Structural basis for protein antiaggregation activity of the trigger factor chaperone

Science

Volumn 344, Issue 6184, 2014, Pages

  Saio, Tomohide ^a   Guan, Xiao ^a   Rossi, Paolo ^a   Economou, Anastassios ^b,c   Kalodimos, Charalampos G ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b REGA INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Belgium)

^c INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; CHAPERONE; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED PROTEIN; PEPTIDE; PEPTIDYLPROLYL ISOMERASE; PHOA PROTEIN, E COLI;

DATA ACQUISITION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATURATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PROTEIN; SUBSTRATE;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ISOTOPE LABELING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PLASTICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN HOMEOSTASIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BINDING SITES; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED PROTEINS; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PEPTIDES; PEPTIDYLPROLYL ISOMERASE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 84900336916     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1250494     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. B. Bukau, J. Weissman, A. Horwich, Molecular chaperones and protein quality control. Cell 125, 443-451 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.014; pmid: 16678092
2. G. Kramer, D. Boehringer, N. Ban, B. Bukau, The ribosome as a platform for co-translational processing, folding and targeting of newly synthesized proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 589-597 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1614; pmid: 19491936
3. F. U. Hartl, M. Hayer-Hartl, Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 574-581 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1591; pmid: 19491934
4. A. L. Horwich, Protein folding in the cell: An inside story. Nat. Med. 17, 1211-1216 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nm.2468; pmid: 21989012
5. F. U. Hartl, A. Bracher, M. Hayer-Hartl, Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 475, 324-332 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nature10317; pmid: 21776078
6. H. Saibil, Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 630-642 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nrm3658; pmid: 24026055
7. F. Hartl, M. Hayer-Hartl, Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: From nascent chain to folded protein. Science 295, 1852-1858 (2002). doi: 10.1126/science.1068408; pmid: 11884745
8. J. Young, V. Agashe, K. Siegers, F. Hartl, Pathways of chaperone-mediated protein folding in the cytosol. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 781-791 (2004). doi: 10.1038/nrm1492; pmid: 15459659
9. S. Preissler, E. Deuerling, Ribosome-associated chaperones as key players in proteostasis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 274-283 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.03.002; pmid: 22503700
10. A. Hoffmann, B. Bukau, G. Kramer, Structure and function of the molecular chaperone Trigger Factor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1803, 650-661 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.01.017; pmid: 20132842
11. G. Kramer et al., L23 protein functions as a chaperone docking site on the ribosome. Nature 419, 171-174 (2002). doi: 10.1038/nature01047; pmid: 12226666
12. L. Ferbitz et al., Trigger factor in complex with the ribosome forms a molecular cradle for nascent proteins. Nature 431, 590-596 (2004). doi: 10.1038/nature02899; pmid: 15334087
13. D. Baram et al., Structure of trigger factor binding domain in biologically homologous complex with eubacterial ribosome reveals its chaperone action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 12017-12022 (2005). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505581102; pmid: 16091460
14. F. Schlünzen et al., The binding mode of the trigger factor on the ribosome: Implications for protein folding and SRP interaction. Structure 13, 1685-1694 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.str.2005.08.007; pmid: 16271892
15. F. Merz et al., Molecular mechanism and structure of Trigger Factor bound to the translating ribosome. EMBO J. 27, 1622-1632 (2008). doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.89; pmid: 18497744
16. B. Bukau, E. Deuerling, C. Pfund, E. A. Craig, Getting newly synthesized proteins into shape. Cell 101, 119-122 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80806- 5; pmid: 10786831
17. R. Maier, B. Eckert, C. Scholz, H. Lilie, F.-X. Schmid, Interaction of trigger factor with the ribosome. J. Mol. Biol. 326, 585-592 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01427-4; pmid: 12559924
18. C. M. Kaiser et al., Real-time observation of trigger factor function on translating ribosomes. Nature 444, 455-460 (2006). doi: 10.1038/nature05225; pmid: 17051157
19. A. Rutkowska et al., Dynamics of trigger factor interaction with translating ribosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 4124-4132 (2008). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708294200; pmid: 18045873
20. R. Lill, E. Crooke, B. Guthrie, W. Wickner, The "trigger factor cycle" includes ribosomes, presecretory proteins, and the plasma membrane. Cell 54, 1013-1018 (1988). doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90116-X; pmid: 3046750
