Impact of Mood, Framing, and Need for Cognition on Decision Makers' Recall and Confidence

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 59-74

  Kuvaas, Bård ^a   Kaufmann, Geir ^b  

^a BI NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cognitive processing; Cognitive style; Framing; Mood

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642477858     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.461     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529-550.
2. Bhattacharjee, S., & Moreno, K. (2002). The impact of affective information on the professional judgments of more experienced and less experienced auditors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 361-377.
3. Bless, H. (2000). The interplay of affect and cognition: the mediating role of general knowledge structures. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 201-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bless, H. (2001). Mood and the use of general knowledge structures. In L. L. Martin, & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook (pp. 9-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305-314.
6. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
7. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
8. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
9. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
10. Chatterjee, S., Heath, T. B., Milberg, S. J., & France, K. R. (2000). The differential processing of price in gains and losses: the effects of frame and need for cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 61-75.
11. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Cooper, A. C., Folta, T. B., & Woo, C. (1995). Entrepreneurial information search. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 107-120.
13. D'Agostini, P. R., & Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1992). Need for cognition and the correspondence bias. Social Cognition, 10, 151-163.
14. Dunegan, K. J. (1993). Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: toward an understanding of a glass half full. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 491-503.
15. Dunegan, K. J., Duchon, D., & Barton, S. L. (1992). Affect, risk, and decision criticality: replication and extension in a business setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 335-351.
16. Dutton, J. E. (1993). The making of organizational opportunities: an interpretive pathway to organizational change. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 15, pp. 195-226). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
17. Elsbach, K. D., & Barr, P. S. (1999). The effects of mood on individuals' use of structured decision protocols. Organization Science, 10, 181-198.
18. Erber, R., & Erber, M. W. (2001). Mood and processing: a view from a self-regulation perspective. In L. L. Martin, & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook (pp. 63-84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Fiedler, K. (2000). Toward an integrative account of affect and cognition phenomena using the BIAS computer algorithm. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 223-252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17.
21. Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
22. Forgas, J. P. (1998). Happy and mistaken? Mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 318-331.
23. Forgas, J. P. (2000a). Affect and information processing strategies: an interactive relationship. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 253-280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Forgas, J. P. (2000b). Introduction: the role of affect in social cognition. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 1-28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Forgas, J. P. (Ed.). (2000c). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Forgas, J. P. (2001a). The affect infusion model (AIM): an integrative theory of mood effects on cognition and judgments. In L. L. Martin, & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook (pp. 99-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Forgas, J. P. (2001b). Affective intelligence: the role of affect in social thinking and behavior. In J. Ciarrochi, J. P. Forgas, & J. D. Mayer (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in everyday life: A scientific inquiry (pp. 45-79). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
28. Forgas, J. P. (Ed.). (2001c). Handbook of affect and social cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Forgas, J. P. (2002). Feeling and doing: affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 1-28.
30. Forgas, J. P., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Mood effects on person perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 53-60.
31. Forgas, J. P., Bower, G. H., & Krantz, S. (1984). The influence of mood on perceptions of social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 497-513.
32. Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influence on judgments and behavior in organizations: an information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 3-34.
33. Gasper, K. (2003). When necessity is the mother of invention: mood and problem-solving. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 248-262.
34. Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
35. Hammond, K. R. (2000). Judgment under stress. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Harvey, N. (1994). Relations between confidence and skilled performance. In G. Wright, & R. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 321-351). New York: Wiley.
37. Heppner, P. P., Reeder, B. L., & Larson, L. M. (1983). Cognitive variables associated with personal problem-solving appraisal: implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 537-545.
38. Inman, J. J., McAlister, L., & Hoyer, W. D. (1990). Promotion signal: proxy for a price cut? Journal of Consumer Resarch, 17, 74-81.
39. Isen, A. M. (1993). Positive affect and decision making. In M. Lewis, & J. Haviland (Eds.), The handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 521-539). New York: Wiley.
40. Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive affect. In T. Dalgleish, & M. Power (Eds.), The handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 521-539). New York: Wiley.
41. Isen, A. M. (2002). Missing in action in the AIM: positive affect's facilitation of flexibility, innovation and problem solving. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 57-65.
42. Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 459, 20-31.
43. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Kaufmann, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (1997). 'Paradoxical' mood effects on creative problem-solving. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 151-170.
45. Kernan, M. C., & Lord, R. G. (1989). The effects of explicit goals and specific feedback on escalation processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1125-1143.
46. Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23-55.
47. Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness. New York: Addison-Wesley.
48. LeBoeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. (2003). Deep thoughts and shallow frames: on the susceptibility to framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 77-92.
49. Levin, I. P. (1999, November 22). Why do you and I make different decisions? Tracking individual differences in decision making. Paper presented at the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, Los Angeles, CA.
50. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
51. Mackie, D. M., Hamilton, D. L., Schroth, H. A., Carlisle, C. J., Gersho, B. F., Meneses, L. M., Nedler, B. F., & Reichel, L. D. (1989). The effects of induced mood on expectancy-based illusory correlations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 524-544.
52. Mackie, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 27-40.
53. Macrae, C. N., Hewstone, M., & Griffith, R. J. (1993). Processing load and memory for stereotype-based information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 234, 77-87.
54. Mahajan, J. (1992). The overconfidence effect in market management predictions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 261-265.
55. Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13-25.
56. Martin, L. L. (2001). Mood as input: a configural view of mood effects. In L. L. Martin, & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook (pp. 135-157). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Martin, L. L., & Clore, G. L. (Eds.). (2001). Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Martin, L. L., & Stoner, P. (1996). Mood as input: what people think about what they feel moods determines how they think. In L. L. Martin, & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions between goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 279-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Maule, A. J. (1994). Framing elaborations and their effects on choice behavior: a comparison across problem isomorphs and subjects with different levels of expertise. In J.-P. Caverni, M. Bar-Hillel, H. Barron, & H. Jungermann (Eds.), Contributions to decision making - I (pp. 281-300). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
60. Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T. J. (1998). The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 298-324.
61. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
62. Schwarz, N. (2001). Feelings as information: implications for affective influences on information processing. In L. L. Martin, & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook (pp. 159-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Sedikides, C. (1995). Central and peripheral self-conceptions are differently influenced by mood: tests of the differential sensitivity hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 759-777.
64. Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (2002). Spontaneous versus controlled influences of stimulus-based affect on choice behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 342-370.
65. Smith, S. M., & Levin, I. P. (1996). Need for cognition and choice framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 283-290.
66. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
67. Staw, B. M., & Barsade, S. G. (1993). Affect and managerial performance: a test of the sadder-but-wiser versus happier-and-smarter hypotheses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 304-331.
68. Svenson, O., & Benson, L. I. (1993). Framing and time pressure in decision making. In O. Svenson, & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 133-144). New York: Plenum Press.
69. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
70. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Understanding effects of mood through the elaboration likelihood and flexible correction models. In L. L. Martin, & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook (pp. 177-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.