In vivo aspects of protein folding and quality control

Science

Volumn 353, Issue 6294, 2016, Pages

  Balchin, David ^a   Hayer Hartl, Manajit ^a   Hartl, F Ulrich ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; CHAPERONIN; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 90; NANOCAGE; POLYPEPTIDE; PROTEOME; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 72; PROTEIN AGGREGATE;

BIOINFORMATICS; DEGRADATION; DISEASE INCIDENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HOMEOSTASIS; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PROTEIN; PROTEOMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; TOXIN;

AGING; CELLULAR STRESS RESPONSE; CYTOSOL; HUMAN; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NERVE DEGENERATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRANSPORT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN HOMEOSTASIS; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; RIBOSOME; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; HOMEOSTASIS; METABOLISM; MOLECULARLY TARGETED THERAPY; NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES; PROTEIN AGGREGATION, PATHOLOGICAL; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PROTEOSTASIS DEFICIENCIES;

AGING; CYTOSOL; HOMEOSTASIS; HSP72 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HUMANS; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; MOLECULAR TARGETED THERAPY; NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES; PROTEIN AGGREGATES; PROTEIN AGGREGATION, PATHOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEOLYSIS; PROTEOSTASIS DEFICIENCIES; RIBOSOMES;

EID: 84976889285     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4354     Document Type: Review

References (187)

1. W. E. Balch, R. I. Morimoto, A. Dillin, J. W. Kelly, Adapting proteostasis for disease intervention. Science 319, 916-919 (2008). doi: 10.1126/science.1141448; pmid: 18276881
2. A. Gershenson, L. M. Gierasch, A. Pastore, S. E. Radford, Energy landscapes of functional proteins are inherently risky. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 884-891 (2014). doi: 10.1038/ nchembio.1670; pmid: 25325699
3. A. K. Dunker, I. Silman, V. N. Uversky, J. L. Sussman, Function and structure of inherently disordered proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 756-764 (2008). doi: 10.1016/ j.sbi.2008.10.002; pmid: 18952168
4. J. Labbadia, R. I. Morimoto, The biology of proteostasis in aging and disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84, 435-464 (2015). doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033955; pmid: 25784053
5. I. Braakman, D. N. Hebert, Protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a013201 (2013). doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a013201; pmid: 23637286
6. C. B. Anfinsen, Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181, 223-230 (1973). doi: 10.1126/ science.181.4096.223; pmid: 4124164
7. F. U. Hartl, Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 381, 571-580 (1996). doi: 10.1038/381571a0; pmid: 8637592
8. D. J. Brockwell, S. E. Radford, Intermediates: Ubiquitous species on folding energy landscapes? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 30-37 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.01.003; pmid: 17239580
9. R. J. Ellis, A. P. Minton, Protein aggregation in crowded environments. Biol. Chem. 387, 485-497 (2006). doi: 10.1515/BC.2006.064; pmid: 16740119
10. A. R. Dinner, A. Sali, L. J. Smith, C. M. Dobson, M. Karplus, Understanding protein folding via free-energy surfaces from theory and experiment. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 331-339 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01610-8; pmid: 10871884
11. P. A. Schmidpeter, F. X. Schmid, Prolyl isomerization and its catalysis in protein folding and protein function. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 1609-1631 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.01.023; pmid: 25676311
12. F. Chiti, C. M. Dobson, Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75, 333-366 (2006). doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.101304.123901; pmid: 16756495
13. Y. E. Kim, M. S. Hipp, A. Bracher, M. Hayer-Hartl, F. U. Hartl, Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and proteostasis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82, 323-355 (2013). doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060208-092442; pmid: 23746257
14. D. N. Wilson, R. Beckmann, The ribosomal tunnel as a functional environment for nascent polypeptide folding and translational stalling. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 274-282 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.01.007; pmid: 21316217
15. A. Kosolapov, C. Deutsch, Tertiary interactions within the ribosomal exit tunnel. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 405-411 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1571; pmid: 19270700
16. E. P. O'Brien, J. Christodoulou, M. Vendruscolo, C. M. Dobson, New scenarios of protein folding can occur on the ribosome. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 513-526 (2011). doi: 10.1021/ ja107863z; pmid: 21204555
17. O. B. Nilsson et al., Cotranslational protein folding inside the ribosome exit tunnel. Cell Reports 12, 1533-1540 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.065; pmid: 26321634
18. W. Holtkamp et al., Cotranslational protein folding on the ribosome monitored in real time. Science 350, 1104-1107 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aad0344; pmid: 26612953
