Thinking styles and decision making: A meta-analysis

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 142, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 260-290

  Phillips, Wendy J ^a   Fletcher, Jennifer M ^b   Marks, Anthony D G ^a   Hine, Donald W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Dual process; Explicit; Implicit; Judgment and decision making; Thinking styles

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84958933574     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000027     Document Type: Article

References (161)

1. Agarwal, S., Driscoll, J. C., Gabaix, X., & Laibson, D. I. (2009). The age of reason: Financial decisions over the life-cycle with implications for regulation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2 51-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/eca.0.0067
2. Alonso, D., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2003). Irrational decisions: Attending to numbers rather than ratios. Personality and Individual Differences, 35 1537-1547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00368-9
3. Alós-Ferrer, C., & Hügelschäfer, S. (2012). Faith in intuition and behavioral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 84 182-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.08.004
4. Areni, C., Ferrell, M., & Wilcox, J. (2000). The persuasive impact of reported group opinions on individuals low vs. high in need for cognition: Rationalization vs. biased elaboration? Psychology and Marketing, 17 855-875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-6793(200010)17: 10_855::AID-MAR2_3.0.CO;2-V
5. Ayal, S., Zakay, D., & Hochman, G. (2012). Deliberative adjustments of intuitive anchors: The case of diversification behavior. Synthese, 189 131-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0156-1
6. Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130 553-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553
7. Barrouillet, P. (2011). Dual-process theories and cognitive development: Advances and challenges. Developmental Review, 31 79-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.002
8. Bartels, D. M. (2006). Proportion dominance: The generality and variability of favoring relative savings over absolute savings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100 76-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.10.004
9. Berger, C. R. I, Lee, E. J., & Johnson, J. T. (2003). Gender, rationality, and base-rate explanations for increasing trends. Communication Research, 30 737-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650203258282
10. Berger, C. R., Johnson, J. T., & Lee, E. J. (2003). Antidotes for anthrax anecdotes: The role of rationality and base-rate data in assuaging apprehension. Communication Research, 30 198-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250880
11. Betsch, C. (2008). Chronic preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 231-248). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Betsch, C., & Iannello, P. (2010). Measuring individual differences in intuitive and deliberate decision-making styles. In A. Glockner & C. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
13. Betsch, C., & Kunz, J. J. (2008). Individual strategy preferences and decisional fit. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21 532-555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.600
14. Björklund, F., & Bäckström, M. (2008). Individual differences in processing styles: Validity of the Rational-Experiential Inventory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49 439-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00652.x
15. Blais, A.-R., Thompson, M. M., & Baranski, J. V. (2005). Individual differences in decision processing and confidence judgments in comparative judgment tasks: The role of cognitive styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 38 1701-1713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.004
16. Bouckenooghe, D., Vanderheyden, K., Mestdagh, S., & Van Laethem, S. (2007). Cognitive motivation correlates of coping style in decisional conflict. The Journal of Psychology, 141 605-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.141.6.605-626
17. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92 938-956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938
18. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125 367-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
19. Chiesi, F., Primi, C., & Morsanyi, K. (2011). Developmental changes in probabilistic reasoning: The role of cognitive capacity, instructions, thinking styles, and relevant knowledge. Thinking & Reasoning, 17 315-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2011.598401
20. Conner, M. T., Perugini, M., O'Gorman, R., Ayres, K., & Prestwich, A. (2007). Relations between implicit and explicit measures of attitudes and measures of behavior: Evidence of moderation by individual difference variables. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33 1727-1740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167207309194
21. Crossley, C. D., & Highhouse, S. (2005). Relation of job search and choice process with subsequent satisfaction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26 255-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2004.04.001
22. Curseu, P. L. (2006). Need for cognition and rationality in decisionmaking. Studia Psychologica, 48 141-156.
23. Curseu, P. L., & Schruijer, S. G. L. (2012). Decision styles and rationality: An analysis of the predictive validity of the General Decision-Making Style Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72 1053-1062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164412448066
24. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Avon.
