PCK and teaching innovations

PCK and Teaching Innovations

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-147

  Jang, Syh Jong ^a  

^a CHUNG YUAN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956268751     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (416)

1. Abell, S.K. (2008). PCK twenty years later: Does it remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1405-1416.
2. Appleton, K. (1997). Analysis and description of students’ learning during science classes using a constructivist-based model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 303-318.
3. Barab, S.A., & Duffy, T.M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D.H. Jonassen & S.M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Barth, R.S. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bowman, C. & McCormick, S. (2000) Comparison of peer coaching versus traditional supervision effects, The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 256-264.
6. Carlsen, W.S. (1991). Effects of new biology teachers’ subject-matter knowledge on curricular planning. Science Education, 75, 631-647.
7. Carlsen, W.S. (1993). Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers’ classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 471-481.
8. Carter, K., & Doyle, W. (1987). Teachers’ knowledge structure and comprehension process. In J. Calder-head (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 147-160). London; Cassel.
9. Clermont, C. P., Borko, H., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Comparative study of the pedagogical content knowledge of experienced and novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 419-441.
10. Czerniak, C. M., Beltyukova, S, Struble, J., Haney, J. J., & Lumpe, A. T. (2006). Do you see what I see? The relationship between a professional development model and student achievement. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Exemplary science in grades 5-8: Standards-based success stories (pp. 13-43). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
11. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597-604.
12. Davis, N. (1987). An application of coaching in middle school science. Paper present at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Washington. DC.
13. Davis, J. R. (1995). Interdisciplinary courses and team teaching: New arrangements for learning. Phoenix, Arizona: American Council on Education/Oryx Press.
14. De Jong, O., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947-964.
15. Firestone, W.A. & Rosenblum, S.(1988). Building commitment in urban high schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(4), 285-299.
16. Geddis, A. N. (1993). Transforming subject-matter knowledge: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 673-683.
17. Geddis, A. N., Onslow, B., Beynon, C., & Oesch, J. (1993). Transforming content knowledge: Learning to teach about isotopes. Science Education, 77(6), 575-591.
18. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N.G. (1993). Preservice biological teachers’ knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year-long assessment. Science Teacher Education, 77(1), 25-43.
19. Gess-Newsome, J. & Lederman, N.G. (Eds.) (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
20. Goker, S. D. (2006). Impact of peer coaching on self-efficacy and instructional skills in TEFL teacher education. System, 34, 239-254.
21. Grossman, P.L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Hasbrouck, J. E.,(1997). Mediated peer coaching for training preservice teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 251-271.
23. Hashweh, M.Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109-120.
24. Hudson, P. & Glomb, N. (1997). If it takes two to tango, then why not teach both partners to dance? Collaboration instruction for all educators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(4), 442-449.
25. Jang, S. J. (2007). A study of the students’ construction of science knowledge: Talk and writing in a collaborative group. Educational Research, 49(1), 65-81.
26. Jang, S. J. (2006a). The effects of incorporating web assisted learning with team teaching in seventh-grade science classes. International Journal of Science Education. 28(6), 615-632.
27. Jang, S. J. (2006b). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48(2), 177-194.
28. Jang, S. J. & Luo, H. Y. (2009). The impacts of secondary students’ perception on PCK of the science teachers using team teaching. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 17(1), 49-68.
29. Jenkins, J., Garn, A. & Jenkins, P. (2005). Preservice teacher observations in peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 2-23.
30. Jenkins, J., & Veal, M.L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ PCK development during peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22(1), 49-68.
31. Joyce, B. R. & Showers, B. (1982). The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40, 4-10.
32. Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal (2nd edition.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
33. Joyce, B, & Weil, M. (1996). Model of teaching(5th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
34. Kittleson, J. M. & Southerland, S. A. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267-293.
35. Knight, S. L. & Waxman, H. C. (1991) Students’ cognition and classroom instruction. In H. C. Waxman and H. J. Walberg (Eds) Effective T eaching: Current Research (Berkeley, CA: McCutchan), 239-255.
36. Koballa, T.R. (1992). Peering coaching: Capitalizing on constructive criticism. Science Teacher, 59(6), 42-45.
37. Kohler, F.W. & Ezell, H. K. (1999). Promoting changes in teachers’ conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. Journal of Special Education, 33(3), 154-165.
38. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Publishers.
39. Leach, J. & Scott, P. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115-142.
40. Lederman, N.G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M.S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 129-146.
41. Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591-596.
42. Lieberman, A., Saxl, E.R.,& Miles, M.B.(1988). Teaching leadership: Ideology and practice. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
43. Little J.W.(1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of education reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129-151.
44. Lortie, D.(1975). School teachers . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S. E., & Hewson, P.W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
46. Loughran, J.J., Mulhall, P. & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 370-391.
47. Lumpe, A. T. (2007). Research-based professional development: Teachers engaged in professional learning communities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 125-128.
48. McAllister, E. A., & Neubert, G. A., (1995). New teachers helping new teachers: Preservice peer coaching. Bloomington, In: EDINFO Press.
49. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
50. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 3-11.
51. Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
52. Miller, L.(1988). Unlikely beginnings: The district office as a starting point for developing a professional culture for teaching. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools. New York: Longman.
53. Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767-790.
54. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281-1299.
56. Pierce, D. & Hunsaker, T. W. (1996) Professional development for the teacher, of the teacher, and by the teacher, Education, 117(1), 101-105.
57. Pugach, M., & Johnson, L.J.(1995). Unlocking expertise among classroom teachers through structures dialogue: Extending research on peer collaboration. Exceptional Children, 62, 101-110.
58. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Ross, J. A. & Bruce, C. D. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 146-159.
60. Sanders, L.R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J.D. (1993). Secondary science teachers’ knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 723-736.
61. Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12-16.
62. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
63. Slater, C.L. & Simmons, D.L.(2001). The design and implementation of a peer coaching program. American Secondary Education, 29(3), 67-76.
64. Sloan, N.(1986). An interpretive study of peer coaching in middle school science. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
65. Smith, D. C. (1999). Changing our teaching: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in elementary science. In J. Gess-Newsome&N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 163-197). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
66. Smith, D.C. & Neale, D.C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1-20.
67. Sykes, G (1996). Reform of and as professional development, Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 465-467.
68. Taylor, J., Munby, H., Chin, P., Hutchinson, N. L., Berg, D. H., & Dalgarno, N. (2003). Coop students’ access to shared knowledge in science-rich workplaces. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society of Education, Halifax, NS.
69. Thijs, A. & van den Berg, E. (2002). Peer coaching as part of a professional development program for science teachers in Botswana. International Journal of Educational Development, 22, 55-68
70. Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J & Gallard, A. J.(1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In Gable, D.(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning(45-93). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
71. Tobin, K., & Garnett, P.(1988). Exemplary practice in science classroom. Science Education, 72, 197-208.
72. Tuan, H-L., Chang, H-P., Wang, K-H. & Treagust, D. F. (2000). The development of an instrument for assessing students’ perceptions of teachers’ knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 22(4), 385-398.
73. Turley, S. (1994). The way teachers teach is, like, totally whacked: The student voice on classroom practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
74. Van Dijk, E. M. & Kattmann, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teachers’ PCK and improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 885-897.
75. Van Driel, J.H., Verloop, N. & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35 (6), 673-695.
76. Van Driel, J.H., De Jong, O.,&Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ PCK. Science Education, 86, 572-590.
77. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.
78. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Syntheses, 80, 121-140.
79. Vidmar, D. J. (2006). Reflective peer coaching: Crafting collaborative self-assessment in teaching. Research Strategies, 20, 135-148.
80. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81. Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method course through technology: Effects on preservice teachers’ technology competency. Computers & Education, 45, 383-398.
82. Brown, D.E (1993). Refocusing core intuitions: A concretizing role for analogy in conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1273-1290.
83. Carlsen, W.S. (1993). Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers’ classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 471-481.
84. Carter, K., & Doyle, W. (1987). Teachers’ knowledge structure and comprehension process. In J. Calder-head(Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 147-160). London; Cassel.
85. Clermont, C. P., Borko, H., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Comparative study of the pedagogical content knowledge of experienced and novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 419-441.
86. Dalgarno, N., & Colgan, L. (2007). Supporting novice elementary mathematics teachers’ induction in professional communities and providing innovative forms of pedagogical content knowledge development through information and communication technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1051-1065.
87. Davis, K. S., & Falba, C. J. (2002). Integrating technology in elementary preservice teacher education: Orchestrating scientific inquiry in meaningful ways. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(4), 303-329.
88. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
89. De Jong, O., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947-964.
90. Doering, A., Hughes, J., Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research in Education, 35(3), 342-361.
91. Drier, H. (2001). Teaching and learning mathematics with interactive spreadsheets, School Science and Mathematics, 101(4), 170-79.
92. Edens, K. M. (2000). Promoting communication, inquiry, and reflection in an early practicum experience via an on-line discussion group. Action in Teacher Education, 22, 14-23.
93. Flick, L., & Bell, R. (2000). Preparing tomorrow’s science teachers to use technology: Guidelines for science educators. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1), 39-60.
94. Geddis, A. N. (1993). Transforming subject-matter knowledge: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 673-683.
95. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N.G. (1993). Preservice biological teachers’ knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year-long assessment. Science Teacher Education, 77(1), 25-43.
96. Grossman, P.L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
97. Hashweh, M.Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109-120.
98. Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher Pedagogical Constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11, 273-292.
99. Jang, S. J. (2008a). The effects of integrating technology, observation and writing into a teacher education method course. Computers & Education, 50(3), 853-865.
100. Jang, S. J. (2008b). Innovations in science teacher education: Effects of integrating technology and team-teaching strategies. Computers & Education, 51(2), 646-659.
101. Jang, S. J. (2007). A study of the students’ construction of science knowledge: Talk and writing in a collaborative group. Educational Research, 49(1), 65-81.
102. Jang, S. J. (2006). The effects of incorporating web assisted learning with team teaching in seventh-grade science classes. International Journal of Science Education. 28(6), 615-632.
