Functional Interplay between the 53BP1-Ortholog Rad9 and the Mre11 Complex Regulates Resection, End-Tethering and Repair of a Double-Strand Break

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Ferrari, Matteo ^a   Dibitetto, Diego ^a   De Gregorio, Giuseppe ^a,c   Eapen, Vinay V ^b   Rawal, Chetan C ^a   Lazzaro, Federico ^a   Tsabar, Michael ^b   Marini, Federica ^a   Haber, James E ^b   Pellicioli, Achille ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; MRE11 PROTEIN; PROTEIN RAD9; SAE2 PROTEIN; SGS1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; ENDONUCLEASE; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; MRE11 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; RAD52 PROTEIN; RAD52 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; RECQ HELICASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SAE2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SGS1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DEGRADATION; DNA END TETHERING; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE; GENE DELETION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID STRUCTURE, METABOLISM AND FUNCTION; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RAD9 GENE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; GENETICS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; METABOLISM; MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ENDODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; ENDONUCLEASES; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MUTATION; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; RECQ HELICASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84924352710     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004928     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Mimitou EP, Symington LS, (2010) Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. The EMBO journal 29: 3358–3369.
2. Langerak P, Mejia-Ramirez E, Limbo O, Russell P, (2011) Release of Ku and MRN from DNA ends by Mre11 nuclease activity and Ctp1 is required for homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks. PLoS genetics 7: e1002271.
3. Foster SS, Balestrini A, Petrini JH, (2011) Functional interplay of the Mre11 nuclease and Ku in the response to replication-associated DNA damage. Molecular and cellular biology 31: 4379–4389.
4. Huertas P, Cortes-Ledesma F, Sartori AA, Aguilera A, Jackson SP, (2008) CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455: 689–692.
5. Gravel S, Chapman JR, Magill C, Jackson SP, (2008) DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes & development 22: 2767–2772.
6. Mimitou EP, Symington LS, (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455: 770–774.
7. Zhu Z, Chung WH, Shim EY, Lee SE, Ira G, (2008) Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134: 981–994.
8. Cejka P, Cannavo E, Polaczek P, Masuda-Sasa T, Pokharel S, et al. (2010) DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature 467: 112–116.
9. Niu H, Chung WH, Zhu Z, Kwon Y, Zhao W, et al. (2010) Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 467: 108–111.
10. Granata M, Panigada D, Galati E, Lazzaro F, Pellicioli A, et al. (2013) To trim or not to trim: progression and control of DSB end resection. Cell cycle 12: 1848–1860.
11. Chapman JR, Taylor MR, Boulton SJ, (2012) Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Molecular cell 47: 497–510.
12. Chung WH, Zhu Z, Papusha A, Malkova A, Ira G, (2010) Defective resection at DNA double-strand breaks leads to de novo telomere formation and enhances gene targeting. PLoS genetics 6: e1000948.
13. Lydeard JR, Lipkin-Moore Z, Jain S, Eapen VV, Haber JE, (2010) Sgs1 and exo1 redundantly inhibit break-induced replication and de novo telomere addition at broken chromosome ends. PLoS genetics 6: e1000973.
14. McVey M, Lee SE, (2008) MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends in genetics: TIG 24: 529–538.
15. Elliott B, Jasin M, (2002) Double-strand breaks and translocations in cancer. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS 59: 373–385.
16. Weinstock DM, Richardson CA, Elliott B, Jasin M, (2006) Modeling oncogenic translocations: distinct roles for double-strand break repair pathways in translocation formation in mammalian cells. DNA repair 5: 1065–1074.
17. Morin I, Ngo HP, Greenall A, Zubko MK, Morrice N, et al. (2008) Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. The EMBO journal 27: 2400–2410.
18. El-Shemerly M, Hess D, Pyakurel AK, Moselhy S, Ferrari S, (2008) ATR-dependent pathways control hEXO1 stability in response to stalled forks. Nucleic acids research 36: 511–519.
19. Bolderson E, Tomimatsu N, Richard DJ, Boucher D, Kumar R, et al. (2010) Phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic acids research 38: 1821–1831.
20. Huyen Y, Zgheib O, Ditullio RA, JrGorgoulis VG, Zacharatos P, et al. (2004) Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 432: 406–411.
21. Giannattasio M, Lazzaro F, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M, (2005) The DNA damage checkpoint response requires histone H2B ubiquitination by Rad6-Bre1 and H3 methylation by Dot1. The Journal of biological chemistry 280: 9879–9886.
22. Wysocki R, Javaheri A, Allard S, Sha F, Cote J, et al. (2005) Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9. Molecular and cellular biology 25: 8430–8443.
23. Hammet A, Magill C, Heierhorst J, Jackson SP, (2007) Rad9 BRCT domain interaction with phosphorylated H2AX regulates the G1 checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO reports 8: 851–857.
