Literacy and disciplinary practices: Opening and closing perspectives

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 13-28

  Johns, Ann M ^a   Swales, John M ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444431972     PISSN: 14751585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00003-6     Document Type: Note

References (41)

1. Askehave, I., & Swales, J. M. (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: a problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22, 195-212.
2. Bahktin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: four essays by M.M. Bahktin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.) Austin: University of Texas.
3. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/Oxford.
4. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1999). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates.
5. Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
6. Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: theory, politics, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Bunton, D. (1998). Linguistic and textual problems in PhD and M Phil theses: an analysis of genre moves and metatext. Unpublished PhD thesis. The University of Hong Kong.
8. Chagnon, N. (1968). Yanamamo: the fierce people. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9. Chang, Y.-Y., & Swales, J. M. (1999). Informal elements in academic writing: threats and opportunities for advanced non-native speakers. In C. Candlin, & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 145-164). London: Longman.
10. Connor, U., & Mayberry, S. (1996). Learning disciplin-speciflc academic writing: a case study of a Finnish graduate student in the United States. In E. Ventola, & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: intercultural and textual issues (pp. 231-253). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
11. Dong, Y. R. (1996). Learning to use citations for knowledge transformation: non-native doctoral students' dissertation writing in science. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 428-457.
12. Dong, Y. R. (1998). Non-native speaker graduate students' thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and advisors from two US institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 369-390.
13. Dudlcy-Evans, T. (1999). The dissertation: a case of neglect? In P. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in E AP writing research and instruction (pp. 28-36). Reading University: CALS.
14. Dudley-Evans, T. (2002). The teaching of the academic essay. Is a genre approach possible? In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: multiple perspectives (pp. 225-236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Geertz, C. (1988). Words and lives The anthropologist as author. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, England: Longman/Pearson.
17. Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin, & K., Hyland, (Eds.), (pp. 99-121)
18. Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. James, K. (1984). The writing of theses by speakers of English as a foreign language. In R. Williams, J. Swales, & J. Kirkman (Eds.), Common ground: shared inyterests in ESP and communication studies (pp. 99-113). Oxford: Pergamon.
20. Johns, A. M. (2002). Destabilizing and enriching novice students' genre theories. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: multiple perspectives (pp. 237-248). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
21. Johns, A. M. (2001). An interdisciplinary, interinstitutional learning communities program: student involvement and student success. In I. Leki (Ed.), Academic writing programs: case studies in TESOL practice (pp. 61-72). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
22. Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: developing academic, literacies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1999). Writing as academic literacies: understanding textual practices in higher education. In C. Candlin, & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: texts, processes, and practices (pp. 62-82). London: Longman.
24. Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: an experimental moment in the human sciences. University of Chicago Press.
25. Paltridge, B. (1997). Thesis and dissertation writing: preparing ESL students for research. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 61-70.
26. Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: an examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 125-143.
27. Parry, S. (1998). Disciplinary discourse in doctoral education. Higher Education, 36, 273-299.
28. Paul, D., Charney, D., & Kendall, A. (2001). Moving beyond the moment: reception studies in the rhetoric of science. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 372-399.
29. Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing disciplinary: a sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Ridley, D. (2000). The different guises of a PhD thesis and the role of a literature review. In P. Thompson (Ed.), Patterns and perspectives: insights into EAP writing practice (pp. 61-76). The University of Reading: CALS.
31. Shaw, P. (1991). Science research students' composing processes. English for Specific Puproses, 10, 189-206.
32. Shaw, P. M. (1996). One-to-one work on dissertations; effectiveness of correction and efficiency of pedagogy. In M. Hewings, & T. Dudley-Evans (Eds.), Evaluation and course design in EAP (pp. 86-95). London: Prentice-Hall.
33. Spack, R. (1988). Initiating students into the academic discourse community: how far should we go? TESOL Quarterly, 22, 29-52.
34. Sung, C.-I. (2000). Investigating rounded academic success: the influence of English language proficieny, academic performance, and socio-academic interaction for Taiwanese doctoral students in the United States. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
35. Swales, J. M. (in preparation). The genres of the research world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2000). English in today's research world: a writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
37. Thompson, P. (1998). Examining PhD theses in a corpus (pp. 177-182). TALC Conference, Keble College Oxford.
38. Thompson, P. (1999). Exploring the contexts of writing: interview with PhD supervisors. In P. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in EAP writing research and instruction (pp. 37-54). The University of Reading: CALS.
39. Thompson, P. & Tribble, C. (2001). Looking at citations: using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language learning and technology (electronic journal; details not available).
40. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Woolgar, S. (1989). Introduction to Ashmore M. The reflexive thesis: writing sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.