103. Jang, S. J. & Luo, H. Y. (2009). The impacts of secondary students’ perception on PCK of the science teachers using team teaching. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 17(1), 49-68.
104. Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J. & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science Education, 91, 1010-1030.
105. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, and technology. Computers & Education, 49, 740-762.
106. Lederman, N.G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M.S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 129-146.
107. Levin, B. B. (1999). Analysis of the content and purpose of four different kinds of electronic communications among preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 139-156.
108. Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255-281.
109. Li, Q. (2003). Would we teach without technology? A professor’s experience of teaching mathematics education incorporating the internet. Educational Research, 45(1), 61-77.
110. Loughran, J.J., Mulhall, P. & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 370-391.
111. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
112. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 3-11.
113. McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
114. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record. 108(6), 1017-1054.
115. Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767-790.
116. Murray, T., Schultz, K., Brown, D. & Clement, J. (1990). An analogy-based computer tutor for remediating physics misconceptions. Interactive Learning Environment, 1, 79-101.
117. Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281-1299.
118. Pope, M., Hare, D., & Howard, E. (2005). Enhancing technology use in student teaching: A case study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 573-618.
119. Sanders, L.R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J.D. (1993). Secondary science teachers’ knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 723-736.
120. She, H.C. (2002). Concepts of higher hierarchical level required more dual situational learning events for conceptual change: A study of students’ conceptual changes on air pressure and buoyancy. International Journal of Science Education, 24(9), 981-996.
121. Shotsberger, P. G. (2000). The human touch: Synchronous communication in web-based learning. Educational Technology, 40(1), 53-56.
122. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
123. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
124. Smith, D. C. (1999). Changing our teaching: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in elementary science. In J. Gess-Newsome&N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 163-197). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
125. Smith, D.C. & Neale, D.C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1-20.
126. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
127. Tobin, K., & Garnett, P.(1988). Exemplary practice in science classroom. Science Education, 72, 197-208.
128. Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J & Gallard, A. J.(1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In Gable, D.(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning(45-93). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
129. Tuan, H. L. (1996). Investigating the nature and development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. Proceedings of National Science Council, Part D, Math-Science-Technology Education, 6(2), 101-112.
130. Upitis, R. & Russell, T. (1998). Building a teacher education community: Combining electronic mail with face-to-face interactions. In M. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 77-109). London: Falmer Press.
131. Van Dijk, E. M. & Kattmann, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teachers’ PCK and improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 885-897.
132. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.
133. Van Driel, J.H., De Jong, O.,&Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ PCK. Science Education, 86, 572-590.
134. Vannatta, R.A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 353-265.
135. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
136. Willis, E. M., & Sujo de Montes, L. (2002). Does requiring a technology course in preservice teacher education affect student teacher’s technology use in the classroom? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(3), 76-80.
137. Barab, S.A., & Duffy, T.M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D.H. Jonassen & S.M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
138. Barth, R.S. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
139. Bowman, C. & McCormick, S. (2000). Comparison of peer coaching versus traditional supervision effects. Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 256-261.
140. Carlsen, W.S. (1991). Effects of new biology teachers’ subject-matter knowledge on curricular planning. Science Education, 75, 631-647.
141. Carlsen, W.S. (1993). Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers’ classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 471-481.
142. Carter, K., & Doyle, W. (1987). Teachers’ knowledge structure and comprehension process. In J. Calder-head (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 147-160). London; Cassel.
143. Cheng, P. C. & Shipstone, D. M. (2003). Supporting learning and promoting conceptual change with box and AVOW diagrams. Part 1: Representational design and instructional approaches. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 193-204.
144. Chiu, M.-H. & Lin, J.-W. (2005). Promoting fourth graders’ conceptual change of their understanding of electric current via multiple analogies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (4), 429-464.
145. Czerniak, C. M., Beltyukova, S, Struble, J., Haney, J. J., & Lumpe, A. T. (2006). Do you see what I see? The relationship between a professional development model and student achievement. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Exemplary science in grades 5-8: Standards-based success stories (pp. 13-43). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
146. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597-604.
147. Davis, N. (1987). An application of coaching in middle school science. Paper present at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Washington. DC.
148. Davis, J. R. (1995). Interdisciplinary courses and team teaching: New arrangements for learning. Phoenix, Arizona: American Council on Education/Oryx Press.
149. De Jong, O., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947-964.
150. DuFour, R. (2005). What is a professional learning community? In R. DuFour, R. Eaker, & R. DuFour (Eds.). On common ground (pp. 31-43). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
151. Geddis, A. N., Onslow, B., Beynon, C., & Oesch, J. (1993). Transforming content knowledge: Learning to teach about isotopes. Science Education, 77(6), 575-591.
152. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N.G. (1993). Preservice biological teachers’ knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year-long assessment. Science Teacher Education, 77(1), 25-43.
153. Gess-Newsome, J. & Lederman, N.G. (Eds.) (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
154. Grossman, P.L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
155. Hasbrouck, J. E.,(1997). Mediated peer coaching for training preservice teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 251-271.
156. Hashweh, M.Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109-120.
157. Jang, S. J. (2006a). The effects of incorporating web assisted learning with team teaching in seventh-grade science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 615-632.