25. Dane, E., Baer, M., Pratt, M. G., & Oldham, G. R. (2011). Rational versus intuitive problem solving: How thinking "offthe beaten path" can stimulate creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5 3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017698
26. De Neys, W. (2006). Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 59 1070-1100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980543000123
27. Dewberry, C., Juanchich, M., & Narendran, S. (2013). Decision-making competence in everyday life: The roles of general cognitive styles, decision-making styles and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 55 783-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.012
28. Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1 95-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x
29. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49 709-724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709
30. Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology (pp. 159-184). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
31. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1995). Individual differences in heuristic processing. [Unpublished manuscript.] Department of Psychology, University of Massachussetts.
32. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 390-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
33. Erev, I., Eyal, E., Roth, A. E., Haruvy, E. E., Herzog, S., Hau, R., Lebiere, C. (2010). A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23 15-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.683
34. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13 378-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193858
35. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59 255-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
36. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2010). Intuition and reasoning: A dual-process perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 21 313-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.521057
37. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2011). Dual-process theories of reasoning: Contemporary issues and developmental applications. Developmental Review, 31 86-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.007
38. Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., Neilens, H., & Over, D. (2010). The influence of cognitive ability and instructional set on causal conditional inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 63 892-909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210903111821
39. Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8 223-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
40. Feldman Barrett, L., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130 553-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553
41. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Wifall, T. (2007). Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 2 1-8.
42. Figner, B., Mackinlay, R. J., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35 709-730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014983
43. Figner, B., & Weber, E. U. (2011). Who takes risks when and why?: Determinants of risk taking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20 211-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721411415790
44. Finucane, M. L., & Gullion, C. M. (2010). Developing a tool for measuring the decision-making competence of older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25 271-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019106
45. Fletcher, J. M., Marks, A. D. G., & Hine, D. W. (2012). Latent profile analysis of working memory capacity and thinking styles in adults and adolescents. Journal of Research in Personality, 46 40-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.11.003
46. Galotti, K. M., Ciner, E., Altenbaumer, H. E., Geerts, H. J., Rupp, A., & Woulfe, J. (2006). Decision-making styles in a real-life decision: Choos-ing a college major. Personality and Individual Differences, 41 629-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.003
47. Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings: A theory of normative judgment The Philosophical Review, 101 934-936.
48. Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings. London, UK: Penguin.
49. Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink. London, UK: Penguin.
50. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008a). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3 215-228.
51. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008b). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34 1055-1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1055
52. Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., Hochman, G., Ayal, S., & Hilbig, B. E. (2012). Processing differences between descriptions and experience: A comparative analysis using eye-tracking and physiological measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 3 Article 173, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00173
53. Godek, J., & Murray, K. B. (2008). Willingness to pay for advice: The role of rational and experiential processing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106 77-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.10.002
54. Goel, V., Buchel, C., Frith, C., & Dolan, R. J. (2000). Dissociation of mechanisms underlying syllogistic reasoning. NeuroImage, 12 504-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0636
55. Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition, 87 B11-B22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00185-3
56. Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44 389-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
57. Hammond, K. R. (2010). Intuition, no!.. Quasirationality, yes! Psychological Inquiry, 21 327-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.521483
58. Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1984). The relative efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition: A second direct comparison. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.
59. Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1987). Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 17 753-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1987.6499282
60. Harman, J. L. (2011). Individual differences in need for cognition and decision making in the Iowa Gambling Task. Personality and Individual Differences, 51 112-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.021
61. Hayes, B. K., Newell, B. R., & Hawkins, G. E. (2013). Causal model and sampling approaches to reducing base rate neglect. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 567-572). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
62. Hertwig, R., & Erev, I. (2009). The description-experience gap in risky choice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13 517-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004
63. Hine, D. W., Reser, J. P., Morrison, M., Phillips, W. J., Nunn, P., & Cooksey, R. (2014). Audience segmentation and climate change communication: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5 441-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.279
64. Hogarth, R. M. (2005). Deciding analytically or trusting your intuition? The advantages and disadvantages of analytic and intuitive thought. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 67-82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65. Holyoak, K. J., & Spellman, B. A. (1993). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 44 265-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.001405
66. Iederan, O. C., Curseu, P. L., & Vermeulen, P. (2009). Effective decisionmaking: The role of cognitive complexity in strategic decisions. Studia Psychologica, 51 293-304.
