Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey

American Psychologist

Volumn 57, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 705-717

  Locke, Edwin A ^b   Latham, Gary P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

GOALS; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 84870885674     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705     Document Type: Article

References (131)

1. Adler, S., & Weiss, H. M. (1988). Recent developments in the study of personality and organizational behavior. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 307-330). New York: Wiley.
2. Atkinson, J. (1958). Towards experimental analysis of human motivation in terms of motives, expectancies and incentives. In J. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society (pp. 288-305). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
3. Audia, P., Locke, E., & Smith, K. (2000). The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following a radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 837-853.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Bandura, A. (1989). Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 19-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
7. Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1017-1028.
8. Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 92-113.
9. Barrick, M., Mount, M., & Strauss, J. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715-722.
10. Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
11. Baum, R., Locke, E., & Smith, K. (2001). A multi-dimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 292-303.
12. Becker, L. (1978). Joint effect of feedback and goal setting on performance: A field study of residential energy conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 428-433.
13. Binswanger, H. (1991). Volition as cognitive self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 154-178.
14. Brown, T. C., & Latham, G. P. (2000a). The effects of goal setting and self-instruction training on the performance of unionized employees. Industrial Relations, 55, 80-94.
15. Brown, T. C., & Latham, G. P. (2000b, August). The effects of training in verbal self-guidance and goal setting on teamplaying behavior. Paper presented at the meetings of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
16. Bryan, J., & Locke, E. (1967a). Goal setting as a means of increasing motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 274-277.
17. Bryan, J., & Locke, E. (1967b). Parkinson's law as a goal-setting phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 2, 258-275.
18. Button, S., Mathieu, J., & Zajac, D. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 26-48.
19. Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Chesney, A., & Locke, E. (1991). An examination of the relationship among goal difficulty, business strategies, and performance on a complex management simulation task. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 400-424.
21. Dorner, D. (1991). The investigation of action regulation in uncertain and complex situations. In J. Rasmussen & B. Brehmer (Eds.), Distributed decision making: Cognitive models for cooperative work (pp. 349-354). Chichester, England: Wiley.
22. Dossett, D. L., Latham, G. P., & Mitchell, T. R. (1979). Effects of assigned vs. participatively set goals, knowledge of results, and individual differences on employee behavior when goal difficulty is held constant. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 291-298.
23. Durham, C., Knight, D., & Locke, E. (1997). Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 203-231.
24. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
25. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
26. Earley, P. C., Connolly, T., & Ekegren, G. (1989). Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 24-33.
27. Earley, P. C., & Perry, B. (1987). Work plan availability and performance: An assessment of task strategy priming on subsequent task completion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 279-302.
28. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.
29. Erez, M. (1977). Feedback: A necessary condition for the goal-performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 624-627.
30. Erez, M. (1986). The congruence of goal-setting strategies with socio-cultural values and its effect on performance. Journal of Management, 12, 585-592.
31. Erez, M., Earley, P. C., & Hulin, C. L. (1985). The impact of participation on goal acceptance and performance: A two step model. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 50-66.
32. Erez, M., & Kanfer, F. H. (1983). The role of goal congruence in goal setting and task performance. Academy of Management Review, 8, 454-463.
33. Erez, M., & Zidon, I. (1984). Effects of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal setting and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 69-78.
34. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
35. Frayne, C. A., & Latham, G. P. (1987). The application of social learning theory to employee self-management of attendance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 387-392.
36. Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C. Triandis & M. D. Dunnette (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 271-340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
37. Gauggel, S. (1999). Goal setting and its influence on the performance of brain-damaged patients. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
38. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Carter, S. M., Lehto, A. T., & Elliott, A. J. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1284-1295.
39. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Elliott, N. J. (1998). The joint effects of target and purpose goals on intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 675-689.
40. Harackiewicz, J. M., Manderlink, G., & Sansone, C. (1984). Rewarding pinball wizardry: Effects of evaluation and cue value on intrinsic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 287-300.
41. Hersey, R. B. (1932). Workers' emotions in shop and home: A study of individual workers from the psychological and physiological standpoint. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
42. Hollenbeck, J., Williams, C., & Klein, H. (1989). An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 18-23.
43. Howard, A., & Bray, D. (1988). Managerial lives in transition. New York: Guilford Press.
44. Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W. A. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184-190.
45. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
46. Kanfer, F. H. (1970). Self-regulation: Research, issues and speculation. In C. Neuringer & J. L. Michael (Eds.), Behavior modification in clinical psychology (pp. 178-220). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
