Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 277-320

  Aleven, Vincent ^a   Stahl, Elmar ^b   Schworm, Silke ^c   Fischer, Frank ^d   Wallace, Raven ^e  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^e MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer based instruction; Educational hypermedia; Epistemological beliefs; Help design; Help seeking; Help systems; Intelligent tutoring systems; Interactive learning environments; Metacognition; On line help; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141872468     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00346543073003277     Document Type: Review

References (124)

1. Aleven, V. (2001, October). Helping students to become better help seekers: Towards supporting metacognition in a Cognitive Tutor. Paper presented at the 1st NSF-DFG Workshop on Learning Technologies, Tübingen, Germany.
2. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Limitations of student control: Do students know when they need help? In C. F. G. Gauthier & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2000 (pp. 292-303). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
3. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2001). Investigations into help seeking and learning with a Cognitive Tutor. In R. Luckin (Ed.), Papers of the AIED-2001 Workshop on Help Provision and Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments. Available: http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/aied2001/workshops.html
4. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective meta-cognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147-179.
5. Aleven, V., Popescu, O., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). Pilot-testing a tutorial dialogue system that supports self-explanation. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouardères, & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2002 (pp. 344-354). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
6. Alexander, P. A., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1995). Conceptions of knowledge and beliefs: A comparison across varying cultural and educational communities. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 413-442.
7. Ames, R. (1983). Help-seeking and achievement orientation: Perspectives from attribution theory. In B. DePaulo, A. Nadler, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), New directions in helping (Vol. 2, pp. 165-186). New York: Academic Press.
8. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Anderson, J. R. ( 1999). Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th ed.). New York: Worth.
10. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive Tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207.
11. Arbreton, A. (1998). Student goal orientation and help-seeking strategy use. In S. A. Karabenick (Ed.), Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 95-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Arroyo, I., Beck, J. E., Beal, C. R., Wing, R., & Woolf, B. P. (2001). Analyzing students' response to help provision in an elementary mathematics intelligent tutoring system. In R. Luckin (Ed.), Papers of the AIED-2001 Workshop on Help Provision and Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments. Available: http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/ aied2001/workshops.html
13. Arroyo, I., Beck, J. E., Woolf, B. P., Beal, C. R., & Schultz, K. (2000). Macro-adapting Animalwatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2000 (pp. 574-583). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
14. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 221-252.
15. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Bromme, R., & Stahl, E. (1999). Spatial metaphors and writing hypertexts: Study within schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 267-281.
17. Bromme, R., & Stahl, E. (Eds.), (2002). Writing hypertext and learning: Conceptual and empirical approaches, London: Elsevier.
18. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
19. Brown, A. L., & Kane, M. J. (1988). Preschool children can learn to transfer: Learning to learn and learning from example. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 493-523.
20. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling & User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 87-110.
21. Buell, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 385-418.
22. Butler, R. (1998). Determinants of help seeking: Relations between perceived reasons for classroom help-avoidance and help-seeking behaviors in an experimental context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 630-643.
23. Chi, M. (1996). Constructing self-explanations and scaffolded explanations in tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 33-49.
24. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring systems. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of humancomputer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 849-874). New York: Elsevier.
26. De Bra, P., Brusilovsky, P., & Houben, G. J. (1999). Adaptive hypermedia: From systems to framework. ACM Computing Surveys, 31(4), 1-6.
27. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322-349.
28. Dochy, F. J. R. C., & Alexander, P. A. (1995). Mapping prior knowledge: A framework for discussion among researchers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 225-242.
29. Dochy, F. J. R. C., & Segers, M. S. R. (1997). The effect of prior knowledge and its assessment on learning in classroom practice. Keynote address presented at the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie Conference on the Role of Prior Knowledge in Learning, Frankfurt.
30. du Boulay, B., Luckin, R., & del Soldato, T. (1999). The plausibility problem: Human teaching tactics in the 'hands' of a machine. In S. P. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education, open learning environments: New computational technologies to support learning, exploration, and collaboration, proceedings of AIED-99 (pp. 225-232). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
31. Duell, O. K., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2001). Measures of people's beliefs about knowledge and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 419-449.
32. Dutke, S., & Reimer, T. (2000). Evaluation of two types of online help information for application software: Operative and function-oriented help. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 16, 307-315.
33. Eberts, R. E. (1997). Computer-based instruction. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 825-847). New York: Elsevier.
34. Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85, 554-567.
35. Evens, M. W., Brandie, S., Chang, R. C., Freedman, R., Glass, M., Lee, Y. H., et al. (2001). CIRCSIM-Tutor: An intelligent tutoring system using natural language dialogue. In Twelfth Midwest AI and Cognitive Science Conference, MAICS 2001 (pp. 16-23). Oxford, OH: Miami University.
36. Fischer, F., Bouillion, L., Mandl, H., & Gomez, L. (in press). Bridging theory and practice in learning environment research-Scientific principles in Pasteur's Quadrant. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, and Practice.
