ATR: A master conductor of cellular responses to DNA replication stress

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 133-140

  Flynn, Rachel Litman ^a   Zou, Lee ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; BRCA1 PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 2; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ALPHA; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; FANCONI ANEMIA PROTEIN; PROTEIN RAD9; PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

CELL CYCLE ARREST; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DENATURATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; DNA STRUCTURE; EXCISION REPAIR; GENOTOXICITY; HUMAN; MISMATCH REPAIR; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; XENOPUS LAEVIS; YEAST;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 79952454660     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.09.005     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Abraham R.T. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 2001, 15:2177-2196.
2. Cortez D., et al. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 2001, 294:1713-1716.
3. Takai H., et al. Tel2 regulates the stability of PI3K-related protein kinases. Cell 2007, 131:1248-1259.
4. Takai H., et al. Tel2 structure and function in the Hsp90-dependent maturation of mTOR and ATR complexes. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:2019-2030.
5. Hurov K.E., et al. A genetic screen identifies the Triple T complex required for DNA damage signaling and ATM and ATR stability. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:1939-1950.
6. Zou L., Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003, 300:1542-1548.
7. Majka J., et al. The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 2006, 24:891-901.
8. MacDougall C.A., et al. The structural determinants of checkpoint activation. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:898-903.
9. Ellison V., Stillman B. Biochemical characterization of DNA damage checkpoint complexes: clamp loader and clamp complexes with specificity for 5' recessed DNA. PLoS Biol. 2003, 1:E33.
10. Zou L., et al. Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:13827-13832.
11. Zou L., et al. Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:198-208.
12. Bonilla C.Y., et al. Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. Mol. Cell 2008, 30:267-276.
13. Lee J., et al. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 checkpoint clamp regulates interaction of TopBP1 with ATR. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:28036-28044.
14. Delacroix S., et al. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:1472-1477.
15. Kumagai A., et al. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 2006, 124:943-955.
16. Shiotani B., Zou L. ATR signaling at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:301-304.
17. Cimprich K.A., Cortez D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:616-627.
18. Zou L. Single- and double-stranded DNA: building a trigger of ATR-mediated DNA damage response. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:879-885.
19. Myers J.S., Cortez D. Rapid activation of ATR by ionizing radiation requires ATM and Mre11. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:9346-9350.
20. Jazayeri A., et al. ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:37-45.
21. Shiotani B., Zou L. Single-stranded DNA orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR switch at DNA breaks. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:547-558.
22. Byun T.S., et al. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:1040-1052.
23. Walter J., Newport J. Initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication: origin unwinding and sequential chromatin association of Cdc45, RPA, and DNA polymerase alpha. Mol. Cell 2000, 5:617-627.
24. Gong Z., et al. BACH1/FANCJ acts with TopBP1 and participates early in DNA replication checkpoint control. Mol. Cell 2010, 37:438-446.
25. Postow L., et al. Identification of SMARCAL1 as a component of the DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:35951-35961.
26. Yuan J., et al. The annealing helicase HARP protects stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2394-2399.
27. Yusufzai T., et al. The annealing helicase HARP is recruited to DNA repair sites via an interaction with RPA. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2400-2404.
28. Ciccia A., et al. The SIOD disorder protein SMARCAL1 is an RPA-interacting protein involved in replication fork restart. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2415-2425.
29. Bansbach C.E., et al. The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2405-2414.
30. Michael W.M., et al. Activation of the DNA replication checkpoint through RNA synthesis by primase. Science 2000, 289:2133-2137.
31. Lupardus P.J., et al. A requirement for replication in activation of the ATR-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:2327-2332.
32. Van C., et al. Continued primer synthesis at stalled replication forks contributes to checkpoint activation. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189:233-246.
33. Lopes M., et al. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol. Cell 2006, 21:15-27.
34. Callegari A.J., et al. Postreplication gaps at UV lesions are signals for checkpoint activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:8219-8224.
35. Navadgi-Patil V.M., Burgers P.M. The unstructured C-terminal tail of the 9-1-1 clamp subunit Ddc1 activates Mec1/ATR via two distinct mechanisms. Mol. Cell 2009, 36:743-753.
36. Navadgi-Patil V.M., Burgers P.M. Yeast DNA replication protein Dpb11 activates the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:35853-35859.
