Scientific Discourse and the Rhetoric of Globalization: The Impact of Culture and Language

Scientific Discourse and the Rhetoric of Globalization: The Impact of Culture and Language

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-246

  Pérez Llantada, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85173978560     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (437)

1. Abbot, A. (2008), Publication and the future of knowledge. Paper presented at the Association of American University Presses, 27 June, Montreal. 22 June 2010.
2. Acosta, C., Cuvi, N. and Roque, X. (2003), Ciencia entreEspaña eHispanoamérica. Ecos delsiglo XX. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC).
3. Ädel, A. (2006), Metadiscourse in L1 and L2. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
4. Ädel, A (2008), ‘Metadiscourse across three varieties of English. American, British and advanced-learner English’, in U. Connor, E. Nagelhout and W. Rozycki (eds), Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 45-62.
5. Ädel, A. and Mauranen, A. (eds) (2010), ‘Metadiscourse: diverse and divided perspectives’, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9 (2), 1-11.
6. Adler, N. and Harzing, A. W. (2009), ‘When knowledge wins: transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings’, Academy of Mana,gement Learning and Education, 8: 72-95. 8 October 2011.
7. Afros, E. and Schryer, C. F. (2009), ‘Promotional (meta)discourse in research articles in language and literary studies’, English for Specific Purposes, 28, 58-68.
8. Alcón Soler, E. and Safont Jordà, M. C. (eds) (2008), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
9. ALEPH, DELPHY, L3, OPAL, SLD collaborations, the LEP Electroweak Working Group, the SLD Electroweak and Heavy Flavour Groups (2006), ‘Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance’, Physics Reports, 427 (5-6), 257-454.
10. Allen, J. (2007), ‘Aristotle on the disciplines of argument: rhetoric, dialectic, analytic’, Rhetorica, 25, 87-108.
11. Altbach, P. G. (2004), ‘Globalization and the university: myths and realities in an unequal world’, Tertiary Education and Management, 10 (1), 3-25.
12. Altbach, P. G. and Umakoshi, T. (eds) (2004), Asian Universities: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Challenges. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
13. Ammon, U. (1990), ‘German or English? The problems of choice experienced by German-speaking scientists’, in P. Nelde (ed.), Language Conflict and Minorities. Bonn: Dümmler, pp. 33-51.
14. Ammon, U. (2000), ‘Toward more fairness in international English: linguistic rights of nonnative speakers’, in R. Phillipson (ed.), Rights to Language: Equity and Power in Language Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 111-16.
15. Ammon, U. (2001), ‘English as a future language of science at German universities? A question of difficult consequences, posed by the decline of German as a language of science’, in U. Ammon (ed.), The Dominance of English as a Language of Science. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 343-61.
16. Ammon, U. (2006), ‘Language planning for international scientific communication: an overview of questions and potential solutions’, Current Issues in Language Planning, 7 (1), 1-30.
17. Archambault, E., Vignola-Gagne, E., Larivière, V. and Gringas, Y. (2006), ‘Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: the limits of existing databases’, Scientometrics, 8 (3), 329-42.
18. Aristóteles (1998), Retórica. Madrid: Alianza.
19. Árvay, A. and Tankó, G. (2004), ‘A contrastive analysis of English and Hungarian theoretical research article introductions’, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42 (1), 38-46.
20. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G. and Tiffin, H. (eds) (2001), The Post-colonial Studies Reader. London, New York: Routledge.
21. Askehave, I. and Swales, J. M. (2001), ‘Genre identification and communicative purpose: a problem and a possible solution’, Applied Linguistics, 22 (2), 195-212.
22. Atkinson, D. (2003), ‘Writing and culture in the post-process era’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 49-63.
23. Atkinson, R. C. and Blanpied, W. A. (2007), ‘Research universities: core of the U.S. science and technology system’, Research and Occasional Paper Series: Center for Studies in Higher Education, 5 (7), 1-26.
24. Austin, J. L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Aydinli, E. and Mathews, J. (2000), ‘Are the core and periphery irreconcilable? The curious world of publishing in contemporary international relations’, International Studies Perspectives, 1, 289-303.
26. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981), The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. C. Emerson and M. Holquist (trans), M. Holquist (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
27. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. V. W. McGee (trans), C. Emerson and M. Holquist (eds). Austin: University of Texas Press.
28. Barras, R. (1978), Scientists Must Write. A Guide to Better Writing for Scientists, Engineers and Students. London and New York: Chapman & Hall.
29. Battalio, J. T. (1998), Essays in the Study of Scientific Discourse. Methods, Practice and Pedagogy. Stanford: Ablex Publishing.
30. Baudrillard, J. (1970), The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. London: Sage Publications.
31. Bazerman, C. (1988), Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
32. Bazerman, C. (1990), ‘Discourse analysis and social construction’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 77-83.
33. Bazerman, C. (1994), ‘Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions’, in A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds), Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 79-101.
34. Bazerman, C. (1997), ‘The life of genre, the life in the classroom’, in W. Bishop and H. Ostrom (eds), Genre and Writing. Issues, Arguments, Alternatives. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers, pp. 19-27.
35. Beaufort, A. (1998), Writing in the Real World: Making the Transition from School to Work. New York: Teacers College Press.
36. Becher, T. (1981), ‘Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures’, Studies in Higher Education, 6 (2), 109-22.
37. Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001), Academic Tribes and Territories. Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham: The Society of Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
38. Belcher, D. (1990), ‘How professors initiate nonnative speakers into their disciplinary discourse communities’, Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 1 (3), 207-24.
39. Belcher, D. (2007), ‘Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 16 (1), 1-22.
40. Benfield, J. R. and Howard, K. M. (2001), ‘The language of science’, European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 18, 642-8.
41. Bennett, K. (2007), ‘Epistemicide! The tale of a predatory discourse’. The Translator, 13 (2), 151-69.
42. Bennett, K. (2009), ‘English academic style manuals: a survey’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 43-54.
43. Bennett, K. (2011), Academic Writing in Portugal. Discourses in Conflict. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra.
44. Benson, P. J. (1998), ‘Changing moorings in scientific writing: suggestions to authors, allusions for teachers’, in J. T. Battalio (ed.), Essays in the Study of Scientific Discourse. Methods, Practice and Pedagogy. Stanford: Ablex Publishing, pp. 209-26.
45. Berghammer, G. (2008), ‘English as the lingua franca of science: a translator’s view on what’s lost and what’s gained in translation’, The Write Stuff, 17 (4), 213-19.
46. Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. N. (1995), Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communities: Cognition, Culture, Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Berns, M. (1995), ‘English in the European Union’, English Today, 43 (11-13), 3-11.
48. Bettercourt-Dias, M. (2007), ‘Training scientists in communication skills’, in M. Claessens (ed.), CommunicatingEuropeanResearch. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 69-76.
49. Bhatia, V. K. (1993), Analysing Genre. Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
50. Bhatia, V. K. (2001), ‘Analysing genre: some conceptual issues’, in M. Hewings (ed.), Academic Writing in Context. Implications and Applications. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press, pp. 79-92.
51. Bhatia, V. K. (2002a), ‘A generic analysis of academic discourse’, in J. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic Discourse. Harlow: Pearson Education, pp. 21-39.