67. Inbar, Y., Cone, J., & Gilovich, T. (2010). People's intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99 232-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020215
68. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004
69. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477
70. Kaufman, S. B. (2009). Faith in intuition is associated with decreased latent inhibition in a sample of high-achieving adolescents. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3 28-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014822
71. Kinnunen, S. P., & Windmann, S. (2013). Dual-processing altruism. Frontiers in Psychology, 4 193. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00193
72. Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Epstein, S. (1992). Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: Further evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 534-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.534
73. Klaczynski, P., & Fauth, J. (1996). Intellectual ability, rationality, and intuitiveness as predictors of warranted and unwarranted optimism for future life events. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25 755-773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01537452
74. Klaczynski, P., Fauth, J., & Swanger, A. (1998). Adolescent identity: Rational vs. experiential processing, formal operations, and critical thinking beliefs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27 185-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021663712950
75. Klaczynski, P., Gordon, D. H., & Fauth, J. (1997). Goal-oriented critical reasoning and individual differences in critical reasoning biases. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 470-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.470
76. Klaczynski, P. A., & Cottrell, J. M. (2004). A dual-process approach to cognitive development: The case of children's understanding of sunk cost decisions. Thinking & Reasoning, 10 147-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546780442000042
77. Kokis, J. V., Macpherson, R., Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002). Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83 26-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00121-2
78. Kowert, P. A., & Hermann, M. G. (1997). Who takes risks? Daring and caution in foreign policy making. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41 611-637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041005001
79. Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118 97-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020762
80. Kuvaas, B., & Kaufmann, G. (2004). Impact of mood, framing, and need for cognition on decision makers' recall and confidence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17 59-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.461
81. LeBoeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. (2003). Deep thoughts and shallow frames; on the susceptibility to framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16 77-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.433
82. Leonard, N. H., Scholl, R. W., & Kowalski, K. B. (1999). Information processing style and decision making. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 407-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199905)20:3_407::AID-JOB891_3.0.CO;2-3
83. Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., Schreiber, J., & Lauriola, M. (2002). A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88 411-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2983
84. Levin, I. P., Huneke, M. E., & Jasper, J. D. (2000). Information processing at successive stages of decision making: Need for cognition and inclusion- exclusion effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82 171-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2881
85. Leybourne, S., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2006). The role of intuition and improvisation in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24 483-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.03.007
86. Leykin, Y., & DeRubeis, R. J. (2010). Decision-making styles and depressive symptomatology: Development of the Decision Styles Questionnaire. Judgment and Decision Making, 5 506-515.
87. Li, S., & Liu, C. J. (2008). Individual differences in a switch from risk-averse preferences for gains to risk-seeking preferences for losses: Can personality variables predict the risk preferences? Journal of Risk Research, 11 673-686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870802086497
88. Liberali, J. M., Reyna, V. F., Furlan, S., Stein, L. M., & Pardo, S. T. (2012). Individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection, with implications for biases and fallacies in probability judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25 361-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.752
89. Lieberman, M. D. (2009). What zombies can't do: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to the irreducibility of reflective consciousness. In J. S. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 293-316). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0013
90. Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 199-249). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80006-5
91. Lieberman, M. D., Jarcho, J. M., & Satpute, A. B. (2004). Evidence-based and intuition-based self-knowledge: An FMRI study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 421-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.421
92. Lindeman, M. (2011). Biases in intuitive reasoning and belief in complementary and alternative medicine. Psychology & Health, 26 371-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870440903440707
93. Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41 731-744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.009
94. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
95. Macpherson, R., & Stanovich, K. E. (2007). Cognitive ability, thinking dispositions, and instructional set as predictors of critical thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 17 115-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.05.003