37. Mordes D.A., et al. Dpb11 activates the Mec1-Ddc2 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:18730-18734.
38. Toledo L.I., et al. ATR signaling can drive cells into senescence in the absence of DNA breaks. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:297-302.
39. Mordes D.A., et al. TopBP1 activates ATR through ATRIP and a PIKK regulatory domain. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:1478-1489.
40. Yan S., Michael W.M. TopBP1 and DNA polymerase-alpha directly recruit the 9-1-1 complex to stalled DNA replication forks. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:793-804.
41. Lee J., Dunphy W.G. Rad17 plays a central role in establishment of the interaction between TopBP1 and the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 complex at stalled replication forks. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:926-935.
42. Choi J.H., et al. Reconstitution of RPA-covered single-stranded DNA-activated ATR-Chk1 signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:13660-13665.
43. Brown E.J., Baltimore D. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 2000, 14:397-402.
44. Syljuasen R.G., et al. Inhibition of human Chk1 causes increased initiation of DNA replication, phosphorylation of ATR targets, and DNA breakage. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25:3553-3562.
45. Casper A.M., et al. ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 2002, 111:779-789.
46. Sorensen C.S., et al. ATR, Claspin and the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complex regulate Chk1 and Cdc25A in the absence of DNA damage. Cell Cycle 2004, 3:941-945.
47. Rozenzhak S., et al. Rad3 decorates critical chromosomal domains with gammaH2A to protect genome integrity during S-Phase in fission yeast. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001032.
48. Stokes M.P., et al. Profiling of UV-induced ATM/ATR signaling pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:19855-19860.
49. Mu J.J., et al. A proteomic analysis of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)/ATM-Rad3-related (ATR) substrates identifies the ubiquitin-proteasome system as a regulator for DNA damage checkpoints. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:17330-17334.
50. Matsuoka S., et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007, 316:1160-1166.
51. Melixetian M., et al. NEK11 regulates CDC25A degradation and the IR-induced G2/M checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:1247-1253.
52. Busino L., et al. Degradation of Cdc25A by beta-TrCP during S phase and in response to DNA damage. Nature 2003, 426:87-91.
53. Jin J., et al. SCFbeta-TRCP links Chk1 signaling to degradation of the Cdc25A protein phosphatase. Genes Dev. 2003, 17:3062-3074.
54. Peng C.Y., et al. Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216. Science 1997, 277:1501-1505.
55. Sanchez Y., et al. Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. Science 1997, 277:1497-1501.
56. Santocanale C., Diffley J.F. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 1998, 395:615-618.
57. Weinreich M., Stillman B. Cdc7p-Dbf4p kinase binds to chromatin during S phase and is regulated by both the APC and the RAD53 checkpoint pathway. EMBO J. 1999, 18:5334-5346.
58. Aparicio O.M., et al. Differential assembly of Cdc45p and DNA polymerases at early and late origins of DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:9130-9135.
59. Zegerman P., Diffley J.F. Checkpoint-dependent inhibition of DNA replication initiation by Sld3 and Dbf4 phosphorylation. Nature 2010, 467:474-478.
60. Costanzo V., et al. An ATR- and Cdc7-dependent DNA damage checkpoint that inhibits initiation of DNA replication. Mol. Cell 2003, 11:203-213.
61. Tsuji T., et al. The role of Dbf4/Drf1-dependent kinase Cdc7 in DNA-damage checkpoint control. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:862-869.
62. Liu P., et al. The Chk1-mediated S-phase checkpoint targets initiation factor Cdc45 via a Cdc25A/Cdk2-independent mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:30631-30644.
63. Liu H., et al. Phosphorylation of MLL by ATR is required for execution of mammalian S-phase checkpoint. Nature 2010, 467:343-346.
64. Lopes M., et al. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 2001, 412:557-561.
65. Tercero J.A., Diffley J.F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 2001, 412:553-557.
66. Cobb J.A., et al. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:3055-3069.
67. Segurado M., Diffley J.F. Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:1816-1827.
68. Lou H., et al. Mrc1 and DNA polymerase epsilon function together in linking DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:106-117.
69. Naylor M.L., et al. Mrc1 phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress is required for Mec1 accumulation at the stalled fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:12765-12770.
70. Arlt M.F., et al. Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2006, 5:1126-1135.
71. Yoo H.Y., et al. Mcm2 is a direct substrate of ATM and ATR during DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoint responses. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:53353-53364.
