Alternative end-joining is suppressed by the canonical NHEJ component Xrcc4-ligase IV during chromosomal translocation formation

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 410-416

  Simsek, Deniz ^a   Jasin, Maria ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYDEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDE SYNTHASE; POLYDEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDE SYNTHASE IV; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XRCC4 PROTEIN;

ALTERNATIVE NON HOMOLOGOUS END JOINING; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CANONICAL NON HOMOLOGOUS END JOINING; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE INSERTION; MOUSE; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WILD TYPE;

DNA LIGASES; DNA REPAIR; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HUMANS; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 77950462986     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1773     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. van Gent, D.C. & van der Burg, M. Non-homologous end-joining, a sticky affair. Oncogene 26, 7731-7740 (2007).
2. Jeggo, P.A. Identifcation of genes involved in repair of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Radiat. Res. 150, S80-S91 (1998).
3. Lieber, M.R., Ma, Y., Pannicke, U. & Schwarz, K. Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous DNA end-joining. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 712-720 (2003).
4. Chaudhuri, J. et al. Evolution of the immunoglobulin heavy chain class switch recombination mechanism. Adv. Immunol. 94, 157-214 (2007).
5. Greaves, M.F. & Wiemels, J. Origins of chromosome translocations in childhood leukaemia. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 639-649 (2003).
6. Weinstock, D.M., Elliott, B. & Jasin, M. A model of oncogenic rearrangements: differences between chromosomal translocation mechanisms and simple double-strand break repair. Blood 107, 777-780 (2006).
7. Zhang, Y. & Rowley, J.D. Chromatin structural elements and chromosomal translocations in leukemia. DNA Repair (Amst.) 5, 1282-1297 (2006).
8. Lieber, M.R. The mechanism of human nonhomologous DNA end joining. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 1-5 (2008).
9. Weterings, E. & Chen, D.J. The endless tale of non-homologous end-joining. Cell Res. 18, 114-124 (2008).
10. Mahajan, K.N., Nick McElhinny, S.A., Mitchell, B.S. & Ramsden, D.A. Association of DNA polymerase μ (pol μ) with Ku and ligase IV: role for pol mu in end-joining double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 5194-5202 (2002).
11. Koch, C.A. et al. Xrcc4 physically links DNA end processing by polynucleotide kinase to DNA ligation by DNA ligase IV. EMBO J. 23, 3874-3885 (2004).
12. Budman, J., Kim, S.A. & Chu, G. Processing of DNA for nonhomologous end-joining is controlled by kinase activity and Xrcc4-ligase IV. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 11950-11959 (2007).
13. Ma, Y. et al. A biochemically defned system for mammalian nonhomologous DNA end joining. Mol. Cell 16, 701-713 (2004).
14. Pierce, A.J., Hu, P., Han, M., Ellis, N. & Jasin, M. Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 15, 3237-3242 (2001). (Pubitemid 34008189)
15. Weinstock, D.M. & Jasin, M. Alternative pathways for the repair of RAG-induced DNA breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 131-139 (2006).
16. Liang, F. & Jasin, M. Ku80 defcient cells exhibit excess degradation of extrachromosomal DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14405-14411 (1996).
17. Delacote, F., Han, M., Stamato, T.D., Jasin, M. & Lopez, B.S. An xrcc4 defect or Wortmannin stimulates homologous recombination specifcally induced by double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3454-3463 (2002).
18. Guirouilh-Barbat, J. et al. Impact of the KU80 pathway on NHEJ-induced genome rearrangements in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 14, 611-623 (2004). (Pubitemid 38744575)
19. Schulte-Uentrop, L., El-Awady, R.A., Schliecker, L., Willers, H. & Dahm-Daphi, J. Distinct roles of XRCC4 and Ku80 in non-homologous end-joining of endonuclease-and ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2561-2569 (2008). (Pubitemid 351659571)
20. Yan, C.T. et al. IgH class switching and translocations use a robust non-classical end-joining pathway. Nature 449, 478-482 (2007).
21. Diflippantonio, M.J. et al. Evidence for replicative repair of DNA double-strand breaks leading to oncogenic translocation and gene amplifcation. J. Exp. Med. 196, 469-480 (2002).
22. Zhu, C. et al. Unrepaired DNA breaks in p53-defcient cells lead to oncogenic gene amplifcation subsequent to translocations. Cell 109, 811-821 (2002). (Pubitemid 34785997)
23. Wang, J.H. et al. Mechanisms promoting translocations in editing and switching peripheral B cells. Nature 460, 231-236 (2009).
