Ino80 Chromatin Remodeling Complex Promotes Recovery of Stalled Replication Forks

Current Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 566-575

  Shimada, Kenji ^a   Oma, Yukako ^b   Schleker, Thomas ^a   Kugou, Kazuto ^c,d   Ohta, Kunihiro ^c,d   Harata, Masahiko ^b   Gasser, Susan M ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH MIESCHER INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Japan Science and Technology Agency   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

CELLCYCLE; DNA

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ALPHA; HYDROXYUREA; INO80 COMPLEX, S CEREVISIAE; LCD1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; RAD52 PROTEIN; RAD52 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; RAD53 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; TRANSFER RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA REPLICATION; DNA REPLICATION ORIGIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA POLYMERASE II; DNA REPLICATION; HYDROXYUREA; MUTATION; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; REPLICATION ORIGIN; RNA, TRANSFER; S PHASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 42049094866     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.049     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Lusser A., and Kadonaga J.T. Chromatin remodeling by ATP-dependent molecular machines. Bioessays 25 (2003) 1192-1200
2. Krogan N.J., Keogh M.C., Datta N., Sawa C., Ryan O.W., Ding H., Haw R.A., Pootoolal J., Tong A., Canadien V., et al. A Snf2 family ATPase complex required for recruitment of the histone H2A variant Htz1. Mol. Cell 12 (2003) 1565-1576
3. Kobor M.S., Venkatasubrahmanyam S., Meneghini M.D., Gin J.W., Jennings J.L., Link A.J., Madhani H.D., and Rine J. A protein complex containing the conserved Swi2/Snf2-related ATPase Swr1p deposits histone variant H2A.Z into euchromatin. PLoS Biol. 2 (2004) e131 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020131
4. Mizuguchi G., Shen X., Landry J., Wu W.H., Sen S., and Wu C. ATP-driven exchange of histone H2AZ variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Science 303 (2004) 343-348
5. Shen X., Mizuguchi G., Hamiche A., and Wu C. A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing. Nature 406 (2000) 541-544
6. van Attikum H., Fritsch O., Hohn B., and Gasser S.M. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119 (2004) 777-788
7. Tsukuda T., Fleming A.B., Nickoloff J.A., and Osley M.A. Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 438 (2005) 379-383
8. van Attikum H., Fritsch O., and Gasser S.M. Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 26 (2007) 4113-4125
9. Kawashima S., Ogiwara H., Tada S., Harata M., Wintersberger U., Enomoto T., and Seki M. The INO80 complex is required for damage-induced recombination. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 355 (2007) 835-841
10. Wu S., Shi Y., Mulligan P., Gay F., Landry J., Liu H., Lu J., Qi H.H., Wang W., Nickoloff J.A., et al. A YY1-INO80 complex regulates genomic stability through homologous recombination-based repair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14 (2007) 1165-1172
11. Jonsson Z.O., Jha S., Wohlschlegel J.A., and Dutta A. Rvb1p/Rvb2p recruit Arp5p and assemble a functional Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex. Mol. Cell 16 (2004) 465-477
12. Jin J., Cai Y., Yao T., Gottschalk A.J., Florens L., Swanson S.K., Gutierrez J.L., Coleman M.K., Workman J.L., Mushegian A., et al. A mammalian chromatin remodeling complex with similarities to the yeast INO80 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 41207-41212
13. Squatrito M., Gorrini C., and Amati B. Tip60 in DNA damage response and growth control: Many tricks in one HAT. Trends Cell Biol. 16 (2006) 433-442
14. Bao Y., and Shen X. Chromatin remodeling in DNA double-strand break repair. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17 (2007) 126-131
15. Tourriere H., and Pasero P. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6 (2007) 900-913
16. Katou Y., Kanoh Y., Bando M., Noguchi H., Tanaka H., Ashikari T., Sugimoto K., and Shirahige K. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424 (2003) 1078-1083
17. Shen X., Ranallo R., Choi E., and Wu C. Involvement of actin-related proteins in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Mol. Cell 12 (2003) 147-155
18. Sharp P.M., and Lloyd A.T. Regional base composition variation along yeast chromosome III: Evolution of chromosome primary structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 21 (1993) 179-183
19. Bradnam K.R., Seoighe C., Sharp P.M., and Wolfe K.H. G+C content variation along and among Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16 (1999) 666-675
20. Dujon B. The yeast genome project: What did we learn?. Trends Genet. 12 (1996) 263-270
21. Ivessa A.S., Lenzmeier B.A., Bessler J.B., Goudsouzian L.K., Schnakenberg S.L., and Zakian V.A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past nonhistone protein-DNA complexes. Mol. Cell 12 (2003) 1525-1536
