Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Volumn 3, Issue 4 SPEC.ISS., 2004, Pages 291-304

  Connor, Ulla ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corpus analysis; EAP; Ethnographic approach; Genre analysis; Tertium comparationis; Text analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 7444251617     PISSN: 14751585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Atkinson D. TESOL and culture TESOL Quarterly 33 1999 625-653
2. Atkinson D. Writing and culture in the post-process era Journal of Second Language Writing 12 2003 49-63
3. Atkinson D. (this issue). Contrasting rhetorics/contrasting cultures: why contrastive rhetoric needs a better conceptualization of culture [Special issue on Contrastive Rhetoric]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes.
4. Atkinson D. (in press). Culture in TESOL and applied linguistics: Modernism, postmodernism, and beyond. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Atkinson D. & Ramanathan V. Cultures of writing: An ethnographic comparison of L1 and L2 university writing/language programs TESOL Quarterly 29 1995 539-568
6. Barton D. Hamilton M. & Ivanič R. Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context 2000 Routledge London
7. Barton E. & Stygall G. Discourse studies in composition 2002 Hampton Cresskill, NJ
8. Bazerman C. Constructing experience 1994 Southern Illinois University Press Carbondale
9. Bazerman C. Speech acts, genres, and activity systems: How texts organize activity and people In Bazerman C. & Prior P. (Eds.) What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices 2004 309-339 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
10. Bazerman C. & Prior P. (Eds.) What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices 2004 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
11. Berkenkotter C. Huckin T.N. Rethinking genre from a socio-cognitive perspective Written Communication 10 1993 475-509
12. Berkenkotter C. & Huckin T.N. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power 1995 Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
13. Bhatia V.K. Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings 1993 Longman London
14. Bhatia V.K. Genre-mixing and professional communication: The case of 'private intentions' v. 'socially recognised purposes' In Bruthiaux P. Boswood T. & Bertha B. (Eds.) Explorations in English for professional communication 1995 1-19 City University of Hong Kong Press Hong Kong
15. Bhatia V.K. Genre-mixing in academic introductions English for Specific Purposes 16 1997 181-195
16. Canagarajah A.S. Critical academic writing and multilingual students 2002 University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor
17. Chesterman A. Contrastive functional analysis 1998 John Benjamins Amsterdam
18. Connor U. Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing 1996 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
19. Connor U. How like you our fish? Accommodation in international business communication In Hewings M. & Nickerson C. (Eds.) Business English: Research into practice 1999 115-128 Longman Harlow, UK
20. Connor U. Variation in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of US humanists and scientists Text 20 2000 1-28
21. Connor U. New directions in contrastive rhetoric TESOL Quarterly 36 2002 493-510
22. Connor U. & Mauranen A. Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants English for Specific Purposes 18 1999 47-62
23. Connor, U., & Moreno, A. I. (in press). The concept of 'tertium comparationis' in contrastive analysis and translation studies. In P. Bruthiaux, A. Atkinson, W. G. Eggington, W. Grabe, & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics: Language education, English for academic purposes, contrastive discourse analysis, and language policy and planning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
24. de Beaugrande R. & Dressler W. Introduction to text linguistics 1981 Longman London
25. Duszak A. Academic discourse and intellectual styles Journal of Pragmatics 21 1994 291-313
26. Enkvist N.E. Tekstilingvistiikan peruskäsitteitä [Basic principles of text linguistics] 1974 Gaudeamus Helsinki
27. Enkvist N.E. Why we need contrastive rhetoric Alternation 4 1997 188-206
28. Faigley L. Fragments of rationality: Postmodernity and the subject of composition 1992 University of Pittsburgh Press Pittsburgh, PA
29. Foster D. & Russell D. Writing and Learning in cross-national perspective: Transitions from secondary to higher education 2002 NCTE Urbana, IL
30. Flowerdew J. Academic discourse 2002 Longman London
31. Gee J. An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method 1999 Routledge London
32. Giles H. Coupland N. Coupland J. Accommodation theory: Communication, content, and consequence In Giles H. Coupland N. & Coupland J. (Eds.) Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics 1991 1-68 Cambridge University Press New York
