Pitting intuitive and analytical thinking against each other: The case of transitivity

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 608-614

  Rusou, Zohar ^a,b   Zakay, Dan ^a,c   Usher, Marius ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF ISRAEL   (Israel)

^c INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Choice; Decision making; Dual process theories; Judgment and decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878522189     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0382-7     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Betsch, T., Plessner, H., Schwieren, C., & Gütig, R. (2001). I like it but I don't know why: A value-account approach to implicit attitude formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 242-253.
2. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon.
3. Dijksterhuis, A. P. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 586-598.
4. Dijksterhuis, A. P., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation without attention effect. Science, 311, 1005-1007.
5. Dijksterhuis, A. P., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95-109.
6. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
7. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
8. Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. W. (2010). Judgment and decision making. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 542-588). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215-228.
10. Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1987). Direct comparison of the relative efficiency on intuitive and analytical cognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 17, 753-770.
11. Hogarth, R. M. (2005). Deciding analytically or trusting your intuition? The advantages and disadvantages of analytic and intuitive thought. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 67-82). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
12. Inbar, Y., Cone, J., & Gilovich, T. (2010). People's intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 232-247.
13. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
14. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 49-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Lee, L., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2009). In search of homo economicus: Cognitive noise and the role of emotion in preference consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 173-187.
16. Levine, G. M., Halberstadt, J. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Reasoning and the weighing of attributes in attitude judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 230-240.
17. MacGregor, D. G., & Armstrong, J. S. (1994). Judgmental decomposition: When does it work? International Journal of Forecasting, 10, 495-506.
18. MacGregor, D. G., Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Structuring knowledge retrieval: An analysis of decomposed quantitative judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 303-323.
19. McMackin, J., & Slovic, P. (2000). When does explicit justification impair decision making? Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 527-541.
20. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Pham, M. T. (2004). The logic of feeling. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 360-369.
22. Pham, M. T., Cohen, J. B., Pracejus, J. W., & Hughes, G. D. (2001). Affect monitoring and the primacy of feelings in judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 167-188.
23. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-21.
24. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
25. Usher, M., Russo, Z., Weyers, M., Brauner, R., & Zakay, D. (2011). The impact of the mode of thought in complex decisions: Intuitive decisions are better. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-13.
26. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D., Schooler, J. W., Hodges, S. D., Klaaren, K. J., & LaFleur, S. J. (1993). Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 331-339.
28. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
29. Zakay, D., & Wooler, S. (1984). Time pressure, training, and decision effectiveness. Ergonomics, 27, 273-284.