24. Weinstock, D.M., Brunet, E. & Jasin, M. Formation of NHEJ-derived reciprocal chromosomal translocations does not require Ku70. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 978-981 (2007). (Pubitemid 47190453)
25. Celli, G.B., Denchi, E.L. & de Lange, T. Ku70 stimulates fusion of dysfunctional telomeres yet protects chromosome ends from homologous recombination. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 885-890 (2006).
26. Gao, Y. et al. A critical role for DNA end-joining proteins in both lymphogenesis and neurogenesis. Cell 95, 891-902 (1998). (Pubitemid 29019042)
27. Guirouilh-Barbat, J., Rass, E., Plo, I., Bertrand, P. & Lopez, B.S. Defects in XRCC4 and KU80 differentially affect the joining of distal nonhomologous ends. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20902-20907 (2007).
28. Sawada, M. et al. Ku70 suppresses the apoptotic translocation of Bax to mitochondria. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 320-329 (2003). (Pubitemid 36432296)
29. Downs, J.A. & Jackson, S.P. A means to a DNA end: the many roles of Ku. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 367-378 (2004).
30. Bryans, M., Valenzano, M.C. & Stamato, T.D. Absence of DNA ligase IV protein in XR-1 cells: evidence for stabilization by XRCC4. Mutat. Res. 433, 53-58 (1999). (Pubitemid 29073670)
31. Lee, K., Zhang, Y. & Lee, S.E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATM orthologue suppresses break-induced chromosome translocations. Nature 454, 543-546 (2008).
32. Kabotyanski, E.B., Gomelsky, L., Han, J.O., Stamato, T.D. & Roth, D.B. Double-strand break repair in Ku86-and XRCC4-defcient cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 5333-5342 (1998). (Pubitemid 28542732)
33. Verkaik, N.S. et al. Different types of V(D)J recombination and end-joining defects in DNA double-strand break repair mutant mammalian cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 32, 701-709 (2002).
34. Nick McElhinny, S.A. et al. A gradient of template dependence defnes distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining. Mol. Cell 19, 357-366 (2005).
35. Gu, J. et al. XRCC4:DNA ligase IV can ligate incompatible DNA ends and can ligate across gaps. EMBO J. 26, 1010-1023 (2007). (Pubitemid 46303583)
36. Shiroishi, T., Sagai, T., Hanzawa, N., Gotoh, H. & Moriwaki, K. Genetic control of sex-dependent meiotic recombination in the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse. EMBO J. 10, 681-686 (1991). (Pubitemid 21905523)
37. Guillon, H. & de Massy, B. An initiation site for meiotic crossing-over and gene conversion in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 32, 296-299 (2002).
38. Daley, J.M. & Wilson, T.E. Rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks as a function of overhang length. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 896-906 (2005).
39. Wang, H. et al. DNA ligase III as a candidate component of backup pathways of nonhomologous end joining. Cancer Res. 65, 4020-4030 (2005). (Pubitemid 40775638)
40. Sallmyr, A., Tomkinson, A.E. & Rassool, F.V. Up-regulation of WRN and DNA ligase IIIα in chronic myeloid leukemia: consequences for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Blood 112, 1413-1423 (2008).
41. Stark, J.M., Pierce, A.J., Oh, J., Pastink, A. & Jasin, M. Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 9305-9316 (2004). (Pubitemid 39391669)
42. Lee, S.E. et al. Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94, 399-409 (1998).
43. Smith, J. et al. Impact of DNA ligase IV on the fdelity of end joining in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 2157-2167 (2003).
44. Soutoglou, E. et al. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 675-682 (2007).
45. Riballo, E. et al. A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to γ-H2AX foci. Mol. Cell 16, 715-724 (2004).
46. Jager, U. et al. Follicular lymphomas' BCL-2/IgH junctions contain templated nucleotide insertions: novel insights into the mechanism of t(14;18) translocation. Blood 95, 3520-3529 (2000).
47. Ng, S.H., Maas, S.A., Petkov, P.M., Mills, K.D. & Paigen, K. Colocalization of somatic and meiotic double strand breaks near the Myc oncogene on mouse chromosome 15. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 48, 925-930 (2009).
48. te Riele, H., Maandag, E.R., Clarke, A., Hooper, M. & Berns, A. Consecutive inactivation of both alleles of the pim-1 proto-oncogene by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Nature 348, 649-651 (1990)
49. te Riele, H., Maandag, E.R. & Berns, A. Highly effcient gene targeting in embryonic stem cells through homologous recombination with isogenic DNA constructs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5128-5132 (1992).
50. Richardson, C., Moynahan, M.E. & Jasin, M. Double-strand break repair by interchromosomal recombination: suppression of chromosomal translocations. Genes Dev. 12, 3831-3842 (1998).
51. Roth, D.B., Porter, T.N. & Wilson, J.H. Mechanisms of nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 2599-2607 (1985).