52. Bhatia, V. K. (2002b), ‘Applied genre analysis: a multi-perspective model’, Ibérica, 4, 3-19.
53. Bhatia, V. K. (2004), Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-based Approach. London: Continuum.
54. Biber, D. and Gray, B. (2010), ‘Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: complexity, elaboration, explicitness’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2-20.
55. Biber, D. Conrad, S. and Reppen, R. (1998), Corpus Linguistics. InvestigatingLanguage Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999), Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.
57. Bishop, W. and Ostrom, H. A. (eds) (1997), Genre and Writing. Issues, Arguments, Alternatives. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
58. Björk, B.-C., Roos, A. and Lauri, M. (2008), ‘Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different Open Access options’, Proceedings ELPUB 2008 Conference on Electronic Publishing. Toronto, Canada, June 2008, pp. 1-10.
59. Blagojevic, S. (2004), ‘Metadiscourse in academic prose: a contrastive study of academic articles written in English by English and Norwegian native speakers’, Studies About Languages, 5, 60-7.
60. Blakeslee, A. M. (1997), ‘Activity, context, interaction and authority: learning to write scientific papers in situ’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11 (2), 125-69.
61. Bloommaert, J., Collins, J. and Slembrouck, S. (2005), ‘Spaces for multilingualism’, Language and Communication, 25, 197-216.
62. Bondi, M. (2004), ‘The discourse function of contrastive connectors in academic abstracts’, in K. Aijmer and A.-B. Stenström (eds), Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 139-56.
63. Bondi, M. (2007), ‘If you think this sounds very complicated, you are correct: awareness of cultural difference in specialized discourse’, in C. N. Candlin and M. Gotti (eds), InterculturalAspects of Specialized Communication. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 53-78.
64. Bondi, M. (2010), ‘Metadiscursive practices in introductions: phraseology and semantic sequences across genres’, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9 (2), 69-97.
65. Bourdieu, P. (2001), ‘Language and symbolic power’, in A. Jaworski and N. Coupland (eds), The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 502-13.
66. Brandenburg, U. and Zhu, J. (2007), Higher Education in China in the Light of Massification and Demographic Change. Lessons to be Learned for Germany. Gütersloh: CHE Centrum für Hochschulentwicklung gGmbH. 5 July 2010.
67. Breivega, K. R., Dalh, T. and Fløttum, K. (2002), ‘Traces of self and others in research articles: a comparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics’, Applied Linguistics, 12 (2), 218-39.
68. Briggs, C. L. and Bauman, R. (1992), ‘Genre, intertextuality and social power’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2 (2), 131-72.
69. Burgess, S. and Martín-Martín, J. P. (eds) (2008), Publishing and Presenting Research Internationally: Issues for Speakers of English as an Additional Language. Bern: Peter Lang.
70. Burgess, S., Fumero Pérez, M. C. and Díaz Galán, A. (2005), ‘Mismatches and missed opportunities? A case study of a non-English speaking background research writer’, in M. Carretero, L. Hidalgo, J. Lavid, E. Martinez, J. Neff, S. Pérez de Ayala and E. Sánchez-Pardo (eds), A Pleasure of Life in Words: A Festschrift for Angela Downing. Madrid: Dptos de Filología Inglesa I y II. Facultad de Filología. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, pp. 283-304.
71. Burns, A. and Coffin, C. (eds) (2001), Analysing English in a Global Context. London and New York: Routledge.
72. Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2002), Culture and Conventions: Writing and Reading Dutch Scientific English. Utrecht, LOT Dissertation Series 59, Utrecht. 7 October 2011.
73. Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2003), ‘Shapers of published NNS research articles’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 223-43.
74. Button, G. (1991), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Bybee, J. and Fleischman, S. (1995), Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
76. Byram, M. (1995), Intercultural Competence and Mobility in Multinational Contexts: A European View. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
77. Canagarajah, S. (1996), ‘Non-discursive requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars and the politics of knowledge production’, Written Communication, 13 (4), 435-72.
78. Canagarajah, S. (1999), Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79. Canagarajah, S. (2002a), A Geopolitics of Academic Writing. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
80. Canagarajah, S. (2002b), ‘Multilingual writers and the academic community: towards a critical relationship’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1 (1), 29-44.
81. Candelier, M. (2007), Across Languages and Cultures. Framework of Reference for Pluralistic Approaches to Languages and Cultures. Strasbourg, Gratz: Council of Europe/European Center for Modern Languages.
82. Candlin, C. N. and Gotti, M. (eds) (2007), Intercultural Aspects of Specialised Communication. Bern: Peter Lang.
83. Candlin, C. N. and Hyland, K. (1999), Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices. London and New York: Longman.
84. Cargill, M. and O’Connor, P. (2009), Writing Scientific Research Articles: Strategy and Steps. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
85. Carli, A. and Ammon, U. (eds) (2007), ‘Linguistic inequality in scientific communication today. What can future applied linguistics do to mitigate disadvantages for non-Anglophones?’, AILA Review, 20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
86. Casanave, C. P. (2008), ‘The stigmatizing effect of Goffman’s stigma label: a response to John Flowerdew’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7 (4), 264-7.
87. Casanave, C. P. and Vandrick, S. (eds) (2003), Writing for Scholarly Publication: Behind the Scenes in Language Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
88. Castells, M. (2001), La galaxia Internet. Reflexiones sobre Internet, empresa y sociedad. Barcelona: Plaza y Janes.
89. Castells, M. (ed.) (2004), The Network Society. A Cross-cultural Perspective. Cheltenham, MA: Edward Elgar.
90. Castells, M., Giddens, A. and Touraine, A. (2001), Teorías para una nueva sociedad. Madrid: Fundación M. Botín.
91. Clyne, M. (1996), Inter-cultural Communication at Work: Cultural Values in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. Coe, R., Lingard, L. and Teslenko, T. (eds) (2002), The Rhetoric and Ideology ofGenre: Strategies for Stability and Change. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
93. Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (2008), Plan Nacional de Investigación Científica, Desarrollo e Innovation Tecnológica 2008-2011. Madrid: Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología 8 October 2011.
94. Commission of the European Communities (2005), A New Framework Strategy for Plurilingualism. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. 29 August 2011.
95. Commission of the European Communities (2007), Competitive European Regions through Research and Innovation. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. 7 July 2011.
96. Commission of the European Communities (2008), Multilingualism: An Asset for Europe and a Shared Commitment. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. 29 August 2011.
97. Connor, U. (2002), ‘New directions in contrastive rhetoric’, TESOL Quarterly, 36 (4), 493-510.
98. Connor, U. (2004), ‘Intercultural rhetoric research: beyond texts’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 291-304.
99. Connor, U. (2008), ‘Mapping multidimensional aspects of research: reaching to intercultural rhetoric’, in U. Connor, E. Nagelhout and W. Rozycki (eds), From Contrastive to Intercultural Research in Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 299-315.
100. Connor, U. (2011), Intercultural Rhetoric in the Writing Classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
101. Connor, U., Nagelhout, E. and Rozycki, W. (eds) (2008), From Contrastive to Intercultural Research in Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
102. Cook, V. (1991), ‘Going beyond the native speaking in language teaching’, TESOL Quarterly, 33 (2), 185-209.
103. Cook, V. (1993), Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
104. Cooke, R. (1993), ‘Learning to publish in English: how can French researchers bridge the gap?’, ASp, 1, 463-74.
105. Cooke, R. and Birch-Becaas, S. (2008), ‘Help on the spot: online assistance for writing scientific English’, LSP and Professional Communication, 8 (2-16), 96-111.