158. Jang, S. J. (2006b). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48(2), 177-194.
159. Jang, S. J. (2007). A study of the students’ construction of science knowledge: Talk and writing in a collaborative group. Educational Research, 49(1), 65-81.
160. Jenkins, J., Garn, A. & Jenkins, P. (2005). Preservice teacher observations in peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 2-23.
161. Jenkins, J., & Veal, M.L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ PCK development during peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22(1), 49-68.
162. Joyce, B. R. & Showers, B. (1982). The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40, 4-10.
163. Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal (2nd edition.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
164. Joyce, B, & Weil, M. (1996). Model of teaching(5th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
165. Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J. & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science Education, 91, 1010-1030.
166. Knight, S. L. and Waxman, H. C. (1991) Students’ cognition and classroom instruction. In H. C. Waxman and H. J. Walberg (Eds) Effective T eaching: Current Research (Berkeley, CA: McCutchan), 239-255.
167. Kohler, F.W. & Ezell, H.K.(1999). Promoting changes in teachers’ conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. Journal of Special Education, 33(3), 154-165.
168. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Publishers.
169. Lederman, N.G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M.S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 129-146.
170. Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591-596.
171. Lin, S. W. & Yang, J. H. (1998). Biology teachers’ knowledge base of instructional representations. Proceedings of National Science Council, Part D, Math-Science-Technology Education, 8(1), 22-32.
172. Little J. W.(1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of education reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129-151.
173. Lloyd, B. C. and Lloyd, R. C. (1986) Teaching/learning: The student viewpoint. Reading Horizons, 26, 266-269.
174. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S. E., & Hewson, P.W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
175. Loughran, J.J., Mulhall, P. & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 370-391.
176. McAllister, E. A., & Neubert, G. A., (1995). New teachers helping new teachers: Preservice peer coaching. Bloomington, In: EDINFO Press.
177. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 3-11.
178. McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
179. Millar, R. & King, T. (1993) Students’ understanding of voltage in simple series electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 15(3), 339-349.
180. Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767-790.
181. Pierce, D. & Hunsaker, T. W. (1996) Professional development for the teacher, of the teacher, and by the teacher, Education, 117(1), 101-105.
182. Pugach, M., & Johnson, L.J.(1995). Unlocking expertise among classroom teachers through structures dialogue: Extending research on peer collaboration. Exceptional Children, 62, 101-110.
183. Sanders, L.R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J.D. (1993). Secondary science teachers’ knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 723-736.
184. Sencar, S. & Eryilmaz, A. (2004). Factors mediating the effect of gender on ninth-grade Turkish students’ misconceptions concerning electric circuits Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 603-616.
185. Shipstone, D. M. (1984) A study of children’s understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits. European Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 185-198.
186. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
187. Slater, C.L. & Simmons, D.L.(2001). The design and implementation of a peer coaching program. American Secondary Education, 29(3), 67-76.
188. Sloan, N.(1986). An interpretive study of peer coaching in middle school science. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
189. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
190. Taylor, J., Munby, H., Chin, P., Hutchinson, N. L., Berg, D. H., & Dalgarno, N. (2003). Coop students’ access to shared knowledge in science-rich workplaces. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society of Education, Halifax, NS.
191. Tobin, K., & Garnett, P.(1988). Exemplary practice in science classroom. Science Education, 72, 197-208.
192. Tsai, C.-C. (2003). Using a conflict map as an instructional tool to change student alternative conceptions in simple series electric-circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 307-327.
193. Tuan, H-L., Chang, H-P., Wang, K-H. & Treagust, D. F. (2000). The development of an instrument for assessing students’ perceptions of teachers’ knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 22(4), 385-398.
194. Van Dijk, E. M. & Kattmann, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teachers’PCK and improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 885-897.
195. Van Driel, J.H., Verloop, N. & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35 (6), 673-695.
196. Van Driel, J.H., De Jong, O.,&Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ PCK. Science Education, 86, 572-590.
197. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.
198. Vidmar, D. J. (2006). Reflective peer coaching: Crafting collaborative self-assessment in teaching. Research Strategies, 20, 135-148.
199. Adajian, L. B. (1996). Professional communities: Teachers supporting teachers. The Mathematics Teacher, 89(4), 321-326.
200. Arnau, L., Kahrs J. & Kruskamp, B. (2004). Peer coaching: Veteran high school teachers take the lead on learning, NASSP Bulletin, 88(639), 26-41.
201. Barab, S.A., & Duffy, T.M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D.H. Jonassen & S.M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
202. Barak, M. & Pearlman-Avnion, S. (1999). Who will teach an integrated program for science and technology in Israeli junior high schools: A case study? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 239-253.
203. Barth, R.S. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
204. Bogdan, R, & Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
205. Bowman, C. & McCormick, S. (2000) Comparison of peer coaching versus traditional supervision effects, The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 256-264.
206. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning new environments of education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
207. Buzbee-Little, P. F. (2005). Peer coaching as support to collaborative teaching, Mentoring and Tutoring, 13(1), 83-94.
