Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles

English for Specific Purposes

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 207-226

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Disciplinary authority; Identity; Research writing; Self citation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000688541     PISSN: 08894906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arnaudet, M., & Barrett, M. (1984). Approaches to academic reading and writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Bartholomae, D. (1986). Inventing the university. Journal of Basic Writing, 5, 4-23.
3. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/OUP.
4. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: CUP.
6. Cadman, K. (1997). Thesis writing for international students: a question of identity? English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), 3-14.
7. Chafe, W. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard, Literature, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 105-123). Cambridge: CUP.
8. Chang, Y.-Y., & Swales, J. (1999). Informal elements in English academic writing: Threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers?. In C. N. Candlin, & K. Hyland, Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 145-167). London: Longman.
9. Cherry, R. (1988). Ethos vs persona: self-representation in written discourse. Written Communication, 5, 251-276.
10. Cohen, M., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Croom Helm.
11. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric. Cambridge: CUP.
12. Council of biology editors style manual (4th ed.) (1978). Washington, DC: American Institute of Biological Sciences.
13. Day, R. (1994). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
14. Einstein, A. (1934). Essays in science. New York: The Philosophical Library.
15. Ervin, E. (1993). Interdisciplinarity or 'an elaborate edifice built on sand'? Rethinking rhetoric's place. Rhetoric Review, 12, 84-105.
16. Gosden, H. (1993). Discourse functions of subject in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 56-75.
17. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
18. Huddleston, R. (1988). Review article. Journal of Linguistics, 24, 137-174.
19. Hunston, S. (1993). Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In M. Ghadessy, Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 57-73). London: Pinter.
20. Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 433-454.
21. Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
23. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
24. Ivanic, R., & Simpson, J. (1992). Who's who in academic writing?. In N. Fairclough, Critical language awareness (pp. 141-173). London: Longman.
25. Johns, A. (1990). Coherence as a cultural phenomenon: employing ethographic principles in the academic milieu. In U. Connor, & A. Johns, Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 209-226). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
26. Johns, A. (1997). Text role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
27. Jones, W. P., & Keene, M. L. (1981). Writing scientific papers and reports (8th ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: W C Brown.
28. Kaufer, D., & Geisler, C. (1989). Novelty in academic writing. Written Communication, 6(3), 286-311.
29. Kolb, D. A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. Chickering, The modern American college (pp. 232-255). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
30. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Kuo, C.-H. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121-138.
32. Lachowicz, D. (1981). On the use of the passive voice for objectivity, author responsibility and hedging in EST. Science of Science, 2(6), 105-115.
33. Lester, J. D. (1993). Writing research papers (7th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
34. Manual on scientific writing (1993). Collingwood, Vic.: Tafe Publications.
35. Mills, G., & Water, J. A. (1986). Technical writing (5th ed.). Fort Worth: HBJ.
36. Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10, 1-35.
37. Pare, A. (1993). Discourse regulations and the production of knowledge. In R. Spilka, Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 111-123). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
38. Pennycook, A. (1994). The politics of pronouns. ELT Journal, 48(2).
39. Rowntree, K. (1991). Writing for success. Auckland: Longman Paul.
40. Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1963). Mathematical theory of communication. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
41. Spencer, C., & Arbon, B. (1996). Foundations of writing: Developing research and academic writing skills. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Co.
42. Sullivan, D. (1996). Displaying disciplinarity. Written Communication, 13(2), 221-250.
43. Thomas, S., & Hawes, T. (1994). Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 129-148.
44. Thompson, G., & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation of the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12, 365-382.
45. Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organisation of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46. Wilkinson, A. M. (1992). Jargon and the passive voice: Prescriptions and proscriptions for scientific writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 22, 319-325.