96. Mahoney, K. T., Buboltz, W., Levin, I. P., Doverspike, D., & Svyantek, D. J. (2011). Individual differences in a within-subjects risky-choice framing study. Personality and Individual Differences, 51 248-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.035
97. Mao, W., & Oppewal, H. (2012). The attraction effect is more pronounced for consumers who rely on intuitive reasoning. Marketing Letters, 23 339-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11002-011-9157-y
98. Marks, A. D. G., Hine, D. W., Blore, R. L., & Phillips, W. J. (2008). Assessing individual differences in adolescents' preference for rational and experiential cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 44 42-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.006
99. Martin, R. A., Berry, G. E., Dobranski, T., Horne, M., & Dodgson, P. G. (1996). Emotion perception threshold: Individual differences in emotional sensitivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 30 290-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0019
100. McElroy, T., & Seta, J. J. (2003). Framing effects: An analytic- holistic perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39 610-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00036-2
101. McMackin, J., & Slovic, P. (2000). When does explicit justification impair decision making? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14 527-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6_527::AID-ACP671_3.0.CO;2-J
102. Miller, P. M., Fagley, N. S., & Casella, N. E. (2009). Effects of problem frame and gender on principals' decision making. Social Psychology of Education, 12 397-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9087-6
103. Morsanyi, K., Primi, C., Chiesi, F., & Handley, S. (2009). The effects and side-effects of statistics education: Psychology students' (mis-) conceptions of probability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34 210-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.05.001
104. Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
105. Newstead, S. E., Thompson, V. A., & Handley, S. J. (2002). Generating alternatives: A key component in human reasoning? Memory & Cognition, 30 129-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195272
106. Norris, P., & Epstein, S. (2011). An experiential thinking style: Its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures. Journal of Personality, 79 1043-1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00718.x
107. Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (2009). The fit of thinking style and situation: New measures of situation-specific experiential and rational cognition. The Journal of Consumer Research, 36 56-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/596026
108. Nygren, T. E. (2000). Development of a measure of decision making styles to predict performance in a dynamic J/DM task. Paper presented at the 41st Psychonomic Society Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
109. Osman, M. (2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11 988-1010. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196730
110. Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratiobias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 972-987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
111. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173933
112. Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2000). The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26 1465-1475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672002612002
113. Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2014). The elaboration likelihood and metacognitive models of attitudes: Implications for prejudice, the self, and beyond. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dualprocess theories of the social mind (pp. 172-187). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
114. Pretz, J. E. (2008). Intuition versus analysis: Strategy and experience in complex everyday problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 36 554-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.554
115. Pretz, J. E., Totz, K. S., & Kaufman, S. B. (2010). The effects of mood, cognitive style, and cognitive ability on implicit learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 20 215-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.003
116. Prowse Turner, J. A., & Thompson, V. A. (2009). The role of training, alternative models, and logical necessity in determining confidence in syllogistic reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 15 69-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546780802619248
117. Raab, M., & Laborde, S. (2011). When to blink and when to think: Preference for intuitive decisions results in faster and better tactical choices. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82 89-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599725
118. Raffaldi, S., Iannello, P., Vittani, L., & Antonietti, A. (2012). Decisionmaking styles in the workplace: Relationships between self-report questionnaires and a contextualized measure of the analytical-systematic versus global-intuitive approach. SAGE Open, 2(2), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244012448082
119. Raidl, M.-H., & Lubart, T. (2000). An empirical study of intuition and creativity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 20 217-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/34QQ-EX6N-TF8V-7U3N
120. Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489 427-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11467
121. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118 219-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.3.219
122. Reber, R., Ruch-Monachon, M-A., & Perrig, W. J. (2007). Decomposing intuitive components in a conceptual problem solving task. Consciousness and Cognition, 16 294-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.05.004
123. Reyna, V. F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk: A dual-processes approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13 60-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x
124. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2011). Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience: A fuzzy trace model. Developmental Review, 31 180-206.
