Assessing individual differences in adolescents' preference for rational and experiential cognition

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 42-52

  Marks, Anthony D G ^a   Hine, Donald W ^a   Blore, Rebecca L ^a   Phillips, Wendy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adolescent reasoning; Cognitive style; Experiential; Individual differences; Rational

Indexed keywords

EID: 35248880089     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bartels D.M. Proportion dominance: The generality and variability of favoring relative savings over absolute savings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100 1 (2006) 76-95
2. Berger C.R., and Lee E. Dynamic representations of threatening trends: The role of rationality and experientiality in potentiating trepidation. Communication Research 34 1 (2007) 53-72
3. Cattell R.B. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1 (1966) 245-276
4. Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., and Aiken L.S. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences. 3rd ed. (2003), Lawrence, Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
5. Danziger S., Moran S., and Rafaely V. The influence of ease of retrieval on judgment as a function of attention to subjective experience. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16 2 (2006) 191-195
6. Davies, R. (2006). Decision making and alcohol use in adolescents: A dual process approach. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
7. de Stadelhofen F.M., Rossier J., Rigozzi C., Zimmermann G., and Berthoud S. Validation d'une version française de l'inventaire rationnel-expérientiel (REI) et application au tabagisme. Validation of a French version of the rational-experiential-inventory and its application to the study of tobacco smoking. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale 17 (2004) 77-102
8. Epstein S. Integration of the Cognitive and the Psychodynamic Unconscious. American Psychologist 49 8 (1994) 709-724
9. Epstein S., Denes-Raj V., and Pacini R. The Linda problem revisited from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 11 (1995) 1124-1138
10. Epstein S., Donovan S., and Denes-Raj V. The missing link in the paradox of the Linda conjunction problem: Beyond knowing and thinking of the conjunction rule, the intrinsic appeal of heuristic processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 2 (1999) 204-214
11. Epstein S., Pacini R., Denes-Raj V., and Heier H. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 2 (1996) 390-405
12. Feldman Barrett L., Tugade M.M., and Engle R.W. Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin 130 4 (2004) 553-573
13. Glassman T., Werch C., and Jobli E. Alcohol self-control behaviors of adolescents. Addictive Behaviors 32 3 (2007) 590-597
14. Handley S.J., Newstead S.E., and Wright H. Rational and experiential thinking: A study of the REI. In: Riding R.J., and Rayner S.G. (Eds). International perspectives on individual differences Vol. 1 (2000), Ablex, Stamford, CO 97-113
15. Haynes S.N., Richard D.C.S., and Kubany E.S. Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. [Special issue: Methodological Issues in Psychological Assessment Research]. Psychological Assessment 7 3 (1995) 238-247
16. Hine D.W., Summers C., Tilleczek K., and Lewko J. Expectancies and mental models as determinants of adolescents' smoking decisions. [Special Issue: Social Science Perspectives on Tobacco Policy]. Journal of Social Issues 53 1 (1997) 35-52
17. Horn J.L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 30 (1965) 179-185
18. John O.P., Donahue E.M., and Kentle R.L. The big five inventory versions 4a and 54 (1991), University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, Berkeley
19. John O.P., and Srivastava S. The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin L.A., and John O.P. (Eds). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. 2nd ed. (1999), Guilford Press, NY 102-138
20. Klaczynski P.A., Fauth J.M., and Swanger A. Adolescent identity: Rational vs. experiential processing, formal operations, and critical thinking beliefs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 27 2 (1998) 185-207
21. Kokis J.V., Macpherson R., Toplak M.E., West R.F., and Stanovich K.E. Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 83 1 (2002) 26-52
22. Kring A.M., Smith D.A., and Neale J.M. Individual differences in dispositional expressiveness: Development and validation of the emotional expressivity scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 5 (1994) 934-949
23. Lieberman J.D. Head over the heart or heart over the head? Cognitive experiential self-theory and extralegal heuristics in juror decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32 12 (2002) 2526-2553
24. Marks, A. D. G., O'Neill, G., & Hine, D. W. (in press). The role of affect, expectancies and dual processes of cognition in predicting adult cigarette smoking. Australian Journal of Psychology.
25. Moore S., and Gullone E. Predicting adolescent risk behavior using a personalized cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 25 3 (1996) 343-359
26. Pacini R., and Epstein S. The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 6 (1999) 972-987
27. Reyna V.F., and Farley F. Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7 1 (2006) 1-44
28. Saher M., and Lindeman M. Alternative medicine: A psychological perspective. Personality and Individual Differences 39 6 (2005) 1169-1178
29. Shiloh S., Salton E., and Sharabi D. Individual differences in rational and intuitive thinking styles as predictors of heuristic responses and framing effects. Personality and Individual Differences 32 3 (2002) 415-429
30. Shiloh S., and Shenhav-Sheffer M. Structure of difficulties in mate-selection decisions and its relationship to rational and intuitive cognitive styles. Personality and Individual Differences 37 2 (2004) 259-273
31. Stanovich K.E., and West R.E. Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking and Reasoning (2006) 1-23
32. Stanovich K.E., and West R.F. Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127 2 (1998) 161-188
33. Toyosawa J., and Karasawa K. Individual differences on judgment using the ratio-bias and the Linda problem: Adopting CEST and Japanese version of REI. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology 20 2 (2004) 85-92
34. Trudeau L., Lillehoj C., Spoth R., and Redmond C. The role of assertiveness and decision making in early adolescent substance initiation: Mediating processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence 13 3 (2003) 301-328