19. C. M. Kaiser, D. H. Goldman, J. D. Chodera, I. Tinoco Jr., C. Bustamante, The ribosome modulates nascent protein folding. Science 334, 1723-1727 (2011). doi: 10.1126/ science.1209740; pmid: 22194581
20. L. D. Cabrita et al., A structural ensemble of a ribosomenascent chain complex during cotranslational protein folding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 278-285 (2016). doi: 10.1038/ nsmb.3182; pmid: 26926436
21. C. Eichmann, S. Preissler, R. Riek, E. Deuerling, Cotranslational structure acquisition of nascent polypeptides monitored by NMR spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.107, 9111-9116 (2010). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914300107; pmid: 20439768
22. O. B. Nilsson, A. Müller-Lucks, G. Kramer, B. Bukau, G. von Heijne, Trigger factor reduces the force exerted on the nascent chain by a cotranslationally folding protein. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 1356-1364 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.014; pmid: 26906929
23. F. U. Hartl, M. Hayer-Hartl, Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: From nascent chain to folded protein. Science 295, 1852-1858 (2002). doi: 10.1126/science.1068408; pmid: 11884745
24. Z. N. Scholl, W. Yang, P. E. Marszalek, Chaperones rescue luciferase folding by separating its domains. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 28607-28618 (2014). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.582049; pmid: 25160632
25. A. Borgia et al., Transient misfolding dominates multidomain protein folding. Nat. Commun. 6, 8861 (2015). doi: 10.1038/ ncomms9861; pmid: 26572969
26. Y.-W. Shieh et al., Operon structure and cotranslational subunit association direct protein assembly in bacteria. Science 350, 678-680 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aac8171; pmid: 26405228
27. F. Brandt et al., The native 3D organization of bacterial polysomes. Cell 136, 261-271 (2009). doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2008.11.016; pmid: 19167328
28. F. Brandt, L.-A. Carlson, F. U. Hartl, W. Baumeister, K. Grünewald, The three-dimensional organization of polyribosomes in intact human cells. Mol. Cell 39, 560-569 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.003; pmid: 20797628
29. G. W. Li, E. Oh, J. S. Weissman, The anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria. Nature 484, 538-541 (2012). doi: 10.1038/ nature10965; pmid: 22456704
30. S. Pechmann, J. Frydman, Evolutionary conservation of codon optimality reveals hidden signatures of cotranslational folding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 237-243 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2466; pmid: 23262490
31. P. S. Spencer, E. Siller, J. F. Anderson, J. M. Barral, Silent substitutions predictably alter translation elongation rates and protein folding efficiencies. J. Mol. Biol. 422, 328-335 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.06.010; pmid: 22705285
32. E. P. O'Brien, M. Vendruscolo, C. M. Dobson, Kinetic modelling indicates that fast-translating codons can coordinate cotranslational protein folding by avoiding misfolded intermediates. Nat. Commun. 5, 2988 (2014). pmid: 24394622
33. S. J. Kim et al., Protein folding. Translational tuning optimizes nascent protein folding in cells. Science 348, 444-448 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3974; pmid: 25908822
34. F. Mohammad, C. J. Woolstenhulme, R. Green, A. R. Buskirk, Clarifying the translational pausing landscape in bacteria by ribosome profiling. Cell Reports 14, 686-694 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.073; pmid: 26776510
35. M. Zhou et al., Non-optimal codon usage affects expression, structure and function of clock protein FRQ. Nature 495, 111-115 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nature11833; pmid: 23417067
36. C. Kimchi-Sarfaty et al., A silent polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science 315, 525-528 (2007). doi: 10.1126/science.1135308; pmid: 17185560
37. R. M. Vabulas, F. U. Hartl, Protein synthesis upon acute nutrient restriction relies on proteasome function. Science 310, 1960-1963 (2005). doi: 10.1126/science.1121925; pmid: 16373576
38. S. Duttler, S. Pechmann, J. Frydman, Principles of cotranslational ubiquitination and quality control at the ribosome. Mol. Cell 50, 379-393 (2013). doi: 10.1016/ j.molcel.2013.03.010; pmid: 23583075
39. T. M. Treweek, S. Meehan, H. Ecroyd, J. A. Carver, Small heatshock proteins: Important players in regulating cellular proteostasis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 72, 429-451 (2015). doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1754-5; pmid: 25352169
40. A. Chari, U. Fischer, Cellular strategies for the assembly of molecular machines. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 676-683 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.07.006; pmid: 20727772
41. T. Hauser, L. Popilka, F. U. Hartl, M. Hayer-Hartl, Role of auxiliary proteins in Rubisco biogenesis and function. Nature Plants 1, 15065 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.65; pmid: 27250005
42. E. Oh et al., Selective ribosome profiling reveals the cotranslational chaperone action of trigger factor in vivo. Cell 147, 1295-1308 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.044; pmid: 22153074
43. S. Preissler, E. Deuerling, Ribosome-associated chaperones as key players in proteostasis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 274-283 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.03.002; pmid: 22503700