47. Kanfer, F. H. (1996). Motivation and emotion in behavior therapy. In K. S. Dobson & K. D. Craig (Eds.), Advances in cognitive-behavioral therapy (pp. 1-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative aptitude treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657-690.
49. Kirkpatrick, S., & Locke, E. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36-51.
50. Klein, H., Wesson, M., Hollenbeck, J., & Alge, B. (1999). Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 885-896.
51. Knight, D., Durham, C., & Locke, E. (2001). The relationship of team goals, incentives and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 326-338.
52. Kernhauser, A. W., & Sharp, A. A. (1932). Employee attitudes: Suggestions from a study in a factory. Personnel Journal, 10, 393-404.
53. LaPorte, R., & Nath, R. (1976). Role of performance goals in prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 260-264.
54. Latham, G. P. (2001). The importance of understanding and changing employee outcome expectancies for gaining commitment to an organizational goal. Personnel Psychology, 54, 707-716.
55. Latham, G. P., & Baldes, J. (1975). The "practical significance" of Locke's theory of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 122-124.
56. Latham, G. P., Erez, M., & Locke, E. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753-772.
57. Latham, G. P., & Frayne, C. A. (1989). Self-management training for increasing job attendance: A follow-up and a replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 411-416.
58. Latham, G. P., & Kinne, S. B. (1974). Improving job performance through training in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 187-191.
59. Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1975). Increasing productivity with decreasing time limits: A field replication of Parkinson's law. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 524-526.
60. Latham, G. P., Locke, E. A., & Fassina, N. E. (2002). The high performance cycle: Standing the test of time. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance (pp. 201-228). Chichester, England: Wiley.
61. Latham, G. P., & Marshall, H. A. (1982). The effects of self-set, participatively set, and assigned goals on the performance of government employees. Personnel Psychology, 35, 399-404.
62. Latham, G. P., Mitchell, T. R., & Dossett, D. L. (1978). The importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 163-171.
63. Latham, G. P., & Saari, L. M. (1979a). The effects of holding goal difficulty constant on assigned and participatively set goals. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 163-168.
64. Latham, G. P., & Saari, L. M. (1979b). The importance of supportive relationships in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 151-156.
65. Latham, G. P., & Saari, L. M. (1982). The importance of union acceptance for productivity improvement through goal setting. Personnel Psychology, 69, 569-573.
66. Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Pursell, E. D., & Campion, M. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422-427.
67. Latham, G. P., & Seijts, G. H. (1999). The effects of proximal and distal goals on performance on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 421-429.
68. Latham, G. P., & Steele, T. P. (1983). The motivational effects of participation versus goal setting on performance. Academy of Management Journal. 26, 406-417.
69. Latham, G. P., & Sue-Chan, C. (1999). A meta-analysis of the situational interview: An enumerative review of reasons for its validity. Canadian Psychology, 40, 56-67.
70. Latham, G. P., Winters, D., & Locke, E. (1994). Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 49-63.
71. Latham, G. P., & Yukl, G. A. (1975). Assigned versus participative goal setting with educated and uneducated wood workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 299-302.
72. Latham, G. P., & Yukl, G. (1976). Effects of assigned and participative goal setting on performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 166-171.
73. Lee, C., & Earley, P. C. (1992). Comparative peer evaluations of organizational behavior theories. Organization Development Journal, 10, 37-42.
74. Lee, T., Locke, E., & Phan, S. (1997). Explaining the assigned goal-incentive interaction: The role of self-efficacy and personal goals. Journal of Management, 23, 541-559.
75. Lerner, B., & Locke, E. A. (1995). The effects of goal setting, self-efficacy, competition and personal traits on the performance of an endurance task. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 138-152.
76. Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of aspiration. In J. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (Vol. 1). New York: Ronald Press.
77. Locke, E. A. (1991a). Goal theory vs. control theory: Contrasting approaches to understanding work motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 9-28.
78. Locke, E. A. (1991b). The motivation sequence, the motivation hub and the motivation core. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 288-299.
79. Locke, E. A. (1994). The emperor is naked. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43, 367-370.
80. Locke, E. A. (1995). Beyond determinism and materialism, or isn't it time we took consciousness seriously? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 265-273.
81. Locke, E. A. (1997). The motivation to work: What we know. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 375-412). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
82. Locke, E. A. (2000). Motivation, cognition, and action: An analysis of studies of task goals and knowledge. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 408-429.
83. Locke, E. A. (2001). Self-set goals and self-efficacy as mediators of incentives and personality. In M. Erez, H. U. Kleinbeck, & H. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 13-26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
84. Locke, E. A., Alavi, M., & Wagner, J. (1997). Participation in decision-making: An information exchange perspective. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 15, pp. 293-331). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
85. Locke, E., & Bryan, J. (1967). Performance goals as determinants of level of performance and boredom. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 120-130.
86. Locke, E. A., & Bryan, J. (1968). Goal setting as a determinant of the effects of knowledge of score in performance. American Journal of Psychology, 81, 398-406.
87. Locke, E. A., & Bryan, J. (1969). The directing function of goals in task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 35-42.
88. Locke, E. A., Chah, D., Harrison, S., & Lustgarten, N. (1989). Separating the effects of goal specificity from goal level. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 43, 270-287.
89. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1984). Goal setting: A motivational technique that works! Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
90. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