208. Childress, V.W. (1996). Does integrating technology, science, and mathematics improve technological problem solving? A quasi-experiment. Journal of Technology Education, 8, 16-26.
209. Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1996). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. In E. L. Meyen, G. A. Vergason, & R. J. Whelan (Eds.). Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive settings (pp. 155-182). Denver: Love.
210. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597-604.
211. Davis, N. (1987). An application of coaching in middle school science. Paper present at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Washington. DC.
212. Davis, J. R. (1995). Interdisciplinary courses and team teaching: New arrangements for learning. Phoenix, Arizona: American Council on Education/Oryx Press.
213. Dieker, L. & Murawski, W. (2003) Co-teaching at the secondary level: Unique issues, current trends, and suggestions for success, The High School Journal, 86(4), 1-13.
214. Eick, C. & Dias, M. (2005). Building the authority of experience in communities of practice: The development of preservice teachers’ practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms. Science Education, 89, 470-491.
215. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. Handbooks of research on teaching. (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
216. Firestone, W.A. & Rosenblum, S.(1988). Building commitment in urban high schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(4), 285-299.
217. Friend, M. & Cook, L. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
218. Hasbrouck, J. E.,(1997). Mediated peer coaching for training preservice teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 251-271.
219. Hudson, P., & Glomb, N.(1997). If it takes two to tango, then why not teach both partners to dance? Collaboration instruction for all educators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(4), 442-448.
220. Jang, S. J. (2006a). The effects of incorporating web assisted learning with team teaching in seventh-grade science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 615-632.
221. Jang, S. J. (2006b). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48(2), 177-194.
222. Jang, S. J. (2007). A study of the students’ construction of science knowledge: Talk and writing in a collaborative group. Educational Research, 49(1), 65-81.
223. Jenkins, J., Garn, A. & Jenkins, P. (2005). Preservice teacher observations in peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 2-23.
224. Jenkins, J., Hamrick, C. & Todorovich, J. (2002). Peer coaching: Implementation and datacollection tools. Journal of Physical Education-Recreation and Dance, 73(4), 47-53.
225. Jenkins, J., & Veal, M.L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ PCK development during peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22(1), 49-68.
226. Joyce, B. R. & Showers, B. (1982). The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40, 4-10.
227. Joyce, B. R. & Showers, B.(1983). Power in staff development through research on training. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Washington, DC.
228. Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal (2nd edition.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
229. Joyce, B, & Weil, M. (1996). Model of teaching(5th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
230. Kittleson, J. M. & Southerland, S. A. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267-293.
231. Koballa, T.R. (1992). Peering coaching: Capitalizing on constructive criticism. Science Teacher, 59(6), 42-45.
232. Kohler, F.W. & Ezell, H.K .(1999). Promoting changes in teachers’ conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. Journal of Special Education, 33(3), 154-165.
233. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Publishers.
234. Leach, J. & Scott, P. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115-142.
235. Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591-596.
236. Lieberman, A., Saxl, E.R., & Miles, M.B. (1988). Teaching leadership: Ideology and practice. In A. Lieberman(Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
237. Little J.W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of education reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129-151.
238. Lortie, D. (1975). School teachers . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
239. McAllister, E. A., & Neubert, G. A., (1995). New teachers helping new teachers: Preservice peer coaching. Bloomington, In: EDINFO Press.
240. Miller, L. (1988). Unlikely beginnings: The district office as a starting point for developing a professional culture for teaching. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools. New York: Longman.
241. Ministry of Education (1998). The general outline of program in the nine-year integrated curriculum. Taiwan.
242. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
243. Oja, S.N. & Smulyan, L. (1989). Collaborative action research: A developmental approach. London: Falmer.
244. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA. Sage Publication.
245. Pierce, D. & Hunsaker, T. W. (1996) Professional development for the teacher, of the teacher, and by the teacher, Education, 117(1), 101-105.
246. Pugach, M., & Johnson, L.J.(1995). Unlocking expertise among classroom teachers through structures dialogue: Extending research on peer collaboration. Exceptional Children, 62, 101-110.
247. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
248. Roth, W-M. & Tobin, K. (2001). Learning to teach science as practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(6), 741-62.
249. Roth, W-M., Tobin, K., Zimmermann, A., Bryant, N. & Davis, C. (2002). Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: an activity-theoretical study of learning in coteaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 253-82.
250. Roth, W-M., Tobin, K., Carambo, C., & Dalland, C. (2005). Coordination in coteaching: Producing alignment in real time. Science Education, 89, 675-702.
251. Sandholtz, J.H. (2000). Interdisciplinary team teaching as a form of professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(3), 39-50.
252. Sanders, M. (1994). Technological problem-solving activities as a means of instruction: The TSM integration program. School Science and Mathematics, 94, 36-43.
253. Schell, J.W., & Wicklein, R.C. (1993). Integration of mathematics, science and technology education: A basis for thinking and problem solving. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 18, 49-76.
254. Showers, B. (1985). Teachers coaching teachers. Educational Leadership, 47, 43-48.
255. Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12-16.
256. Shulamn, L. S., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Fostering communities of teachers as learners: Disciplinary perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 135-140.