44. C. M. Kaiser et al., Real-time observation of trigger factor function on translating ribosomes. Nature 444, 455-460 (2006). doi: 10.1038/nature05225; pmid: 17051157
45. A. Hoffmann et al., Concerted action of the ribosome and the associated chaperone trigger factor confines nascent polypeptide folding. Mol. Cell 48, 63-74 (2012). doi: 10.1016/ j.molcel.2012.07.018; pmid: 22921937
46. A. Mashaghi et al., Reshaping of the conformational search of a protein by the chaperone trigger factor. Nature 500, 98-101 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nature12293; pmid: 23831649
47. T. Saio, X. Guan, P. Rossi, A. Economou, C. G. Kalodimos, Structural basis for protein antiaggregation activity of the trigger factor chaperone. Science 344, 1250494 (2014). doi: 10.1126/science.1250494; pmid: 24812405
48. V. R. Agashe et al., Function of trigger factor and DnaK in multidomain protein folding: Increase in yield at the expense of folding speed. Cell 117, 199-209 (2004). doi: 10.1016/ S0092-8674(04)00299-5; pmid: 15084258
49. F. Stull, P. Koldewey, J. R. Humes, S. E. Radford, J. C. Bardwell, Substrate protein folds while it is bound to the ATP-independent chaperone Spy. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 53-58 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3133; pmid: 26619265
50. F. Willmund et al., The cotranslational function of ribosomeassociated Hsp70 in eukaryotic protein homeostasis. Cell 152, 196-209 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.001; pmid: 23332755
51. M. Chiabudini, C. Conz, F. Reckmann, S. Rospert, Ribosomeassociated complex and Ssb are required for translational repression induced by polylysine segments within nascent chains. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 4769-4779 (2012). doi: 10.1128/ MCB.00809-12; pmid: 23007158
52. Y. Zhang et al., Structural basis for interaction of a cotranslational chaperone with the eukaryotic ribosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 1042-1046 (2014). doi: 10.1038/ nsmb.2908; pmid: 25362488
53. J. Kirstein-Miles, A. Scior, E. Deuerling, R. I. Morimoto, The nascent polypeptide-associated complex is a key regulator of proteostasis. EMBO J. 32, 1451-1468 (2013). doi: 10.1038/ emboj.2013.87; pmid: 23604074
54. M. del Alamo et al., Defining the specificity of cotranslationally acting chaperones by systematic analysis of mRNAs associated with ribosome-nascent chain complexes. PLOS Biol. 9, e1001100 (2011). doi: 10.1371/journal. pbio.1001100; pmid: 21765803
55. Y. Zhang et al., NAC functions as a modulator of SRP during the early steps of protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 3027-3040 (2012). doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-02-0112; pmid: 22740632
56. M. Gamerdinger, M. A. Hanebuth, T. Frickey, E. Deuerling, The principle of antagonism ensures protein targeting specificity at the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 348, 201-207 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5335; pmid: 25859040
57. G. Calloni et al., DnaK functions as a central hub in the E. coli chaperone network. Cell Reports 1, 251-264 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2011.12.007; pmid: 22832197
58. E. Kirschke, D. Goswami, D. Southworth, P. R. Griffin, D. A. Agard, Glucocorticoid receptor function regulated by coordinated action of the Hsp90 and Hsp70 chaperone cycles. Cell 157, 1685-1697 (2014). doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2014.04.038; pmid: 24949977
59. N. Morgner et al., Hsp70 forms antiparallel dimers stabilized by post-translational modifications to position clients for transfer to Hsp90. Cell Reports 11, 759-769 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.063; pmid: 25921532
60. J. Cuéllar et al., The structure of CCT-Hsc70 NBD suggests a mechanism for Hsp70 delivery of substrates to the chaperonin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 858-864 (2008). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1464; pmid: 18660820
61. M. P. Mayer, Hsp70 chaperone dynamics and molecular mechanism. Trends Biochem. Sci. 38, 507-514 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.08.001; pmid: 24012426
62. E. M. Clerico, J. M. Tilitsky, W. Meng, L. M. Gierasch, How hsp70 molecular machines interact with their substrates to mediate diverse physiological functions. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 1575-1588 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.02.004; pmid: 25683596
63. R. Kityk, J. Kopp, I. Sinning, M. P. Mayer, Structure and dynamics of the ATP-bound open conformation of Hsp70 chaperones. Mol. Cell 48, 863-874 (2012). doi: 10.1016/ j.molcel.2012.09.023; pmid: 23123194
64. R. Qi et al., Allosteric opening of the polypeptide-binding site when an Hsp70 binds ATP. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 900-907 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2583; pmid: 23708608
65. A. Zhuravleva, L. M. Gierasch, Substrate-binding domain conformational dynamics mediate Hsp70 allostery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, E2865-E2873 (2015). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506692112; pmid:26038563
66. M. Sikor, K. Mapa, L. V. von Voithenberg, D. Mokranjac, D. C. Lamb, Real-time observation of the conformational dynamics of mitochondrial Hsp70 by spFRET. EMBO J. 32, 1639-1649 (2013). doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.89; pmid: 23624933