106. Coulmas, F. (2007), Language Regimes in Transformation. Future Prospects for German and Japanese in Science, Economy and Politics. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
107. Council of Europe (2001), Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108. Coxhead, A. (2000), ‘A new Academic Word List’, TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213-38.
109. Crismore, A. (1989), Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.
110. Crystal, D. (1997), English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111. Curry, M. J. and Lillis, T. (2004), ‘Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: negotiating interests, demands and rewards’, TESOL Quarterly, 38 (4), 663-88.
112. Curry, M. J. and Lillis, T. (2010), ‘Academic research networks: accessing resources for English-medium publishing’, English for Specific Purposes, 29, 281-95.
113. Dahl, T. (2004), ‘Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline?’ Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807-25.
114. Davies, B. L. (2007), ‘Grice’s cooperative principle: meaning and rationality’, Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (12), 2308-31.
115. Devitt, A. J. (2004), Writing Genres. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
116. Dewey, M. (2007), ‘English as a lingua franca and globalization. An interconnected perspective’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17 (3), 332-54.
117. Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P. and Paré, A. (1999), Worlds Apart. Acting and Writing in Academic and Workplace Contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
118. Dressen, D. (2003), ‘Geologists’ implicit persuasive strategies and the construction of evaluative evidence’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4), 273-90.
119. Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2008), ‘From novice to disciplinary expert: disciplinary identity and genre mastery’, English for Specific Purposes, 27, 233-52.
120. Dudley-Evans, T. (2000), ‘Genre analysis: a key theory of ESP?’ Ibérica, 2, 4-11.
121. Dumitru, I. (2008), ‘Aspects regarding the scientific production of a university’, InformaticaEconomică, 4 (48), 77-9.
122. Durand, C. X. (2006), ‘If it’s not in English, it’s not worth reading!’, Current Issues in Language Planning, 7 (1), 44-60.
123. Durrant, P. and Mathews-Aydınlı, J. (2011), ‘A function-first approach to identifying formulaic language in academic writing’, English for Specific Purposes, 30, 58-72.
124. Duszak, A. (1994), ‘Academic discourse and intellectual styles’, JournalofPragmatics, 21, 291-313.
125. Duszak, A. (2005), ‘Between styles and values: an academic community in transition’, in G. Cortese and A. Duszak (eds), Identity, Community, Discourse. English in Intercultural Settings. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 69-94.
126. Duszak, A. and Lewkowicz, J. (2008), ‘Publishing academic texts in English: a Polish perspective’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 108-20.
127. El Malik, A. T. and Nesi, H. (2008), ‘Publishing research in a second language: the case of Sudanese contributors to international medical journals’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 87-96.
128. Englander, K. (2009), ‘Transformation of the identities of nonnative Englishspeaking scientists as a consequence of the social construction of revision’, Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 8 (1), 35-53.
129. European Commission (2003), Third European Report on Science and Technology Indicators. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research. 20 August 2011.
130. European Commission (2006), Study on the Economic and Technical Evolution of the Scientific Publication Markets in Europe. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Brussels. 4 July 2011.
131. European Commission (2007), Towards a European Research Area. Indicators of Science, Technology and Education, Luxembourg: European Communities. 19 August 2011.
132. European Commission (2008), A More Research-intensive and Integrated European Research Area Science, Technology and Competitiveness: Key Figures Report 2008/2009. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.
133. European Commission (2010), European Commission Annual Report 2010. Brussels: European Commission. 12 January 2012.
134. European Research Advisory Board (EURAB) (2006), Scientific Publication: Policy on Open Access. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research. 5 July 2010.
135. Facchinetti, R. and Palmer, F. (eds) (2004), English Modality in Perspective. Genre Analysis and Contrastive Studies. Frankfurt, Berlin: Peter Lang.
136. Fairclough, N. (1989), Language and Power. London and New York: Longman.
137. Fairclough, N. (1993), Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
138. Fairclough, N. (2003), Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.
139. Fairclough, N. (2006), Language and Globalization. London and New York: Routledge.
140. Fasold, R. (1990), The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
141. Feak, C. B. (2009), ‘Negotiating publication: author response to peer review of medical research articles in thoracic surgery’, Revista Ca,naria deEstudios Ingleses, 59, 17-34.
142. Fairclough, N. (2011), ‘Putting strategy into ESP materials development’, in C. Pérez-Llantada and M. Watson (eds), Specialized Languages in the Global Village. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 239-60.
143. Ferguson, G. R. (2005), ‘Is English really a tyrannosaurus rex?’, in P. Durán, G. Aguado de Cea and A. M. R. Riejos (eds), Reflections on Language Use. Madrid: DLACT, pp. 73-93.
144. Ferguson, G. R. (2007), ‘The global spread of English, scientific communication and ESP: questions of equity, access and domain loss’, Ibérica, 13, 7-38.
145. Ferguson, G. R. (2009), ‘Issues in researching English as a lingua franca: a conceptual enquiry’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (2), 117-35.
146. Ferguson, G. R. (2011), ‘English as a lingua franca of business: issues and challenges’, in C. Pérez-Llantada and M. Watson (eds), Specialized Languages in the Global Village. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 9-26.
147. Ferguson, G. R., Pérez-Llantada, C. and Plo, R. (2011), ‘English as an international language of scientific publication: a study of attitudes’, World Englishes, 29 (3), 41-59.
148. Fernández-Polo, F. J. and Cal-Varela, M. (2009), ‘English for research purposes at the University of Santiago de Compostela: a survey’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8 (3), 152-64.
149. Fish, S. (1980), Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
150. Fishelov, D. (1993), Metaphors of Genre: The Role of Analogies in Genre Theory. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press.
151. Fletcher, W. H. (2002-7), KfNgram. Annapolis, MD: USNA.
152. Fløttum, K. (2005), ‘The self and the others -polyphonic visibility in research articles’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15 (1), 29-44.
153. Flowerdew, J. (1999), ‘Writing for scholarly publication in English: the case of Hong Kong’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 123-46.
154. Flowerdew, J. (2000), ‘Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation and the non-native-English-speaking scholar’, TESOL Quarterly, 34, 127-50.
155. Flowerdew, J. (2001), ‘Attitudes of journal editors to non-native-speaker contributions: an interview study’, TESOL Quarterly, 35, 121-50.
156. Flowerdew, J. (ed.) (2002), Academic Discourse. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
157. Flowerdew, J. (2008), ‘Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: what can Goffman’s stigma tell us?’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7 (4), 77-86.
158. Flowerdew, L. (2003), ‘A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis of the problem-solution pattern in a student and professional corpus of technical writing’, TESOL Quarterly, 37 (3), 489-511.
159. Flowerdew, L. (2008), Corpus-based Analyses of the Problem-Solution Pattern. A Phraseological Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
160. Fortanet, I. (2008), ‘Evaluative language in peer review referee reports’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 27-37.
161. Foucault, M. (1970), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Random House.
162. Foucault, M. (1972), The Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith, London: Tavistock Publications.
163. Freedman, A. and Medway, P. (1994), Genre and the New Rhetoric. Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor and Francis.
