Shapers of published NNS research articles

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 223-243

  Burrough Boenisch, Joy ^a  

^a Science Editing and Translation   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Editing; NNS writing; Research article; Revision; Scientific English

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242267577     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00037-7     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Alley, M. (2000). The craft of editing: A guide for managers, scientists, and engineers. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Ammon, U. (2000). Towards more fairness in international English: Linguistic rights of non-native speakers? In R. Phillipson (Ed.), Rights to language, equity, power, and education (pp. 111-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Barzun, J. (1986). On writing, editing, and publishing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Benfield J.R. Howard K.M. The language of science European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 18 2001 642-648
5. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Broekkamp, H., & van den Bergh, H. (1996). Attention strategies in revising a foreign language text. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 170-181). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
7. Burrough-Boenisch J. When is a corrector an editor? A guide to the people and problems involved in checking Dutch manuscripts Van Taal tot Taal 293 1985 87-91
8. Burrough-Boenisch, J. (1998). Righting English that's gone Dutch. The Hague: Sdu.
9. Burrough-Boenisch J. Authors' editors: Their procedures and interaction with authors European Science Editing 27 4 2001 90-91
10. Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2002a). Culture and conventions: Writing and reading Dutch scientific English. Utrecht, LOT Dissertation Series 59, Utrecht. Available on Internet at http://www.lotpublications.nl/index.html.
11. Burrough-Boenisch J. Journal articles as chapters in doctoral theses European Science Editing 28 7 2002b 7-9
12. Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2003). Editing texts by non-native speakers of English. In H. Maisonneuve, A. Polderman, M. Vekony, & R. Thapa (Eds.), Science editors' handbook (pp. 1-2.4). West Clandon, Surrey, UK: European Association of Science Editors.
13. Butcher, J. (1992). Copy-editing: The Cambridge handbook for editors, authors and publishers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Butterfield E.V. Hacker D.J. Albertson L.R. Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision - assessing the evidence Educational Psychology Review 83 1996 239-297
15. Canagarajah A.S. "Nondiscursive" requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and politics of knowledge production Written Communication 134 1996 435-473
16. Cook, K., & Gibb, D. (2003). Eindelijk Engels! Een praktische handreiking voor het verbeteren van uw Engels. Den Haag: Kemper Conseil.
17. DeBakey L. Woodford F.P. Extensive revision of scientific articles: Whose job? Scholarly Publishing 3 1973 147-151
18. De Guerrero M.C.M. Villamil O.S. Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision Modern Language Journal 78 4 1994 484-496
19. Dudley-Evans, T. (1991). Socialisation into the academic community: Linguistic and stylistic expectations of a PhD thesis as revealed by supervisor comments. In P. Adams, B. Heaton, & P. Howarth (Eds.), Socio-cultural issues in English for academic purposes (pp. 41-51). London: Modern English Publications.
20. Eron C. Editing and the art of illusion Journal of Scholarly Publishing 262 1995 149-152
21. Fletcher C. Editing of biomedical research manuscripts written by Chinese scientists in English European Science Editing 55 1995 5-7
22. Flower L. Hayes J.R. Carey L. Schriver K. Stratman J. Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision College Composition 371 1986 16-55
23. Flowerdew J. Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar TESOL Quarterly 341 2000 127-150
24. Flowerdew J. Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions TESOL Quarterly 351 2001 121-150
25. Gordon, M. D. (1980). The role of referees in scientific communication. In J. Hartley (Ed.), The psychology of written communication (pp. 263-275). London: Kogan Page.
26. Gosden H. Research writing and NNSs: From the editors Journal of Second Language Writing 12 1992 123-139
27. Gosden H. Success in research article writing and revision: A social-constructionist perspective English for Specific Purposes 141 1995 37-57
28. Gould J.D. Grischowsky N. Doing the same work with hard copy and with cathode-ray tube (CRT) computer terminals Human Factors 263 1984 323-337
29. Grabe, W. (1993). Current developments in second language reading research. In S. Silberstein (Ed.), State of the art TESOL essays: Celebrating 25 years of the discipline (pp. 350-370). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
30. Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and effect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Horton, R. (2000). The imagined author. In A. H. Jones & E. McLellan (Eds.), Ethical issues in biomedical publication (pp. 46-51). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
32. Iverson C. US medical journal editors' attitudes towards submissions from other countries Science Editor 25 3 2002 75-78
33. James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. London: Longman.
34. Jones, A. H. (2000). The changing tradition of authorship. In A. H. Jones & F. McLellan (Eds.), Ethical issues in biomedical publication (pp. 46-51). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
35. Kerans, M. E. (2001). Eliciting substantive revision of manuscripts for peer review through process-oriented conferences with Spanish scientists. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Trabajos en lingüística aplicada (pp. 339-347). Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.
36. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon.
37. Krishnan L. Murphy N. Assessing tertiary writers at tertiary level: Implications for English language and engineering lecturers Guidelines 152 1993 86-96
38. Lyle K. What is a freelance editor? European Science Editing 27 2 2001 32-33
39. Mauranen, A. (1997). Hedging and modality in language revisers' hands. In H. Markkanen & H. Schröder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon (pp. 115-133). Berlin: de Gruyter.
40. McLellan F. Writing an ethical code for authors' editors European Science Editing 56 1995 9
41. McNab S.M. On-the-spot revision of science papers written in English as a second language European Science Editing 35 1988 10-12
42. Myers G. The social construction of two biologists' proposals Written Communication 23 1985 219-245
43. Norris C.B. Author's editing - some tips from Finland European Science Editing 243 1998 66-67
44. O'Connor, M. (1978). Editing scientific books and journals. London: Pitman Medical.
45. Page, G., Campbell, R., & Meadows, J. (1997). Journal publishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Pierie J.-P.E.N. Walvoort H.C. Overbeke A.J.P.M. Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde Lancet 348 1996 1480-1483
47. Porte G. English as a forgotten language ELT Journal 531 1999 28-37
48. Purcell G.P. Donovan S.L. Davidoff F. Changes to manuscripts during the editorial process: Characterizing the evolution of a clinical paper JAMA 2803 1998 227-228
49. Quian S. Ethical problems: Authorship, ghost writing, ghost translation and copy-editing? European Science Editing 54 1995 9-11
50. Riis, P. (1999). Ethical conduct in grant publications and manuscripts. In E. Godlee & T. Jefferson (Eds.), Peer review in health sciences (pp. 184-185). London: BMJ Books.
51. Roberts J.C. Fletcher R.H. Fletcher S.W. Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 272 1994 119-121
52. Sharp, D. (2000). Journal selection, refereeing and negotiation. In F. Luttikhuizen (Ed.), III congrés internacional sobre llengües per a finalitats específiques (pp. 336-338). Canet de Mar, Spain: Universitat de Barcelona.
53. Sharpe, L. T., & Gunther, I. (1994). Editing fact and fiction: A concise guide to book editing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Shashok K. Educating international authors European Science Editing 45 1992 5-7
55. Shashok, K. (2000). What does it take to prepare the manuscript for an international peer-reviewed journal? In F. Lutttikhuizen (Ed.), III congrés internacional sobre llengües per a finalitats específiques (pp. 335-336). Canet de Mar, Spain: Universitat de Barcelona.
56. Shashok K. Author's editors: Facilitators of science information transfer Learned Publishing 14 2 2001 113-121
57. Sionis C. Communication strategies in the writing of scientific research articles by non-native users of English English for Specific Purposes 142 1995 99-113
58. Springer-Verlag. (2003). Instructions for authors. Accessed on June 30, 2003, from http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/ 00791/instr.htm.
59. Tijssen, R., Hollanders, H., van Leeuwen, T., & Verspagen, B. (2001). Science and technology indicators report 2000. Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS).
60. Ventola, E., & Mauranen, A. (1991). Non-native writing and native revising of scientific articles. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp. 457-492). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
61. Wardropper I. A curator replies Journal of Scholarly Publishing 262 1995 111-115
62. Webster R. An editor's farewell Soil Use and Management 61 1990 3-6
63. Webster R. Oliver M.A. The role of the referee Journal of Soil Science 44 1 1993 189
64. Webster R. Yaalon D.H. The research paper: An informal guide for authors Catena 21 1994 3-11
65. Weingartner F. Author versus editor: An editor replies Journal of Scholarly Publishing 262 1995 116-120
66. Whalen K. Ménard N. L1 and L2 writers' strategic and linguistic knowledge: A model of multiple-level discourse processing Language Learning 453 1995 381-418
67. Wood D. Hurst P. Online peer review: Perceptions in the biological sciences Learned Publishing 132 2000 95-100