Can computers be teammates?

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 669-678

  Nass, Clifford ^a   Fogg, B J ^a   Moon, Youngme ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; USER INTERFACES;

HUMAN-HUMAN INTERACTIONS; TEAM AFFILIATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0030380243     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0073     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ABRAMS, D., WETHERELL, M., COCHRANE, S., HOGG, M. A. & TURNER, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
2. ALLEN, V. L. & WILDER, D. A. (1975). Categorization, belief similarity, and intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 971-977.
3. ALLEN, V. L. & WILDER, D. A. (1979). Group categorization and attribution of belief similarity. Small Group Behaviour, 10, 73-80.
4. ALLEN, V. L. (1965). Situational factors in conformity. In L. BERKOWITZ, Ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 133-176). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
5. BACK, K. W. (1951). Influence through social communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 9-23.
6. BERKOWITZ, L. (1957). Effects of perceived dependency relationships upon conformity to group expectations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 350-54.
7. BOCIONEK, S. R. (1995). Agent systems that negotiate and learn. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42, 265-288.
8. BROCK, T. C. (1965). Communicator-recipient similarity and decision change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 650-654.
9. CARTWRIGHT, D. & ZANDER, A. (1968). Group Dynamics: Research and Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
10. CLARKE, A. & SMYTH, M. (1993). A co-operative computer based on the principles of human co-operation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 2-22.
11. DESMARAIS, M., GIROUX, L. & LAROCHELLE, S. (1993). An advice-giving interface based on plan-recognition and user-knowledge assessment. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 901-924.
12. DEUTSCH, M. & GERARD, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and information social influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
13. FRENCH, J. R. P. & RAVEN, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. CARTWRIGHT, Ed. Studies in Social Power, pp. 150-167. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
14. HORWITZ, M. & RABBIE, J. M. (1982). Individuality and membership in the intergroup system. In H. TAJFEL, Ed. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, pp. 241-274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. JOHNSTONE, A., BERRY, U. & NGUYEN, T. (1994). There was a long pause: influencing turn-taking behaviour in human-human and human-computer spoken dialogues. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41, 383-411.
16. KELMAN, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57-78.
17. KIESLER, S., SPROULL, L. & WATERS, K. (1996). A "prisoner's dilemma" experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 47-65.
18. LAFFERTY, J. C. & EADY, P. M. (1974). The Desert Survival Problem. Plymouth, MI: Experimental Learning Methods.
19. LEWIN, K. (1948). Resolving Social Conflicts. New York: Harper.
20. MACKIE, D. M. (1986). Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 720-728.
21. MACKIE, D. M., GASTARDO-CONACO, M. C. & SKELLY, J. J. (1992). Knowledge of the advocated position and the processing of in-group and out-group persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 145-151.
22. MACKIE, D. M., WORTH, L. T. & ASUNCION, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Society Psychology, 58, 812-822.
23. MACKIE, D. M. & COOPER, J. (1984). Group polarization: the effects of group membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 575-585.
24. NASS, C., STEUER, J. & TAUBER, E. (1994). Computers are social actors. Paper presented to CHI'94 conference of the ACM/SIGCHI, Boston, MA, USA.
25. NASS, C. I. STEUER, J. S., HENRIKSEN, L. & DRYER D. C. (1994) Machines and social attributions: performance assessment of computers subsequent to "self-" of "other"-evaluations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 543-559.
26. NASS, C. I., MOON, Y., FOGG, B. J., REEVES, B. & DRYCER, D. C. (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 223-239.
27. NASS, C. I., STEUER, J. S., TAUBER, E. & REEDER, H. (1993). Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia: computers as social actors. Proceedings of the International CHI Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
28. REEVES, B. & NASS, C. (1996). The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. SHAW, M. E. (1981). Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
30. SPEARS, S. C. (1989). Controlling for exposure to intragroup communication: effects of heterogeneous social perspectives and dependence in intragroup behavior and attitudes. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University CA, USA.
31. TAJFEL, H. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. TAJFEL, H., BILLIG, M., BUNDY, R. & FLAMENT, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
33. TURNER, J. C. (1982). Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. TAJFEL, Ed. Social Identity and Intergroup Behavior, pp. 15-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. TURNER, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: a social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. LAWLER, Ed. Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research, Vol. 2, pp. 77-121. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
35. WILDER, D. A. (1990). Some determinants of the persuasive power of in-group and out-groups: organization of information and attribution of independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1202-1213.
36. WILDER, D. A. & SHAPIRO, P. N. (1984). Roles of out-group cues in determining social identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 342-348.