Metacognition and Conceptual Change

Teaching Science for Understanding

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 133-163

  Gunstone, Richard F ^a   Mitchell, Ian J ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882521305     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012498360-1/50006-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Baird J.R. Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A classroom study. European Journal of Science Education 1986, 8:263-282.
2. Baird J.R. Metacognition, purposeful enquiry and conceptual change. The student laboratory and the science curriculum 1990, Routledge, London. E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.).
3. Improving the quality of teaching and learning: An Australian case study-The PEEL project 1986, Faculty of Education, Monash University. J.R. Baird, I.J. Mitchell (Eds.).
4. Learning from the PEEL experience 1992, Faculty of Education, Monash University. J.R. Baird, J.R. Northfield (Eds.).
5. Barnes D.R. From communication to curriculum 1976, Penguin, Harmonsworth, U.K.
6. Champagne A.B., Gunstone R.F., Klopfer L.E. Effecting changes in cognitive structures among physics students. Cognitive structure and conceptual change 1985, Academic Press, Orlando, FL. L.H.T. West, A.L. Pines (Eds.).
7. The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning 1994, Falmer Press, London. P.J. Fensham, R.F. Gunstone, R.T. White (Eds.).
8. Gunstone R.F. The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning 1994, Falmer Press, London. P.J. Fensham, R.F. Gunstone, R.T. White (Eds.).
9. Gunstone R.F., Northfield J.R. Metacognition and learning to teach. International Journal of Science Education 1994, 16:523-537.
10. Gunstone R.F., White R.T. Understanding of gravity. Science Education 1981, 65:291-299.
11. Hewson P.W., Hewson G.A.B. The status of students' conceptions. Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies 1992, IPN, Keil, Germany. R. Duit, F. Goldberg, H. Neidderer (Eds.).
12. Mitchell I.J. Teaching for quality learning 1993, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Monash University.
13. Mitchell I.J., Baird J.R. Teaching, learning and the curriculum-1: The influence of content in science. Research in Science Education 1986, 16:141-149.
14. Mitchell I.J., Gunstone R.F. Some student misconceptions brought to the study of stoichiometry. Research in Science Education 1984, 14:78-88.
15. Newman B. Realistic expectations for traditional laboratory work. Research in Science Education 1985, 15:8-12.
16. Osborne R., Freyberg P. Learning in science: the implications of children's science 1985, Heinemann, Auckland.
17. Rowe M.B. Wait time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic, and fate control: Part I. Wait time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1974, 11:81-94.
18. Tao P.K. Conceptual change, collaboration and the computer: Learning introductory mechanics 1996, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Monash University.
19. Tao P.K., Gunstone R.F. The process of conceptual change in force and motion. Paper given at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association 1997.
20. Tasker R. Children's views and classroom experiences. Australian Science Teachers Journal 1981, 27(3):33-37.
21. White R.T. Dimensions of content. The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning 1994, Falmer Press, London. P. Fensham, R. Gunstone, R. White (Eds.).
22. White R.T., Gunstone R.F. Probing understanding 1992, Falmer, London.
23. White R.T., Mitchell I.J. Metacognition and the quality of learning. Studies in Science Education 1994, 23:21-37.