Chaperonin-Catalyzed Rescue of Kinetically Trapped States in Protein Folding

Cell

Volumn 142, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 112-122

  Chakraborty, Kausik ^a   Chatila, Manal ^a   Sinha, Jyoti ^a   Shi, Qiaoyun ^a   Poschner, Bernhard C ^a   Sikor, Martin ^b   Jiang, Guoxin ^a   Lamb, Don C ^b,c   Hartl, F Ulrich ^a   Hayer Hartl, Manajit ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellbio; Proteins

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN; MALTOSE BINDING PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISULFIDE BOND; MUTATION; POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY;

EID: 77954277524     PISSN: 00928674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.027     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Apetri A.C., Horwich A.L. Chaperonin chamber accelerates protein folding through passive action of preventing aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:17351-17355.
2. Bartlett A.I., Radford S.E. An expanding arsenal of experimental methods yields an explosion of insights into protein folding mechanisms. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:582-588.
3. Baumketner A., Jewett A., Shea J.E. Effects of confinement in chaperonin assisted protein folding: Rate enhancement by decreasing the roughness of the folding energy landscape. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 332:701-713.
4. Bicout D.J., Szabo A. Entropic barriers, transition states, funnels, and exponential protein folding kinetics: A simple model. Protein Sci. 2000, 9:452-465.
5. Betz S.F. Disulfide bonds and the stability of globular proteins. Protein Sci. 1993, 2:1551-1558.
6. Brinker A., Pfeifer G., Kerner M.J., Naylor D.J., Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Dual function of protein confinement in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Cell 2001, 107:223-233.
7. Camacho C.J., Thirumalai D. Modeling the role of disulfide bonds in protein folding - entropic barriers and pathways. Proteins 1995, 22:27-40.
8. Chun S.Y., Strobel S., Bassford P., Randall L.L. Folding of maltose-binding protein. Evidence for the identity of the rate-determining step in vivo and in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268:20855-20862.
9. Connelly G.P., Bai Y., Jeng M.F., Englander S.W. Isotope effects in peptide group hydrogen exchange. Proteins 1993, 17:87-92.
10. England J.L., Pande V.S. Potential for modulation of the hydrophobic effect inside chaperonins. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:3391-3399.
11. Ewalt K.L., Hendrick J.P., Houry W.A., Hartl F.U. In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system. Cell 1997, 90:491-500.
12. Frydman J. Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: The role of molecular chaperones. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001, 70:603-647.
13. Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science 2002, 295:1852-1858.
14. Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:574-581.
15. Hayer-Hartl M., Minton A.P. A simple semiempirical model for the effect of molecular confinement upon the rate of protein folding. Biochemistry 2006, 45:13356-13360.
16. Hayer-Hartl M.K., Weber F., Hartl F.U. Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. EMBO J. 1996, 15:6111-6121.
17. Horwich A.L., Apetri A.C., Fenton W.A. The GroEL/GroES cis cavity as a passive anti-aggregation device. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583:2654-2662.
18. Houry W.A., Frishman D., Eckerskorn C., Lottspeich F., Hartl F.U. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 1999, 402:147-154.
19. Jewett A.I., Shea J.-E. Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67:255-276.
20. Kerner M.J., Naylor D.J., Ishihama Y., Maier T., Chang H.C., Stines A.P., Georgopoulos C., Frishman D., Hayer-Hartl M., Mann M., et al. Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell 2005, 122:209-220.
21. Lin Z., Madan D., Rye H.S. GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:303-311.
22. Lucent D., Vishal V., Pande V.S. Protein folding under confinement: a role for solvent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:10430-10434.
23. Mamathambika B.S., Bardwell J.C. Disulfide-linked protein folding pathways. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008, 24:211-235.
24. Martin J., Langer T., Boteva R., Schramel A., Horwich A.L., Hartl F.U. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of GroEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate. Nature 1991, 352:36-42.
25. Mayhew M., Da Silva A.C.R., Martin J., Erdjument-bromage H., Tempst P., Hartl F.U. Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature 1996, 379:420-426.
26. Muller B.K., Zaychikov E., Brauchle C., Lamb D.C. Pulsed interleaved excitation. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:3508-3522.
27. Plaxco K.W., Simons K.T., Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 277:985-994.
28. Qu Y.X., Bolen D.W. Hydrogen exchange kinetics of RNase A and the urea: TMAO paradigm. Biochemistry 2003, 42:5837-5849.
29. Sharma S., Chakraborty K., Mueller B.K., Astola N., Tang Y.C., Lamb D.C., Hayer-Hartl M., Hartl F.U. Monitoring protein conformation along the pathway of chaperonin-assisted folding. Cell 2008, 133:142-153.
30. Shtilerman M., Lorimer G.H., Englander S.W. Chaperonin function: Folding by forced unfolding. Science 1999, 284:822-825.
31. Spurlino J.C., Lu G.Y., Quiocho F.A. The 2.3-A resolution structure of the maltose- or maltodextrin-binding protein, a primary receptor of bacterial active transport and chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266:5202-5219.
32. Tang Y.C., Chang H.C., Roeben A., Wischnewski D., Wischnewski N., Kerner M.J., Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein. Cell 2006, 125:903-914.
33. Tang Y.C., Chang H.C., Chakraborty K., Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Essential role of the chaperonin folding compartment in vivo. EMBO J. 2008, 27:1458-1468.
34. Thirumalai D., Lorimer G.H. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2001, 30:245-269.
35. Tokuriki N., Tawfik D.S. Chaperonin overexpression promotes genetic variation and enzyme evolution. Nature 2009, 459:668-671.
36. Vendruscolo M., Paci E., Karplus M., Dobson C.M. Structures and relative free energies of partially folded states of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:14817-14821.
37. Wallin S., Chan H.S. Conformational entropic barriers in topology-dependent protein folding: perspectives from a simple native-centric polymer model. J. Phys. Condes. Matter 2006, 18:S307-S328.
38. Weissman J.S., Rye H.S., Fenton W.A., Beechem J.M., Horwich A.L. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell 1996, 84:481-490.
39. Xu Z.H., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 1997, 388:741-749.
40. Zou Q., Bennion B.J., Daggett V., Murphy K.P. The molecular mechanism of stabilization of proteins by TMAO and its ability to counteract the effects of urea. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124:1192-1202.