Evaluation and promotion across languages

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 343-357

  Shaw, Philip ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Academic writing; Contrastive; Danish; Economics; Genre

Indexed keywords

EID: 23744474960     PISSN: 14751585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00050-X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Burgess, S. (2002). Packed houses and intimate gatherings: audience and rhetorical structure. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 196-215). London: Longman.
2. Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
3. Casanave, C. P. (1998). Transitions: the balancing act of bilingual academics. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 175-203.
4. Deneire, M. (2002). English and the politics of recognition. Paper presented at the ESSE Conference, Strasbourg. August 2002.
5. Fredrickson, K., & Swales, J. (1994). Competition and discourse community: introductions from Nysvenska studier. In B.-L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Nordberg (Eds.), Text and talk in professional contexts (pp. 9-22). Stockholm: ASLA.
6. Granger, S. (Ed.). (1998). Learner English on computer. London: Longman.
7. Hemais, B. (2001). The discourse of research and practice in marketing journals. English for Specifc Purposes, 20(1), 39-59.
8. Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation and the planes of discourse: status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston, & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP.
9. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses. London: Longman.
10. Lindeberg, A. -C. (1997). Promotional rhetorical steps and linguistic signalling in research articles in three disciplines. In Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on LSP, Copenhagen 18-22 August 1997. Helsinki.
11. Mauranen, A. (2001). Descriptions or explanations? Some methodological issues in contrastive rhetoric. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic writing in context (pp. 43-54). Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.
12. Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12(1), 3-22.
13. Melander, B. (1998). Culture or genre? Issues in the interpretation of cross-cultural differences in scientific English. In J. F. Coll, I. Fortanet, J. C. Palmer, & S. Posteguillo (Eds.), Genre studies in English for academic purposes (pp. 211-226). Castello de la Plana: Universitat Jaume 1.
14. Melander, B., Swales, J., & Fredrickson, K. (1997). Journal abstracts from three academic fields in the US and Sweden: national or disciplinary proclivities. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 251-272). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Moreno, A. (1998). The explicit signaling of premise-conclusion sequences in research articles: a contrastive framework. Text, 18(4), 545-585.
16. Myers, G. (1991). Lexical cohesion and specialised knowledge in science and popular science texts. Discourse Processes, 14, 1-26.
17. Okamura, A. (2000). The roles of culture, sub-culture and language in scientific research articles. PhD thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
18. Petersen, M., & Shaw, P. (2002). Disciplinary differences and language of publications in a biliterate environment. World Englishes, 21/3, 357-374.
19. Samraj, B. (2001). Introductions in research articles: variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17.
20. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: CUP.
21. Taylor, G., & Chen, T. (1991). Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 319-336.
22. Thetela, P. (1997). Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 101-118.
23. Vassileva, I. (2000). Who is the Author? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian academic discourse. Sankt Augustin, Nordrhein-Westfalen: Asgard.
24. Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 83-102.
25. Yakhontova, T. (2002). 'Selling' or 'telling': the issue of cultural variation in research genres. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 216-232). London: Longman.