67. P. De Los Rios, A. Barducci, Hsp70 chaperones are nonequilibrium machines that achieve ultra-affinity by energy consumption. eLife 3, e02218 (2014). doi: 10.7554/ eLife.02218; pmid: 24867638
68. S. K. Sharma, P. De los Rios, P. Christen, A. Lustig, P. Goloubinoff, The kinetic parameters and energy cost of the Hsp70 chaperone as a polypeptide unfoldase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 914-920 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nchembio.455; pmid: 20953191
69. J. M. Nunes, M. Mayer-Hartl, F. U. Hartl, D. J. Müller, Action of the Hsp70 chaperone system observed with single proteins. Nat. Commun. 6, 6307 (2015). doi: 10.1038/ncomms7307; pmid: 25686738
70. A. Sekhar, R. Rosenzweig, G. Bouvignies, L. E. Kay, Mapping the conformation of a client protein through the Hsp70 functional cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 10395-10400 (2015). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508504112; pmid: 26240333
71. A. Sekhar, R. Rosenzweig, G. Bouvignies, L. E. Kay, Hsp70 biases the folding pathways of client proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E2794-E2801 (2016). doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1601846113; pmid: 27140645
72. J. H. Lee et al., Heterogeneous binding of the SH3 client protein to the DnaK molecular chaperone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, E4206-E4215 (2015). doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1505173112; pmid: 26195753
73. Z. Li, F. U. Hartl, A. Bracher, Structure and function of Hip, an attenuator of the Hsp70 chaperone cycle. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 929-935 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2608; pmid: 23812373
74. H. H. Kampinga, E. A. Craig, The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 579-592 (2010). doi: 10.1038/ nrm2941; pmid: 20651708
75. S. Taguwa et al., Defining Hsp70 subnetworks in dengue virus replication reveals key vulnerability in flavivirus infection. Cell 163, 1108-1123 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.046; pmid: 26582131
76. A. Bracher, J. Verghese, The nucleotide exchange factors of Hsp70 molecular chaperones. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2, 10 (2015). doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00010; pmid: 26913285
77. H. Rampelt et al., Metazoan Hsp70 machines use Hsp110 to power protein disaggregation. EMBO J. 31, 4221-4235 (2012). doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.264; pmid:22990239
78. N. B. Nillegoda et al., Crucial HSP70 co-chaperone complex unlocks metazoan protein disaggregation. Nature 524, 247-251 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nature14884; pmid: 26245380
79. H. Zhang et al., A bipartite interaction between Hsp70 and CHIP regulates ubiquitination of chaperoned client proteins. Structure 23, 472-482 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.str.2015.01.003; pmid: 25684577
80. M. Hayer-Hartl, A. Bracher, F. U. Hartl, The GroEL-GroES chaperonin machine: A nano-cage for protein folding. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 62-76 (2016). doi: 10.1016/ j.tibs.2015.07.009; pmid: 26422689
81. T. Lopez, K. Dalton, J. Frydman, The mechanism and function of Group II chaperonins. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 2919-2930 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.04.013; pmid: 25936650
82. H. R. Saibil, W. A. Fenton, D. K. Clare, A. L. Horwich, Structure and allostery of the chaperonin GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 1476-1487 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.11.028; pmid: 23183375
83. D. K. Clare et al., ATP-triggered conformational changes delineate substrate-binding and -folding mechanics of the GroEL chaperonin. Cell 149, 113-123 (2012). doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2012.02.047; pmid: 22445172
84. R. Gruber, A. Horovitz, Allosteric mechanisms in chaperonin machines. Chem. Rev. 116, 6588-6606 (2016). doi: 10.1021/ acs.chemrev.5b00556; pmid: 26726755
85. A. J. Gupta, S. Haldar, G. Milièiæ, F. U. Hartl, M. Hayer-Hartl, Active cage mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding demonstrated at single-molecule level. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 2739-2754 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.04.018; pmid: 24816391
86. Z. Lin, D. Madan, H. S. Rye, GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 303-311 (2008). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1394; pmid: 18311152
87. S. Sharma et al., Monitoring protein conformation along the pathway of chaperonin-assisted folding. Cell 133, 142-153 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.048; pmid: 18394994
88. H. Taguchi, Reaction cycle of chaperonin GroEL via symmetric football intermediate. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 2912-2918 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.04.007; pmid: 25900372
89. M. J. Kerner et al., Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonindependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell 122, 209-220 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.028; pmid: 16051146
90. K. Fujiwara, Y. Ishihama, K. Nakahigashi, T. Soga, H. Taguchi, A systematic survey of in vivo obligate chaperonin-dependent substrates. EMBO J. 29, 1552-1564 (2010). doi: 10.1038/ emboj.2010.52; pmid: 20360681
91. A. L. Horwich, A. C. Apetri, W. A. Fenton, The GroEL/GroES cis cavity as a passive anti-aggregation device. FEBS Lett. 583, 2654-2662 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.06.049; pmid: 19577567