37. Floden, R. E. (2001). Research on effects of teaching: A continuing model for research on teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
38. Gibbons, A. S., & Fairweather, P. G. (1998). Computer-based instruction: Design and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
39. Glaser, R., & De Corte, E. (1992). Preface of the assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning. In F. J. R. C. Dochy (Ed.), Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning. London: Jessica Kingsley.
40. Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 15, 84-93.
41. Gluck, K. A., Anderson, J. R., & Douglas, S. A. (2000). Broader bandwidth in student modeling: What if ITS were "eye" TS? In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2000 (pp. 504-513). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
42. Gomez, L. M., Fishman, B. J., & Pea, R. D. (1998). The CoVis project: Building a large-scale science education testbed. Interactive Learning Environments, 6, 59-92.
43. Graesser, A. C., VanLehn, K., Rosé, C. P., Jordan, P. W., & Harter, D. (2001). Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI Magazine, 22(4), 39- 51.
44. Gräsel, C., & Fischer, F. (2000). Information and communication technologies at schools: A trigger for better teaching and learning? International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, and Practice, 1, 327-336.
45. Gräsel, C., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2001). The use of additional information in problem-oriented learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 3, 287-305.
46. Gray, S. H. (1990). Using protocol analyses and drawings to study mental model construction. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 2, 359-378.
47. Gray, S. H. (1995). Linear coherence and relevance: Logic in computer-human 'conversations.' Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 627-647.
48. Hannover, B., & Bettge, S. (1993). Mädchen und Technik [Girls and technology]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
49. Hasebrook, J. (1995). Multimedia-Psychologie: Eine neue Perspektive menschlicher Kommunikation [Multimedia psychology: A new perspective of human communication]. Heidelberg: Spektrum.
50. Heffernan, N. T., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An intelligent tutoring system incorporating a model of an experienced human tutor. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouardères, & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2002. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
51. Helmke, A., & Weinert, F. E. (1997). Bedingungsfaktoren schulischer Leistungen [Requirements of school achievements]. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Psychologie des Unterrichts und der Schule: Enzyklopädie der Pädagogischen Psychologie (pp. 71-153). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
52. Hofer, B. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 353-383.
53. Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
54. Hofer, M., Niegemann, H. M., Eckert, A., & Rinn, U. (1996). Pädagogische Hilfen für interaktive selbstgesteuerte Lernprozesse und Konstruktion eines neuen Verfahrens zur Wissensdiagnose [Instructional help for interactive self-directed learning processes and construction of a new procedure for knowledge diagnosis]. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik Beiheft, 13, 53-67.
55. Jacobson, M. J., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 145-199.
56. Jacobson, M. J., & Jehng, J.-C. (1999). Epistemological beliefs instrument: Scales and items. Available: http://emergentdesigns.com/mjjacobson/publications/Epist_Beliefs_ Instrument98.pdf
57. Jacobson, M. J., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1996). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 239-281.
58. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 301-333.
59. Kardash, C. M., & Howell, K. L. (2000). Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates' cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 524-535.
60. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructionintegration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
61. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
63. Larkin, J. H., & Chabay, R. W. (Eds.). (1992). Computer-assisted instruction and intelligent tutoring systems: Shared goals and complementary approaches. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Leventhal, L. M., Teasley, B. M., Instone, K., Rohlman, D. S., & Farhat, J. (1993). Sleuthing in HyperHolmes: An evaluation of using hypertext vs. a book to answer questions. Behaviour & Information Technology, 12, 149-164.
65. Luckin, R., & du Boulay, B. (1999). Ecolab: The development and evaluation of a Vygotskian design framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 198-220.
66. Luckin, R., & Hammerton, L. (2002). Getting to know me: Helping learners understand their own learning needs through metacognitive scaffolding. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouardères, & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2002 (pp. 759-771). Berlin: SpringerVerlag.
67. Macneal, L. G. (2001). Epistemic beliefs and comprehension in a hypertext system. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 12A.
68. Mandl, H., Gräsel, C., & Fischer, F. (2000). Problem-oriented learning: Facilitating the use of domain-specific and control strategies through modeling by an expert. In W. J. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behavior, mental processes and consciousness (pp. 165-182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
70. McKendree, J. (1990). Effective feedback content for tutoring complex skills. Human Computer Interaction, 5, 381-413.
71. Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of the lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
72. Miyake, N., & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 75, 357-364.
73. Nelson-Le Gall, S. (1981). Help-seeking: An understudied problem-solving skill in children. Developmental Review, 1, 224-246.
74. Nelson-Le Gall, S. (1987). Necessary and unnecessary help-seeking in children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 148, 53-62.
75. Nelson-Le Gall, S., Kratzer, L., Jones, E., & DeCooke, P. (1990). Children's selfassessment of performance and task-related help seeking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 245-263.
76. Newman, R. S. (1994). Adaptive help seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 283-301 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
77. Newman, R. S. (1998a). Adaptive help seeking: A role of social interaction in self-regulated learning. In S. A. Karabenick (Ed.), Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 13-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Newman, R. S. (1998b). Students' help seeking during problem solving: Influences of personal and contextual achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 644-658.
