Regulation of Single-Strand Annealing and its Role in Genome Maintenance

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 566-575

  Bhargava, Ragini ^a   Onyango, David O ^a   Stark, Jeremy M ^a  

^a CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

alternative end joining; end resection; homology directed repair; RAD51; RAD52; single strand annealing

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; DNA BINDING PROTEIN;

CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE TARGETING; GENOME; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SINGLE STRAND ANNEALING; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; NEOPLASM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84978864815     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 13624555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2016.06.007     Document Type: Review

References (110)

1. 1 Nitiss, J.L., Targeting DNA topoisomerase II in cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 9 (2009), 338–350.
2. 2 Lieber, M.R., The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79 (2010), 181–211.
3. 3 Keeney, S., Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 52 (2001), 1–53.
4. 4 Hanada, K., et al. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81-Eme1 promotes conversion of interstrand DNA crosslinks into double-strands breaks. EMBO J. 25 (2006), 4921–4932.
5. 5 Sollier, J., et al. Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair factors promote R-loop-induced genome instability. Mol. Cell 56 (2014), 777–785.
6. 6 Ran, F.A., et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8 (2013), 2281–2308.
7. 7 Collins, A., et al. The comet assay as a tool for human biomonitoring studies: the ComNet project. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 759 (2014), 27–39.
8. 8 Thoms, J., Bristow, R.G., DNA repair targeting and radiotherapy: a focus on the therapeutic ratio. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 20 (2010), 217–222.
9. 9 Ivanov, E.L., et al. Genetic requirements for the single-strand annealing pathway of double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 142 (1996), 693–704.
10. 10 Do, A.T., et al. Double-strand break repair assays determine pathway choice and structure of gene conversion events in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 (Bethesda) 4 (2014), 425–432.
11. 11 Orel, N., et al. Different pathways of homologous recombination are used for the repair of double-strand breaks within tandemly arranged sequences in the plant genome. Plant J. 35 (2003), 604–612.
12. 12 Pontier, D.B., Tijsterman, M., A robust network of double-strand break repair pathways governs genome integrity during C. elegans development. Curr. Biol. 19 (2009), 1384–1388.
13. 13 Lin, F.L., et al. Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process. Mol. Cell Biol. 4 (1984), 1020–1034.
14. 14 Munoz, M.C., et al. RING finger nuclear factor RNF168 is important for defects in homologous recombination caused by loss of the breast cancer susceptibility factor BRCA1. J. Biol. Chem. 287 (2012), 40618–40628.
15. 15 Bennardo, N., et al. Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair. PLoS Genet., 4, 2008, e1000110.
16. 16 Sartori, A.A., et al. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450 (2007), 509–514.
17. 17 Chen, L., et al. Cell cycle-dependent complex formation of BRCA1.CtIP.MRN is important for DNA double-strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008), 7713–7720.
18. 18 Zhou, Y., et al. Quantitation of DNA double-strand break resection intermediates in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 2014, e19.
19. 19 Xie, A., et al. Control of sister chromatid recombination by histone H2AX. Mol. Cell 16 (2004), 1017–1025.
20. 20 Escribano-Diaz, C., et al. A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell 49 (2013), 872–883.
21. 21 Hakim, O., et al. DNA damage defines sites of recurrent chromosomal translocations in B lymphocytes. Nature 484 (2012), 69–74.
22. 22 Sturzenegger, A., et al. DNA2 cooperates with the WRN and BLM RecQ helicases to mediate long-range DNA end resection in human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 289 (2014), 27314–27326.
23. 23 Yang, Y.-G., et al. Conditional deletion of Nbs1 in murine cells reveals its role in branching repair pathways of DNA double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 25 (2006), 5527–5538.
