Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts

Written Communication

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 3-35

  Lillis, Theresa ^a   Curry, Mary Jane ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic literacy; Expanding circle; Scholarly publishing; Text ethnography

Indexed keywords

EID: 30744476812     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088305283754     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Amarou, M., Canagarajah, A. S., Killian, P., & Robinson, T. (1998, March). Connecting the global community through conduit scholars. Symposium conducted at the 32nd annual TESOL convention, Seattle, WA.
2. Ammon, U. (2001). Editor's preface. In U. Ammon (Ed.), The dominance of English as a language of science (pp. v-x). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
4. Baynham, M. (1993). Code switching and mode switching: Community interpreters and mediators of literacy. In B. Street (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to literacy (pp. 294-314). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Baynham, M., & Maybin, J. (1996). Literacy practices in English. In J. Maybin & N. Mercer (Eds.), Using English: From conversation to canon (pp. 42-63). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
6. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Becher, T. (1994).Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes, UK: SRHE/Open University Press.
8. Belcher, D., & Connor, U. (Eds.). (2001). Reflections on multiliterate lives. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
9. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Bernasconi, R. (2005). Levy-Bruhl among the phenomenologist: Exoticization and the logic of "the primitive." Social Identities, 11(3), 229-245.
11. Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
12. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press/Polity.
13. Brandt, D. (2001). Literacy in American lives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Brock-Utne, B. (2001). The growth of English in academic communication in the Nordic countries. International Review of Education, 47(3-4), 221-233.
15. Burrough-Boenish, J. (2003). Shapers of published NNS research articles. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 223-243.
16. Canagarajah, A. S. (1996). "Nondiscursive" requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication, 13(4), 435-472.
17. Canagarajah, A. S. (2002).A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
18. Csepeli, G., Örkény, A., & Scheppele, K. L. (1996). Response to our critics (and our supporters). Replika, 6, 21-22.
19. Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 663-688.
20. Dysthe, O. (2002). Professors as mediators of academic text cultures: An interview study with advisors and master's degree students in three disciplines in a Norwegian university. Written Communication, 19(4), 493-544.
21. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
22. Faulstich Orellana, M., Meza, M., & Pietsch, K. (2002). Mexican immigrant networks and home-school connections. Practicing Anthropology, 24(3), 4-8.
23. Flowerdew, J. (1999). Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 123-145.
24. Flowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 127-150.
25. Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 121-150.
26. Gee, J. P. (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. New York: Bergin and Garvey.
27. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
28. Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-126.
29. Gibbs, W. W. (1995, August). Lost science in the Third World. Scientific American, pp. 76-83.
30. Golebiowski, Z., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2002). The interaction of discipline and culture in academic writing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 59-71.
31. Gosden, H. (1995). Success in research article writing and revision: A social-constructionist perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 14(1), 37-57.
32. Gunnarson, B. L. (1997). The writing process from a sociolinguistic viewpoint. Written Communication, 24(2), 139-188.
33. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
34. Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Jernudd, B. H., & Baldauf, R. B. (1987). Planning science communication for human resource development. In B. K. Das (Ed.), Communicative language teaching (pp. 144-189). Singapore: RELC.
36. Jones, C., Turner, J. & Street, B. V. (Eds.). (1999). Students writing in the university: Cultural and epistemological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. Kachru, B. (Ed.). (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
38. Kachru, B. (2001). World Englishes. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of sociolinguistics (pp. 519-524). New York: Elsevier.
39. Kalman, J. (1999). Writing on the plaza: Mediated literacy practice among scribes and clients in Mexico City. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
40. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
41. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Lea, M., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172.
43. Lillis, T. M. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
44. MacDonald, S. P. (1994). Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
45. Mace, J. (2002). The give and take of writing: Scribes, literacy, and everyday life. Leicester, UK: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.
46. Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
47. Mauranen, A. (1997). Hedging in language revisers' hands. In R. Markkanen & H. Schroder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 115-133). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
48. Medgyes, P., & Kaplan, R. B. (1992). Discourse in a foreign language: The example of Hungarian scholars. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 98, 67-100.
49. Mišak, A., Marušic, M., & Marušić, A. (2005). Manuscript editing as a way of teaching academic writing: Experience from a small scientific journal. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 122-131.
50. Morales-Galvez, C., Arrimadas Gomez, I., Ramirez Nueda, E., Lopez Gayarre, A., & Ocana Villuendas, L. (2000) La enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras en Espana [The teaching of foreign languages in Spain]. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Educacación y Deporte, CIDE.
51. Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
52. Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. London: Routledge.
53. Petzold, R., & Berns, M. (2000). Catching up with Europe: Speakers and functions of English in Hungary. World Englishes, 19(1), 113-124.
54. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55. Phillipson, R. (2003). English-only Europe? Challenging language policy. London: Routledge.
56. Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57. Ramanthan, V. (1999). English is here to stay: A critical look at institutional and educational practices in India. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 211-233.
58. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (1981). Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
59. Sengupta, S., Forey, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1999). Supporting effective English communication within the context of teaching and research in a tertiary institute: Developing a genre model for consciousness raising. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S7-S22.
60. Shi, L. (2002). How Western-trained Chinese TESOL professionals publish in their home environment. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 625-634.
61. Sousa Santos, B. (1994) Pela mao de Alice: O social e o politico na pos-modernidade [By the hand of Alice: The social and the political in post modernity]. Porto, Portugal: Edicções Afrontamento.
62. Street, B. V. (2003). What's new in new literacy studies? Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 1-14.
63. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64. Tardy, C. (2004). The role of English in scientific communication: Lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 247-269.
65. Truchot, C. (1994). The spread of English in Europe. Journal of European Studies, 25, 141-151.
66. Ventola, E., & Mauranen, A. (1991). Nonnative writing and native revising of scientific articles. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp. 457-492). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
67. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world-system: 1. Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world economy in the 16th century. New York: Academic Press.
68. Wallerstein, I. (1991). Geopolitics and geoculture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. Wagner, D. A., Messick, B. M., & Spratt, J. (1986). Studying literacy in Morocco. In B. B. Schiefflin & P. Gilmore (Eds.), The acquisition of literacy: Ethnographic perspectives (pp. 233-260). New York: Ablex.
70. Web of Science (2005). Thompson Corporation. Accessed April 25, 2005 from http://isi01.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi/.
71. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72. Yakhontova, T. (1997). The signs of a new time: Academic writing in ESP curricula of Ukrainian universities. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp.103-112). Berlin, Germany/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.