72. Yoo H.Y., et al. Adaptation of a DNA replication checkpoint response depends upon inactivation of Claspin by the Polo-like kinase. Cell 2004, 117:575-588.
73. Trenz K., et al. Plx1 is required for chromosomal DNA replication under stressful conditions. EMBO J. 2008, 27:876-885.
74. Gari K., et al. The Fanconi anemia protein FANCM can promote branch migration of Holliday junctions and replication forks. Mol. Cell 2008, 29:141-148.
75. Gari K., et al. Remodeling of DNA replication structures by the branch point translocase FANCM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:16107-16112.
76. Schwab R.A., et al. ATR activation and replication fork restart are defective in FANCM-deficient cells. EMBO J. 2010, 29:806-818.
77. Luke-Glaser S., et al. FANCM regulates DNA chain elongation and is stabilized by S-phase checkpoint signalling. EMBO J. 2010, 29:795-805.
78. Collis S.J., et al. FANCM and FAAP24 function in ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling independently of the Fanconi anemia core complex. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:313-324.
79. Huang M., et al. The FANCM/FAAP24 complex is required for the DNA interstrand crosslink-induced checkpoint response. Mol. Cell 2010, 39:259-268.
80. Pichierri P., Rosselli F. The DNA crosslink-induced S-phase checkpoint depends on ATR-CHK1 and ATR-NBS1-FANCD2 pathways. EMBO J. 2004, 23:1178-1187.
81. Ben-Yehoyada M., et al. Checkpoint signaling from a single DNA interstrand crosslink. Mol. Cell 2009, 35:704-715.
82. Taniguchi T., et al. Convergence of the Fanconi anemia and ataxia telangiectasia signaling pathways. Cell 2002, 109:459-472.
83. Sims A.E., et al. FANCI is a second monoubiquitinated member of the Fanconi anemia pathway. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14:564-567.
84. Smogorzewska A., et al. Identification of the FANCI protein, a monoubiquitinated FANCD2 paralog required for DNA repair. Cell 2007, 129:289-301.
85. Ho G.P., et al. Phosphorylation of FANCD2 on two novel sites is required for mitomycin C resistance. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 26:7005-7015.
86. Andreassen P.R., et al. ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:1958-1963.
87. Ishiai M., et al. FANCI phosphorylation functions as a molecular switch to turn on the Fanconi anemia pathway. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:1138-1146.
88. Knipscheer P., et al. The Fanconi anemia pathway promotes replication-dependent DNA interstrand cross-link repair. Science 2009, 326:1698-1701.
89. Liu T., et al. FAN1 acts with FANCI-FANCD2 to promote DNA interstrand cross-link repair. Science 2010, 329:693-696.
90. Smogorzewska A., et al. A genetic screen identifies FAN1, a Fanconi anemia-associated nuclease necessary for DNA interstrand crosslink repair. Mol. Cell 2010, 39:36-47.
91. Kratz K., et al. Deficiency of FANCD2-associated nuclease KIAA1018/FAN1 sensitizes cells to interstrand crosslinking agents. Cell 2010, 142:77-88.
92. MacKay C., et al. Identification of KIAA1018/FAN1, a DNA repair nuclease recruited to DNA damage by monoubiquitinated FANCD2. Cell 2010, 142:65-76.
93. Pace P., et al. Ku70 corrupts DNA repair in the absence of the Fanconi anemia pathway. Science 2010, 329:219-223.
94. Ohouo P.Y., et al. DNA damage signaling recruits the Rtt107-Slx4 scaffolds via Dpb11 to mediate replication stress response. Mol. Cell 2010, 39:300-306.
95. Fekairi S., et al. Human SLX4 is a Holliday junction resolvase subunit that binds multiple DNA repair/recombination endonucleases. Cell 2009, 138:78-89.
96. Svendsen J.M., et al. Mammalian BTBD12/SLX4 assembles a Holliday junction resolvase and is required for DNA repair. Cell 2009, 138:63-77.
97. Falbo K.B., et al. Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:1167-1172.
98. Shimada K., et al. Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex promotes recovery of stalled replication forks. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:566-575.
99. Papamichos-Chronakis M., Peterson C.L. The Ino80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme regulates replisome function and stability. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:338-345.
100. Bartek J., et al. DNA damage signalling guards against activated oncogenes and tumour progression. Oncogene 2007, 26:7773-7779.