92. Y.-C. Tang et al., Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein. Cell 125, 903-914 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.027; pmid: 16751100
93. K. Chakraborty et al., Chaperonin-catalyzed rescue of kinetically trapped states in protein folding. Cell 142, 112-122 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.027; pmid: 20603018
94. A. L. Mallam, S. E. Jackson, Knot formation in newly translated proteins is spontaneous and accelerated by chaperonins. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 147-153 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nchembio.742; pmid: 22179065
95. F. Georgescauld et al., GroEL/ES chaperonin modulates the mechanism and accelerates the rate of TIM-barrel domain folding. Cell 157, 922-934 (2014). doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2014.03.038; pmid: 24813614
96. J. Weaver, H. S. Rye, The C-terminal tails of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL stimulate protein folding by directly altering the conformation of a substrate protein. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 23219-23232 (2014). doi: 10.1074/jbc. M114.577205; pmid: 24970895
97. N. R. Douglas et al., Dual action of ATP hydrolysis couples lid closure to substrate release into the group II chaperonin chamber. Cell 144, 240-252 (2011). doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2010.12.017; pmid: 21241893
98. F. Rüβmann et al., Folding of large multidomain proteins by partial encapsulation in the chaperonin TRiC/CCT. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 21208-21215 (2012). doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1218836109; pmid: 23197838
99. L. A. Joachimiak, T. Walzthoeni, C. W. Liu, R. Aebersold, J. Frydman, The structural basis of substrate recognition by the eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT. Cell 159, 1042-1055 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.042; pmid: 25416944
100. S. Reissmann et al., A gradient of ATP affinities generates an asymmetric power stroke driving the chaperonin TRIC/CCT folding cycle. Cell Rep. 2, 866-877 (2012). pmid: 23041314
101. D. Rivenzon-Segal, S. G. Wolf, L. Shimon, K. R. Willison, A. Horovitz, Sequential ATP-induced allosteric transitions of the cytoplasmic chaperonin containing TCP-1 revealed by EM analysis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 233-237 (2005). doi: 10.1038/nsmb901; pmid: 15696173
102. N. Kalisman, C. M. Adams, M. Levitt, Subunit order of eukaryotic TRiC/CCT chaperonin by cross-linking, mass spectrometry, and combinatorial homology modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 2884-2889 (2012). doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1119472109; pmid: 22308438
103. A. Leitner et al., The molecular architecture of the eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT. Structure 20, 814-825 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.03.007; pmid: 22503819
104. N. Kalisman, G. F. Schröder, M. Levitt, The crystal structures of the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT reveal its functional partitioning. Structure 21, 540-549 (2013). doi: 10.1016/ j.str.2013.01.017; pmid: 23478063
105. R. L. Plimpton et al., Structures of the Gb-CCT and PhLP1-Gb-CCT complexes reveal a mechanism for G-protein b-subunit folding and Gbg dimer assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112,2413-2418 (2015). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419595112; pmid:25675501
106. M. Taipale, D. F. Jarosz, S. Lindquist, HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: Emerging mechanistic insights. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 515-528 (2010). doi: 10.1038/ nrm2918; pmid: 20531426
107. J. Li, J. Soroka, J. Buchner, The Hsp90 chaperone machinery: Conformational dynamics and regulation by co-chaperones. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1823, 624-635 (2012). doi: 10.1016/ j.bbamcr.2011.09.003; pmid: 21951723
108. K. Sharma et al., Quantitative proteomics reveals that Hsp90 inhibition preferentially targets kinases and the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 014654 (2012). doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.014654; pmid: 22167270
109. M. Taipale et al., Quantitative analysis of HSP90-client interactions reveals principles of substrate recognition. Cell 150, 987-1001 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.047; pmid: 22939624
110. W. B. Pratt, J. E. Gestwicki, Y. Osawa, A. P. Lieberman, Targeting Hsp90/Hsp70-based protein quality control for treatment of adult onset neurodegenerative diseases. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 55, 353-371 (2015). doi: 10.1146/ annurev-pharmtox-010814-124332; pmid: 25292434
111. S. Lindquist, Protein folding sculpting evolutionary change. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 74, 103-108 (2009). doi: 10.1101/sqb.2009.74.043; pmid: 20375316
112. A. Röhl, J. Rohrberg, J. Buchner, The chaperone Hsp90: Changing partners for demanding clients. Trends Biochem. Sci. 38, 253-262 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.02.003; pmid: 23507089
113. G. E. Karagöz, S. G. D. Rüdiger, Hsp90 interaction with clients. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 117-125 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.12.002; pmid: 25579468
