Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 127-150

  Flowerdew, John ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038216182     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3588099     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allison, D., Cooley, L., Lewkowicz, J., & Nunan, D. (1988). Dissertation writing in action. English for Specific Purposes, 2, 209-217.
2. Ball, S. J. (1988). Participant observation. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research methodology and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 310-314). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
3. Bartholomae, D. (1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write (pp. 134-165). New York: Guilford Press.
4. Bazerman, C. (1980). A relationship between reading and writing: The conversational model. College English, 41, 656-661.
5. Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2, 3-23.
6. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
8. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1993). You are what you cite: Novelty and intertextuality in a biologist's experimental article. In N. R. Blyler & C. Thralls (Eds.), Professional communication: The social perspective (pp. 109-127). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T., & Akerman, J. (1988). Conventions, conversations, and the writer: Case study of a student in a rhetoric Ph.D. program. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 9-44.
11. Bizzell, P. (1982a). Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. PRE/TEXT, 3, 213-243.
12. Bizzell, P. (1982b). College composition: Initiation into the academic discourse community. [Review of Four worlds of writing and Writing in the arts and sciences]. Curriculum Inquiry, 12, 191-207.
13. Casanave, C. P. (1995). Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 83-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Connor, U. (1999). Learning to write academic prose in a second language: A literacy autobiography. In G. Braine (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 29-42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Dias, P. (1994). Initiating students into discipline-based reading and writing. In A. Freeman & P. Medway (Eds.), Learning and teaching genre (pp. 193-206). Portsmouth, NH: Elsevier.
16. Dudley-Evans, T. (1991). Socialisation into the academic community: Linguistic and stylistic expectations of a Ph.D. thesis as revealed by supervisor comments. In P. Adams, B. Heaton, & P. Howarth (Eds.), Socio-cultural issues in English for academic purposes (pp. 41-51). London: Macmillan.
17. Flowerdew, J. (1999a). Attitudes of journal editors to non-native speaker contributions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Flowerdew, J. (1999b). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 243-264.
19. Flowerdew, J. (1999c). A text analysis of the introductions to two manuscript submissions written by Hong Kong academics. Manuscript in preparation.
20. Flowerdew, J. (1999d). Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 123-145.
21. Flowerdew, J., & Dudley-Evans, A. (1999). Genre analysis of editorial letters to international journal contributors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
23. Gosden, H. (1995). Success in research article writing and revisions: A social constructionist perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 14, 37-57.
24. Gosden, H. (1996). Verbal reports of Japanese doctoral students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 109-128.
25. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Lave, J. (1998). Communities of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Li, X. M. (1999). Writing from the vantage point of an outsider/insider. In G. Braine (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 43-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Myers, G. (1985). The social construction of two biologists' proposals. Written Communication, 12, 219-245.
30. Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Sengupta, S., Forey, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1999). Supporting effective English communication within the context of teaching and research in a tertiary institute: Developing a genre model for consciousness raising. English for Specific Purposes, 18(Supplement), S7-S22.
32. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
34. Weissberg, R., & Buker, S. (1990). Writing up research: Experimental research report writing for students of English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.