Cellular strategies for the assembly of molecular machines

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 35, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 676-683

  Chari, Ashwin ^a   Fischer, Utz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; HOLOENZYME; PROTEASOME; PROTEIN SM; RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; SMALL NUCLEAR RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; SURVIVAL MOTOR NEURON PROTEIN 1;

BIOCATALYSIS; BIOGENESIS; COMPLEX FORMATION; DNA PROTEIN COMPLEX; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SIGNAL; PHOTORESPIRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REVIEW; RIBOSOME;

ANIMALS; CELL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; HUMANS; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; RIBONUCLEOPROTEINS, SMALL NUCLEAR; RIBULOSE-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; RNA;

EID: 78649324240     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.07.006     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Hartwell L.H., et al. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 1999, 402:C47-C52.
2. Alberts B. The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell 1998, 92:291-294.
3. Kornberg R.D. Structure of chromatin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1977, 46:931-954.
4. Nierhaus K.H., Dohme F. Total reconstitution of functionally active 50S ribosomal subunits from Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1974, 71:4713-4717.
5. Nomura M., et al. Hybrid 30S ribosomal particles reconstituted from components of different bacterial origins. Nature 1968, 219:793-799.
6. Kushner D.J. Self-assembly of biological structures. Bacteriol. Rev. 1969, 33:302-345.
7. Frydman J. Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001, 70:603-647.
8. Ellis R.J. Molecular chaperones: assisting assembly in addition to folding. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31:395-401.
9. Fromont-Racine M., et al. Ribosome assembly in eukaryotes. Gene 2003, 313:17-42.
10. Zemp I., Kutay U. Nuclear export and cytoplasmic maturation of ribosomal subunits. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581:2783-2793.
11. Gallastegui N., Groll M. The 26S proteasome: assembly and function of a destructive machine. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.05.005.
12. Park S., et al. Assembly manual for the proteasome regulatory particle: the first draft. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2010, 38:6-13.
13. Besche H.C., et al. Getting to first base in proteasome assembly. Cell 2009, 138:25-28.
14. Berg O.G., von Hippel P.H. Diffusion-controlled macromolecular interactions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 1985, 14:131-160.
15. Pomeranz Krummel D.A., et al. Crystal structure of human spliceosomal U1 snRNP at 5.5 A resolution. Nature 2009, 458:475-480.
16. Luger K., et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 1997, 389:251-260.
17. Nooren I.M., Thornton J.M. Diversity of protein-protein interactions. EMBO J. 2003, 22:3486-3492.
18. Ellis R.J., Minton A.P. Protein aggregation in crowded environments. Biol. Chem. 2006, 387:485-497.
19. Ellis R.J. Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2001, 26:597-604.
20. Zimmerman S.B., Minton A.P. Macromolecular crowding: biochemical, biophysical, and physiological consequences. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1993, 22:27-65.
21. Zhou H.X. Protein folding and binding in confined spaces and in crowded solutions. J. Mol. Recognit. 2004, 17:368-375.
22. Wenner J.R., Bloomfield V.A. Crowding effects on EcoRV kinetics and binding. Biophys. J. 1999, 77:3234-3241.
23. Gutteridge S., Gatenby A.A. Rubisco synthesis, assembly, mechanism, and regulation. Plant Cell 1995, 7:809-819.
24. Andersson I. Catalysis and regulation in Rubisco. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59:1555-1568.
25. Watson G.M., Tabita F.R. Microbial ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase: a molecule for phylogenetic and enzymological investigation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1997, 146:13-22.
26. Andersson I., Taylor T.C. Structural framework for catalysis and regulation in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 414:130-140.
27. Dean C., et al. Structure, evolution, and regulation of RbcS genes in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1989, 40:415-439.
28. Gatenby A.A., Ellis R.J. Chaperone function: the assembly of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 1990, 6:125-149.
29. Gruissem W. Chloroplast gene expression: how plants turn their plastids on. Cell 1989, 56:161-170.
30. Hemmingsen S.M., et al. Homologous plant and bacterial proteins chaperone oligomeric protein assembly. Nature 1988, 333:330-334.
31. Saschenbrecker S., et al. Structure and function of RbcX, an assembly chaperone for hexadecameric Rubisco. Cell 2007, 129:1189-1200.
32. Roy H. Rubisco assembly: a model system for studying the mechanism of chaperonin action. Plant Cell 1989, 1:1035-1042.
33. Liu C., et al. Coupled chaperone action in folding and assembly of hexadecameric Rubisco. Nature 2010, 463:197-202.
34. Moore M.J. From birth to death: the complex lives of eukaryotic mRNAs. Science 2005, 309:1514-1518.
35. Will C.L., Luhrmann R. Spliceosomal UsnRNP biogenesis, structure and function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001, 13:290-301.
36. Wahl M.C., et al. The spliceosome: design principles of a dynamic RNP machine. Cell 2009, 136:701-718.
37. Tarn W.Y., Steitz J.A. Pre-mRNA splicing: the discovery of a new spliceosome doubles the challenge. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1997, 22:132-137.
38. Lerner M.R., Steitz J.A. Antibodies to small nuclear RNAs complexed with proteins are produced by patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1979, 76:5495-5499.
39. Achsel T., et al. A doughnut-shaped heteromer of human Sm-like proteins binds to the 3′- end of U6 snRNA, thereby facilitating U4/U6 duplex formation in vitro. EMBO J. 1999, 18:5789-5802.
40. Hamm J., Mattaj I.W. Monomethylated cap structures facilitate RNA export from the nucleus. Cell 1990, 63:109-118.
41. Ohno M., et al. PHAX, a mediator of U snRNA nuclear export whose activity is regulated by phosphorylation. Cell 2000, 101:187-198.