21. V. R. Agashe et al., Function of trigger factor and DnaK in multidomain protein folding: Increase in yield at the expense of folding speed. Cell 117, 199-209 (2004). doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00299-5; pmid: 15084258
22. A. Hoffmann et al., Trigger factor forms a protective shield for nascent polypeptides at the ribosome. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 6539-6545 (2006). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512345200; pmid: 16407311
23. S. Tomic, A. E. Johnson, F. U. Hartl, S. A. Etchells, Exploring the capacity of trigger factor to function as a shield for ribosome bound polypeptide chains. FEBS Lett. 580, 72-76 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005. 11.050; pmid: 16359675
24. E. Deuerling et al., Trigger Factor and DnaK possess overlapping substrate pools and binding specificities. Mol. Microbiol. 47, 1317-1328 (2003). doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03370.x; pmid: 12603737
25. E. Oh et al., Selective ribosome profiling reveals the cotranslational chaperone action of trigger factor in vivo. Cell 147, 1295-1308 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.044; pmid: 22153074
26. S. K. Lakshmipathy, R. Gupta, S. Pinkert, S. A. Etchells, F. U. Hartl, Versatility of trigger factor interactions with ribosome-nascent chain complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 27911-27923 (2010). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.134163; pmid: 20595383
27. E. Martinez-Hackert, W. A. Hendrickson, Promiscuous substrate recognition in folding and assembly activities of the trigger factor chaperone. Cell 138, 923-934 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.044; pmid: 19737520
28. E. P. O'Brien, J. Christodoulou, M. Vendruscolo, C. M. Dobson, Trigger factor slows co-translational folding through kinetic trapping while sterically protecting the nascent chain from aberrant cytosolic interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 10920-10932 (2012). doi: 10.1021/ja302305u; pmid: 22680285
29. A. Mashaghi et al., Reshaping of the conformational search of a protein by the chaperone trigger factor. Nature 500, 98-101 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nature12293; pmid: 23831649
30. A. Hoffmann et al., Concerted action of the ribosome and the associated chaperone Trigger Factor confines nascent polypeptide folding. Mol. Cell 48, 63-74 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.018; pmid: 22921937
31. P. Genevaux et al., In vivo analysis of the overlapping functions of DnaK and trigger factor. EMBO Rep. 5, 195-200 (2004). doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400067; pmid: 14726952
32. E. Deuerling, A. Schulze-Specking, T. Tomoyasu, A. Mogk, B. Bukau, Trigger factor and DnaK cooperate in folding of newly synthesized proteins. Nature 400, 693-696 (1999). doi: 10.1038/23301; pmid: 10458167
33. S. A. Teter et al., Polypeptide flux through bacterial Hsp70: DnaK cooperates with trigger factor in chaperoning nascent chains. Cell 97, 755-765 (1999). doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80787-4; pmid: 10380927
34. G. Calloni et al., DnaK functions as a central hub in the E. coli chaperone network. Cell Rep. 1, 251-264 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2011.12. 007; pmid: 22832197
35. P. Bechtluft et al., Direct observation of chaperone-induced changes in a protein folding pathway. Science 318, 1458-1461 (2007). doi: 10.1126/science.1144972; pmid: 18048690
36. R. S. Ullers, D. Ang, F. Schwager, C. Georgopoulos, P. Genevaux, Trigger Factor can antagonize both SecB and DnaK/DnaJ chaperone functions in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 3101-3106 (2007). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608232104; pmid: 17360615
37. S. Rudiger, S. M. V. Freund, D. B. Veprintsev, A. R. Fersht, CRINEPT-TROSY NMR reveals p53 core domain bound in an unfolded form to the chaperone Hsp90. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 11085-11090 (2002). doi: 10.1073/pnas.132393699; pmid: 12163643
38. R. Horst et al., Direct NMR observation of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 12748-12753 (2005). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505642102; pmid: 16116078
39. T. A. Walton, C. M. Sandoval, C. A. Fowler, A. Pardi, M. C. Sousa, The cavity-chaperone Skp protects its substrate from aggregation but allows independent folding of substrate domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 1772-1777 (2009). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809275106; pmid: 19181847
40. S. J. Park, B. N. Borin, M. A. Martinez-Yamout, H. J. Dyson, The client protein p53 adopts a molten globule-like state in the presence of Hsp90. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 537-541 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2045; pmid: 21460846
41. A. Zhuravleva, E. M. Clérico, L. M. Gierasch, An interdomain energetic tug-of-war creates the allosterically active state in Hsp70 molecular chaperones. Cell 151, 1296-1307 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.002; pmid: 23217711
42. B. M. Burmann, C. Wang, S. Hiller, Conformation and dynamics of the periplasmic membrane-protein-chaperone complexes OmpX-Skp and tOmpA-Skp. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1265-1272 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2677; pmid: 24077225