91. Locke, E. A., Motowidlo, S., & Bobko, P. (1986). Using self-efficacy theory to resolve the conflict between goal-setting theory and expectancy theory in organizational behavior and industrial/organizational psychology. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 328-338.
92. Locke, E. A., Smith, K., Erez, M., Chah, D., & Schaffer, A. (1994). The effects of intra-individual goal conflict on performance. Journal of Management, 20, 67-91.
93. Mace, C. A. (1935). Incentives: Some experimental studies (Report No. 72). London: Industrial Health Research Board.
94. Matsui, T., Okada, A., & Inoshita, O. (1983). Mechanism of feedback affecting task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 114-122.
95. Matsui, T., Okada, A., & Kakuyama, T. (1982). Influence of achievement need on goal setting, performance, and feedback effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 645-648.
96. McClelland, D., Atkinson, J., Clark, J., & Lowell, E. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
97. McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599-616.
98. Mento, A., Locke, E., & Klein, H. (1992). Relationship of goal level to valence and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 395-405.
99. Miner, J. B. (1984). The validity and usefulness of theories in emerging organizational science. Academy of Management Review, 9, 296-306.
100. Morin, L., & Latham, G. P. (2000). Effect of mental practice and goal setting as a transfer of training intervention on supervisors' self-efficacy and communication skills: An exploratory study. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 566-578.
101. Murphy, S. T. (2001). Feeling without thinking: Affective primacy and the nonconscious processing of emotion. In J. A. Bargh & D. K. Apsley (Eds.), Unraveling the complexities of social life: A festschrift in honor of Robert B. Zajonc (pp. 39-53). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
102. O'Leary-Kelly, A., Martocchio, J., & Frink, D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1285-1301.
103. Pinder, C. (1998). Work motivation in organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
104. Powers, W. (1978). Quantitative analysis of purposive systems: Some spadework at the foundations of scientific psychology. Psychological Review, 85, 417-435.
105. Richardson, A. (1967). Mental practice: A review and discussion: Part I. Research Quarterly, 38, 95-107.
106. Rogers, R., & Hunter, J. (1991). Impact of management by objectives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 322-336.
107. Ronan, W. W., Latham, G. P., & Kinne, S. B. (1973). The effects of goal setting and supervision on worker behavior in an industrial situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 302-307.
108. Rothkopf, E., & Billington, M. (1979). Goal-guided learning from text: Inferring a descriptive processing model from inspection times and eye movements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 310-327.
109. Ryan, T. A. (1970). Intentional behavior. New York: Ronald Press.
110. Ryan, T. A., & Smith, P. C. (1954). Principles of industrial psychology. New York: Ronald Press.
111. Sales, M. (1970). Some effects of role overload and role underload. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 592-608.
112. Seijts, G. H., & Latham, B. W. (2001, June). Can goal orientation be induced? Further exploration of the state versus trait debate. In C. Sue-Chan (Chair), Justice, efficacy, goal orientation, culture, and creativity: New findings in motivation. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, St. Foy, Quebec, Canada.
113. Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2000a). The construct of goal commitment: Measurement and relationships with task performance. In R. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment (pp. 315-332). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
114. Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2000b). The effects of goal setting and group size on performance in a social dilemma. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32, 104-116.
115. Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2001). The effect of learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 291-302.
116. Smith, K., Locke, E., & Barry, D. (1990). Goal setting, planning and organizational performance: An experimental simulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 118-134.
117. Strang, H. R., Lawrence, E. C., & Fowler, P. C. (1978). Effects of assigned goal level and knowledge of results on arithmetic compensation: A laboratory study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 446-450.
118. Terpstra, D. E., & Rozell, E. J. (1994). The relationship of goal setting to organizational profitability. Group and Organization Management, 19, 285-294.
119. Tracy, K., Locke, E., & Renard, M. (1999, August). Conscious goal setting versus subconscious motives: Longitudinal and concurrent effects on the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL.
120. VandeWalle, D., Cron, W., & Slocum, J. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 629-640.
121. Vroom, V. (1964). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley.
122. Wagner, J., & Gooding, R. (1987a). Effects of societal trends on participation research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 241-262.
123. Wagner, J., & Gooding, R. (1987b). Shared influence and organizational behavior: A meta-analysis of situational variables expected to moderate participation-outcome relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 524-541.
124. Wegge, J., & Dibbelt, S. (2000). Zur wirkung von Zielsetzungen auf die Informationsverarbeitung bei Buchstabenvergleichsaufgaben [Effects of goal setting on information processing in letter-matching tasks]. Zeitschrift fuer Experimentelle Psychologie, 47, 89-114.
125. White, S., & Locke, E. (2000). Problems with the Pygmalion effect and some proposed solutions. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 389-415.
126. Winters, D., & Latham, G. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group and Organization Management, 21, 236-250.
127. Wood, R., Atkins, P., & Bright, J. (1999). Bonuses, goals and instrumentality effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 703-720.
128. Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social-cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14, 361-384.
129. Wood, R., & Locke, E. (1990). Goal setting and strategy effects on complex tasks. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 73-109). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
130. Wood, R., Mento, A., & Locke, E. (1987). Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 17, 416-425.
131. Yukl, G. A., & Latham, G. P. (1978). Interrelationships among employee participation, individual differences, goal difficulty, goal acceptance, goal instrumentality, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 31, 305-324.