Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse

Discourse Studies

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 173-192

  Hyland, Ken ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b School of Culture Language and Communication   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic writing; Corpus analysis; Disciplinary differences; Engagement; Evaluation; Stance

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144453309     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: 14617080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461445605050365     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bakhtin, M. (1986) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (ed. M. Holquist, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Becher, T. (1989) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Inquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/OUP.
3. Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (1989) 'Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Grammatical Marking of Evidentiality and Affect', Text 9(1): 93-124.
4. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
5. Bondi, M. (1999) English across Genres: Language Variation in the Discourse of Economics. Modena: Edizioni Il Fiorino.
6. Bondi, M. and Mauranen, A. (2003) 'Editorial: Evaluative Language Use in Academic Discourse', Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4): 269-71.
7. Brenton, F. (1996) 'Rhetoric in Competition: The Formation of Organizational Discourse in Conference on College Composition and Communication Abstracts', Written Communication 13(3): 355-84.
8. Brett, P. (1994) A Genre Analysis of the Results Section of Sociology Articles', English for Specific Purposes 13(1): 47-59.
9. Crismore, A. (1989) Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.
10. Dillon, G. (1991) Contending Rhetorics: Writing in Academic Disciplines. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Gosden, H. (1993) 'Discourse Functions of Subject in Scientific Research Articles', Applied Linguistics 14(1): 56-75.
12. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn). London: Edward Arnold.
13. Hanania, E.A S. and Akhtar, K. (1985) 'Verb Form and Rhetorical Function in Science Writing: A Study of MS Theses in Biology, Chemistry, and Physics', English for Specific Purpose 4, 49-58.
14. Hunston, S. (1994) 'Evaluation and Organisation in a Sample of Written Academic Discourse', in M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis, pp. 191-218. London: Routledge.
15. Hunston, S. and Thompson, G. (eds) (2000) Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Hyland, K. (1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Hyland, K. (1999) 'Disciplinary Discourses: Writer Stance in Research Articles', in C. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds) Writing: Texts: Processes and Practices, pp. 99-121. London: Longman.
18. Hyland, K. (2000) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
19. Hyland, K. (2001) 'Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Writing', Written Communication 18(4): 549-74.
20. Hyland, K. (2002a) 'Directives: Power and Engagement in Academic Writing', Applied Linguistics 23(2): 215-39.
21. Hyland, K. (2002b) 'What Do They Mean? Questions in Academic Writing', Text 22(4): 529-57.
22. Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2004) 'Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal', Applied Linguistics 25(2): 156-77.
23. Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (forthcoming) 'Hooking the Reader: A Corpus Study of Evaluative That in Abstracts', English for Specific Purposes.
24. Ivanic, R. (1998) Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
26. Martin, J. (2000) 'Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English', in S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds) Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Thompson, G. (2001) 'Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader', Applied Linguistics 22(1): 58-78.
29. White, P. (2003) 'Beyond Modality and Hedging: A Dialogic View of the Language of Intersubjective Stance', Text 23(2): 2594-8.