43. R. Sprangers, L. E. Kay, Quantitative dynamics and binding studies of the 20S proteasome by NMR. Nature 445, 618-622 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nature05512; pmid: 17237764
44. I. Gelis et al., Structural basis for signal-sequence recognition by the translocase motor SecA as determined by NMR. Cell 131, 756-769 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.039; pmid: 18022369
45. T. L. Religa, R. Sprangers, L. E. Kay, Dynamic regulation of archaeal proteasome gate opening as studied by TROSY NMR. Science 328, 98-102 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1184991; pmid: 20360109
46. R. Rosenzweig, S. Moradi, A. Zarrine-Afsar, J. R. Glover, L. E. Kay, Unraveling the mechanism of protein disaggregation through a ClpB-DnaK interaction. Science 339, 1080-1083 (2013). doi: 10.1126/science.1233066; pmid: 23393091
47. N. Popovych, S.-R. Tzeng, M. Tonelli, R. H. Ebright, C. G. Kalodimos, Structural basis for cAMP-mediated allosteric control of the catabolite activator protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 6927-6932 (2009). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900595106; pmid: 19359484
48. L. Chen et al., Structural instability tuning as a regulatory mechanism in protein-protein interactions. Mol. Cell 44, 734-744 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.022; pmid: 22152477
49. S. K. Lakshmipathy et al., Identification of nascent chain interaction sites on trigger factor. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 12186-12193 (2007). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609871200; pmid: 17296610
50. F. Merz et al., The C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli trigger factor represents the central module of its chaperone activity. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 31963-31971 (2006). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605164200; pmid: 16926148
51. H. Patzelt et al., Three-state equilibrium of Escherichia coli trigger factor. Biol. Chem. 383, 1611-1619 (2002). doi: 10.1515/BC.2002.182; pmid: 12452438
52. 13C assignments of the dimeric ribosome binding domain of trigger factor from Escherichia coli. Biomol. NMR Assign. 3, 17-20 (2009). doi: 10.1007/s12104-008-9130-8; pmid: 19636937
53. Y. Yao, G. Bhabha, G. Kroon, M. Landes, H. J. Dyson, Structure discrimination for the C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli trigger factor in solution. J. Biomol. NMR 40, 23-30 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s10858-007-9207-1; pmid: 18043871
54. J. C. Bardwell, K. McGovern, J. Beckwith, Identification of a protein required for disulfide bond formation in vivo. Cell 67, 581-589 (1991). doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90532-4; pmid: 1934062
55. Y. Akiyama, K. Ito, Export of Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatase attached to an integral membrane protein, SecY. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 437-442 (1989). pmid: 2535843
56. S. Kamitani, Y. Akiyama, K. Ito, Identification and characterization of an Escherichia coli gene required for the formation of correctly folded alkaline phosphatase, a periplasmic enzyme. EMBO J. 11, 57-62 (1992). pmid: 1740115
57. Q. A. Valent et al., Early events in preprotein recognition in E. coli: Interaction of SRP and trigger factor with nascent polypeptides. EMBO J. 14, 5494-5505 (1995). pmid: 8521806
58. H. C. Lee, H. D. Bernstein, Trigger factor retards protein export in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 43527-43535 (2002). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205950200; pmid: 12205085
59. J. A. Marsh, V. K. Singh, Z. Jia, J. D. Forman-Kay, Sensitivity of secondary structure propensities to sequence differences between α- and γ-synuclein: Implications for fibrillation. Protein Sci. 15, 2795-2804 (2006). doi: 10.1110/ps.062465306; pmid: 17088319
60. H. J. Dyson, P. E. Wright, Elucidation of the protein folding landscape by NMR. Methods Enzymol. 394, 299-321 (2005). doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)94011- 1; pmid: 15808225
61. K. Takeuchi, G. Wagner, NMR studies of protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16, 109-117 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.01.006; pmid: 16427776
62. H. Patzelt et al., Binding specificity of Escherichia coli trigger factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 14244-14249 (2001). doi: 10.1073/pnas.261432298; pmid: 11724963
63. W. A. Fenton, Y. Kashi, K. Furtak, A. L. Horwich, Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371, 614-619 (1994). doi: 10.1038/371614a0; pmid: 7935796
64. P. C. Stirling, S. F. Bakhoum, A. B. Feigl, M. R. Leroux, Convergent evolution of clamp-like binding sites in diverse chaperones. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 865-870 (2006). doi: 10.1038/nsmb1153; pmid: 17021621
65. A. Mittermaier, L. E. Kay, New tools provide new insights in NMR studies of protein dynamics. Science 312, 224-228 (2006). doi: 10.1126/science.1124964; pmid: 16614210
66. A. Palmer, NMR characterization of the dynamics of biomacromolecules. Chem. Rev. 104, 3623-3640 (2004). doi: 10.1021/cr030413t; pmid: 15303831
67. J. P. Loria, M. Rance, A. G. Palmer, A TROSY CPMG sequence for characterizing chemical exchange in large proteins. J. Biomol. NMR 15, 151-155 (1999). doi: 10.1023/A:1008355631073; pmid: 10605088
