Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure

English for Specific Purposes

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 227-247

  Martínez, Iliana A ^a  

^a NONE   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18044404512     PISSN: 08894906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00013-2     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. London: The University of Wisconsin Press.
2. Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (1993). How economists modify propositions. In W. Henderson, T. Dudley-Evans, & R. Backhouse, Economics and language (pp. 153-159). London: Routledge.
3. Celce-Murcia, M. (1997). Describing and teaching English grammar with reference to written discourse. The Journal of TESOL - France, 5-18.
4. Cumming, S., & Ono, T. (1997). Discourse and grammar. In T. Van Dijk, Discourse as structure and process (pp. 112-137). London: Sage Publications.
5. Day, R. (1979). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Philadelphia: ISI Press.
6. Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre Analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In M. Coulthard, Talking about text (pp. 128-145). Birmingham: English Language Research.
7. Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard, Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219-228). London: Routledge.
8. Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter Publishers.
9. Eisterhold, J. (1990). Reading-writing connections: Toward a description for second language learners. In B. Kroll, Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
11. Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1987). Reading and writing relations: Assumptions and directions. In J. Squire, The dynamics of language learning (pp. 9-33). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
12. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science. Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.
13. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
14. Henderson, W., & Hewings, A. (1990). A language of model building. In T. Dudley-Evans, & W. Henderson, The language of economics: The analysis of economics discourse. (ELT Documents 134). (pp. 43-54). London: Modern English Publications in Association with the British Council.
15. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1979). Language as ideology. London: Routledge.
16. Hunston, S. (1994). Evaluation and organisation in a sample of written academic discourse. In M. Coulthard, Advances in written text analysis (pp. 191-218). London: Routledge.
17. Kennedy, C. (1991). Systemic grammar and its use in literary analysis. In R. Carter, Language and literature. An introductory reader in stylistics (pp. 82-99). London: Routledge.
18. Kucer, S. (1987). The cognitive base of reading and writing. In J. Squire, The dynamics of language learning (pp. 27-51). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
19. Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.
20. Martin, J. R. (1992). English text. System and structure. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
21. Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. London: Arnold.
22. Master, P. (1991). Active verbs with inanimate subjects in scientific prose. ESP Journal, 10, 15-33.
23. Múrat, F. (1990). El método experimental, hoy. Córdoba, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
24. Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied linguistics, 10(1), 1-35.
25. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (1996). Washington: American Psychological Association.
26. Rutherford, W. (1987). Second language grammar: Learning and teaching. London: Longman.
27. Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. ESP Journal, 13(2), 149-170.
28. Shaw, P. (1992). Reasons for the correlation of voice, tense and sentence function in reporting verbs.. Applied Linguistics, 13(3), 301-319.
29. Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology and point of view. London: Routledge.
30. Sinclair, J. (1990). English grammar. London: Harper-Collins Publishers.
31. Squire, J. (1983). Composing and comprehending: two sides of the same basic process. Language Arts, 60(5), 581-589.
32. Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
33. Swales, J. (1985). Episodes in ESP. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
34. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic research settings. Glasgow: Cambridge University Press.
35. Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S., & Icke, V. (1981). On the use of passive in two astrophysics journal papers. ESP Journal, 1,2,1981. Reprinted in Swales, J. (Ed.) Episodes in ESP. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
36. Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S., & Icke, V. (1981). On the use of passive in two astrophysics journal papers. ESP Journal, 1,2,1981. Reprinted in Swales, J. (Ed.) Episodes in ESP. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
37. Thompson, D. (1993). Arguing for experimental "facts" in science. A study of research article results section in biochemistry. Written Communication, 10(1), 106-128.
38. Thompson, G., & Yiyun, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365-382.
39. Tierney, R., & Pearson, P. (1983). Toward a composing model of reading. Language Arts, 60(5), 568-580.