164. FECYT, Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (2007), Actividades en Investigación Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica. Programa de Trabajo ‘07. Madrid: Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología. 12 January 2012.
165. Garfield, M. (1989), ‘The English language: the lingua franca of international science’, The Scientist, 3 (10), 12.
166. Gee, J. P. (1996), Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideologies in Discourse. London: Taylor and Francis.
167. Gee, J. P. (1999), An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Theory and Method. London: Routledge.
168. Geertz, C. (1983), Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
169. Gentil, G. (2011), ‘A biliteracy agenda for genre research’, Journal ofSecond Language Writing, 20, 6-23.
170. Giannoni, D. (2008), ‘Medical writing at the periphery: the case of Italian journal editorials’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7 (2), 97-107.
171. Giddens, A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
172. Giddens, A. (1999), Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping our Lives. London: Profile Books.
173. Gilbert, G. N. (1977), ‘Referencing as persuasion’, Social Studies of Science, 7, 113-22.
174. Gilbert, G. N. and Mulkay, M. (1984), Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientific Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
175. Gilbert, J. (2005), Catching the Knowledge Wave ? The Knowledge Society and the Future of Education. Wellington: NZGER Press.
176. Glänzel, W. (2003), Bibliometrics as a research field. A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Course Handouts. 8 October 2011.
177. Glänzel, W. and Schubert, A. (2004), ‘Analysing scientific networks through coauthorship’, in H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel and U. Schmoch (eds), Handbook of Quantitative Scienceand Technology Research. The Use of Publication andPatentStatistics in Studies of S&T Systems. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
178. Glänzel, W., Debackere, K. and Meyer, M. (2007), ‘Triad or tetrad? On global changes in a dynamic world’, Working Paper Series, 1-17.
179. Goffman, E. (1986), Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Touchstone.
180. Goodrum, A., McCain, K. W., Lawrence, S. and Giles, C. L. (2001), ‘Scholarly publishing in the internet age: a citation analysis of computer science literature’, Information Processing and Management, 37, 661-75.
181. Gosden, H. (1992), ‘Discourse functions of marked theme in scientific research articles’, English for Specific Purposes, 11, 207-24.
182. Gosden, H. (1995), ‘Success in research article writing: a social-constructionist perspective’, English for Specific Purposes, 14 (1), 37-57.
183. Gosden, H. (2001), ‘Thank you for your critical comments and helpful suggestions: compliance and conflict in authors’ replies to referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers’, Ibérica, 3, 3-17.
184. Gosden, H. (2003), ‘Why not give us the full story?: functions of referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (2), 87-101.
185. Gotti, M. (2005), ‘English in intercultural settings: globalizing trends and local resistance’, in G. Cortese and A. Duszak (eds), Identity, Community, Discourse: English in Intercultural Settings. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 139-66.
186. Gotti, M. (2006), ‘Creating a corpus for the analysis of identity traits in English specialized discourse’, The European English Messenger, 15 (2), 44-7.
187. Grabe, W. and Kaplan, R. (1996), Theory and Practice of Writing. Harlow: Longman.
188. Graddol, D. (1997), The Future of English. UK: The British Council.
189. Gragson, G. M. and Gragson, T. L. (1998), ‘Uncertain science and the sponsored-research process’, in J. T. Battalio (ed.), Essays in the Study of Scientific Discourse. Methods, Practice and Pedagogy. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing, pp. 3-22.
190. Gray, B. (2010), ‘On the use of demonstrative pronouns and determiners as cohesive devices: A focus on sentence-initial this/these in academic prose’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (3), 167-83.
191. Grice, H. P. (1975), ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 44-58.
192. Gross, A. (1990), The Rhetoric of Science: The Rhetorical Analysis of Scientific Texts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
193. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2000), ‘Swedish tomorrow -a product of the linguistic dominance of English?’, Current Issues in Language and Society, 7 (1), 51-69.
194. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2001), ‘Swedish, English, French or German -the language situation at Swedish universities’, in U. Ammon (ed.), The Dominance of English as a Language of Science. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 267-315.
195. Haberland, H. (2005), ‘Domains and domain loss’, in B. Preisler, A. Fabricius, H. Haberland, S. Kjærbeck and K. Risager (eds), The Consequences of Mobility. Roskilde: Roskilde University, Department of Language and Culture, pp. 227-37.
196. Habermas, J. (1984), Cienciay tecnología como ideología. Madrid: Tecnos.
197. Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (eds) (1993), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London, Washington, D.C.: the Falmer Press.
198. Hamel, R. E. (2007), ‘The dominance of English in the international scientific periodical literature and the future of language use in science’, AILA Review, 20, 53-71.
199. Hancioğlu, N., Neufeld, S. and Eldridge, J. (2008), ‘Through the looking glass and into the land of lexico-grammar’, English for Specific Purposes, 27, 459-79.
200. Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000), Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
201. Harley, D., Acord, S. K., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S. and King, C.J. (2010), Assessing the Future Landscape ofScholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines. UC Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education, 22 June 2010.
202. Harwood, N. (2005a), ‘We do not seem to have a theory… The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap: inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing’, Applied Linguistics, 26, 343-75.
203. Harwood, N. (2005b), ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted… In this article I aim to do just that: a corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines’, Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1207-31.
204. Harzing, A. W. K. and Wal, R. van der (2009), ‘A Google Scholar H-Index for journals: an alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business?’, Journal of the America,n Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (1), 41-6.
205. Hasrati, M. (2005), ‘Legitimate peripheral participating and supervising PhD students’, Studies in Higher Education, 30 (5), 557-70.
206. Hazelkorn, E. (2010), ‘Community engagement as social innovation’, in L. C. Weber and J. J. Duderstadt (eds), University Research for Innovation. London, Paris, Geneve: Economica, pp. 63-76.
207. Herr, B. W., Huang, W., Penumarthy, S. and Börner, K. (2007), ‘Designing highly flexible and usable cyberinfrastructures for convergence’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1093, 161-79.
208. Hewings, A. and Hewings, M. (2001), ‘Anticipatory it in academic writing: an indicator of disciplinary difference and developing disciplinary knowledge’, in M. Hewings (ed.), Academic Writing in Context. Implications and Applications. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press, pp. 199-214.
209. Hewings, A., Lillis, T. and Vladimiroua, D. (2010), ‘Who’s citing whose writings? A corpus based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English medium national and English medium international journals’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (2), 102-15.
210. Hewings, M. (2006), ‘English language standards in academic articles: attitudes of peer reviewers’, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 53, 47-62.
211. Hoey, M. (1983), On the Surface of Discourse. London: George Allen & Unwin.
212. Hoey, M. (2001), Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
213. House, J. (2003), ‘English as a lingua franca. A threat to multilingualism?’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7 (4), 556-78.
214. Huckin, T. (1991), Technical Writing and Professional Communication for Nonnative Speakers of English. New York: McGraw Hill.
215. Huckin, T. (2001), ‘Abstracting from abstracts’, in M. Hewings (ed.), Academic Writing in Context. Implications and Applications. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham Press, pp. 93-103.
216. Hunston, S. (1993), ‘Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing’, in M. Ghadessy (ed.), Register Analysis: Theory and Practice. London: Pinter, pp. 57-73.
