Preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 947-964

  De Jong, Onno ^a   Van Driel, Jan H ^b   Verloop, Nico ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMISTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TEACHING;

PARTICLE MODELS; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE;

EDUCATION;

EID: 27844474260     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20078     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). In P.L. Lijnse, P. Licht, W. De Vos, & A.J. Waarlo (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles (pp. 12-35). Utrecht: CDβ-Press.
2. Baxter, J.A. & Lederman, N.G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 147-161). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
3. Bryan, L.A. & Abell, S.K. (1999). Development of pedagogical knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121-139.
4. Clarke, D. & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967.
5. Clermont, C.P., Krajcik, J.S., & Borko, H. (1993). The influence of an intensive in-service workshop on pedagogical content knowledge growth among novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 21-43.
6. Cochran, K.F., DeRuiter, J.A., & King, R.A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowledge: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263-272.
7. De Vos, W. & Verdonk, A.H. (1987). A new road to reactions. Part 4: The substance and its molecules. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 692-694.
8. De Vos, W. & Verdonk, A.H. (1996). The particulate nature of matter in science education and in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 657-664.
9. Erduran, S. (2001). Philosophy of chemistry: An emerging field with implications for chemistry education. Science & Education, 10, 581-593.
10. Francoeur, E. (1997). The forgotten tool: The design and use of molecular models. Social Studies of Science, 27, 7-40.
11. Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 548-554.
12. Grossman, P.L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Harrison, A.J. & Treagust, D.F. (1996). Secondary students' models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80, 509-534.
14. Ingham, A.M. & Gilbert, J.K. (1991). The use of analogue models by students of chemistry at higher education level. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 193-202.
15. Janesick, V.J. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 379-399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Johnstone, A.H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 701-705.
17. Justi, R.S. & Gilbert, J.K. (2002). Models and modelling in chemical education. In J.K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D.F. Treagust, & J.H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 47-68). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
18. Lampert, M. & Loewenberg, D.B. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Lederman, N.G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M.S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 129-146.
20. Loughran, J.J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education, 31, 289-307.
21. Loughran, J.J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 370-391.
22. Luisi, P.L. & Thomas, R.M. (1990). The pictorial molecular paradigm - pictorial communication in the chemical and biological sciences. Naturwissenschaften, 77, 67-74.
23. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
24. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 3-11.
25. Morrison, J.A. & Lederman, N.G. (2003). Science teachers' diagnosis and understanding of students' preconceptions. Science Education, 87, 849-867.
26. Osborne, H.D. (1998). Teacher as knower and learner, reflections on situated knowledge in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 427-439.
27. Pieren, L., Scheffers-Sap, M., Scholte, H., Vroemen, E., & Davids, W. (1995). Chemie 3HAVO/VWO [Chemistry]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
28. Sanders, L.R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J.D. (1993). Secondary science teachers' knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 723-736.
29. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
30. Smith, D.C. & Neale, D.C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1-20.
31. Smith, J.A. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J.A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Sprinthall, N.A., Reiman, A.J., & Thies-Sprinthall, L. (1996). Teacher professional development. In J. Sikula, T.J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 666-703). New York: Macmillan.
33. Tobin, K., Tippins, D.J., & Gallard, A.J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45-93). New York: Macmillan.
34. Van Driel, J.H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673-695.
35. Van Driel, J.H., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers' PCK. Science Education, 86, 572-590.
36. Yager, R.E. (1983). The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 577-588.