125. Reyna, V. F., & Farley, F. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7 1-44.
126. Rowe, A. J., & Mason, R. O. (1987). Managing with style: A guide to understanding, assessing, and improving decision making. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
127. Rusou, Z., Zakay, D., & Usher, M. (2013). Pitting intuitive and analytical thinking against each other: The case of transitivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20 608-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0382-7
128. Salthouse, T. (2012). Consequences of age-related cognitive declines. Annual Review of Psychology, 63 201-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100328
129. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55 818-831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055005017
130. Shiloh, S., Salton, E., & Sharabi, D. (2002). Individual differences in rational and intuitive thinking styles as predictors of heuristic responses and framing effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 32 415-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00034-4
131. Shiloh, S., & Shenhav-Sheffer, M. (2004). Structure of difficulties in mate-selection decisions and its relationship to rational and intuitive cognitive styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 37 259-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.08.016
132. Simon, A., Fagley, N., & Halleran, J. (2004). Decision framing: Moderating effects of individual differences and cognitive processing. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17 77-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.463
133. Singh, R., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2004). The relation between career decision making strategies and person-job fit: A study of job changers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64 198-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00034-4
134. Sirota, M., Juanchich, M., & Hagmayer, Y. (2013). Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning. [Advance online publication]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
135. Sladek, R. M., Bond, M. J., Luan, T. H., Chew, D. P. B., & Phillips, P. A. (2008). Thinking styles and doctors' knowledge and behaviours relating to acute coronary syndromes guidelines. Implementation Science, 3 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-23
136. Sladek, R. M., Bond, M. J., & Phillips, P. A. (2010). Age and gender differences in preferences for rational and experiential thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 49 907-911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.028
137. Slater, M. D., Kelly, K. J., & Thackeray, R. (2006). Segmentation on a shoestring: Health audience segmentation in limited-budget and local social marketing interventions. Health Promotion Practice, 7 170-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1524839906286616
138. Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 379-398). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.024
139. Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4 108-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01
140. Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Rationality and the reflective mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341140.001.0001
141. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2003). The rationality debate as a progressive research program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26 531-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X03240115
142. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases. Thinking & Reasoning, 14 129-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546780701679764
143. Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011). The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models. Developmental Review, 31 103-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.003
144. Steinberg, L. (2007). Risk taking in adolescence: New perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16 55-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00475.x
145. Thompson, V. A. (2009). Dual-process theories: A meta-cognitive perspective. In J. St. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 171-196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0008
146. Thunholm, P. (2008). Decision-making styles and physiological correlates of negative stress: Is there a relation? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49 213-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00640.x
147. Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002). The domain specificity and generality of disjunctive reasoning: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 197-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.197
148. Tsujii, T., & Watanabe, S. (2009). Neural correlates of dual-task effect on belief-bias syllogistic reasoning: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain Research, 1287 118-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.080
149. Tymula, A., Rosenberg Belmaker, L. A., Ruderman, L., Glimcher, P. W., & Levy, I. (2013). Like cognitive function, decision making across the life span shows profound age-related changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 17143-17148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309909110
150. Uhlmann, E., Brescoll, V., & Machery, E. (2010). The motives underlying stereotype-based discrimination against members of stigmatized groups. Social Justice Research, 23 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0110-7
151. Wang, S., Krajbich, I., Adolphs, R., & Tsuchiya, N. (2012). The role of risk aversion in non-conscious decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 3 50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00050
152. Wedell, D. H. (2011). Probabilistic reasoning in prediction and diagnosis: Effects of problem type, response mode, and individual differences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24 157-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.686
153. Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., & Denburg, N. L. (2011). Trajectory of risky decision making for potential gains and losses from ages 5 to 85. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24 331-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.690
154. Wilson, T. D., Dunn, D. S., Kraft, D., & Lisle, D. J. (1989). In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do (Vol. 22, pp. 287-343). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
155. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 181-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.181
156. Windschitl, P. D., & Krizan, Z. (2005). Contigent approaches to making likelihood judgments about polychotomous cases: The influence of task factors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18 281-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.505
157. Witteman, C., van den Bercken, J., Claes, L., & Godoy, A. (2009). Assessing rational and intuitive thinking styles. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25 39-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.25.1.39
158. Wolfradt, U., Oubaid, V., Straube, E. R., Bischoff, N., & Mischo, J. (1999). Thinking styles, schizotypal traits and anomalous experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 27 821-830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00031-8
159. Wong, K., Kwong, J., & Ng, C. (2008). When thinking rationally increases biases: The role of rational thinking style in escalation of commitment. Applied Psychology, 572 246-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00309.x
160. Woolhouse, L. S., & Bayne, R. (2000). Personality and the use of intuition: Individual differences in strategy and performance on an implicit learning task. European Journal of Personality, 14 157-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(200003/04)14:2_157::AIDPER366_3.0.CO;2-L
161. Zenhausern, R. (1978). Imagery, cerebral dominance, and style of thinking: A unified field model. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21 381-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329714