24. 24 Gunn, A., et al. Correct end use during end joining of multiple chromosomal double strand breaks is influenced by repair protein RAD50. DNA-dependent protein kinase DNA-PKcs, and transcription context. J. Biol. Chem. 286 (2011), 42470–42482.
25. 25 Bennardo, N., et al. Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential. PLoS Genet., 5, 2009, e1000683.
26. 26 Howard, S.M., et al. DNA damage response factors from diverse pathways, including DNA crosslink repair, mediate alternative end joining. PLoS Genet., 11, 2015, e1004943.
27. 27 Karanja, K.K., et al. DNA2 and EXO1 in replication-coupled, homology-directed repair and in the interplay between HDR and the FA/BRCA network. Cell Cycle 11 (2012), 3983–3996.
28. 28 Costelloe, T., et al. The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 489 (2012), 581–584.
29. 29 Chen, X., et al. The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 489 (2012), 576–580.
30. 30 Onyango, D.O., et al. Tetratricopeptide repeat factor XAB2 mediates the end resection step of homologous recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (2016), 5702–5716.
31. 31 Shen, J., et al. ARID1A deficiency impairs the DNA damage checkpoint and sensitizes cells to PARP inhibitors. Cancer Discov. 5 (2015), 752–767.
32. 32 Stark, J.M., et al. Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol. Cell Biol. 24 (2004), 9305–9316.
33. 33 Scully, R., et al. Association of BRCA1 with Rad51 in mitotic and meiotic cells. Cell 88 (1997), 265–275.
34. 34 Schlegel, B.P., et al. BRCA1 promotes induction of ssDNA by ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 66 (2006), 5181–5189.
35. 35 Cruz-Garcia, A., et al. BRCA1 accelerates CtIP-mediated DNA-end resection. Cell Rep. 9 (2014), 451–459.
36. 36 Tkac, J., et al. HELB Is a feedback inhibitor of DNA end resection. Mol. Cell 61 (2016), 405–418.
37. 37 Coleman, K.A., Greenberg, R.A., The BRCA1-RAP80 complex regulates DNA repair mechanism utilization by restricting end resection. J. Biol. Chem. 286 (2011), 13669–13680.
38. 38 Zhu, Z., et al. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134 (2008), 981–994.
39. 39 Mimitou, E.P., Symington, L.S., Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455 (2008), 770–774.
40. 40 Lazzaro, F., et al. Histone methyltransferase Dot1, Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs, uncapped telomeres. EMBO.J. 27 (2008), 1502–1512.
41. 41 Ferrari, M., et al. Functional interplay between the 53BP1-ortholog Rad9 and the Mre11 complex regulates resection, end-tethering and repair of a double-strand break. PLoS Genet., 11, 2015, e1004928.
42. 42 Caravita, T., et al. Bortezomib: efficacy comparisons in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 3 (2006), 374–387.
43. 43 Mortensen, U.H., et al. Rad52. Curr. Biol 19 (2009), R676–R677.
44. 44 Symington, L.S., Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66 (2002), 630–670.
45. 45 Rothenberg, E., et al. Human Rad52-mediated homology search and annealing occurs by continuous interactions between overlapping nucleoprotein complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (2008), 20274–20279.
46. 46 Motycka, T.A., et al. Physical and functional interaction between the XPF/ERCC1 endonuclease and hRad52. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004), 13634–13639.
47. 47 Morales, M.E., et al. The contribution of Alu elements to mutagenic DNA double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet., 11, 2015, e1005016.
48. 48 Sugawara, N., et al. Role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 and Msh3 repair proteins in double-strand break-induced recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94 (1997), 9214–9219.
49. 49 Guirouilh-Barbat, J., et al. Impact of the KU80 pathway on NHEJ-induced genome rearrangements in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 14 (2004), 611–623.
50. 50 Haber, J.E., Alternative endings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (2008), 405–406.
51. 51 Zhu, C., et al. Unrepaired DNA breaks in p53-deficient cells lead to oncogenic gene amplification subsequent to translocations. Cell 109 (2002), 811–821.
52. 52 Wang, M., et al. PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006), 6170–6182.
53. 53 Audebert, M., et al. Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA ligase III in an alternative route for DNA double-strand breaks rejoining. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004), 55117–55126.
