Innovations in science teacher education: Effects of integrating technology and team-teaching strategies

Computers and Education

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 646-659

  Jang, Syh Jong ^a  

^a CHUNG YUAN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Science teacher education; Team teaching; Web based technology

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; PROBLEM SOLVING; TEACHING;

SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION; TEAM-TEACHING; WEB-BASED TECHNOLOGY;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 43849087979     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Angeli C. Transforming a teacher education method course through technology: Effects on preservice teachers' technology competency. Computers & Education 45 (2005) 383-398
2. Annetta L.A., and Shymansky J.A. Investigating science learning for rural elementary school teachers in a professional-development project through three distance-education strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 10 (2006) 1019-1039
3. Jang S.J. The effects of incorporating web assisted learning with team teaching in seventh-grade science classes. International Journal of Science Education 28 6 (2006) 615-632
4. Jang S.J. Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research 48 2 (2006) 177-194
5. Jang, S. J. (in press). The effects of integrating technology, observation and writing into a teacher education method course. Computers & Education.
6. Bagdonis A., and Salisbury D. Development and validation of models in instructional design. Educational Technology 34 4 (1994) 26-32
7. Barab S.A., Makinster J.G., Moore J.A., and Cunningham D.J. Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational Technology Research and Development 49 (2001) 71-96
8. Bayer A.S. Collaborative-apprenticeship learning: Language and thinking across the curriculum, K-12 (1990), Mayfield Publishing Company, London
9. Bullough R.V., Young J., Birrell J.R., and Clark D.C. Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (2003) 57-73
10. Cohen D.K., McLaughlin M.W., and Talbert J.E. Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction (1993), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
11. Cook L., and Friend M. Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. In: Meyen E., Vergason G., and Whelan R. (Eds). Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive settings (1996), Love, Denver 155-182
12. Cooper L. A comparison of online and traditional computer applications class. Technological Horizons in Education Journal 28 (2001) 52-64
13. Davis K.S., and Falba C.J. Integrating technology in elementary preservice teacher education: orchestrating scientific inquiry in meaningful ways. Journal of Science Teacher Education 13 4 (2002) 303-329
14. Dick W., and Carey L. The systematic design of instruction. second edition. (1985), Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL
15. Doering A., Hughes J., and Huffman D. Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology?. Journal of Research in Education 35 3 (2003) 342-361
16. Edens K.M. Promoting communication, inquiry, and reflection in an early practicum experience via an on-line discussion group. Action in Teacher Education 22 (2000) 14-23
17. Eick C., and Dias M. Building the authority of experience in communities of practice: The development of preservice teachers' practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms. Science Education 89 (2005) 470-491
18. Eick C., Ware F., and Williams P. Coteaching in a science methods course: A situated learning model of becoming a teacher. Journal of Teacher Education 54 (2003) 74-85
19. Erickson F. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. Handbooks of research on teaching (1986), Macmillan, New York
20. Guillaume A.M., and Rudney G.L. Student teachers' growth toward independence: An analysis of their changing concerns. Teaching and Teacher Education 9 (1993) 65-80
21. Handler M.G. Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: Perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators. Computers & Education 20 2 (1993) 147-156
22. Hiltz S.R. Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure, multi-method approach. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network 4 3 (2000) 140-151
23. Johnson D.C. and programming in the school mathematics curriculum: Support is waning - Is there still a case to be made?. Education and Information Technologies 5 (2000) 201-214
24. Jonassen D.H. Computers in the classroom: Mind tools for critical thinking (1996), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
25. Joy E.H., and Garcia F.E. Measuring learning effectiveness: A new look at no significant difference findings. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4 (2000) 33-39
26. Labbo L.D., and Reinking D. Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly 34 (1999) 478-492
27. Levin B.B. Analysis of the content and purpose of four different kinds of electronic communications among preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 32 (1999) 139-156
28. Lewis T. Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 3 (2006) 255-281
29. Li Q. Would we teach without technology? A professor's experience of teaching mathematics education incorporating the internet. Educational Research 45 1 (2003) 61-77
30. Macdonald C.J., Stodel E.J., Farres L.G., Breithaupt K., and Gabriel M.A. The demand-driven learning model: A framework for web-based learning. Internet and Higher Education 4 (2001) 9-30
