Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse

Applied Linguistics

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 266-285

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49749085115     PISSN: 01426001     EISSN: 1477450X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amm011     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Becher, T. (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Inquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/OUP.
2. Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad, and E. Finegan. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
3. Blakemore, D. (1993). 'The relevance of reformulations,' Language and Literature 2: 101-20.
4. Burton-Roberts, N. (1993). 'Apposition' in The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
5. Cuenca, M.-J. (2003). 'Two ways to reformulate: a contrastive analysis of reformulation markers,' Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1069-93.
6. Downing, A. and P. Locke. (1992). A University Course in English Grammar. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
7. Gonzales, P. (1996). The talk and social organisation of problem-solving activities among physicists. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. UCLA.
8. Greenbaum, S. (1996) The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
10. Hyland, K. (2000/2004). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman/Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
11. Hyland, K. (2004) 'Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing,' Journal of Second Language Writing 13: 133-51.
12. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
13. Hyland. K. and P. Tse. (2004). 'Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal,' Applied Linguistics 25/2: 156-77.
14. Killingsworth, M. and M. Gilbertson. (1992). Signs, Genres and Communities in Technical Communication. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
15. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Lee, Y.-A. (2004). 'The work of examples in classroom instruction,' Linguistics and Education 15: 99-120.
17. Martin, J., and D. Rose. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
18. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. (1972). A Grammar of Contemporary English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
19. Rouchota, V. (1998). 'Procedural meaning and parenthetical discourse markers' in A. Jucker and Y. Ziv (eds.): Discourse Markers: Description and Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 97-126.
20. Schegloff, E., G. Jefferson, and H. Sacks. (1977). 'The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation,' Language 53: 361-82.
21. Swales, J. M. (2004). Research Genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.