114. M. Mickler, M. Hessling, C. Ratzke, J. Buchner, T. Hugel, The large conformational changes of Hsp90 are only weakly coupled to ATP hydrolysis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 281-286 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1557; pmid: 19234469
115. T. O. Street, L. A. Lavery, D. A. Agard, Substrate binding drives large-scale conformational changes in the Hsp90 molecular chaperone. Mol. Cell 42, 96-105 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.01.029; pmid: 21474071
116. M. Hessling, K. Richter, J. Buchner, Dissection of the ATPinduced conformational cycle of the molecular chaperone Hsp90. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 287-293 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1565; pmid: 19234467
117. G. E. Karagöz et al., Hsp90-Tau complex reveals molecular basis for specificity in chaperone action. Cell 156, 963-974 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.037; pmid: 24581495
118. T. O. Street et al., Elucidating the mechanism of substrate recognition by the bacterial Hsp90 molecular chaperone. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 2393-2404 (2014). doi: 10.1016/ j.jmb.2014.04.001; pmid: 24726919
119. E. E. Boczek et al., Conformational processing of oncogenic v-Src kinase by the molecular chaperone Hsp90. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, E3189-E3198 (2015). doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1424342112; pmid: 26056257
120. J. Li, K. Richter, J. Buchner, Mixed Hsp90-cochaperone complexes are important for the progression of the reaction cycle. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 61-66 (2011). doi: 10.1038/ nsmb.1965; pmid: 21170051
121. A. V. Koulov et al., Biological and structural basis for Aha1 regulation of Hsp90 ATPase activity in maintaining proteostasis in the human disease cystic fibrosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 871-884 (2010). doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-12-1017; pmid: 20089831
122. M. Retzlaff et al., Asymmetric activation of the hsp90 dimer by its cochaperone aha1. Mol. Cell 37, 344-354 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.006; pmid: 20159554
123. M. Brehme et al., A chaperome subnetwork safeguards proteostasis in aging and neurodegenerative disease. Cell Reports 9, 1135-1150 (2014). doi: 10.1016/ j.celrep.2014.09.042; pmid: 25437566
124. M. S. Hipp, S.-H. Park, F. U. Hartl, Proteostasis impairment in protein-misfolding and -aggregation diseases. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 506-514 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.05.003; pmid: 24946960
125. M. Taipale et al., A quantitative chaperone interaction network reveals the architecture of cellular protein homeostasis pathways. Cell 158, 434-448 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.039; pmid: 25036637
126. R. C. Taylor, A. Dillin, Aging as an event of proteostasis collapse. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a004440 (2011). doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004440; pmid: 21441594
127. T. Wang et al., Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome. Science 350, 1096-1101 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aac7041; pmid: 26472758
128. J. Anckar, L. Sistonen, Regulation of HSF1 function in the heat stress response: Implications in aging and disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 1089-1115 (2011). doi: 10.1146/annurevbiochem-060809-095203; pmid: 21417720
129. P. Walter, D. Ron, The unfolded protein response: From stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science 334, 1081-1086 (2011). doi: 10.1126/science.1209038; pmid: 22116877
130. A. M. Schulz, C. M. Haynes, UPR(mt)-mediated cytoprotection and organismal aging. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1847, 1448-1456 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.03.008; pmid: 25857997
131. R. Schinzel, A. Dillin, Endocrine aspects of organelle stress-cell non-autonomous signaling of mitochondria and the ER. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 33, 102-110 (2015). doi: 10.1016/ j.ceb.2015.01.006; pmid: 25677685
132. A. Shemorry, C. S. Hwang, A. Varshavsky, Control of protein quality and stoichiometries by N-terminal acetylation and the N-end rule pathway. Mol. Cell 50, 540-551 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.018; pmid: 23603116
133. A. Ciechanover, Y. T. Kwon, Degradation of misfolded proteins in neurodegenerative diseases: Therapeutic targets and strategies. Exp. Mol. Med. 47, e147 (2015). doi: 10.1038/ emm.2014.117; pmid: 25766616
134. D. Vilchez et al., Increased proteasome activity in human embryonic stem cells is regulated by PSMD11. Nature 489, 304-308 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nature11468; pmid: 22972301
135. J. W. Heck, S. K. Cheung, R. Y. Hampton, Cytoplasmic protein quality control degradation mediated by parallel actions of the E3 ubiquitin ligases Ubr1 and San1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1106-1111 (2010). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910591107; pmid: 20080635
136. R. Prasad, S. Kawaguchi, D. T. Ng, A nucleus-based quality control mechanism for cytosolic proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 2117-2127 (2010). doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-02-0111; pmid: 20462951
137. S.-H. Park et al., PolyQ proteins interfere with nuclear degradation of cytosolic proteins by sequestering the Sis1p chaperone. Cell 154, 134-145 (2013). doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2013.06.003; pmid: 23791384