31. Means, B., & Olson, K. (1995). Technology's role within constructivist classrooms. In Paper presented as part of the symposium, teachers, technology and authentic tasks: Lessons from within and across classrooms, at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
32. Mistler-Jackson M., and Songer N.B. Student motivation and internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 5 (2000) 459-479
33. Mitchell J. On-line writing: A link to learning in a teacher education program. Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (2003) 127-143
34. Munday R., Windham R., and Stamper J. Technology for learning: Are teachers being prepared?. Educational Technology 31 3 (1991) 29-31
35. National Research Council. National science education standards (1996), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
36. Patton M.Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990), Sage Publication, Newbury Park, CA
37. Pope M., Hare D., and Howard E. Enhancing technology use in student teaching: A case study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 13 4 (2005) 573-618
38. Rosaen C.L., Hobson S., and Khan G. Making connections: Collaborative approaches to preparing today's and tomorrow's teachers to use technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 11 2 (2003) 281-306
39. Roth W.-M., Tobin K., Carambo C., and Dalland C. Coordination in coteaching: Producing alignment in real time. Science Education 89 (2005) 675-702
40. Roth W.-M., Tobin K., Zimmermann A., Bryant N., and Davis C. Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: an activity-theoretical study of learning in coteaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 3 (2002) 253-282
41. Russell T.L. The no significant difference phenomenon (1999), North Carolina State University, Raleigh
42. Sandholtz J.H. Interdisciplinary team teaching as a form of professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly 27 3 (2000) 39-50
43. Schaverien L. Teacher education in the generative virtual classroom: developing learning theories through a web-delivered, technology-and-science education context. International Journal of Science Education 25 12 (2003) 1451-1469
44. Schrum L., Skeele R., and Grant M. One college of education's effort to infuse technology: A systemic approach to revision teaching and learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 35 2 (2003) 256-271
45. Songer N.B. Can technology bring students closer to science?. In: Tobin K., and Fraser B. (Eds). The international handbook of science education (1998), Kluwer, AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands 333-348
46. Songer N.B., Lee H.-S., and Kam R. Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 2 (2002) 128-150
47. Stetson R., and Bagwell T. Technology and teacher preparation: An oxymoron?. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 7 (1999) 145-152
48. Strauss A. Qualitative analysis for social scientists (1987), Cambridge University Press, New York
49. Stylianidou F., Boohan R., and Ogborn J. Science teachers' transformations of the use of computer modeling in the classroom: Using research to inform training. Science Education 89 (2005) 56-70
50. Swain C. Preservice teachers' self-assessment using technology: Determining what is worthwhile and looking for changes in daily teaching and learning practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 14 1 (2006) 29-59
51. Tobin K., Roth W.-N., and Zimmermann A. Learning to teach science in urban Schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 8 (2001) 941-964
52. Upitis R., and Russell T. Building a teacher education community: Combining electronic mail with face-to-face interactions. In: Hamilton M.L. (Ed). Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (1998), Falmer Press, London 77-109
53. Vannatta R.A., and Fordham N. Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36 3 (2004) 253-272
54. Volkmann, M., Friedrichsen, P., Abell, S., Arbaugh, F., & Lannin, J. (2004). Becoming a secondary science teacher: Exploring the development of teacher identity in an alternative certification program. In Paper presented at the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Nashville, TN.
55. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society (1978), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
56. Walther-Thomas C., Brtant M., and Land S. Planning for effective co-teaching: The key to successful inclusion. Remedial and Special Education 17 (1996) 255-265
57. Wang Y. When technology meets beliefs: Preservice teachers' perception of the teacher's role in the classroom with computers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 35 (2002) 150-161
58. Wang L., Ertmer P.A., and Newby T.J. Increasing preservice teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36 3 (2004) 231-250
59. Watts-Taffe S., Gwinn C.B., Johnson J.R., and Horn M.L. Preparing preservice teachers to integrate technology with the elementary literacy program. Reading Teacher 57 2 (2003) 130-140
60. Weigel V. E-learning and the tradeoff between richness and reach in higher education. Change 33 (2000) 10-16
61. Welch M., and Sheridan S.M. Educational partnerships: Serving students at risk (1995), Harcourt Brace, Ft. Worth, TX
62. Wenger E. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (1998), Cambridge University Press, New York
63. Willis E.M., and Sujo de Montes L. Does requiring a technology course in preservice teacher education affect student teacher's technology use in the classroom?. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 18 3 (2002) 76-80