33. Golebiowski Z. Rhetorical approaches to scientific writing: An English-Polish contrastive study Text 18 1998 67-102
34. Halliday M.A.K. Spoken and written language 1985 Oxford University Press Oxford, UK
35. Halliday M.A.K. & Hasan R. Cohesion in English 1976 Longman London
36. Holliday A. Appropriate methodology and social content 1994 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
37. Holliday A. Small cultures Applied Linguistics 20 1999 237-264
38. Hyland K. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing 2000 Pearson Harlow, UK
39. Hyland K. Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process Journal of Second Language Writing 12 2003 17-29
40. James C. Contrastive analysis 1980 Oxford University Press London
41. Johansson S. On the role of corpora in cross-linguistic research In Johansson S. & Oksefjell S. (Eds.) Corpora and cross-linguistic research: Theory, method, and case studies 1998 1-24 Amsterdam Rodopi
42. Kaplan R.B. Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education Language Learning 16 1 1966 1-20
43. Kong K. Are simple business request letters really simple? A comparison of Chinese and English business request letters Text 18 1998 103-141
44. Li X. 'Good writing' in cross-cultural context 1996 SUNY Press Albany
45. Li X. 'Track (dis)connecting': Chinese high school and university writing in a time of change In Foster D. & Russell D. (Eds.) Writing and learning in cross-national perspective: Transitions from secondary to higher education 2002 49-87 NCTE Urbana, IL
46. Louhiala-Salminen L. The fly's perspective: Discourse in the daily routine of a business manager English for Specific Purposes 21 2002 211-231
47. Matsuda P.K. Mission impossible? An agenda for contrastive rhetoric in the 21st century Paper presented at the Contrastive Rhetoric Roundtable, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, October, 2002 2002
48. Mauranen A. Descriptions or explanations? Some methodological issues in contrastive rhetoric In Hewings M. (Ed.) Academic writing in context 2001 43-54 University of Birmingham Press Birmingham, UK
49. Moreno A.I. Genre constraints across languages: Causal metatext in Spanish and English RAs English for Specific Purposes 16 1997 161-179
50. Moreno A.I. The explicit signaling of premise-conclusion sequences in research articles: A contrastive framework Text 18 1998 545-585
51. Moreno, A. I. (this issue). Retrospective labelling in premise-conclusion metatext: An English-Spanish contrastive study of research articles on business and economics [Special issue on Contrastive Rhetoric]. Journal of English of Academic Purposes.
52. Precht, K. (2000). Patterns of stance in English. Unpublished dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
53. Scollon R. & Scollon S.W. Intercultural communication: A discourse approach 1995 Blackwell Malden, MA
54. Swales J.M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings 1990 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
55. Swales J.M. & Feak C.B. Academic writing for graduate students 1994 University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor
56. Swales J.M. & Feak C.B. English in today's research world: A writing guide 2001 University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor
57. Upton T. & Connor U. Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre English for Specific Purposes 20 2001 313-329
58. van Dijk T.A. Handbook of discourse analysis 1-4 1985 Academic Press New York
59. van Nostrand A.D. A genre map of R&D knowledge production for the US Department of Defense In Freesman A. & Medway P. (Eds.) Genre and the new rhetoric 1994 133-145 Taylor and Francis London
60. van Nostrand A.D. Fundable knowledge: The marketing of defense technology 1997 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
61. Ventola E. & Mauranen A. Non-native writing and native revising of scientific articles In Ventola E. (Ed.) Functional and systematic linguistics 1991 457-492 Mouton de Gruyter Berlin
62. Witte S.P. & Faigley L. Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality College Composition and Communication 32 1981 189-204
63. Yli-Jokipii H. An approach to contrasting languages and cultures in the corporate context: Finnish, British and American business letters and telefax messages Multilingua 15 1996 305-327
64. Yli-Jokipii, H., & Jorgensen, P. E. F. (this issue). Academic journalese for the Internet: A study of native English-speaking editors' changes to texts written by Danish and Finnish professionals [Special issue on Contrastive Rhetoric]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes.
65. Zhu Y. An analysis of structural moves in Chinese sales letters Text 17 1997 543-566