New directions in contrastive rhetoric

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 493-510

  Connor, Ulla ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3342963930     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3588238     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Allaei, S. K., & Connor, U. (1990). Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms. The Writing Instructor, 10, 19-28.
2. Atkinson, D. (1999). Culture in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 625-654.
3. Atkinson, D. (2000). On Robert B. Kaplan's response to Terry Santos et al.'s "On the Future of Second Language Writing." Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 317-320.
4. Atkinson, D., & Ramanathan, V. (1995). Cultures of writing: An ethnographic comparison of L1 and L2 university writing/language programs. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 539-568.
5. Belcher, D. D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
6. Belcher, D. D. (1997). An argument for nonadversarial argumentation: On the relevance of the feminist critique of academic discourse to L2 writing pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 1-21.
7. Belcher, D. D., & Connor, U. (Eds.). (2001). Reflections on multiliterate lives. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
8. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York: Longman.
9. Bloch, J (2001). Plagiarism and the ESL student: From printed to electronic texts. In D. D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking literacies (pp. 209-245). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10. Braine, G. (Ed.). (1998). Non-native educators in English language teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Carson, J. G. (1992). Becoming biliterate: First language influences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 37-60.
12. Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 17-30.
13. Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1-19.
14. Casanave, C. P. (1995). Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. D. Belcher & G Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 83-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Christensen, F. (1963). A generative rhetoric of the paragraph. College Composition and Communication, 16, 144-156.
16. Clyne, M. G., (1987). Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts: English and German. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 211-247.
17. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Connor, U. (in press). Changing currents in contrastive rhetoric: Implications for teaching and research. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 257-275.
20. Connor, U., Davis, K., & DeRycker, T. (1995). Correctness and clarity in applying for overseas jobs: A cross-cultural analysis of U.S. and Flemish applications Text, 15, 457-475.
21. Connor, U., Halleck, G, & Mbaye, A. (2002, March). Cross-cultural issues of academic literacy in U.S. research labs: Fronting the socialization dimension. Paper given at the American Association of Applied Linguistics conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
22. Connor, U., Helle, T., Mauranen, A., Ringbom, H., Tirkkonen-Condit, S., & Yli-Antola, M. (1995). Tekokkaita EU-projektiehdotuksia [Successful EU grant proposals]. Helsinki, Finland: Tekes.
23. Connor, U., & Johns, A. M. (Eds.). (1990). Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
24. Connor, U., & Kaplan, R. B. (1987). Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
25. Connor, U, & Kramer, M. (1995). Writing from sources: Case studies of graduate students in business management. In D. D. Belcher & G Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 155-182). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26. Connor, U., & Lauer, J. (1985). Understanding persuasive essay writing: Linguistic/ rhetorical approach. Text, 5, 309-326.
27. Connor, U., & Lauer, J. (1988). Cross-cultural variation in persuasive student writing. In A. C. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures (pp. 138-159). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 47-62.
29. Connor, U., & Mayberry, S. (1995). Learning discipline-specific academic writing: A case study of a Finnish graduate student in the United States. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 231-253). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30. Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Duszak, A. (1994). Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 291-313.
32. Eggington, W. G (1987). Written academic discourse in Korean: Implication for effective communication. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 153-168). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
33. Enkvist, N. E. (Ed.). (1985). Text linguistics and written composition [Special issue]. Text, 5(4).
34. Enkvist, N. E. (1997). Why we need contrastive rhetoric. Alternation, 4, 188-206.
35. Evensen, L. S. (Ed.). (1986). Nordic research on text linguistics and discourse analysis.
36. Trondheim, Norway: University of Trondheim, Tapir. Flowerdew, J. (1999). Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 123-146.
37. Goldstein, L. M., & Conrad, S. M. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 443-460.
38. Golebiowski, Z. (1998). Rhetorical approaches to scientific writing: An English-Polish contrastive study. Text, 18, 67-102
39. Gosden, H. (1992). Research writing and NNS: From the editors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 123-140.
40. Gumperz, J., & Levinson, S. (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Hatim, B. (1997). Communication across cultures. Translation theory and contrastive text linguistics. Exeter, England: University of Exeter Press.