24. Granata M, Lazzaro F, Novarina D, Panigada D, Puddu F, et al. (2010) Dynamics of Rad9 chromatin binding and checkpoint function are mediated by its dimerization and are cell cycle-regulated by CDK1 activity. PLoS genetics 6.
25. Pfander B, Diffley JF, (2011) Dpb11 coordinates Mec1 kinase activation with cell cycle-regulated Rad9 recruitment. The EMBO journal 30: 4897–4907.
26. Shroff R, Arbel-Eden A, Pilch D, Ira G, Bonner WM, et al. (2004) Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Current biology: CB 14: 1703–1711.
27. Navadgi-Patil VM, Burgers PM, (2008) Yeast DNA replication protein Dpb11 activates the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase. The Journal of biological chemistry 283: 35853–35859.
28. Puddu F, Granata M, Di Nola L, Balestrini A, Piergiovanni G, et al. (2008) Phosphorylation of the budding yeast 9-1-1 complex is required for Dpb11 function in the full activation of the UV-induced DNA damage checkpoint. Molecular and cellular biology 28: 4782–4793.
29. Usui T, Foster SS, Petrini JH, (2009) Maintenance of the DNA-damage checkpoint requires DNA-damage-induced mediator protein oligomerization. Molecular cell 33: 147–159.
30. Soulier J, Lowndes NF, (1999) The BRCT domain of the S. cerevisiae checkpoint protein Rad9 mediates a Rad9-Rad9 interaction after DNA damage. Current biology: CB 9: 551–554.
31. Zimmermann M, Lottersberger F, Buonomo SB, Sfeir A, de Lange T, (2013) 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5' end resection. Science 339: 700–704.
32. Chapman JR, Barral P, Vannier JB, Borel V, Steger M, et al. (2013) RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent nonhomologous end joining and suppression of DNA double-strand break resection. Molecular cell 49: 858–871.
33. Escribano-Diaz C, Orthwein A, Fradet-Turcotte A, Xing M, Young JT, et al. (2013) A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Molecular cell 49: 872–883.
34. Feng L, Fong KW, Wang J, Wang W, Chen J, (2013) RIF1 counteracts BRCA1-mediated end resection during DNA repair. The Journal of biological chemistry 288: 11135–11143.
35. Di Virgilio M, Callen E, Yamane A, Zhang W, Jankovic M, et al. (2013) Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching. Science 339: 711–715.
36. Lazzaro F, Sapountzi V, Granata M, Pellicioli A, Vaze M, et al. (2008) Histone methyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. The EMBO journal 27: 1502–1512.
37. Chen X, Cui D, Papusha A, Zhang X, Chu CD, et al. (2012) The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 489: 576–580.
38. Mimitou EP, Symington LS, (2009) DNA end resection: many nucleases make light work. DNA repair 8: 983–995.
39. Vaze MB, Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Ira G, Liberi G, et al. (2002) Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Molecular cell 10: 373–385.
40. Ooi SL, Shoemaker DD, Boeke JD, (2003) DNA helicase gene interaction network defined using synthetic lethality analyzed by microarray. Nature genetics 35: 277–286.
41. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294: 2364–2368.
42. Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP, (2005) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. The Journal of biological chemistry 280: 38631–38638.
43. Mullen JR, Kaliraman V, Brill SJ, (2000) Bipartite structure of the SGS1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 154: 1101–1114.
44. Cannavo E, Cejka P (2014) Sae2 promotes dsDNA endonuclease activity within Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to resect DNA breaks. Nature.
45. Moreau S, Ferguson JR, Symington LS, (1999) The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Molecular and cellular biology 19: 556–566.
46. Pommier Y, (2004) Camptothecins and topoisomerase I: a foot in the door. Targeting the genome beyond topoisomerase I with camptothecins and novel anticancer drugs: importance of DNA replication, repair and cell cycle checkpoints. Current medicinal chemistry Anti-cancer agents 4: 429–434.
47. Nishimura K, Fukagawa T, Takisawa H, Kakimoto T, Kanemaki M, (2009) An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nature methods 6: 917–922.
48. Jain S, Sugawara N, Lydeard J, Vaze M, Tanguy Le Gac N, et al. (2009) A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair. Genes & development 23: 291–303.
49. Lee SE, Moore JK, Holmes A, Umezu K, Kolodner RD, et al. (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94: 399–409.
50. White CI, Haber JE, (1990) Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The EMBO journal 9: 663–673.
51. Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP, (2006) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signalling. EMBO reports 7: 212–218.
52. Zierhut C, Diffley JF, (2008) Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. The EMBO journal 27: 1875–1885.
53. Lee K, Lee SE, (2007) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-dependent single-strand DNA formation at DNA break promotes microhomology-mediated end joining. Genetics 176: 2003–2014.