257. Shulha, L., & Wilson, R. J. (2003). Collaborative mixed-methods research. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methodology, (pp. 639-670). Newbury Park: Sage.
258. Slater, C.L. & Simmons, D.L.(2001). The design and implementation of a peer coaching program. American Secondary Education, 29(3), 67-76.
259. Sloan, N.(1986). An interpretive study of peer coaching in middle school science. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
260. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
261. Sykes, G (1996). Reform of and as professional development, Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 465-467.
262. Taylor, J., Munby, H., Chin, P., Hutchinson, N. L., Berg, D. H., & Dalgarno, N. (2003). Coop students’ access to shared knowledge in science-rich workplaces. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society of Education, Halifax, NS.
263. Tobin, K., Roth, W-M, and Zimmermann, A. (2001). Learning to teach science in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 941-964.
264. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
265. Walther-Thomas, C., Brtant, M., & Land, S. (1996). Planning for effective co-teaching: The key to successful inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 255-265.
266. Walther-Thomas, C. (1997) Co-teaching experiences: The benefits and problems that teachers and principals report over time, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(4), 395-413.
267. Wellington, J., and Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press
268. Alexopoulou, E. & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1099-1114.
269. Briscoe, C. & Prayaga, C. S. (2004). Teaching future K-8 teachers the language of Newton: A case study of collaboration and change in university. Science Education, 88, 947-969.
270. Brown, D. S. (2003). High school biology: A group approach to concept mapping. The American Biology Teacher, 65(3), 192-198.
271. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. Handbooks of research on teaching. (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
272. Fensham, P., Gunstone, R., & White, R. (Eds.). (1994). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: The Falmer Press.
273. Gallenstein, N. L. (2005). Never too young for a concept map. Science Children, 43(1), 44-47.
274. Gijlers, H. & de Jong, T. (2005). The relation between prior knowledge and students’ collaborative discovery learning processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 264-282.
275. Glaser, R. & Bassok, M. (1989). Learning theory and the study of instruction. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 88-96.
276. Guastello, E. F., Beasley, T. M., & Sinatra, R. C. (2000). Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of low-achieving inner-city seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 21(6), 356-365.
277. Gunstone, R., & Mitchell, I. (1998). Metacognition and conceptual change. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 133-163). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
278. Jang, S. J. (2006a). The effects of incorporating web assisted learning with team teaching in seventh-grade science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 615-632.
279. Jang, S. J. (2006b). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48(2), 177-194.
280. Jang, S. J. (2007). A study of the students’ construction of science knowledge: Talk and writing in a collaborative group. Educational Research, 49(1), 65-81.
281. Kelly, G. & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81, 533-559.
282. Keys, C. W. (1996). Writing collaborative laboratory reports in ninth grade science: Three case studies of social interactions. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 178-186.
283. Kinchin, I.M. (2000) Concept mapping in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 61-68.
284. Kittleson, J. M. & Southerland, S. A. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267-293.
285. Liu, X. (2004). Use concept mapping for assessing and promoting relational conceptual change in science. Science Education, 88, 373-396.
286. McClure. J. R., Sonak. B. & Suen. H. K.(1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 475-492.
287. Mitchell, I. J. Baird, J. R. (1986). Teaching, learning and the curriculum: The influence of content in science. Research in Science Education, 16, 141-149.
288. Ministry of Education (2001). The implementation outline of program in the nine-year innovatory curriculum. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
289. Mintzes, J. J., & Wandersee, J. H. (1998). Research in science teaching and learning: A human constructivist view. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 29-58). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
290. Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (Eds.). (1998). Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
291. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
292. Novak, J. D. (1984). Application of advances in learning theory and philosophy of science to the improvement of chemistry teaching. The Journal of Chemical Education, 61(7), 607-612.
293. Novak, J. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
294. Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 88, 548-571.
295. Novak, J. D. (2005). Results and implications of a 12-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 35, 23-40.
296. Novak, J., & Gowin, B. D. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
297. Okebukola, P. A. (1992). Attaining meaningful learning of concepts in genetics and ecology: An examination of the potency of the concept-mapping technique. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 493-504.
298. Palincsar, A. S., Anderson, C., & David, Y. M. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 643-658.
299. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
300. Richmond, G. & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 839-858.
301. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
302. Roth, W. M. & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 503-534.
303. Ruiz-Primo, M. A, & Shavelson R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569-600.
304. Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Shavelson, R.J., Li, M., & Schultz, S.E. (2001). On the validity of cognitive interpretations of scores from alternative concept-mapping techniques. Educational Assessment, 7, 99-141.
305. Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils’ understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14, 63-82.
306. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
307. Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D. & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86(2), 264-286.
308. Van Zele, E. & Wieme, W. (2004). Improving the usefulness of concept maps as a research tool for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1043-1064.
309. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
310. Wallace, J. D., & Mintzes, J. J. (1990). The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1033-1052.
311. White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: The Falmer Press.
312. Wellington, J., and Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
313. Yin. Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., & Shavelson R. J. (2005). Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: Implications for scoring, interpretation, and use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 166-184.
314. Abell, S. K. (2000). From professor to colleague: Creating a professional identity as collaborator in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 6, 548-562.