68. F. A. Mulder, A. Mittermaier, B. Hon, F. W. Dahlquist, L. E. Kay, Studying excited states of proteins by NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 932-935 (2001). doi: 10.1038/nsb1101-932; pmid: 11685237
69. P. Vallurupalli, D. F. Hansen, E. Stollar, E. Meirovitch, L. E. Kay, Measurement of bond vector orientations in invisible excited states of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 18473-18477 (2007). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708296104; pmid: 18006656
70. K. Sugase, J. C. Lansing, H. J. Dyson, P. E. Wright, Tailoring relaxation dispersion experiments for fast-associating protein complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 13406-13407 (2007). doi: 10.1021/ja0762238; pmid: 17935336
71. R. Maier, C. Scholz, F. Schmid, Dynamic association of trigger factor with protein substrates. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 1181-1190 (2001). doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.5192; pmid: 11743733
72. D. Tomkiewicz, N. Nouwen, A. J. M. Driessen, Kinetics and energetics of the translocation of maltose binding protein folding mutants. J. Mol. Biol. 377, 83-90 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.014; pmid: 18241889
73. N. K. Tyagi, W. A. Fenton, A. L. Horwich, GroEL/GroES cycling: ATP binds to an open ring before substrate protein favoring protein binding and production of the native state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 20264-20269 (2009). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911556106; pmid: 19915138
74. K. Chakraborty et al., Chaperonin-catalyzed rescue of kinetically trapped states in protein folding. Cell 142, 112-122 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010. 05.027; pmid: 20603018
75. J. M. Betton, M. Hofnung, Folding of a mutant maltose-binding protein of Escherichia coli which forms inclusion bodies. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 8046-8052 (1996). doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.14.8046; pmid: 8626487
76. S. Raffy, N. Sassoon, M. Hofnung, J. M. Betton, Tertiary structure-dependence of misfolding substitutions in loops of the maltose-binding protein. Protein Sci. 7, 2136-2142 (1998). doi: 10.1002/pro.5560071010; pmid: 9792100
77. F. A. Saul et al., Crystal structure of a defective folding protein. Protein Sci. 12, 577-585 (2003). doi: 10.1110/ps.0235103; pmid: 12592028
78. J. Kuriyan, D. Eisenberg, The origin of protein interactions and allostery in colocalization. Nature 450, 983-990 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nature06524; pmid: 18075577
79. V. Novokhatny, K. Ingham, Thermodynamics of maltose binding protein unfolding. Protein Sci. 6, 141-146 (1997). doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060116; pmid: 9007986
80. S. Sharma et al., Monitoring protein conformation along the pathway of chaperonin-assisted folding. Cell 133, 142-153 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008. 01.048; pmid: 18394994
81. G. W. Farr et al., Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL. Cell 100, 561-573 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00) 80692-3; pmid: 10721993
82. M. Shtilerman, G. H. Lorimer, S. W. Englander, Chaperonin function: Folding by forced unfolding. Science 284, 822-825 (1999). doi: 10.1126/science.284.5415.822; pmid: 10221918
83. A. Hoffmann, B. Bukau, Trigger factor finds new jobs and contacts. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1006-1008 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nsmb1009-1006; pmid: 19809489
84. G. Kramer et al., Functional dissection of Escherichia coli trigger factor: Unraveling the function of individual domains. J. Bacteriol. 186, 3777-3784 (2004). doi: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3777-3784.2004; pmid: 15175291
85. F. Delaglio et al., NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277-293 (1995). doi: 10.1007/BF00197809; pmid: 8520220
86. R. Sprangers, A. Velyvis, L. Kay, Solution NMR of supramolecular complexes: Providing new insights into function. Nat. Methods 4, 697-703 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nmeth1080; pmid: 17762877
87. 3-threonine for solution NMR studies of large protein complexes: Application to the 670 kDa proteasome. PLOS One 7, e43725 (2012). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043725; pmid: 22984438
88. P. Güntert, Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA. Methods Mol. Biol. 278, 353-378 (2004). pmid: 15318003
89. Y. Shen, F. Delaglio, G. Cornilescu, A. Bax, TALOS+: A hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts. J. Biomol. NMR 44, 213-223 (2009). doi: 10.1007/s10858-009-9333-z; pmid: 19548092
90. C. Schwieters, J. Kuszewski, G.M. Clore, Using Xplor-NIH for NMR molecular structure determination. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Res. Spect. 48, 47-62 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2005.10.001
91. A. T. Brunger, Version 1.2 of the Crystallography and NMR system. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2728-2733 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.406; pmid: 18007608
92. 2 on the Carr-Purcell pulse separation. J. Magn. Reson. 6, 89-105 (1972). doi: 10.1016/0022-2364(72)90090-X
93. S.-R. Tzeng, C. G. Kalodimos, Protein activity regulation by conformational entropy. Nature 488, 236-240 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nature11271; pmid: 22801505