217. Hunston, S. and Francis, G. (1996), Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
218. Hunston, S. and Thompson, G. (eds) (2000), Evaluation in Texts. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
219. Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A. (1987), English for Specific Purposes. A LearningCentred Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
220. Hyland, K. (1998a), Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
221. Hyland, K. (1998b), ‘Persuasion and context: the pragmatics of academic metadiscourse’, Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-55.
222. Hyland, K. (1999), ‘Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge’, Applied Linguistics, 20 (3), 341-67.
223. Hyland, K. (2000), Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Ltd.
224. Hyland, K. (2001), ‘Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles’, English for Specific Purposes, 20, 207-26.
225. Hyland, K. (2002), ‘Activity and evaluation. Reporting practices in academic writing’, in J. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic Discourse. Harlow: Pearsons Education, pp. 115-30.
226. Hyland, K. (2005), ‘Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse’, Discourse Studies, 7 (2), 173-92.
227. Hyland, K. (2007), ‘Applying a gloss: exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse’, Applied Linguistics, 28 (2), 266-85.
228. Hyland, K. (2008), ‘As can be seen: lexical bundles and disciplinary variation’, English for Specific Purposes, 27, 4-21.
229. Hyland, K. and Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002), ‘EAP: issues and directions’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 1-12.
230. Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2005), ‘Hooking the reader: a corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts’, English for Specific Purposes, 24, 12-39.
231. Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2007), ‘Is there an Academic Vocabulary?’, TESOL Quarterly, 41 (2), 235-53.
232. Hymes, D. (1972), ‘On communicative competence’, in J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-93.
233. Hyon, S. (1996), ‘Genre in three traditions: implications for ESL’, TESOL Quarterly, 30 (4), 693-722.
234. Instituto Cervantes (2010), El espa,ñol en el mundo. Anuario del Instituto Cervantes 2009. Madrid. Instituto Cervantes. 31 August 2011.
235. Ives, B. and Obenchain, K. M. (2007), ‘Scholarly publication: focus on research’, Synergy, 3 (1), 7-15.
236. Jakobson, R. (1975), Ensayos de Ungüística general. Barcelona: Seix Barral.
237. Jameson, F. (1984), ‘Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism’, New Left Review, 146.
238. Jevons, W. S. (1887), The Principles of Science: A Treatise on Logic and Scientific Method. London: Macmillan.
239. Johns, A. M. (1988), ‘The discourse communities dilemma: transferable skills for the academic milieu’, English for Specific Purposes, 7, 55-60.
240. Johns, A. M. (1997), Text, Role and Context. Developing Academic Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
241. Johns, A. M. (ed.) (2002), Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
242. Johns, A. M. (2003), ‘Academic writing: a European perspective’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (4), 313-16.
243. Johns, A. M. and Swales, J. M. (2002), ‘Literacy and disciplinary practices: opening and closing perspectives’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 13-28.
244. Johns, T. (2001), ‘From evidence to conclusion: the case of indicate that in M. Hewings (ed.), Academic Writing in Context. Implications and Applications. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press, pp. 55-62.
245. Kachru, B. B. (1981), ‘An overview of language policy and planning’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2, 2-7.
246. Kachru, B. B. (1985), ‘Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism; the English language in the outer circle’, in R. Quirk and H. Widdowson (eds), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and the Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press in association with The British Council, pp. 11-30.
247. Kachru, B. B. (1986), ‘The power and politics of English’, World Englishes, 5 (2-3), 121-40.
248. Kaplan, R. (1966), ‘Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education’, Language Learning, 16 (1), 1-20.
249. Kaufman-Wills Group (2006), ‘The facts about Open Access’, The Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. 10 July 2011.
250. Kecskes, I. and Papp, T. (2000), Foreign Language and Mother Tongue. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
251. Kerans, M. E. (2002), ‘Close to home: notes on the post-publication withdrawal of a Spanish research paper’, Ibérica, 4, 39-54.
252. Kirkpatrick, A. (2006), ‘Teaching English across cultures. What do English language teachers need to know to know how to teach English’, EA Journal, 23 (2), 20-36.
253. Kirkpatrick, A. (2007), World Englishes: Implications for Language Teaching and International Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
254. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
255. Knorr-Cetina, K. (2009), ‘The synthetic situation: interactionism for a global world’, Interaction, 32 (1), 61-87.
256. Kourilovà, M. (1996), ‘Interactive functions of language in peer reviews of medical papers written by non-native users of English’, UNESCO ALSED-LSP Newsletter, 19 (1), 4-21.
257. Kourilovà, M. (1998), ‘Communicative characteristics of reviews of scientific papers written by non-native users of English’, Endocrine Regulations, 32, 107-14.
258. Kraidy, M. M. (2002), ‘The global, the local and the hybrid: a native ethnography of glocalization’, in S. Taylor (ed.), Ethnographic Research. A Reader. London: Sage, pp. 187-209.
259. Krell, F.-T. (2010), ‘Should editors influence journal impact factors?’, Learned Publishing, 23, 59-62.
260. Kristeva, J. (1980), Desire in Langage: A Semiotic Aproach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
261. Kubota, R. (2002), ‘The impact of globalization on language teaching in Japan’, in D. Block and D. Cameron (eds), Globalization and Language Teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 13-28.
262. Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
263. Lafuente, A. (1996), ‘Conflicto de lealtades: los científicos entre la nación y la República de la Letras’, Revista de Occidente, 161, 97-122.
264. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986), Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
265. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
266. Lawrence, P. A. (2008), ‘Lost in publication: how measurement harms science’, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 1-3.
267. Leech, G., Rayson, P. and Wilson, A. (2001), Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English. London: Longman.
268. Leki, I. (1992), Understanding ESL Writers: A Guide for Teachers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
269. Leki, I. (2003), ‘Tangled webs: complexities of professional writing’, in C. P. Casanave and S. Vandrick (eds), Writing for Scholarly Publication: Behind the Scenes in Language Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 125-36.
270. Lillis, T. and Curry, M. J. (2006), ‘Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts’, Written Communication, 23 (1), 3-35.
271. Lillis, T. and Curry, M. J. (2010), Academic Writing in a Global Context. The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. London: Routledge.
272. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry. London: Sage.
273. Ljosland, J. R. (2007), ‘English in Norwegian academia: a step towards diglossia?’, World Englishes, 26 (4), 395-410.
274. Locke, S. (2001), ‘Sociology and the public understanding of science: from rationalization to rhetoric’, British Journal of Sociology, 52 (1), 1-18.
275. Long, J. S. and Fox, M. F. (1995), ‘Scientific careers: universalism and particularism’, Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 45-71.
276. Longino, H. (1990), Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
277. Lorés, R. (2004), ‘On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organization’, English for Specific Purposes, 23, 280-302.
278. Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P. and Lafuente-Millán, E. (eds) (2010), Constructing Interpersonality. Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Press.
279. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
280. Markkanen, R. and Schröder, H. (eds) (1997), Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
281. Martín, P. (2002), ‘A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences’, English for Specific Purposes, 22 (1), 25-43.
282. Martin, B. and Tang, P. (2007), The Benefits from Publicly Funded Research. Falmer: The University of Sussex. 20 August 2011.
283. Martin, C. and Chabolle, F. (2010), ‘De l’évolution récente de notre revue scien-tifique’, Annales françaises d’Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale, 127 (1), 1.
284. Martinez, I. A. (2001), ‘Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure’, English for Specific Purposes, 20, 227-47.