138. A. Mogk, E. Kummer, B. Bukau, Cooperation of Hsp70 and Hsp100 chaperone machines in protein disaggregation. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2, 22 (2015). doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00022; pmid: 26042222
139. M. Gamerdinger et al., Protein quality control during aging involves recruitment of the macroautophagy pathway by BAG3. EMBO J. 28, 889-901 (2009). doi: 10.1038/ emboj.2009.29; pmid: 19229298
140. N. Kettern, M. Dreiseidler, R. Tawo, J. Höhfeld, Chaperoneassisted degradation: Multiple paths to destruction. Biol. Chem. 391, 481-489 (2010). doi: 10.1515/bc.2010.058; pmid: 20302520
141. N. Sahni et al., Widespread macromolecular interaction perturbations in human genetic disorders. Cell 161, 647-660 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.013; pmid: 25910212
142. A. Ben-Zvi, E. A. Miller, R. I. Morimoto, Collapse of proteostasis represents an early molecular event in Caenorhabditis elegans aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 14914-14919 (2009). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902882106; pmid: 19706382
143. R. Gupta et al., Firefly luciferase mutants as sensors of proteome stress. Nat. Methods 8, 879-884 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1697; pmid: 21892152
144. T. P. Knowles et al., An analytical solution to the kinetics of breakable filament assembly. Science 326, 1533-1537 (2009). doi: 10.1126/science.1178250; pmid:20007899
145. G. Schaffar et al., Cellular toxicity of polyglutamine expansion proteins: Mechanism of transcription factor deactivation. Mol. Cell 15, 95-105 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.029; pmid: 15225551
146. S. I. Cohen et al., A molecular chaperone breaks the catalytic cycle that generates toxic Ab oligomers. Nat.Struct.Mol.Biol.22, 207-213 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2971; pmid: 25686087
147. D. D. Nedialkova, S. A. Leidel, Optimization of codon translation rates via tRNA modifications maintains proteome integrity. Cell 161, 1606-1618 (2015). doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2015.05.022; pmid: 26052047
148. S. Preissler et al., Not4-dependent translational repression is important for cellular protein homeostasis in yeast. EMBO J.34, 1905-1924 (2015). doi: 10.15252/embj.201490194; pmid: 25971775
149. Y.-J. Choe et al., Failure of RQC machinery causes protein aggregation and proteotoxic stress. Nature 531, 191-195 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nature16973; pmid: 26934223
150. O. Brandman, R. S. Hegde, Ribosome-associated protein quality control. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 7-15 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3147; pmid: 26733220
151. R. Yonashiro et al., The Rqc2/Tae2 subunit of the ribosomeassociated quality control (RQC) complex marks ribosomestalled nascent polypeptide chains for aggregation. eLife 5, e11794 (2016). doi: 10.7554/eLife.11794; pmid: 26943317
152. L. Breydo, V. N. Uversky, Structural, morphological, and functional diversity of amyloid oligomers. FEBS Lett. 589 (19PartA), 2640-2648 (2015). doi: 10.1016/ j.febslet.2015.07.013; pmid: 26188543
153. K. L. Sugars, D. C. Rubinsztein, Transcriptional abnormalities in Huntington disease. Trends Genet. 19, 233-238 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00074-X; pmid: 12711212
154. H. Olzscha et al., Amyloid-like aggregates sequester numerous metastable proteins with essential cellular functions. Cell 144, 67-78 (2011). doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2010.11.050; pmid: 21215370
155. A. Patel et al., A liquid-to-solid phase transition of the ALS protein FUS accelerated by disease mutation. Cell 162, 1066-1077 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.047; pmid: 26317470
156. A. C. Woerner et al., Cytoplasmic protein aggregates interfere with nucleocytoplasmic transport of protein and RNA. Science 351, 173-176 (2016). doi: 10.1126/science.aad2033; pmid: 26634439
157. S. Calabretta, S. Richard, Emerging roles of disordered sequences in RNA-binding proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 662-672 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.012; pmid: 26481498
158. B. D. Freibaum et al., GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9orf72 compromises nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nature 525, 129-133 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nature14974; pmid: 26308899
159. P. Ciryam, G. G. Tartaglia, R. I. Morimoto, C. M. Dobson, M. Vendruscolo, Widespread aggregation and neurodegenerative diseases are associated with supersaturated proteins. Cell Reports 5, 781-790 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.043; pmid: 24183671
160. A. B. Oromendia, A. Amon, Aneuploidy: Implications for protein homeostasis and disease. Dis. Model. Mech. 7, 15-20 (2014). doi: 10.1242/dmm.013391; pmid: 24396150
161. D. M. Walther et al., Widespread Proteome Remodeling and Aggregation in Aging C. elegans. Cell 161, 919-932 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.032; pmid: 25957690
162. E. Cohen, J. Bieschke, R. M. Perciavalle, J. W. Kelly, A. Dillin, Opposing activities protect against age-onset proteotoxicity. Science 313, 1604-1610 (2006). doi: 10.1126/ science.1124646; pmid: 16902091
163. D. Kaganovich, R. Kopito, J. Frydman, Misfolded proteins partition between two distinct quality control compartments.Nature 454, 1088-1095 (2008). doi: 10.1038/nature07195; pmid: 18756251