42. Zeller R., et al. Nucleocytoplasmic distribution of snRNPs and stockpiled snRNA-binding proteins during oogenesis and early development in Xenopus laevis. Cell 1983, 32:425-434.
43. Mattaj I.W. Cap trimethylation of U snRNA is cytoplasmic and dependent on U snRNP protein binding. Cell 1986, 46:905-911.
44. Plessel G., et al. m3G cap hypermethylation of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) in vitro: evidence that the U1 small nuclear RNA-(guanosine-N2)- methyltransferase is a non-snRNP cytoplasmic protein that requires a binding site on the Sm core domain. Mol. Cell Biol. 1994, 14:4160-4172.
45. Fischer U., et al. Nuclear transport of U1 snRNP in somatic cells: differences in signal requirement compared with Xenopus laevis oocytes. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 125:971-980.
46. Fischer U., Luhrmann R. An essential signaling role for the m3G cap in the transport of U1 snRNP to the nucleus. Science 1990, 249:786-790.
47. Hamm J., et al. The trimethylguanosine cap structure of U1 snRNA is a component of a bipartite nuclear targeting signal. Cell 1990, 62:569-577.
48. Stanek D., Neugebauer K.M. Detection of snRNP assembly intermediates in Cajal bodies by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 166:1015-1025.
49. Stanek D., et al. Spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles repeatedly cycle through Cajal bodies. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19:2534-2543.
50. Kiss T. Biogenesis of small nuclear RNPs. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117:5949-5951.
51. Zhang D., et al. A biochemical function for the Sm complex. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:319-329.
52. Raker V.A., et al. The snRNP core assembly pathway: identification of stable core protein heteromeric complexes and an snRNP subcore particle in vitro. EMBO J. 1996, 15:2256-2269.
53. Meister G., et al. A multiprotein complex mediates the ATP-dependent assembly of spliceosomal U snRNPs. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3:945-949.
54. Lefebvre S., et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell 1995, 80:155-165.
55. Neuenkirchen N., et al. Deciphering the assembly pathway of Sm-class U snRNPs. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582:1997-2003.
56. Gubitz A.K., et al. The SMN complex. Exp. Cell Res. 2004, 296:51-56.
57. Meister G., Fischer U. Assisted RNP assembly: SMN and PRMT5 complexes cooperate in the formation of spliceosomal UsnRNPs. EMBO J. 2002, 21:5853-5863.
58. Pellizzoni L., et al. Essential role for the SMN complex in the specificity of snRNP assembly. Science 2002, 298:1775-1779.
59. Friesen W.J., et al. The methylosome, a 20S complex containing JBP1 and pICln, produces dimethylarginine-modified Sm proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21:8289-8300.
60. Meister G., et al. Methylation of Sm proteins by a complex containing PRMT5 and the putative U snRNP assembly factor pICln. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:1990-1994.
61. Gonsalvez G.B., et al. Two distinct arginine methyltransferases are required for biogenesis of Sm-class ribonucleoproteins. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178:733-740.
62. Chari A., et al. An assembly chaperone collaborates with the SMN complex to generate spliceosomal SnRNPs. Cell 2008, 135:497-509.
63. Fisher D.E., et al. Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle assembly in vivo: demonstration of a 6S RNA-free core precursor and posttranslational modification. Cell 1985, 42:751-758.
64. Pu W.T., et al. pICln inhibits snRNP biogenesis by binding core spliceosomal proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19:4113-4120.
65. Urlaub H., et al. Sm protein-Sm site RNA interactions within the inner ring of the spliceosomal snRNP core structure. EMBO J. 2001, 20:187-196.
66. Brahms H., et al. Symmetrical dimethylation of arginine residues in spliceosomal Sm protein B/B′ and the Sm-like protein LSm4, and their interaction with the SMN protein. RNA 2001, 7:1531-1542.
67. Friesen W.J., et al. SMN, the product of the spinal muscular atrophy gene, binds preferentially to dimethylarginine-containing protein targets. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:1111-1117.
68. Kroiss M., et al. Evolution of an RNP assembly system: a minimal SMN complex facilitates formation of UsnRNPs in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:10045-10050.
69. Palfi Z., et al. SMN-assisted assembly of snRNP-specific Sm cores in trypanosomes. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:1650-1664.
70. Battle D.J., et al. The Gemin5 protein of the SMN complex identifies snRNAs. Mol. Cell 2006, 23:273-279.
71. Yong J., et al. Gemin5 delivers snRNA precursors to the SMN complex for snRNP biogenesis. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:551-562.
72. Lau C.K., et al. Gemin5-snRNA interaction reveals an RNA binding function for WD repeat domains. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:486-491.
73. Facey S.J., Kuhn A. Biogenesis of bacterial inner-membrane proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67:2343-2362.
74. Hagan C.L., et al. Reconstitution of outer membrane protein assembly from purified components. Science 2010, 328:890-892.
75. Nishiyama M., et al. Reconstitution of pilus assembly reveals a bacterial outer membrane catalyst. Science 2008, 320:376-379.
76. Vetsch M., et al. Mechanism of fibre assembly through the chaperone-usher pathway. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7:734-738.
77. Waksman G., Hultgren S.J. Structural biology of the chaperone-usher pathway of pilus biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7:765-774.
78. Becker T., et al. Biogenesis of mitochondrial membrane proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:484-493.
79. Park Y.J., Luger K. Histone chaperones in nucleosome eviction and histone exchange. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18:282-289.
80. Rocha W., Verreault A. Clothing up DNA for all seasons: histone chaperones and nucleosome assembly pathways. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582:1938-1949.
81. Segal E., Widom J. What controls nucleosome positions?. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:335-343.