Exploration of collaborative learning and communication in an educational environment using computer-mediated communication

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 503-516

  Li, Qing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Computermediated communication; Language functions; Mathematics and science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007807945     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2002.10782364     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahern, T., & El-Hindi, A. (2000). Improving the instructional congruency of a computer-mediated small-group discussion: A case study in design and delivery. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(3), 385-400.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Anderson, J. (1994). Journal writing: The promise and the reality. Journal of Reading, 36(4), 304-309.
4. Aviv, R., & Golan G. (1998). Pedagogical communication patterns in collaborative telelearning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 26(3), 201-208.
5. Bonk, C., Malikowski, S., Angeli, C., & East, J. (1998). Web-based case conferencing for pre-service teacher education: Electronic discourse from the field. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(3), 269-306.
6. Bruer, J. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Burge, E. (1993). Students’perceptions of learning in computer conferencing: A qualitative analysis. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.
8. Coelho, E. (1992). Cooperative learning: Foundation for a communicative curriculum. In C. Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative language learning: A teachers resource book (pp. 31-50). Englewood Cliffs, CO: Prentice Hall Regents.
9. Coleman, E. (1995). Learning by explaining: Fostering collaborative progressive discourse in science. In R. Beun, M. Baker, & M. Reiner (Eds), Dialogue and instruction: Modeling interaction in intelligent tutoring system, NATO ASI series (pp. 136-147). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
10. Collis, B. (1998). Building evaluation of collaborative learning into a WWW based course: Pedagogical and technical experiences. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 7(1), 17-25.
11. Cookson, P. (1995, May). Analyzing interactoin in audio-conferencing: A progress report. Paper presented at the Invitational Research Conference in Distance Education, Penn State University, State College, PA.
12. Crook, C. (1995). Educational practice within two local computer networks. In C. O’Malley (ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning, NATO ASI series (pp. 165-182). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13. Crookes, G. (1990). The utterance, and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 183-199.
14. Davie, L. (1987). Learning through networks: A graduate course using computer conferencing. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 13(2), 11-26.
15. Finocchiaro, M., & Brumfit, C. (1983). The functional-notional approach: From theory to practice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
16. Flores, M. (1990). Computer conferencing: Composing a feminist community of writers. In C. Handa (Ed.), Computers and community: Teaching composition in the twenty-first century (pp. 107-115). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publisher.
17. Harasim, L. M. (1990). On-line education: An environmental collaboration and intellectual amplification. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), On-line education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 39-64). New York: Praeger.
18. Hartmann, D. (1982). Assessing the dependability of observational data. In D. Hartmann (Ed.), Using observers to study behavior (pp. 51-66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
19. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing, NATO, ASI series (pp. 117-135). Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
20. Henri, F. (1995). Distance learning and computer mediated communication: Interactive, quasi-interactive or monologue. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning, NATO ASI series (pp. 145-161). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
21. Henri, F., & Rigault, C. (1996). Collaborative distance learning and computer conferencing. In T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced educational technology: Research issues and future potential, NATO ASI series (pp. 45-76). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
22. Hunt, K. W. (1966). Recent measures in syntactic development. Elementary English, 43, 732-739.
23. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperations and competition: Theory and research. Minnesota: Interation Book Company.
24. Kitchen, D., & McDougall, D. (1999). Collaborative learning on the Internet. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27(3), 245-258.
25. Knowledge Forum [Computer software]. (1996-2002). Santa Cruz, CA: Learning in Motion, Inc.
26. Lamon, M., Reeve, R., & Caswell, B. (April, 1999). Finding theory in practice: Collaborative networks for professional learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, Montreal. Available: http://csile.oise.utoronto.ca/abstracts/finding_theory.html.
27. McDonell, W (1992). Language and cognitive development through cooperative group work. In C. Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative language learning: A teachers resource book (pp. 51-64). Englewood Cliffs, CO: Prentice Hall Regents.
28. Murphy, K., Cifuentes, L., Yakimovicz, A., Segur, R., Mahoney, S., & Kodali, S. (1996). Students assume the mantle of moderating computer conferencing: A case study. The American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), 20-36.
29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
30. National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. O’Donnell, A., & Dansereau, D. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120-144). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
32. Olsen, R. (1992). Cooperative learning and social studies. In C. Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative language learning: A teacher’s resource book (pp. 85-115). Englewood Cliffs, CO: Prentice Hall Regents.
33. Olsen, R., & Kagan, S. (1992). About cooperative learning. In C. Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative language learning: A teacher’s resource book (pp. 1-30). Englewood Cliffs, CO: Prentice Hall Regents.
34. Quinn, M., & Molloy, M. (1992). “I learned to talk mathematics”: Using cooperative groups with college minority students. In C. Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative language learning: A teacher’s resource book (pp. 117-128). Englewood Cliffs, CO: Prentice Hall Regents.
35. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Student communities for the advancement of knowledge. Communication of ACM, 39(4), 36-37.
36. Turoff, M. (1990). Foreword. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), On-line education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. ix-xiii). New York: Praeger.
37. Waggoner, M. (1992). A case study approach to evaluation of computer conferencing. In A. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 137-146). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
38. Wells, R. (1992). Computer-mediated-communication for distance education: An international review of design, teaching, and institutional issues. ACSDE research monograph. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, American Center for the Study of Distance Education