54. Moore JK, Haber JE, (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular and cellular biology 16: 2164–2173.
55. Kim HS, Vijayakumar S, Reger M, Harrison JC, Haber JE, et al. (2008) Functional interactions between Sae2 and the Mre11 complex. Genetics 178: 711–723.
56. Bernstein KA, Mimitou EP, Mihalevic MJ, Chen H, Sunjaveric I, et al. (2013) Resection activity of the Sgs1 helicase alters the affinity of DNA ends for homologous recombination proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 195: 1241–1251.
57. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R, (2004) Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118: 699–713.
58. Kaye JA, Melo JA, Cheung SK, Vaze MB, Haber JE, et al. (2004) DNA breaks promote genomic instability by impeding proper chromosome segregation. Current biology: CB 14: 2096–2106.
59. Lisby M, Rothstein R, (2004) DNA repair: keeping it together. Current biology: CB 14: R994–996.
60. Lobachev K, Vitriol E, Stemple J, Resnick MA, Bloom K, (2004) Chromosome fragmentation after induction of a double-strand break is an active process prevented by the RMX repair complex. Current biology: CB 14: 2107–2112.
61. Nakai W, Westmoreland J, Yeh E, Bloom K, Resnick MA, (2011) Chromosome integrity at a double-strand break requires exonuclease 1 and MRX. DNA repair 10: 102–110.
62. Lee K, Zhang Y, Lee SE, (2008) Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATM orthologue suppresses break-induced chromosome translocations. Nature 454: 543–546.
63. Eapen VV, Sugawara N, Tsabar M, Wu WH, Haber JE, (2012) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end resection and checkpoint deactivation. Molecular and cellular biology 32: 4727–4740.
64. Schwartz MF, Duong JK, Sun Z, Morrow JS, Pradhan D, et al. (2002) Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Molecular cell 9: 1055–1065.
65. Garcia V, Phelps SE, Gray S, Neale MJ, (2011) Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1. Nature 479: 241–244.
66. Shibata A, Moiani D, Arvai AS, Perry J, Harding SM, et al. (2014) DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathway Choice Is Directed by Distinct MRE11 Nuclease Activities. Molecular cell 53: 7–18.
67. Clerici M, Mantiero D, Guerini I, Lucchini G, Longhese MP, (2008) The Yku70-Yku80 complex contributes to regulate double-strand break processing and checkpoint activation during the cell cycle. EMBO reports 9: 810–818.
68. Trovesi C, Falcettoni M, Lucchini G, Clerici M, Longhese MP, (2011) Distinct Cdk1 requirements during single-strand annealing, noncrossover, and crossover recombination. PLoS genetics 7: e1002263.
69. Donnianni RA, Ferrari M, Lazzaro F, Clerici M, Tamilselvan Nachimuthu B, et al. (2010) Elevated levels of the polo kinase Cdc5 override the Mec1/ATR checkpoint in budding yeast by acting at different steps of the signaling pathway. PLoS genetics 6: e1000763.
70. Majka J, Burgers PM, (2003) Yeast Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1: a sliding clamp for the DNA damage checkpoint. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 2249–2254.
71. Lee CS, Lee K, Legube G, Haber JE, (2014) Dynamics of yeast histone H2A and H2B phosphorylation in response to a double-strand break. Nature structural & molecular biology 21: 103–109.
72. Shim EY, Hong SJ, Oum JH, Yanez Y, Zhang Y, et al. (2007) RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Molecular and cellular biology 27: 1602–1613.
73. Tsukuda T, Fleming AB, Nickoloff JA, Osley MA, (2005) Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 438: 379–383.
74. Westmoreland JW, Resnick MA, (2013) Coincident resection at both ends of random, gamma-induced double-strand breaks requires MRX (MRN), Sae2 (Ctp1), and Mre11-nuclease. PLoS genetics 9: e1003420.
75. Grabarz A, Guirouilh-Barbat J, Barascu A, Pennarun G, Genet D, et al. (2013) A role for BLM in double-strand break repair pathway choice: prevention of CtIP/Mre11-mediated alternative nonhomologous end-joining. Cell reports 5: 21–28.
76. Bouwman P, Aly A, Escandell JM, Pieterse M, Bartkova J, et al. (2010) 53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and is associated with triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers. Nature structural & molecular biology 17: 688–695.
77. Bunting SF, Callen E, Wong N, Chen HT, Polato F, et al. (2010) 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 141: 243–254.
78. Polato F, Callen E, Wong N, Faryabi R, Bunting S, et al. (2014) CtIP-mediated resection is essential for viability and can operate independently of BRCA1. The Journal of experimental medicine 211: 1027–1036.
79. Longtine MS, McKenzie A, 3rdDemarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, et al. (1998) Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 953–961.
80. Muzi Falconi M, Piseri A, Ferrari M, Lucchini G, Plevani P, et al. (1993) De novo synthesis of budding yeast DNA polymerase alpha and POL1 transcription at the G1/S boundary are not required for entrance into S phase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90: 10519–10523.