54. 54 Simsek, D., Jasin, M., Alternative end-joining is suppressed by the canonical NHEJ component Xrcc4-ligase IV during chromosomal translocation formation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17 (2010), 410–416.
55. 55 Decottignies, A., Microhomology-mediated end joining in fission yeast is repressed by pku70 and relies on genes involved in homologous recombination. Genetics 176 (2007), 1403–1415.
56. 56 McVey, M., Lee, S.E., MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet. 24 (2008), 529–538.
57. 57 LaRocque, J.R., et al. Interhomolog recombination and loss of heterozygosity in wild-type and Bloom syndrome helicase (BLM)-deficient mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 (2011), 11971–11976.
58. 58 Ira, G., et al. Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 115 (2003), 401–411.
59. 59 Benson, F.E., et al. Purification and characterization of the human Rad51 protein, an analogue of E. coli RecA. EMBO J. 13 (1994), 5764–5771.
60. 60 Sung, P., Catalysis of ATP-dependent homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange by yeast RAD51 protein. Science 265 (1994), 1241–1243.
61. 61 Ogawa, T., et al. Similarity of the yeast RAD51 filament to the bacterial RecA filament. Science 259 (1993), 1896–1899.
62. 62 Lambert, S., Lopez, B.S., Characterization of mammalian RAD51 double strand break repair using non-lethal dominant-negative forms. EMBO J. 19 (2000), 3090–3099.
63. 63 Chen, J.J., et al. BRCA1, BRCA2, and Rad51 operate in a common DNA damage response pathway. Cancer Res. 59 (1999), 1752s–1756s.
64. 64 Stark, J.M., et al. ATP hydrolysis by mammalian RAD51 has a key role during homology-directed DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002), 20185–20194.
65. 65 Tutt, A., et al. Mutation in Brca2 stimulates error-prone homology-directed repair of DNA double-strand breaks occurring between repeated sequences. EMBO J. 20 (2001), 4704–4716.
66. 66 Dronkert, M.L., et al. Mouse RAD54 affects DNA double-strand break repair and sister chromatid exchange. Mol. Cell Biol. 20 (2000), 3147–3156.
67. 67 Betermier, M., et al. Is non-homologous end-joining really an inherently error-prone process?. PLoS Genet., 10, 2014, e1004086.
68. 68 Lee, S.E., et al. Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94 (1998), 399–409.
69. 69 Ma, J.L., et al. Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences. Mol. Cell Biol. 23 (2003), 8820–8828.
70. 70 Pierce, A.J., et al. Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 15 (2001), 3237–3242.
71. 71 Yang, Y.G., et al. The Fanconi anemia group A protein modulates homologous repair of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Carcinogenesis 26 (2005), 1731–1740.
72. 72 Pace, P., et al. Ku70 corrupts DNA repair in the absence of the Fanconi anemia pathway. Science 329 (2010), 219–223.
73. 73 Adamo, A., et al. Preventing nonhomologous end joining suppresses DNA repair defects of Fanconi anemia. Mol. Cell 39 (2010), 25–35.
74. 74 Murina, O., et al. FANCD2 and CtIP cooperate to repair DNA interstrand crosslinks. Cell Rep. 7 (2014), 1030–1038.
75. 75 Yu, X., Gabriel, A., Ku-dependent and Ku-independent end-joining pathways lead to chromosomal rearrangements during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 163 (2003), 843–856.
76. 76 Mansour, W.Y., et al. The absence of Ku but not defects in classical non-homologous end-joining is required to trigger PARP1-dependent end-joining. DNA Repair 12 (2013), 1134–1142.
77. 77 Mateos-Gomez, P.A., et al. Mammalian polymerase θ promotes alternative NHEJ and suppresses recombination. Nature 518 (2015), 254–257.
78. 78 Ceccaldi, R., et al. Homologous-recombination-deficient tumours are dependent on Polθ-mediated repair. Nature 518 (2015), 258–262.
79. 79 Kent, T., et al. Mechanism of microhomology-mediated end-joining promoted by human DNA polymerase θ. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22 (2015), 230–237.
80. 80 Zahn, K.E., et al. Human DNA polymerase θ grasps the primer terminus to mediate DNA repair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22 (2015), 304–311.
81. 81 Yousefzadeh, M.J., et al. Mechanism of suppression of chromosomal instability by DNA polymerase POLQ. PLoS Genet., 10, 2014, e1004654.
82. 82 Yu, A.M., McVey, M., Synthesis-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining accounts for multiple types of repair junctions. Nucleic Acids Res. 38 (2010), 5706–5717.
83. 83 Ahmad, A., et al. ERCC1-XPF endonuclease facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell Biol. 28 (2008), 5082–5092.
