Emotion sensors go to school

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 200, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 17-24

  Arroyo, Ivon ^a   Cooper, David G ^a   Burleson, Winslow ^b   Woolf, Beverly Park ^a   Muldner, Kasia ^b   Christopherson, Robert ^b  

^a University of Massachusetts Amherst   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Infer cognition; Infer student affect; Intelligent tutor; Physiological activity; Sensors; Student emotion

Indexed keywords

FACE RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY; TEACHING;

AFFECTIVE STATE; DATA STREAM; EMOTIONAL SUPPORTS; INFER COGNITION; INFER STUDENT AFFECT; INTELLIGENT TUTORS; PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL DATA; STATE BASED; STUDENT EMOTIONS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 73149108640     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-028-5-17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., Mark, M.A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8(1), 30-43.
2. Picard, R. W., Papert, S., Bender, W., Blumberg, B., Breazeal, C., Cavallo, D., Machover, T., Resnick, M., Roy, D., Strohecker, C. (2004). Affective Learning--A Manifesto. BT Technical Journal, 2(4), 253-269.
3. Ekman, P. (1999). Facial Expressions. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
4. Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Royer, J.M. and Tai, M., (2009) Affective Gendered Learning Companions, 14th International conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (AIED 2009) V. Dimitrova and R. Mizoguchi (Eds), IOS Press.
5. Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In Berliner, D. & Calfee, R (Eds), Handbook of Educational Psychology. 63-84. New York: Macmillan.
6. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
7. Wentzel K and Asher S R, 1995, Academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children', Child Development, 66, pp 754-763 (1995).
8. Conati C. & Mclaren H. (2004). Evaluating A Probabilistic Model of Student Affect. Proceedings of ITS 2004, 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 3220/2004, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg p. 55-66.
9. D'Mello, S. & Graesser, A. (2007). Mind and Body: Dialogue and Posture for Affect Detection in Learning Environments. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications.
10. McQuiggan, S. & Lester, J. (2006). Diagnosing Self-Efficacy in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Empirical Study. Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, M. Ikeda, K. Ashley, T.W. Chan (Eds), Jhongli, Taiwan
11. Graesser, A. C. , Chipman, P., King, B., McDaniel, B., and D'Mello, S (2007). Emotions and Learning with AutoTutor. 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2007). R. Luckin, K. Koedinger, and J. Greer (Eds), (pp 569-571). IOS Press.
12. D'Mello, S. K., Picard, R. W., and Graesser, A. C. (2007). Towards an Affect-Sensitive AutoTutor. Special issue on Intelligent Educational Systems IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22 (4), 53-61.
13. Conati, C., Gertner, A. and VanLehn, K. (2002). Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(4), 371-417.
14. Burleson, W. (2006). Affective Learning Companions: Strategies for Empathetic Agents with Real-Time Multimodal Affective Sensing to Foster Meta-Cognitive Approaches to Learning, Motivation, and Perseverance. MIT PhD thesis, Available at http://affect.media.mit.edu/pdfs/06.burleson-phd.pdf.
15. Arroyo, I., Beal, C.R., Murray, T., Walles, R., Woolf, B.P. (2004). Web-Based Intelligent Multimedia Tutoring for High Stakes Achievement Tests. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 7th International Conference, ITS 2004, (pp. 468-477). Maceiò, Alagoas, Brazil, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3220: Springer 2004.
16. Arroyo, I., Ferguson, K., Johns, J., Dragon, T., Mehranian, H., Fisher, D., Barto, A., Mahadevan, S., Woolf, B. (2007). Repairing Disengagement With Non Invasive Interventions. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Marina del Rey, CA.
17. Mueller, C.M., Dweck, C.S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children's and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 75 (1), 33-52.
18. Wigfield, A., & Karpathian, M. (1991). Who am I and what can I do? Children's self-concepts and motivation in achievement solutions. Educational Psychologist, 26, 233-261.
19. Dragon, T., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Burleson, W., El Kaliouby, R., Eydgahi, H. (2008) Viewing Student Affect and Learning through Classroom Observation and Physical Sensors. International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2008: 29-39
20. El Kaliouby, R. (2005). Mind-Reading Machines: Automated Inference of Complex Mental States. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
21. Dennerlein, J., Becker, T., Johnson, P., Reynolds, C. and Picard, R. (2003) Frustrating Computer Users Increases Exposure to Physical Factors, Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association, pp. 24--29
22. Royer, J. M., & Walles, R. (2007). Influences of gender, motivation and socioeconomic status on mathematics performance. In D. B. Berch and M. M. M. Mazzocco, (Eds), Why is math so hard for some children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. (pp. 349-368).