Erratum: Like cognitive function, decision making across the life span shows profound age-related changes (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2013) 110 (17143-17148) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309909110);Like cognitive function, decision making across the life span shows profound age-related changes

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 42, 2013, Pages 17143-17148

  Tymula, Agnieszka ^a   Belmaker, Lior A Rosenberg ^b   Ruderman, Lital ^b   Glimcher, Paul W ^c   Levy, Ifat ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMBIGUITY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO LIFE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CHILD; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEMOGRAPHY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; LIFESPAN; MALE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; NEWBORN; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING;

EID: 84885787304     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517212112     Document Type: Erratum

References (41)

1. Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ (1995) Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learn Individ Differ 7(1): 1-75.
2. Spear LP (2010) The Behavioral Neuroscience of Adolescence (Norton, New York).
3. Tymula A, et al. (2012) Adolescents' risk-taking behavior is driven by tolerance to ambiguity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(42): 17135-17140.
4. Park DC, et al. (2002) Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging 17(2): 299-320.
5. McArdle JJ, Ferrer-Caja E, Hamagami F, Woodcock RW (2002) Comparative longitudinal structural analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span. Dev Psychol 38(1): 115-142.
6. Baltes PB, Lindenberger U (1997) Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: A new window to the study of cognitive aging? Psychol Aging 12(1): 12-21.
7. Salthouse TA (1996) The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev 103(3): 403-428.
8. Horn JL, Cattell RB (1967) Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. Acta Psychol (Amst) 26(2): 107-129.
9. Minino AM (2010) Mortality among teenagers aged 12-19 years: United States, 1999-2006. NCHS Data Brief, no. 37 (National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD).
10. Arias E (2011) United States life tables, 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep 59(9): 1-60.
11. Agarwal S, Driscoll JC, Gabaix X, Laibson DI (2009) The age of reason: Financial decisions over the life-cycle with implications for regulation. Brookings Pap Econ Act 2009(2): 51-117.
12. McFadden D (2006) Free markets and fettered consumers. Am Econ Rev 96(1): 5-29.
13. Shue K, Luttmer EFP (2009) Who misvotes? The effect of differential cognition costs on election outcomes. Am Econ J Econ Policy 1(1): 229-257.
14. Plassman BL, et al. (2007) Prevalence of dementia in the United States: The Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study. Neuroepidemiology 29(1-2): 125-132.
15. Plassman BL, et al. (2008) Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States. Ann Intern Med 148(6): 427-434.
16. Von Gaudecker H-M, van Soest A, Wengström E (2011) Heterogeneity in risky choice behavior in a broad population. Am Econ Rev 101(2): 664-694.
17. Dohmen T, et al. (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences. J Eur Econ Assoc 9(3): 522-550.
18. Halek M, Eisenhauer JG (2001) Demography of risk aversion. J Risk Insur 68(1): 1-24.
19. Morin RA, Suarez AF (1983) Risk aversion revisited. J Finance 38(4): 1201-1216.
20. Riley WB, Chow V (1992) Asset allocation and individual risk aversion. Financ Anal J 48(6): 32-37.
21. Mata R, Josef AK, Samanez-Larkin GR, Hertwig R (2011) Age differences in risky choice: A meta-analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1235: 18-29.
22. Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Am Econ Rev 92(5): 1644-1655.
23. Cohen M, Jaffray J-Y, Said T (1987) Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 39(1): 1-22.
24. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263-292.
25. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1972) Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognit Psychol 3(3): 430-454.
26. Birnbaum MH (2005) A comparison of five models that predict violations of first-order stochastic dominance in risky decision making. J Risk Uncertain 31(3): 263-287.
27. Charness G, Karni E, Levin D (2007) Individual and group decision making under risk: An experimental study of Bayesian updating and violations of first-order stochastic dominance. J Risk Uncertain 35(2): 129-148.
28. Becker GM, Degroot MH, Marschak J (1963) Stochastic models of choice behavior. Behav Sci 8(1): 41-55.
29. McFadden D (2001) Economic choices. Am Econ Rev 91(3): 351-378.
30. Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J Math Econ 18(2): 141-153.
31. Fechner G (1966) in Elements of Psychophysics, ed Howes DH (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).
32. Chakravarty S, Roy J (2009) Recursive expected utility and the separation of attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: An experimental study. Theory Decis 66(3): 199-228.
33. Schoemaker PJH (1990) Are risk-attitudes related across domains and response modes? Manage Sci 36(12): 1451-1463.
34. Baucells M, Villasís A (2010) Stability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theory. Theory Decis 68(1-2): 193-211.
35. Reyna VF, Nelson WL, Han PK, Dieckmann NF (2009) How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychol Bull 135(6): 943-973.
36. Ofstedal M, Fisher G, Regula Herzog A (2005) Documentation of cognitive functioning measures in the Health and Retirement Study (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI). Available at http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/userg/dr- 006.pdf.
37. Kirsch IS, et al. (1993) Adult literacy in America: A first look at the findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey (US Department of Education, Washington).
38. Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q J Econ 75(4): 643-669.
39. Camerer C, Weber M (1992) Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J Risk Uncertain 5(4): 325-370.
40. Lauriola M, Levin IP (2001) Relating individual differences in attitude toward ambiguity to risky choices. J Behav Decis Making 14(2): 107-122.
41. Levy I, Snell J, Nelson AJ, Rustichini A, Glimcher PW (2010) Neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity. J Neurophysiol 103(2): 1036-1047.