79. Newman, R. S., & Goldin, L. (1990). Children's reluctance to seek help with schoolwork. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 92-100.
80. Newman, R. S., & Schwager, M. T. (1995). Students' help seeking during problem solving: Effects of grade, goal, and prior achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 352-376.
81. Puustinen, M. (1998). Help-seeking behavior in a problem-solving situation: Development of self-regulation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 271-282.
82. Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students' learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 282-292.
83. Quentin-Baxter, M. (1999). Quantitative evidence for differences between learners making use of passive hypermedia learning environments. ACM Computing Surveys, 31(4).
84. Renkl, A. (2002). Learning from worked-out examples: Instructional explanations supplement self-explanations. Learning & Instruction, 12, 529-556.
85. Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M. H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students' academic efficacy, teachers' social-emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 528-535.
86. Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). "Should I ask for help?" The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents' help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 329-341.
87. Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Achievement and social motivational influences on help seeking in the classroom. In S. A. Karabenick (Ed.), Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 117-139). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
88. Ryan, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., & Midgley, C. (2001). Avoiding seeking help in the classroom: Who and why? Educational Psychology Review, 13, 93-114.
89. Ryan, M. P. (1984). Monitoring text comprehension: Individual differences in epistemological standards. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 248-258.
90. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 177-199.
91. Schofield, J. W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
92. Schofield, J. W., Eurich-Fulcer, R.,&Britt, C. L. (1994). Teachers, computer tutors, and teaching: The artificially intelligent tutor as an agent for classroom change. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 69-97.
93. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
94. Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 406-411.
95. Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariglietti, G.,&Bajaj, A. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 37-40.
96. Schommer, M., Crouse, A.,&Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 435-443.
97. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman&D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer.
98. Schworm, S.,&Renkl, A. (2002a). Learning by solved example problems: Instructional explanations reduce self-explanation activity. In W. D. Gray&C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 816-821). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
99. Schworm, S.,&Renkl, A. (2002b). Lernen effektive Lösungsbeispiele zu erstellen: Ein Experiment zu einer computer-basierten Lernumgebung für Lehrende [Learning to design worked-out examples: Study about a computer-based learning environment for teachers]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 30, 7-26.
100. Shulman, L. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
101. Shulman, L. S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
102. Shute, V. J.,&Gluck, K. A. (1996). Individual differences in patterns of spontaneous online tool use. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 329-355.
103. Shute, V. J.,&Psotka, J. (1996). Intelligent tutoring systems: Past, present, and future. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 570-600). New York: Macmillan.
104. Simons, P. R.-J. (1992). Lernen, selbständig zu lernen-ein Rahmenmodel. In H. Mandl & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Lern- und Denkstrategien - Analysen und Interventionen (pp. 251-264). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
105. Slotta, J. D., & Linn, M. C. (2000). The Knowledge Integration Environment: Helping students use the Internet effectively. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 193-226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
106. Souterland, S. A., Sinatra, G. M., & Matthews, R. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 325-351.
107. Stahl, E. (2001). Hyper-Text Schreiben: Die Auswirkungen verschiedener Instruktionen auf Lernprozesse beim Schreiben von Hypertext [Hypertext writing: Effects of different instructions on learning processes during the writing of hypertext]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
108. Stark, R. (in press). Experimetelle Untersuchungen zur Überwindung von Transferproblemen in der kaufmännischen Erstausbilding [Experimental studies on overcoming the transfer problem in primary vocational education]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik.
109. Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2001). Die Kluft zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis - ein unlösbares Problem für die pädagogisch-psychologische Forschung? [The gap between theory and practice - An unresolvable problem for educational psychology?] (Research Report 118). München, Germany: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Institut für Pädagogische Psychologie und Empirische Pädagogik.
110. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
111. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
112. Thomas, J. W., & Rohwer, W. D. (1986). Academic studying: The role of learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 19-41.
113. van Merrienboer, J. J. G., De Crook, M. B. M., & Jelsma, O. (1997). The transfer paradox: Effects of contextual interference on retention and transfer performance of a complex cognitive skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 784-786.
114. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
115. Wallace, R. M., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students on-line in a sixth grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 175-204.
116. Weinert, F. E. (1996). Lerntheorien und Instruktionsmodelle [Learning theories and models of instruction]. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Psychologie des Lernens und der Instruktion: Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 1-48). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
117. Weinert, F. E., & Schrader, F. W. (1997). Lernen lernen als psychologisches Problem [Learning how to learn as a psychological problem]. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Psychologie der Erwachsenenbildung: Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 295-335). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
118. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: Computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
119. Wilson, B. G., & Myers, K. M. (2000). Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
120. Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 145-160.
121. Wood, D, (2001). Scaffolding, contingent tutoring, and computer-supported learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 280-292.
122. Wood, H., & Wood, D. (1999). Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers and Education, 33, 153-169.
123. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
124. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer.