'We do not seem to have a theory ... The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap': Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing

Applied Linguistics

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 343-375

  Harwood, Nigel ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24144467468     PISSN: 01426001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/applin/ami012     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Becher, T. 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton. Keynes: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
2. Becher, T. 1994. The significance of disciplinary differences,' Studies in Higher Education 19/2: 151-61.
3. Bernhardt, S.A. 1985. The writer, the reader, and the scientific text,' Journal of Technical Writing & Communication 15/2: 163-74.
4. Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad, and E. Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
5. Crammond, J. 1998. The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing,' Written Communication 15/2: 230-68.
6. Crick, F. 1979. 'Split genes and RNA splicing,' Science 204: 264-71.
7. Crismore, A. and R. Famsworth. 1989. 'Mr Darwin and his readers: exploring interpersonal metadiscourse as a dimension of ethos,' Rhetoric Review 8/1: 91-112.
8. Day, R. A. 1998. How To Write and Publish a Scientific Paper 5th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Dubois, B. L. 1987. '"Something on the order of around forty to forty four": Imprecise numerical expressions in biomedical slide talks,' Language in Society 16: 527-41.
10. Gilbert, G. N. 1977. 'Referencing as persuasion,' Social Studies of Science 7: 113-22.
11. Hamp-Lyons, L. and B. Heasley. 1987. Study Writing: A Course in Written English for Academic and Study Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Harwood, N. 2003. 'Person Markers and Interpersonal Metadiscourse in academic writing: a multidisciplinary corpus-based study of expert and student texts,' Unpublished PhD thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University College.
13. Harwood, N. 2005a. '"I hoped to counteract the memory problem, but I made no impact whatsoever": discussing methods in computing science using I,' English for Specific Purposes 24/3: 243-67.
14. Harwood, N. 2005b. 'What do we want EAP teaching materials for?' Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4/2: 149-61.
15. Harwood, N. and G. Hadley. 2004. 'Demystifying institutional practices: Critical pragmatism and the teaching of academic writing,' English for Specific Purposes 23/4: 355-77.
16. Hewings, M. and A. Hewings. 2002. '"It is interesting to note that ...": A comparative study of anticipatory "it" in student and published writing,' English for Specific Purposes 21/4: 367-83.
17. Holmes, J. 1988. 'Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks,' Applied Linguistics 9/1: 21-44.
18. Horowitz, D. M. 1986. 'What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom,' TESOL Quarterly 20/3: 445-62.
19. Hubbuch, S. M. 1996. Writing Research Papers across the Curriculum. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.
20. Hyland, K. 1994. 'Hedging in academic writing and EAP coursebooks,' English for Specific Purposes 13/3:239-56.
21. Hyland, K. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22. Hyland, K. 2001. 'Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles,' Written Communication 18/4: 549-74.
23. Hyland, K. 2002a. 'Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing,' Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1091-112.
24. Hyland, K. 2002b. 'What do they mean? Questions in academic writing,' Text 22/4: 529-57.
25. Ivanič, R. 1998. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Johns, A. M. 1988. 'The discourse communities dilemma: Identifying transferable skills for the academic milieu,' English for Specific Purposes 7: 55-60.
27. Johns, A. M. 1997. Text, Role, and Context: Developing Academic Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kuo, C.-H. 1999. 'The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles,' English for Specific Purposes 18/2: 121-38.
29. Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
30. McEnery, T. and N. A. Kifle. 2002. 'Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second-language writers' in J. Flowerdew (ed.): Academic Discourse. Harlow: Longman.
31. Markkanen, R. and H. Schröder. 1992. 'Hedging and its linguistic realizations in German, English and Finnish philosophical texts: a case study' in M. Nordman (ed.): Fachsprachliche Miniaturen; Festschrift für Christer Laurén. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
32. Mühlhäusler, P. and R. Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
33. Myers, G. 1989. The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles,' Applied Linguistics 10/1: 1-35.
34. Nystrand, M. 1989. 'A social-interactive model of writing,' Written Communication 6/1: 66-85.
35. Paltridge, B. 2002. 'Genre, text type, and the English for academic purposes (EAP) classroom' in A. Johns (ed.): Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Pennycook, A. 1994. 'The politics of pronouns,' ELT Journal 48/2: 173-8.
37. Prince, E. F., J. Frader, and C. Bosk. 1982. 'On hedging in physician-physician discourse' in R. J. Di Pietro (ed.): Linguistics and the Professions: Proceedings of the Second Annual Delaware Symposium on Language Studies. Norwood: Ablex.
38. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.
39. Salager-Meyer, F. 1994. 'Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse,' English for Specific Purposes 13/2: 149-70.
40. Salager-Meyer, F. 1997. 'I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse' in T. Miller (ed.): Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. Washington: United States Information Agency.
41. Samraj, B. 2002. 'Texts and contextual layers: academic writing in content courses' in A. M. Johns (ed.): Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Samraj, B. 2004, 'Discourse features of the student-produced academic research paper: Variations across disciplinary courses,' Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3/1: 5-22.
43. Skelton, J. R., A. M. Wearn, and F. D. B. Hobbs. 2002. ' "I" and "we": A concordancing analysis of how doctors and patients use first person pronouns in primary care consultations,' Family Practice 19/5:484-8.
44. Snyder, H. and S. Bonzi. 1998. 'Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989),' Journal of Information Science 24/6:431-5.
45. Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Swales, J. M. and C. B. Feak. 2000. English in Today's Research World: A Writing Guide. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
47. Swetnam, D. 2000. Writing Your Dissertation: How to Plan, Prepare and Present Successful Work 3rd edn. Oxford: How To Books.
48. Tang, R. and S. John. 1999. 'The "I" in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun,' English for Specific Purposes 18: S23-S39.
49. Thompson, G. and S. Hunston. 2000. 'Evaluation: An introduction' in S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds): Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Thompson, G. and P. Thetela. 1995. The sound of one hand clapping: The management of interaction in written, discourse,' Text 15/1: 103-27.
51. Trzeciak, J. and S. E. Mackay. 1994. Study Skills for Academic Writing. Harlow: Longman.
52. Vassileva, I. 1998. 'Who am I/who are we in academic writing? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian,' International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8/2: 163-90.
53. Wales, K. 1980. 'Exophora re-examined: The uses of we in present-day English,' UEA Papers in Linguistics 12: 21-44.
54. Wales, K. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Watson, G. 1987. Writing a Thesis: A Guide to Long Essays and Dissertations. Harlow: Longman.
56. Webber, P. 1994. The role of questions in different medical journal genres,' English for Specific Purposes 13/3: 257-68.
57. Weissberg, R. and S. Buker. 1990. Writing Up Research: Experimental Research Report Writing for Students of English. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Regents.