and Personal Relationships, pp. 12-29. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester (2000).
20. Cozby, P.C.: Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin (1973).
21. Wheeless, L., Grotz, J.: The Measurement of Trust and Its Relationship to Self-Disclosure. Human Communication Research 3, 250-257 (1977).
22. Leach, C.W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M.L.W., Pennekamp, S.F., Doosje, B.: Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. J. of Personality and Social Psych. 95, 144-165 (2008).
23. Spirtes, P., Glymour, G., Scheines, R.: Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)