285. Matsuda, P. K. and Tardy, C. M. (2007), ‘Voice in academic writing: the rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review’, English for Specific Purposes, 26 (2), 235-49.
286. Matthiessen, C. (1995), Lexicographical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
287. Mauranen, A. (1992), ‘Reference in academic rhetoric: A contrastive study of Finnish and English writing’, in A. C. Lindeberg (ed.), Nordic Research on Text and Discourse. Nordtext Symposium 1990. Abo, Finland: Abo Akademi Press, pp. 237-50.
288. Mauranen, A. (1993a), Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Frankfurt and Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
289. Mauranen, A. (1993b), ‘Cultural differences in academic discourse -problems of a linguistic and cultural minority’, in L. Löfman, L. Kirki-Suonio, S. Pellinen and J. Lehtonen (eds), The Competent Intercultural Communicator. Tampere: Publications de l’association finlandaise de linguistique appliquée 51, pp. 157-74.
290. Mauranen, A. (2001), ‘Descriptions or explanations? Some methodological issues in contrastive rhetoric’, in M. Hewings (ed.), Academic Writing in Context, Birmingham, England: University of Birmingham Press, pp. 43-54.
291. Mauranen, A. (2003), ‘The corpus of English as lingua franca in academic settings’, TESOL Quarterly, 37 (3), 513-27.
292. Mauranen, A. (2005), ‘English as a lingua franca -an unknown language?’, in G. Cortese and A. Duszak (eds), Identity, Community, Discourse: English in Intercultural Settings. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 269-93.
293. Mauranen, A. (2011), ‘English as the lingua franca of the academic world’, in D. Belcher, A. M. Johns and B. Paltridge (eds), New Directions in English for Specific Purposes Research. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, pp. 94-117.
294. Mauranen, A. and Bondi, M. (2003), ‘Evaluative language use in academic discourse’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 269-71.
295. Mauranen, A. and Metsä-Ketelä, M. (eds) (2006), Nordic Journal of English Studies. Special Issue: English as a Lingua Franca, 5 (2), 1-8.
296. Mauranen, A., Hynninen, N. and Ranta, E. (2010a), ‘English as an academic lingua franca: the ELFA project’, English for Specific Purposes, 29, 183-90.
297. Mauranen, A., Pérez-Llantada, C. and Swales, J. M. (2010b), ‘Academic Englishes: a standardized knowledge?’, in A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), The Rűutledge Handbook of World Englishes. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 634-52.
298. Medgyes, P. and Kaplan, R. B. (1992), ‘Discourse in a foreign language: the example of Hungarian scholars’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 98, 67-100.
299. Medway, P. (2002), ‘Fuzzy genres and community identities: the case of architecture students’ sketchbooks’, in R. Cole, L. Lingard and T. Teslenko (eds), The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 123-53.
300. Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J., Thomas, R. and Davies, A. (2008), ‘Hegemonic academic practices: experiences of publishing from the periphery’, Organization, 15, 584-97.
301. Miller, C. R. (1984), ‘Genre as social action’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70 (2), 151-67.
302. Miller, C. R.. (1994), ‘Rhetorical community. The cultural basis of genre’s understanding how to participate in the actions of a community’, in A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds), Genre and the New Rhetoric. Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor and Francis, pp. 67-78.
303. Misăk, A., Marusìć, M. and Marusìć, A. (2005), ‘Manuscript editing as a way of teaching academic writing: experience from a small scientific journal’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 122-31.
304. Mittelman, J. (1996), Globalization: Critical Reflections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
305. Moreno, A. I. (1997), ‘Genre constraints across languages: causal metatext in Spanish and English’, English for Specific Purposes, 16, 161-79.
306. Moreno, A. I. (2008), ‘The importance of comparable corpora in cross cultural studies’, in U. Connor, E. Nagelhout and W. V. Rozycki (eds), Contrastive Rhetoric. Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 25-41.
307. Moreno, A. I. (2010), ‘Researching into English for research publication purposes from an applied intercultural perspective’, in M. Ruiz-Garrido, J. C. Palmer-Silveira and I. Fortanet-Gómez (eds), English for Professional and Academic Purposes. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, pp. 57-71.
308. Munby, J. (1978), Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
309. Mungra, P. and Webber, P. (2010), ‘Peer review process in medical research publications: language and content comments’, English for Specific Purposes, 29, 43-53.
310. Mur-Dueñas, P. (2010), ‘Attitude markers in business management research articles: a cross-cultural corpus-driven approach’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20 (1), 50-72.
311. Murray, H. and Dingwall, S. (2001), ‘The dominance of English at European universities: Switzerland and Sweden compared’, in U. Ammon (ed.), The Dominance of English as a Language of Science: Effects on Other Languages and Language Communities. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 85-112.
312. Myers, G. (1990), ‘Stories and styles in two molecular biology review articles’, in C. Bazerman and J. Paradis (eds), Textual Dynamics in the Professions. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 45-75.
313. Myers, G. (1996), ‘Strategic vagueness in academic writing’, in E. Ventola and A. Mauranen (eds), Academic Writing. Intercultural and Textual Issues. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 3-18.
314. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. and Watkinson, A. (2005), ‘Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis’, Journal of Documentation, 61 (2), 248-80.
315. Nickerson, C. (2005), ‘English as a lingua franca in international business contexts’, English for Specific Purposes, 24 (4), 367-80.
316. Norris, C. (2000), Deconstruction. Theory and Practice. London, New York: Routledge.
317. Oakes, L. (2005), ‘From internationalization to globalization’, Language Problems and Language Planning, 29 (2), 151-76.
318. Okamura, A. (2008), ‘Citation forms in scientific texts: similarities and differences in L1 and L2 professional writing’, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 7 (3), 61-81.
319. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007), Main Science and Technology Indicators 2007. Paris: OECD Publishing.
320. Orna-Montesinos, C. (2012), Constructing Professional Discourse. A Multi-perspective Approach to Domain-specific Discourses. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
321. Pabón, S. C. and Costa, M. C. da (2006), ‘Visibilidade das publicações científicas latinoamericanas: o exemplo da Bolivia’, Journal of Science Communication, 5 (2), 1-8.
322. Paltridge, B. (2002), ‘Academic literacies and changing university communities’, Revista Ca,naria deEstudios Ingleses, 44, 15-28.
323. Paltridge, B., Harbon, L., Hirsh, D., Shen, H., Stevenson, M., Phakiti, A. and Woodrow, L. (2009), Teaching Academic Writing. An Introduction for Teachers of Second Language Writers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
324. Parker, J. (2002), ‘A new disciplinarity: communities of knowledge, learning and practice’, Teaching in Higher Education, 7 (4), 373-86.
325. Parodi, G. (2010), Academic and Professional Discourse Genres in Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
326. Pauly, D. and Stergiou, K. I. (2008), ‘Re-interpretation of “influence weight” as a citation-based Index of New Knowledge (INK) ’, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 75-8.
327. Pennycook, A. (2007), Global Englishes and Transcultural Flows. London, New York: Routledge.
328. Pennycook, A. (2010), Language as a Local Practice. Oxford: Routledge.
329. Pérez-Llantada, C. (2004), ‘The epistemic nature of disciplinary discourses: echoing postmodern literary practices’, Revista de Estudios de la Complutense, 12, 25-41.
