Perspective on technology mediated learning in secondary school mathematics classrooms

Journal of Mathematical Behavior

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 73-89

  Goos, Merrilyn ^a   Galbraith, Peter ^a   Renshaw, Peter ^a   Geiger, Vince ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Calculator; Collaborative inquiry; Pedagogy; Projection devices; Secondary school; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038579782     PISSN: 07323123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00005-1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams T.Addressing students' difficulties with the concept of function: applying graphing calculators and a model of conceptual change Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 192 1997 43-57
2. Australian Education Council. (1991). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Melbourne: Australian Education Council and Curriculum Corporation.
3. Brown C.A.Stein M.K.Forman E.A.Assisting teachers and students to reform the mathematics classroom Educational Studies in Mathematics 31 1995 63-93
4. Burns, R. (1997). Introduction to research methods (3rd ed.). Melbourne: Longman.
5. Cobb P. Whitenack J.W. A method for conducting longitudinal analysis of classroom videorecordings and transcripts Educational Studies in Mathematics 30 1996 213-228
6. Doerr H.M. Zangor R. Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator Educational Studies in Mathematics 41 2000 143-163
7. AFarrell A. Roles and behaviors in technology-integrated precalculus classrooms Journal of Mathematical Behavior 15 1996 35-53
8. Forman, E. A. (1996). Learning mathematics as participation in classroom practice: implications of sociocultural theory for educational reform. In: L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 115-130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Galbraith, P., Goos, M., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2001). Integrating technology in mathematics learning: what some students say. In: J. Bobis, B. Perry, & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia on numeracy and beyond (pp. 225-232). Sydney: MERGA
10. Geiger, V. (1998). Students' perspectives on using computers and graphing calculators during mathematical collaborative practice. In: C. Kanes, M. Goos, & E. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia on teaching mathematics in new times (pp. 217-224). Gold Coast, Qld: MERGA.
11. PGoos, M. (1998). Technology as a tool for transforming mathematical tasks. In: P. Galbraith, W. Blum, G. Booker, & I. Huntley (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: teaching and assessing in a technology rich world (pp. 103-113). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.
12. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (1999). Establishing a community of practice in a secondary mathematics classroom. In: L. Burton (Ed.), Learning mathematics: from hierarchies to networks (pp. 36-61). London: Falmer Press.
13. Goos M. Galbraith P. Renshaw P. Geiger V. Reshaping teacher and student roles in technology-enriched classrooms Mathematics Education Research Journal 12 2000a 303-320
14. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2000b). Classroom voices: technology enriched interactions in a community of mathematical practice. Paper presented to Working Group for Action 11 on The Use of Technology in Mathematics Education at the 9th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Tokyo/Makuhari, 31 July-6 August 2000.
15. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2001). Promoting collaborative inquiry in technology enriched mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington, 10-14 April 2001.
16. Guin D.Trouche L.The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: the case of calculators International Journal of Computers in Mathematical Learning 3 1999 195-227
17. Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In: J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19-44). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
18. Lesmeister L.M. The effect of graphing calculators on secondary mathematics achievement. (Unpublished MS thesis, University of Houston) Dissertation Abstracts International 35 1996 01
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
20. Penglase M. Arnold S. The graphics calculator in mathematics education: a critical review of recent research Mathematics Education Research Journal 8 1996 58-90
21. Quesada A.R. Maxwell M.E. The effects of using graphing calculators to enhance college students' performance in precalculus Educational Studies in Mathematics 27 1994 205-215
22. Resnick, L. B., Pontecorvo, C., & Säljö, R. (1997). Discourse, tools, and reasoning. In: L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: essays on situated cognition (pp. 1-20). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
23. Schoenfeld A.H. Ideas in the air: speculations on small group learning, environmental and cultural influences on cognition, and epistemology International Journal of Educational Research 13 1989 71-88
24. Simonsen L.M. Dick T.P. Teachers' perceptions of the impact of graphing calculators in the mathematics classroom Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 16 1997 239-268
25. Stake, R. (1988). Case study methods in educational research: seeking sweet water. In: R. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 253-265). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
26. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Templer, R., Klug, D., & Gould, I. (1998). Mathematics laboratories for science undergraduates. In: C. Hoyles, C. Morgan, & G. Woodhouse (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum (pp. 140-154). London: Falmer.
28. Tharp M.L. Fitzsimmons J.A. Ayers R.L.B. Negotiating a technological shift: teacher perception of the implementation of graphing calculators Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 16 1997 551-575
29. Thomas M. Tyrrell J. Bullock J. Using computers in the mathematics classroom: the role of the teacher Mathematics Education Research Journal 7 1996 38-57
30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Weber, T. E. (1998). Graphing technology and its effect on solving inequalities. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(01A), 88.
32. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Wertsch J.V. Rupert L.J. The authority of cultural tools in a sociocultural approach to mediated agency Cognition and Instruction 11 1993 227-239