315. Barth, R.S. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
316. Brown, C. A., Stein, M. K., & Forman, E. A. (1995). Assisting teachers and students to reform the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 63-93.
317. Chick, H. L., & Watson, J. M. (2001). Data representation and interpretation by primary school students working in groups. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13, 91-111.
318. Chick, H. L., & Watson, J. M. (2002).Collaborative influences on emergent statistical thinking -a case study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 371-400.
319. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing group work: Strategies for heterogeneous classrooms. Teacher College Press, New York.
320. Cook, L., and Friend, M. (1996). Co-teaching and Guidelines for creating effective practices. In E. L. Meyen, G. A. Vergason, and R. J. Whelan (Eds.). Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive settings (pp. 155-182). Denver: Love.
321. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597-604.
322. Davidson, N. (1985). Small-group learning and teaching in mathematics: a selective review of the research. In: R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 211-230). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
323. Dekker, R. & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 39-65.
324. Dekker, R., Elshout-Mohr, M. & Wood, T. (2006). How children regulate their own collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 57-79.
325. Dieker, L. & Murawski, W. (2003) Co-teaching at the secondary level: Unique issues, current trends, and suggestions for success, The High School Journal, 86(4), 1-13.
326. Eick, C. & Dias, M. (2005). Building the authority of experience in communities of practice: The development of preservice teachers’ practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms. Science Education, 89, 470-491.
327. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. Handbooks of research on teaching. (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
328. Friend, M. & Cook, L. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
329. Irwin, K. C. (2001). Using everyday knowledge of decimals to enhance understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(4), 399-420.
330. Jang, S. J. (2003). The constructivist approach of teaching: Mathematics and science. Taipei: Wu-Nan Company.
331. Jang, S. J. (2007). A study of the students’ construction of science knowledge: Talk and writing in a collaborative group. Educational Research, 49(1), 65-81.
332. Jang, S. J. (2006a). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48(2), 177-194.
333. Jang, S. J. (2006b). The effects of incorporating web assisted learning with team teaching in seventh-grade science classes. International Journal of Science Education. 28(6), 615-632.
334. Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z.R. & Arami, M. (2002). The effects of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical authentic tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), 225-250.
335. Li, Q. (2002). Exploration of collaborative learning and communication in an educational environment using computer-mediated communication. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 503-516.
336. Lieberman, A. (1995) .Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591-596.
337. Lieberman, A., Saxl, E.R., & Miles, M.B.(1988). Teaching leadership: Ideology and practice. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
338. Lindquist, M. M. (1989). Mathematics content and small-group instruction in grades four through six. Elementary School Journal, 89, 625-632.
339. Little J.W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of education reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129-151.
340. Lytle, S., and R. Fecho(1991). Meeting stranger in familiar places: Teacher collaboration by cross visitation. English Education, 23(1), 5-28.
341. Miller, L.(1988). Unlikely beginnings: The district office as a starting point for developing a professional culture for teaching. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools. New York: Longman.
342. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
343. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
344. Phelps, E., & Damon, W. (1989). Problem solving with equals: Peer collaboration as a context for learning mathematics and spatial concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 639-646.
345. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
346. Roth, W-M. & Tobin, K. (2001). Learning to teach science as practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 6, 741-62.
347. Roth, W-M., Tobin, K., Zimmermann, A., Bryant, N. & Davis, C. (2002). Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: an activity-theoretical study of learning in coteaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 3, 253-82.
348. Roth, W-M., Tobin, K., Carambo, C., & Dalland, C. (2005). Coordination in coteaching: Producing alignment in real time. Science Education, 89, 675-702.
349. Sandholtz, J.H. (2000). Interdisciplinary team teaching as a form of professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(3), 39-50.
350. Slavin, R. E. (1978). Student teams and comparison among equals: Effects on academic performance and student attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 532-538.
351. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48 (5), 71-81.
352. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
353. Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils’ understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14, 63-82.
354. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
355. Sykes, G (1996). Reform of and as professional development, Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 465-467.
356. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
357. Walther-Thomas, C., Bryant, M., & Land, S. (1996). Planning for effective co-teaching: The key to successful inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 255-265.
358. Welch, M., & Sheridan, S.M.(1995). Educational partnerships: Serving students at risk. Ft. Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
359. Wertsch J. (1991) Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvester, London.
360. Wertsch J., Tulviste P. & Hagstron P. (2003) A sociocultural approach to agency. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
361. Zurita, G. & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 42, 289-314
362. Adams, T. (1997). Addressing students’ difficulties with the concept of function: applying graphing calculators and a model of conceptual change. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19(2), 43-57.
363. Atkinson, R., Mayer, R. & Merrill, M. (2005). Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 117-139.
364. Brandt, D. S. (1997). Constructivism: Teaching for understanding of the internet. Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 112-117.
365. Brown, C. A., Stein, M. K., & Forman, E. A. (1995). Assisting teachers and students to reform the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 63-93.
366. Bruce, B.C. & Levin, J. A. (1997). Educational technology: Media for inquiry, communication, construction, and express. Journal of Education Computing Research, 17(1), 79-102.