330. Pérez-Llantada, C. (2007), ‘Native and non-native English scholars publishing research internationally: a small-scale study on authorial (in)visibility’, Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), 217-38.
331. Pérez-Llantada, C. (2008), ‘Humans vs. machines? A multi-perspective model for ESP discourse analysis in intercultural rhetoric research’, ESP across Cultures, 5, 91-104.
332. Pérez-Llantada, C. (2010a), ‘The discourse functions of metadiscourse in published writing: culture and language issues’, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9 (2), 41-68.
333. Pérez-Llantada, C. (2010b), ‘The “dialectics of change” as a facet of globalization. Epistemic modality in academic writing’, in M. Ruiz-Garrido, J. C. Palmer-Silveira and I. Fortanet-Gómez (eds), English for Professionaland Academic Purposes. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, pp. 25-42.
334. Pérez-Llantada, C. (2011), ‘Heteroglossic (dis) engagement and the construal of the ideal readership: dialogic spaces in academic texts’, in V. Bhatia, P. Sánchez and P. Pérez-Paredes (eds), Researching Specialized Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 25-45.
335. Pérez-Llantada, C., Plo, R. and Ferguson, G. R. (2011), ‘ You don’t say what you know, only what you can: the perceptions and practices of senior Spanish academics regarding research dissemination in English’, English for Specific Purposes, 30 (1), 18-30.
336. Petersen, M. and Shaw, P. (2002), ‘Language and disciplinary differences in a biliterate context’, World Englishes, 21, 357-74.
337. Phillipson, R. (1992), Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
338. Phillipson, R. (2003), English-only Europe? Challenging Language Policy. London: Routledge.
339. Pinch, T. (1998), ‘Cold fusion and the sociology of scientific knowledge’, in J. T. Battalio (ed.), Essays in the Study of Scientific Discourse. Methods, Practice and Pedagogy. Stanford: Ablex Publishing, pp. 73-88.
340. Plaza, L., Granadino, B. and Arias-Salgado, M. J. (2009), ‘Las revistas científicas editadas en lengua española: su misión actual y sus perspectivas como instur-mento para la difusión internacional de la ciencia’, in M. J. Arias-Salgado, M. Cámara, B. Granadino, J. A. López, D. Martin, L. Plaza and V. Vivanco (eds), El español, lenguapra la ciencia y la tecnología. Presente y perspectivas de futuro. Alcalá de Henares: Santillana, pp. 41-56.
341. Poon, A. Y. K. (2010), ‘Language use and language policy and planning in Hong Kong’, Current Issues in Language Planning, 11 (1), 1-66.
342. Prior, P. A. (1998), Writing/Disciplinarity. A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. New York, London: Routledge.
343. Putnam, L. L. (2009), ‘Symbolic capital and academic fields: an alternative discourse on journal rankings’, Management Communication Quarterly, 23 (1), 127-34.
344. Quirk, R. and Greenbaum, S. (1978), A Concise Grammar of Contemporary English. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
345. Reeves, C. (2005), The Language of Science. Oxon: Routledge.
346. Repanovici, A. (2010), ‘Measuring the visibility of the university’s scientific production using GoogleScholar, Publish or Perish software and Scientometrics’, World Library and Information Congress. 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden. 10 July 2011.
347. Rezzano, N. S. (2004), ‘Modality and modal responsibility in research articles in English’, in R. Facchinetti and F. Palmer (eds), English Modality in Perspective. Genre Analysis and Contrastive Studies. Frankfurt, Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 101-18.
348. Riley, K. (1991), ‘Passive voice and rhetorical role in scientific writing’, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 21 (3), 239-57.
349. Ringdal, K. G., Lossius, H. M. and Søreide, K. (2009), ‘Getting your message through: an editorial guide for meeting publication standards’, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 17, 1-4. 13 April 2010.
350. Roberts, R. H. and Good, J. M. M. (eds) (1993), The Recovery of Rhetoric: Persuasive Discourse and Disciplinarity in the Human Sciences. London: Bristol Classical Press.
351. Said, E. W. (1993), Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.
352. Salager-Meyer, F. (1994), ‘Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse’, English for Specific Purposes, 13, 149-70.
353. Salager-Meyer, F. (2000), ‘Procrustes’ recipe: hedging and positivism’, English for Specific Purposes, 19, 175-87.
354. Salager-Meyer, F. (2008), ‘Scientific publishing in developing countries: challenges for the future’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7 (2), 121-32.
355. Salkie, R. (1995), Text and Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
356. Salmi, J. (2010), ‘The challenge of establishing world-class research universities in developing countries’, in L. C. Weber and J. J. Duderstadt (eds), University Research for Innovation. London, Paris, Geneve: Economica, pp. 271-86.
357. Salter, A. J. and Martin, B. R. (2001), ‘The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research. A critical review’, Research Policy, 30, 509-32.
358. Samraj, B. (2002), ‘Introductions in research articles: variations across disciplines’, English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1-17.
359. Sano, H. (2002), ‘The world’s lingua franca of science’, English Today, 18 (4), 45-9.
360. Sarup, M. (1993), An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism. New York, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
361. Savory, T. H. (1953), The Language of Science. Its Growth, Character and Usage. London: Andre Deutsch Limited.
362. Schneegans, S. (ed.) (2010), UNESCO Science Report 2010. The Current Status ofScience Around the World. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
363. Scollon, R. (2001), Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. London: Routledge.
364. Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (1995), Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
365. Scott, M. (2008), Wordsmith Tools 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
366. Seidlhofer, B. (2001), ‘Closing a conceptual gap: the case for a description of English as a lingua franca’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 133-58.
367. Seidlhofer, B. (2005), ‘English as a lingua franca’, ELT Journal, 59 (4), 339-41.
368. Seidlhofer, B., Breiteneder, A. and Pitzl, M.-L. (2006), ‘English as a lingua franca in Europe: challenges for applied linguistics’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 3-34.
369. Šeškauskienė, I. (2009), ‘The paper suggests: inanimate subject + active verb in English linguistic discourse’, KALBOTYRA, 60 (3), 84-93.
370. Shapin, S. (1995), ‘Here and everywhere: sociology of scientific knowledge’, Annual Review of Sociology, 21 (1), 289-321.
371. Seidlhofer, B. (1996), The Scientific Revolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
372. Shaw, P. (2003), ‘Evaluation and promotion across languages’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4), 343-57.
373. Sifakis, N. (2007), ‘The education of teachers of English as a lingua franca: a transformative perspective’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17 (3), 355-75.
374. Silva-Corvalán, C. (ed.) (1995), Spanish in Four Continents: Studies in Language Contact and Bilingualism. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
375. Simpson, R. (2004), ‘Stylistic features of academic speech: the role of formulaic expressions’, in U. Connor and T. A. Upton (eds), Discourse in the Professions. Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 37-64.
376. Simpson-Vlach, R. and Ellis, N. C. (2010), ‘An academic formulas list: new methods in phraseology research’, Applied Linguistics, 31 (4), 487-512.
377. Sinclair, J. (2004), Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.
378. Sionis, C. (1995), ‘Communication strategies in the writing of scientific research articles by non-native users of English’, English for Specific Purposes, 14 (2), 99-113.
379. Sjolander, C. T. (1996), ‘The rhetoric of globalization: what’s in a wor(l)d?’, International Journal, 51 (4), 603-16.