84. 84 Lee, K., Lee, S.E., Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-dependent single-strand DNA formation at DNA break promotes microhomology-mediated end joining. Genetics 176 (2007), 2003–2014.
85. 85 Sugawara, N., et al. Heteroduplex rejection during single-strand annealing requires Sgs1 helicase and mismatch repair proteins Msh2 and Msh6 but not Pms1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004), 9315–9320.
86. 86 George, C.M., Alani, E., Multiple cellular mechanisms prevent chromosomal rearrangements involving repetitive DNA. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 47 (2012), 297–313.
87. 87 Chakraborty, U., et al. A delicate balance between repair and replication factors regulates recombination between divergent DNA sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 202 (2016), 525–540.
88. 88 Huertas, P., Jackson, S.P., Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 284 (2009), 9558–9565.
89. 89 Fu, Q., et al. Phosphorylation-regulated transitions in an oligomeric state control the activity of the Sae2 DNA repair enzyme. Mol. Cell Biol. 34 (2014), 778–793.
90. 90 Johnson, R.D., Jasin, M., Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 19 (2000), 3398–3407.
91. 91 Vaze, M.B., et al. Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol. Cell 10 (2002), 373–385.
92. 92 Aymard, F., et al. Transcriptionally active chromatin recruits homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21 (2014), 366–374.
93. 93 Ryu, T., et al. Heterochromatic breaks move to the nuclear periphery to continue recombinational repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 17 (2015), 1401–1411.
94. 94 Belancio, V.P., et al. All y'all need to know ‘bout retroelements in cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 20 (2010), 200–210.
95. 95 Zhang, W., et al. Alu distribution and mutation types of cancer genes. BMC Genomics, 12, 2011, 157.
96. 96 Pavlicek, A., et al. Evolution of the tumor suppressor BRCA1 locus in primates: implications for cancer predisposition. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13 (2004), 2737–2751.
97. 97 Strout, M.P., et al. The partial tandem duplication of ALL1 (MLL) is consistently generated by Alu-mediated homologous recombination in acute myeloid leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 (1998), 2390–2395.
98. 98 Elliott, B., et al. Chromosomal translocation mechanisms at intronic Alu elements in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 17 (2005), 885–894.
99. 99 Manthey, G.M., Bailis, A.M., Rad51 inhibits translocation formation by non-conservative homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE, 5, 2010, e11889.
100. 100 Argueso, J.L., et al. Double-strand breaks associated with repetitive DNA can reshape the genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (2008), 11845–11850.
101. 101 Weckselblatt, B., Rudd, M.K., Human structural variation: mechanisms of chromosome rearrangements. Trends Genet. 31 (2015), 587–599.
102. 102 Startek, M., et al. Genome-wide analyses of LINE-LINE-mediated nonallelic homologous recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 (2015), 2188–2198.
103. 103 Rouet, P., et al. Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease. Mol. Cell Biol. 14 (1994), 8096–8106.
104. 104 Davis, L., Maizels, N., Homology-directed repair of DNA nicks via pathways distinct from canonical double-strand break repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 (2014), E924–E932.
105. 105 Song, J., et al. RS-1 enhances CRISPR/Cas9- and TALEN-mediated knock-in efficiency. Nat. Commun., 7, 2016, 10548.
106. 106 Storici, F., et al. Conservative repair of a chromosomal double-strand break by single-strand DNA through two steps of annealing. Mol. Cell Biol. 26 (2006), 7645–7657.
107. 107 Sakuma, T., et al. MMEJ-assisted gene knock-in using TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 with the PITCh systems. Nat. Protoc. 11 (2016), 118–133.
108. 108 Chandramouly, G., et al. Small-molecule disruption of RAD52 rings as a mechanism for precision medicine in BRCA-deficient cancers. Chem. Biol. 22 (2015), 1491–1504.
109. 109 Huang, F., et al. Targeting BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient cells with RAD52 small molecule inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (2016), 4189–4199.
110. 110 Ochs, F., et al. 53BP1 fosters fidelity of homology-directed DNA repair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 2016, 10.1038/nsmb.3251 Published online June 27, 2016.