164. S. F. Falsone et al., SERF protein is a direct modifier of amyloid fiber assembly. Cell Reports 2, 358-371 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.06.012; pmid: 22854022
165. S. Escusa-Toret, W. I. Vonk, J. Frydman, Spatial sequestration of misfolded proteins by a dynamic chaperone pathway enhances cellular fitness during stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1231-1243 (2013). doi: 10.1038/ncb2838; pmid: 24036477
166. S. M. Hill, X. Hao, B. Liu, T. Nyström, Life-span extension by a metacaspase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 344, 1389-1392 (2014). doi: 10.1126/science.1252634; pmid: 24855027
167. E. M. Sontag, W. I. M. Vonk, J. Frydman, Sorting out the trash: The spatial nature of eukaryotic protein quality control. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 26, 139-146 (2014). doi: 10.1016/ j.ceb.2013.12.006; pmid: 24463332
168. E. W. J. Wallace et al., Reversible, specific, active aggregates of endogenous proteins assemble upon heat stress. Cell 162, 1286-1298 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.041; pmid: 26359986
169. M. Arrasate, S. Mitra, E. S. Schweitzer, M. R. Segal, S. Finkbeiner, Inclusion body formation reduces levels of mutant huntingtin and the risk of neuronal death. Nature 431, 805-810 (2004). doi: 10.1038/nature02998; pmid: 15483602
170. E. T. Powers, R. I. Morimoto, A. Dillin, J. W. Kelly, W. E. Balch, Biological and chemical approaches to diseases of proteostasis deficiency. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 959-991 (2009). doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.114844; pmid: 19298183
171. Y. Miyata, H. Nakamoto, L. Neckers, The therapeutic target Hsp90 and cancer hallmarks. Curr. Pharm. Des. 19, 347-365 (2013). doi: 10.2174/138161213804143725; pmid: 22920906
172. X. Li, H. Shao, I. R. Taylor, J. E. Gestwicki, Targeting allosteric control mechanisms in heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70). Curr. Top. Med. Chem. (2016). pmid: 27072701
173. P. Tsaytler, H. P. Harding, D. Ron, A. Bertolotti, Selective inhibition of a regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 1 restores proteostasis. Science 332, 91-94 (2011). doi: 10.1126/science.1201396; pmid: 21385720
174. I. Das et al., Preventing proteostasis diseases by selective inhibition of a phosphatase regulatory subunit. Science 348, 239-242 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4484 pmid: 25859045
175. J. Leitman et al., ER stress-induced eIF2-a phosphorylation underlies sensitivity of striatal neurons to pathogenic huntingtin. PLOS ONE 9, e90803 (2014). doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0090803; pmid: 24594939
176. C. Sidrauski et al., Pharmacological brake-release of mRNA translation enhances cognitive memory. eLife 2, e00498 (2013). doi: 10.7554/eLife.00498; pmid: 23741617
177. Y. Sekine et al., Stress responses. Mutations in a translation initiation factor identify the target of a memory-enhancing compound. Science 348, 1027-1030 (2015). doi: 10.1126/ science.aaa6986; pmid: 25858979
178. C. Sidrauski et al., Pharmacological dimerization and activation of the exchange factor eIF2B antagonizes the integrated stress response. eLife 4, e07314 (2015). doi: 10.7554/eLife.07314; pmid: 25875391
179. B. Calamini et al., Small-molecule proteostasis regulators for protein conformational diseases. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 185-196 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nchembio.763; pmid: 22198733
180. C. B. Cooley et al., Unfolded protein response activation reduces secretion and extracellular aggregation of amyloidogenic immunoglobulin light chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 13046-13051 (2014). doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1406050111; pmid: 25157167
181. A. S. Mendez et al., Endoplasmic reticulum stressindependent activation of unfolded protein response kinases by a small molecule ATP-mimic. eLife 4, e05434 (2015). doi: 10.7554/eLife.05434; pmid: 25986605
182. V. Kakkar et al., The S/T-rich motif in the DNAJB6 chaperone delays polyglutamine aggregation and the onset of disease in a mouse model. Mol. Cell 62,272-283 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.017;pmid:27151442
183. M. Nagy, W. A. Fenton, D. Li, K. Furtak, A. L. Horwich, Extended survival of misfolded G85R SOD1-linked ALS mice by transgenic expression of chaperone Hsp110. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 5424-5428 (2016). doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1604885113; pmid: 27114530
184. B. H. Lee et al., Enhancement of proteasome activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of USP14. Nature 467, 179-184 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nature09299; pmid: 20829789
185. D. C. Rubinsztein, C. F. Bento, V. Deretic, Therapeutic targeting of autophagy in neurodegenerative and infectious diseases. J. Exp. Med. 212, 979-990 (2015). doi: 10.1084/ jem.20150956; pmid: 26101267
186. G. Veit et al., From CFTR biology toward combinatorial pharmacotherapy: Expanded classification of cystic fibrosis mutations. Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 424-433 (2016). doi: 10.1091/ mbc.E14-04-0935; pmid: 26823392
187. A. Baranczak, J. W. Kelly, A current pharmacologic agent versus the promise of next generation therapeutics to ameliorate protein misfolding and/or aggregation diseases. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 32, 10-21 (2016). doi: 10.1016/ j.cbpa.2016.01.009; pmid: 26859714