380. Skelton, P. (1997), ‘The representation of truth in academic medical writing’, Applied Linguistics, 18 (2), 121-40.
381. Sollaci, L. B. and Pereira, M. G. (2004), ‘The Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey’, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92 (3), 364-71.
382. Solomon, J. F. (1988), Discourse and Reference in the Nuclear Age. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
383. Spivak, G. C. (1990), The Post-colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues. Ed. by Sa. Harasym. London: Routledge.
384. StJohn, M.J. (1987), ‘Writing processes of Spanish scientists publishing in English’, English for Specific Purposes, 6 (2), 113-20.
385. Stadler, S. (2011), ‘Intercultural competence and its complementary role in language education’, in C. Pérez-Llantada and M. Watson (eds), Specialized Languages in the Global Village. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 261-86.
386. Starbuck, W. H. (2005), ‘How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication’, Organization Science, 16 (2), 180-200.
387. Steinman, L. (2003), ‘Cultural collisions in L2 academic writing’, TESL Canada Journal, 20 (2), 80-91.
388. Stenberg, L. (2004), Government Research and Innovation Policies in Japan. Stockholm, Sweden; Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies. 5 July 2010.
389. Storey, J. (1993), An Introductory Guide to Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
390. Stotesbury, H. (2003), ‘Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 327-41.
391. Strunk, W. (1918), The Elements of Style. Ithaca, New York: W. P. Humphrey.
392. Suttmeier, R. P. (2002), Globa,lization, Structural Cha,nge and the Role ofGovernment in China’s Search for a National Innovation Strategy. Oregon: University of Oregon, 1 July 2011.
393. Swales, J. M. (1981), Aspects of Research Article Introductions. ESP Monograph No. 1 Language Studies Unit. Aston: Aston University.
394. Swales, J. M. (1990), Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
395. Swales, J. M. (1997), ‘English as tyrannosaurus rex’, World Englishes, 16, 373-82.
396. Swales, J. M. (1998), Other Floors, Other Voices: A Textography of a Small University Building. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
397. Swales, J. M. (2002), ‘On models in applied discourse analysis’, in C. Candlin (ed.), Research on Discourse and the Professions. Hong Kong: City University Press, pp. 61-77.
398. Swales, J. M. (2004), Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
399. Swales, J. M. (2005), ‘Attended and unattended “this” in academic writing: a long and unfinished story’, ESP Malaysia, 11, 1-15.
400. Swales, J. M. (2009), ‘Worlds of genre -metaphors of genre’, in C. Bazerman, A. Bonini and D. Figueiredo (eds), Genre in a Changing World. Fort Collins: WAC Clearinghouse, pp. 1-16.
401. Swales, J. M. and Feak, C. B. (1994), Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
402. Swales, J. M. and Feak, C. B. (2009a), Telling a Research Story. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
403. Swales, J. M. and Feak, C. B. (2009b), Abstracts and the Writing of Abstracts. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
404. Swales, J., Ahmad, U., Chang, Y.-Y., Chavez, D., Dressen, D. and Seymour, R. (1998), ‘Consider this: the role of imperatives in scholarly writing’, Applied Linguistics, 19 (1), 97-121.
405. Tardy, C. (2004), ‘The role of English in scientific communication: lingua franca or tyrannosaurus rex?’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3 (3), 247-69.
406. Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S. and Icke, V. (1981), ‘On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers’, The ESP Journal, 1 (2), 123-40.
407. Taylor, S. (2002), Ethnographic Research. A Reader. London: Sage Publications.
408. Thompson, G. (2001), ‘Interaction in academic writing. Learning to argue with the reader’, Applied Linguistics, 22 (1), 58-78.
409. Thomson Scientific (2007), Thomson Scientific Takes a Fresh Look at Multiauthor Papers. 8 October 2011.
410. Thrall, C. (1992), ‘Bakhtin, collaborative partners and published discourse: a collaborative view of composing’, in J. Forman (ed.), New Visions of Collaborative Writing. Portsmouth Boynton/Cook Publishers, pp. 63-81.
411. Toal, G. O. (2000), ‘The postmodern geopolitical condition: states, statecraft, and security into the twenty first century’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90 (1), 166-78.
412. Tomalin, B. and Stempleski, S. (1995), Cultural Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
413. Tomlin, R. S. (1997), ‘Mapping conceptual representations into linguistic representations: the role of attention in grammar’, in J. Nuyts and E. Pederson (eds), Language and Conceptualization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 162-89.
414. Trappes-Lomax, H. (2002), ‘Language in language teacher education: a discourse perspective’, in H. Trappes-Lomax and G. R. Ferguson (eds), Language in Language Teacher Education. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1-22.
415. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2010), UNESCO Science Report 2010. The Current Status of Science around the World. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. 8 October 2011.
416. Uzuner, S. (2008), ‘Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: a literature review’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 250-63.
417. Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985), ‘Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse’, College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93.
418. Varttala, T. (1999), ‘Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles’, English for Specific Purposes, 18 (2), 177-200.
419. Vassileva, I. (2000), Who is the Author? A Contrastive Analysis of Authorial Presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian Academic Discourse. Sankt Augustin: Asgard Verlag.
420. Vázquez, I. and Giner, D. (2009), ‘Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modeling persuasion in academic discourses’, Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 22, 219-37.
421. Ventola, E. and Mauranen, A. (1991), ‘Non-native writing and native revising of scientific articles’, in E. Ventola (ed.), Functional and Systemic Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 457-92.
422. Verschueren, J. (1999), Understanding Pragmatics. London, New York: Arnold.
423. Vold, E. T. (2006), ‘Epistemic modality markers in research articles: a cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16 (1), 61-87.
424. Warchał, K. (2010), ‘Moulding interpersonal relations through conditional clauses: consensus-building strategies in written academic discourse’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (2), 140-50.
425. White, P. R. R. (2003), ‘Beyond modality and hedging: a dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance’, Text, 23 (2), 259-84.
426. Whitley, R. (2000), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
427. Widdowson, H. (2006), ‘EIL, ESL, EFL: global issues and local interests’, in K. Bolton and B. B. Kachru (eds), World Englishes: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, New York: Routledge, pp. 163-77.
428. Wilkinson, A. (1991), The Scientist's Handbook for Writing Papers and Dissertations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
429. Williams, R. and Edge, D. (1996), ‘The social shaping of technology’, Research Policy, 25, 865-99.
430. Woodward-Kron, R. (2008), ‘More thanjustjargon-the nature and role of specialist language in learning disciplinary knowledge’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7 (3), 234-49.
431. World Bank (2002), World Bank Development Indicators 2002. Washington DFC: World Bank Publications.
432. World Bank (2011), World Bank Development Indicators 2011. Washington DFC: World Bank Publications.
433. Yakhontova, T. (2002), ‘Selling or telling? The issue of cultural variation in research genres’, in J. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic Discourse. London: Pearson, pp. 216-32.
434. Yakhontova, T. (2006), ‘Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: the issue of influencing factors’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5 (2), 153-67.
435. Yule, G. (1996), Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
436. Zamel, V. (1997), ‘Towards a model of transculturation’, TESOL Quarterly, 31, 341-52.
437. Zamel, V. and Spack, R. (eds) (1998), Negotiating Academic Literacies: Teaching and Learning across Languages and Cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.