Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1167-1172

  Falbo, Karina B ^a   Alabert, Constance ^b   Katou, Yuki ^c   Wu, Su ^d   Han, Junhong ^e   Wehr, Tammy ^a   Xiao, Jing ^a   He, Xiangwei ^f   Zhang, Zhiguo ^e   Shi, Yang ^d   Shirahige, Katsu ^c   Pasero, Philippe ^b   Shen, Xuetong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS   (France)

^c TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e MAYO GRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

^f BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLINE; DNA; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; HYDROXYUREA; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; PROTEIN INO80; RAD51 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YEAST;

CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HYDROXYUREA; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 70350783732     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1686     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Falbo, K.B. & Shen, X. Chromatin remodeling in DNA replication. J. Cell. Biochem. 97, 684-689 (2006).
2. Vincent, J.A., Kwong, T.J. & Tsukiyama, T. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling shapes the DNA replication landscape. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 477-484 (2008).
3. Papamichos-Chronakis, M. & Peterson, C.L. The Ino80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme regulates replisome function and stability. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 338-345 (2008).
4. Shimada, K. et al. Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex promotes recovery of stalled replication forks. Curr. Biol. 18, 566-575 (2008).
5. Shen, X., Mizuguchi, G., Hamiche, A. & Wu, C. A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing. Nature 406, 541-544 (2000).
6. Morrison, A.J. et al. INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119, 767-775 (2004).
7. Morrison, A.J. et al. Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex infuences DNA damage checkpoint responses. Cell 130, 499-511 (2007).
8. van Attikum, H., Fritsch, O., Hohn, B. & Gasser, S.M. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119, 777-788 (2004).
9. Katou, Y. et al. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424, 1078-1083 (2003).
10. Michalet, X. et al. Dynamic molecular combing: stretching the whole human genome for high-resolution studies. Science 277, 1518-1523 (1997).
11. Shen, X., Ranallo, R., Choi, E. & Wu, C. Involvement of actin-related proteins in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Mol. Cell 12, 147-155 (2003).
12. Tourrière, H., Versini, G., Cordon-Preciado, V., Alabert, C. & Pasero, P. Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol. Cell 19, 699-706 (2005).
13. Branzei, D. & Foiani, M. The Rad53 signal transduction pathway: Replication fork stabilization, DNA repair, and adaptation. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 2654-2659 (2006).
14. Branzei, D. & Foiani, M. Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6, 994-1003 (2007).
15. Branzei, D. & Foiani, M. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 297-308 (2008).
16. Lopes, M. et al. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412, 557-561 (2001).
17. Rogakou, E.P., Pilch, D.R., Orr, A.H., Ivanova, V.S. & Bonner, W.M. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5858-5868 (1998).
18. Luke, B. et al. The cullin Rtt101p promotes replication fork progression through damaged DNA and natural pause sites. Curr. Biol. 16, 786-792 (2006).
19. Branzei, D. et al. Ubc9-and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127, 509-522 (2006).
20. Hoege, C., Pfander, B., Moldovan, G.L., Pyrowolakis, G. & Jentsch, S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modifcation of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419, 135-141 (2002).
21. Ulrich, H.D. Conservation of DNA damage tolerance pathways from yeast to humans. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 35, 1334-1337 (2007).
22. Papouli, E. et al. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol. Cell 19, 123-133 (2005).
23. Watts, F.Z. Sumoylation of PCNA: Wrestling with recombination at stalled replication forks. DNA Repair (Amst.) 5, 399-403 (2006).
24. Chang, M., Bellaoui, M., Boone, C. & Brown, G.W. A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16934-16939 (2002).
25. Veis, J., Klug, H., Koranda, M. & Ammerer, G. Activation of the G2/M-specifc gene CLB2 requires multiple cell cycle signals. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 8364-8373 (2007).
26. Stelter, P. & Ulrich, H.D. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425, 188-191 (2003).
27. Kao, C.F. & Osley, M.A. In vivo assays to study histone ubiquitylation. Methods 31, 59-66 (2003).
28. Han, J., Zhou, H., Li, Z., Xu, R.M. & Zhang, Z. Acetylation of lysine 56 of histone H3 catalyzed by RTT109 and regulated by ASF1 is required for replisome integrity. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 28587-28596 (2007).
29. Gangavarapu, V., Prakash, S. & Prakash, L. Requirement of RAD52 group genes for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 7758-7764 (2007).
30. Duro, E., Vaisica, J.A., Brown, G.W. & Rouse, J. Budding yeast Mms22 and Mms1 regulate homologous recombination induced by replisome blockage. DNA Repair (Amst.) 7, 811-818 (2008).
31. Li, X. & Heyer, W.D. Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance. Cell Res. 18, 99-113 (2008).
32. Branzei, D., Vanoli, F. & Foiani, M. SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 456, 915-920 (2008).
33. Tsukuda, T., Fleming, A.B., Nickoloff, J.A. & Osley, M.A. Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 438, 379-383 (2005).
34. Fasullo, M., Giallanza, P., Dong, Z., Cera, C. & Bennett, T. Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad51 mutants are defective in DNA damage-associated sister chromatid exchanges but exhibit increased rates of homology-directed translocations. Genetics 158, 959-972 (2001).
35. Pasero, P., Bensimon, A. & Schwob, E. Single-molecule analysis reveals clustering and epigenetic regulation of replication origins at the yeast rDNA locus. Genes Dev. 16, 2479-2484 (2002).
36. Cobb, J.A., Bjergbaek, L., Shimada, K., Frei, C. & Gasser, S.M. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 22, 4325-4336 (2003)