42. Hinds, J. (1983). Contrastive rhetoric: Japanese and English. Text, 3, 183-195.
43. Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R. B Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 141-152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
44. Hinds, J. (1990). Inductive, deductive, quasi-inductive: Expository writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and Thai. In U. Connor & A. M. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 87-110). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
45. Hottel-Burkhart, N. G. (2000). The canons of Aristotelian rhetoric: Their place in contrastive Arabic-English studies. In Z. M. Ibrahim, N. Kassabgy, & S. Aydelott (Eds.), Diversity in language: Contrastive studies in English and Arabic theoretical and applied linguistics (pp. 93-110). Cairo, Egypt: The American University in Cairo Press.
46. Hull, G., Rose, M., Fraser, K. L., & Castellano, M. (1991). Remediation as a social construct: Perspectives from an analysis of classroom discourse. College Composition and Communication, 42, 299-329.
47. Hymes, D. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In T. Gladwin & W. Sturtevant, Anthropology and human behavior (pp. 13-53). Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington.
48. Ibrahim, Z. M., Kassabgy, N., & Aydelott, S. (Eds.). (2000). Diversity in language: Contrastive studies in English and Arabic theoretical and applied linguistics. Cairo, Egypt: The American University in Cairo Press.
49. Jenkins, S., & Hinds J. (1987). Business letter writing: English, French, and Japanese. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 327-354.
50. Johnstone, B. (1986). Arguments with Khomeni: Rhetorical situation and persuasive style in cross-cultural perspective. Text, 6, 171-187.
51. Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20.
52. Koch, B. (1983). Presentation as proof: The language of Arabic rhetoric. Anthropological Linguistics, 25, 47-60.
53. Kong, K (1998). Are simple business request letters really simple? A comparison of Chinese and English business request letters. Text, 18, 103-141.
54. Kubota, R. (1999). Japanese culture constructed by discourses: Implications for applied linguistics research and English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 9-35.
55. Kubota, R. (2001). Discursive construction of the images of U.S. classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 9-38.
56. Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 242-281.
57. Matsuda, P. K (2001). On the origin of contrastive rhetoric: A response to "The Origin of Contrastive Rhetoric Revisited" by H. G Ying (2000). International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 257-260
58. Mauranen, A (1993). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
59. Mauranen, A. (2001). Descriptions or explanations? Some methodological issues in contrastive rhetoric. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic writing in context (pp. 43-54). Birmingham, England: University of Birmingham Press.
60. Moreno, A. I. (1998). The explicit signaling of premise-conclusion sequences in research articles: A contrastive framework. Text, 18, 545-585.
61. Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113-132.
62. Nelson, G L., & Murphy, J. M. (1992). An ESL writing group: Task and social dimensions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 171-194.
63. Panetta, C. G. (Ed.). (2001). Contrastive rhetoric revisited and redefined. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 201-229.
65. Prior, P. (1995). Redefining the task: An ethnographic examination of writing and response in six graduate seminars. In D. D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 47-82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
66. Purves, A. C. (1988). Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
67. Ramanathan, V., & Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 45-75.
68. Sarangi, S. (1994). Intercultural or not? Beyond celebration of cultural differences in miscommunication analysis. Pragmatics, 4, 409-427.
69. Scollon, R. (1997). Contrastive rhetoric, contrastive poetics, or perhaps something else? TESOL Quarterly, 31, 352-363.
70. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1997). Point of view and citation: Fourteen Chinese and English versions of the "same" news story. Text, 17, 83-125.
71. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 201-231.
72. Spack, R. (1997). The rhetorical construction of multilingual students. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 765-774.
73. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Tannen, D. (1985). Cross-cultural communication. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 203-216). New York: Academic Press.
75. Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (1996). Explicitness vs. implicitness in argumentation: An intercultural comparison. Multilingua, 15, 274-275.
76. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Upton, T., & Connor, U. (2001). Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. English for Specific Purposes: An International Journal, 20, 313-329.
78. Ventola, E., & Mauranen, A. (1991). Non-native writing and native revising of scientific articles. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systematic linguistics (p. 457-492). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
79. Ying, H. G. (2000). The origin of contrastive rhetoric revisited. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 259-268.
80. Yli-Jokipii, H. (1996). An approach to contrasting languages and cultures in the corporate context: Finnish, British, and American business letters and telefax messages. Multilingua, 15, 305-327.
81. Zamel, V (1997). Toward a model of transculturation. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 341-343.
82. Zhu, Y. (1997). An analysis of structural moves in Chinese sales letters. Text, 17, 543-566.