22. Azvolinsky A., Dunaway S., Torres J.Z., Bessler J.B., and Zakian V.A. The S. cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase moves with the replication fork and affects replication of all yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev. 20 (2006) 3104-3116
23. Myers C.L., Robson D., Wible A., Hibbs M.A., Chiriac C., Theesfeld C.L., Dolinski K., and Troyanskaya O.G. Discovery of biological networks from diverse functional genomic data. Genome Biol. 6 (2005) R114 10.1186/gb-2005-6-13-r114
24. van Werven F.J., and Timmers H.T. The use of biotin tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves the sensitivity of chromatin immunoprecipitation. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) e33 10.1093/nar/gkl003
25. Brewer B.J., Lockshon D., and Fangman W.L. The arrest of replication forks in the rDNA of yeast occurs independently of transcription. Cell 71 (1992) 267-276
26. Kobayashi T. The replication fork barrier site forms a unique structure with Fob1p and inhibits the replication fork. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 (2003) 9178-9188
27. Santocanale C., and Diffley J.F. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 395 (1998) 615-618
28. Cobb J.A., Schleker T., Rojas V., Bjergbaek L., Tercero J.A., and Gasser S.M. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 3055-3069
29. Paciotti V., Clerici M., Scotti M., Lucchini G., and Longhese M.P. Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 (2001) 3913-3925
30. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Newlon C.S., and Foiani M. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412 (2001) 557-561
31. Zou L., and Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300 (2003) 1542-1548
32. Dubrana K., van Attikum H., Hediger F., and Gasser S.M. The processing of double-strand breaks and binding of single-strand-binding proteins RPA and Rad51 modulate the formation of ATR-kinase foci in yeast. J. Cell Sci. 120 (2007) 4209-4220
33. Rouse J., and Jackson S.P. Lcd1p recruits Mec1p to DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell 9 (2002) 857-869
34. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., and Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: Spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118 (2004) 699-713
35. Meister P., Taddei A., Vernis L., Poidevin M., Gasser S.M., and Baldacci G. Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 168 (2005) 537-544
36. Viggiani C.J., and Aparicio O.M. New vectors for simplified construction of BrdU-Incorporating strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 23 (2006) 1045-1051
37. Tsukiyama T. The in vivo functions of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling factors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3 (2002) 422-429
38. Dhillon N., Oki M., Szyjka S.J., Aparicio O.M., and Kamakaka R.T. H2A.Z functions to regulate progression through the cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 489-501
39. Morrison A.J., Kim J.A., Person M.D., Highland J., Xiao J., Wehr T.S., Hensley S., Bao Y., Shen J., Collins S.R., et al. Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex influences DNA damage checkpoint responses. Cell 130 (2007) 499-511
40. Morrison A.J., Highland J., Krogan N.J., Arbel-Eden A., Greenblatt J.F., Haber J.E., and Shen X. INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119 (2004) 767-775
41. Collins S.R., Miller K.M., Maas N.L., Roguev A., Fillingham J., Chu C.S., Schuldiner M., Gebbia M., Recht J., Shales M., et al. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446 (2007) 806-810
42. Pan X., Ye P., Yuan D.S., Wang X., Bader J.S., and Boeke J.D. A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124 (2006) 1069-1081
43. Hanna M., Ball L.G., Tong A.H., Boone C., and Xiao W. Pol32 is required for Pol zeta-dependent translesion synthesis and prevents double-strand breaks at the replication fork. Mutat. Res. 625 (2007) 164-176
44. Lydeard J.R., Jain S., Yamaguchi M., and Haber J.E. Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 448 (2007) 820-823
45. Archambault V., Ikui A.E., Drapkin B.J., and Cross F.R. Disruption of mechanisms that prevent rereplication triggers a DNA damage response. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 6707-6721
46. Yu E.Y., Steinberg-Neifach O., Dandjinou A.T., Kang F., Morrison A.J., Shen X., and Lue N.F. Regulation of telomere structure and functions by subunits of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27 (2007) 5639-5649
47. Cobb J.A., Bjergbaek L., Shimada K., Frei C., and Gasser S.M. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 22 (2003) 4325-4336
48. Shimada K., Pasero P., and Gasser S.M. ORC and the intra-S-phase checkpoint: A threshold regulates Rad53p activation in S phase. Genes Dev. 16 (2002) 3236-3252
49. Katou Y., Kaneshiro K., Aburatani H., and Shirahige K. Genomic approach for the understanding of dynamic aspect of chromosome behavior. Methods Enzymol. 409 (2006) 389-410
50. Nieduszynski C.A., Hiraga S., Ak P., Benham C.J., and Donaldson A.D. OriDB: A DNA replication origin database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (2007) D40-D46