367. Chick, H. L., & Watson, J. M. (2001). Data representation and interpretation by primary school students working in groups. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13, 91-111.
368. Chick, H. L., & Watson, J. M. (2002).Collaborative influences on emergent statistical thinking -a case study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 371-400.
369. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-Learning and the science of instruction. New York: Wiley.
370. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). Interaction and learning in mathematics classroom situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 99-122.
371. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing group work: Strategies for heterogeneous classrooms. Teacher College Press, New York.
372. Crowe, D. & Zand, H.(2000) Computers and undergraduate mathematics 1: Setting the scene. Computers and Education, 35, 95-121.
373. Davidson, N. (1985). Small-group learning and teaching in mathematics: a selective review of the research. In: R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 211-230). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
374. Dekker, R. & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 39-65.
375. Dekker, R., Elshout-Mohr, M. & Wood, T. (2006). How children regulate their own collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 57-79.
376. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: cognitive and computational approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
377. Driver, R. (1988). Theory into practice II: A constructivist approach to curriculum development. Development and Dilemmas in Science Education. Falmer Press, Lewes.
378. Edwards, L.D. (1995). The design and analysis of a mathematical micro-world. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 77-94.
379. Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A. (2005). Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the web. Part 2: Attributes and Possibilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics 58(2), 253-276.
380. Erbas, A., Ledford, S., Polly, D., & Orrill, C. (2004). Engaging Students through Technology. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 9 (6), 300-305.
381. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2000). Reshaping teacher and student roles in technology-enriched classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12, 303-320.
382. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193-223.
383. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P. & Geiger, V. (2003). Perspectives on technology mediated learning in secondary school mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 73-89.
384. Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S. & Hsu, R. L. (2006). Development and evaluation of multimedia whiteboard system for improving mathematical problem solving Computers & Education, 46, 105-121.
385. Irwin, K. C. (2001). Using everyday knowledge of decimals to enhance understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(4), 399-420.
386. Jang, S. J. (2008). Innovations in science teacher education: Effects of integrating technology and team-teaching strategies. Computers & Education, 51(2), 646-659.
387. Jang, S. J. (2006a). The effects of incorporating web assisted learning with team teaching in seventh-grade science classes. International Journal of Science Education. 28(6), 615-632.
388. Jang, S. J. (2006b). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48(2), 177-194.
389. Johnson, S. D. & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 31-44.
390. Jonassen, D.H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mind tools for critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
391. Jonanssen, D. H., & Carr, C. S. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls (Vol. 2, pp. 165-196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawlence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
392. Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z.R. & Arami, M. (2002). The effects of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical authentic tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), 225-250.
393. Kutnick, P., Ota, C. & Berdondini, L. (2007). Improving the effects of group working in classrooms with young school-aged children: Facilitating attainment, interaction and classroom activity. Learning and Instruction, (in press).
394. Leikin, R (2004). The wholes that are greater than the sum of their parts: employing cooperative learning in mathematics teachers’ education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 223-256.
395. Leikin, R. & Zaslavsky, O. (1997). Facilitating students’ interactions in mathematics in a cooperative learning setting. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 331-354.
396. Leikin, R. & Zaslavsky, O. (1999). Connecting research with practice: Cooperative learning in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 92, 240-246.
397. Li, Q. (2002). Exploration of collaborative learning and communication in an educational environment using computer-mediated communication. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 503-516.
398. Lindquist, M. M. (1989). Mathematics content and small-group instruction in grades four through six. Elementary School Journal, 89, 625-632.
399. Macdonald, C. J. Stodel, E. J. Farres, L. G. Breithaupt, K. & Gabriel, M. A. (2001). The demand-driven learning model: A framework for web-based learning, Internet and Higher Education, 4, 9-30.
400. Ministry of Education (2003). The curriculum standard of 9-year integrated curriculum for elementary schools. Taipei: Author.
401. Najjar, L. J. (2001). Principles of educational multimedia user interface design. In R. W. Swezey, & D. H. Andrews (Eds.), Readings in training and simulation: A 30-year perspective (pp. 146-158). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
402. Noddings, N. (1985). Small groups as a setting for research on mathematical problem solving. In: E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: multiple research perspectives (pp. 345-359). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
403. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
404. Phelps, E. & Damon, W. (1989). Problem solving with equals: Peer collaboration as a context for learning mathematics and spatial concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 639-646.
405. Quesada, A. R. & Maxwell, M. E. (1994). The effects of using graphing calculators to enhance college students’ performance in precalculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 205-215.
406. Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V., Correa, M., & Flores, P., et al. (2003). Beyond nintendo: Design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers and Education, 40, 71-94.
407. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
408. Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils’ understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14, 63-82.
409. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Syntheses, 80, 121-140.
410. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
411. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interactions and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 390-408.
412. Weir, S. (1989). The computer in schools: Machine as humanizer. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 61-73.
413. Wells, G. (1999) Dialogic inquiry: towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
414. Wertsch J. (1991) Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvester, London.
415. Wertsch J., Tulviste P. & Hagstron P. (2003) A sociocultural approach to agency. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
416. Zurita, G. & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 42, 289-314.