Affective gendered learning companions

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 200, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 41-48

  Arroyo, Ivon ^a   Woolf, Beverly Park ^a   Royer, James M ^a   Tai, Minghui ^b  

^a Department of Computer Science ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Emotions; Evaluation; Gender differences; Intelligent tutors; Mathematics education; Motivation and affect; Pedagogical agents

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE AGENTS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EMOTION; EVALUATION; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS; INTELLIGENT TUTORS; LEARNING COMPANIONS; MATHEMATICS EDUCATION; MOTIVATION AND AFFECT; PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS; STUDENT ATTITUDES;

MOTIVATION;

EID: 73149108869     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-028-5-41     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Royer, J. M., & Walles, R. (2007). Influences of gender, motivation and socioeconomic status on mathematics performance. In D. B. Berch and M. M. M. Mazzocco, (Eds), Why is math so hard for some children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. (pp. 349-368).
2. Catsambis, S. (1994). The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 67, 199-215.
3. Catsambis, S. (2005). The gender gap in mathematics: Merely a step function? In A. M., Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics. Cambridge University Press. (pp. 220-245).
4. NSF, National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VA. (2007). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: NSF 07-315.
5. James C. Lester, Sharolyn A. Converse, Susan E. Kahler, S. Todd Barlow, Brian A. Stone, and Ravinder S. Bhogal. The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of the Conference of Human Factors in Computer Systems (CHI-97), 359-366, Atlanta, GA, 1996.
6. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H., & Lester, J. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19, 177-213
7. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia : The Psychology Press
8. Mueller, C.M., Dweck, C.S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children's and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 75 (1), 33-52.
9. Hartfield, E. (1994) Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press. United Kingdom.
10. Arroyo, I., Beal, C. R., Murray, T., Walles, R., Woolf, B. P. (2004). Web-Based Intelligent Multimedia Tutoring for High Stakes Achievement Tests. 468-477. ITS 2004, Proceedings.
11. Beal, C. R., Walles, R., Arroyo, I., & Woolf, B. P. (2007). On-line tutoring for math achievement testing: A controlled evaluation. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6 (1), 43-55.
12. Ekman, P. (1999). Facial Expressions. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
13. Dweck, C.S. (2002). Messages that motivate: How praise molds students' beliefs, motivation, and performance (in surprising ways). In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement. NY : Academic Press.
14. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., Yoon, K., Harold, R., Abreton, A., Freedman-Doan, C., & Blumenfeld, P. (1997). Changes in Children's competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451-469.
15. Baylor, A. L.; Kim, Y (2004) Pedagogical Agent Design: The Impact of Agent Realism, Gender, Ethnicity, and Instructional Role. Proceedings of ITS 2004.
16. Arroyo, I., Cooper, D., Burleson, W., Woolf, B. P. Muldner, K., Empathetic Pedagogical Agents, Submitted to AIED, 2009.
17. Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In Berliner, D. & Calfee, R (Eds), Handbook of Educational Psychology. 63-84. New York: Macmillan.
18. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
19. Reeves and Nass (1996). The Media Equation. Cambridge University Press.